https://youtu.be/z-NVZ2gzcG4?t=120ShadowBardock89 wrote:Ok, I'm confused. What are you talking about?mahakaishin1991 wrote:that brown colour with the black feels like its teasing me with Raditz, please be so.
"Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
- mahakaishin1991
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1658
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2017 6:32 am
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
- MCDaveG
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5533
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 5:54 pm
- Location: Prague, Czechia
- Contact:
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
They are updatong the gamw right before DLC release, so that is why we had only Jiren and Videl datamined? Or do you think, we will know more soon?
FighterZ: Funky_Strudel
PS4: Dynamixx88
PS4: Dynamixx88
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
Definitely on the same page! If they're able and willing to do alternate skins/models like Videl, there's no reason they couldn't make DBS Broly an alternate costume, and the same definitely goes for Vegetto/Gogeta. (I'm not super fond of the countless Goku and Vegeta variants either, but if they made alternate skins of some other SSJ forms, that would help justify it a bit...?)Nickolaidas wrote:Oh my God - this. This so much.Bryesque wrote:I wouldn't mind Raditz, but there are a bunch of other characters who deserve a slot before he does. Two Brolys already feels like kind of a waste of space here... I'd really prefer they use their remaining DLC on a wider representation of characters instead of even more Saiyans (especially since there multiple versions of the same Saiyan characters filling up the roster already).
Basically, Roshi or I riot.
Broly from the movie feels so, so, SO unnecessary. That's like having jumpsuit ToP 18 or jumpsuit RoF Gohan as 'new' characters. When we still don't have characters like Janemba, Roshi, Gero, Tao Pai Pai, Trio de Dangers, Ribrianne, Kefla, God Toppo, Dyspo, Zarbon, #19, Dabura, Slug, Bojack, Kid Goku, Piccolo Daimaoh, and a dozen others.
Yes, I get that they're trying to capitalize on the hype of the movie - but they knew a Broly movie was in the works as they made the game - they could've ditched DBZ Broly altogether and release him once as the very first DLC character of Season 2.
Heck, I find Gogeta unnecessary when Vegetto is already in the roster. Just make him an alternate costume for Chrisake - he's literally the same fusion with a different method.
It's such a great game and does such a nice job representing the look and feel of the series that I wish the roster was more "definitive" (for example, I'd rather have most of the characters you listed than, say, Cooler). This is the one game where I'd buy more season passes without complaining too much, though.
- ShadowBardock89
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:40 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
I hate to say it, but it might be Roshi.mahakaishin1991 wrote:https://youtu.be/z-NVZ2gzcG4?t=120ShadowBardock89 wrote:Ok, I'm confused. What are you talking about?mahakaishin1991 wrote:that brown colour with the black feels like its teasing me with Raditz, please be so.
The next two are obviously Broly: BR (stupid designation) and SSB Gogeta.
After them, I'd say the purple one is Kefla. If they are going to keep the ToP theme, then the brown one is either Cabba or Roshi.
As much as I'd love to see Raditz in THE most hype Dragon Ball game of all, I just do not see it unless the theme is [SAIYANS!!].
Its as if this game DOESN'T want my money.
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=40715&start=20#p1439892
http://dba.bn-ent.net/character/barduck.html
https://i.imgur.com/86hOk5i.gif
http://dba.bn-ent.net/character/barduck.html
https://i.imgur.com/86hOk5i.gif
- Hellspawn28
- Patreon Supporter
- Posts: 15191
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
- Location: Maryland, USA
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
I won't mind if they did both Raditz and Tullece. You get two low class warriors and it would be a good way to complete the base Saiyan roster.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
No more Goku's & Goku lookalikes. PleaseHellspawn28 wrote:I won't mind if they did both Raditz and Tullece. You get two low class warriors and it would be a good way to complete the base Saiyan roster.
zarmack wrote:The whole "Dragonball is only supposed to be light and funny" mentality that exist in a lot of the fandom is in many ways even dumber than the "edgeload" side of the fandom. You know, the contrarians who think DB should be a Slice-of-Life series, the folks who worship Pre-Raditz Dragonball uncritically, the folks who downplay and often flat-out deny that Dragonball is an action series, the folks who try to push that false argument that none of the serious moments in the series were mean't to be taken seriously, etc.
Dragonball doesn't have a single tone. It has both silly and serious moments, both humor and drama, just like real life. The idea that a work of fiction should be only all-comedy or all-serious is unnatural and frankly, retarded.
- Hellspawn28
- Patreon Supporter
- Posts: 15191
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
- Location: Maryland, USA
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
Tullece has a different moveset from Goku and will probably play different from him.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
in any case raditz is better option than turles
and turles is not that it has many interesting movements
I also do not see possible to cabba in addition it is very similar to vegeta in movements
janemba or Kefla and raditz or roshi
the worst case ... dodoria or android 13 ...
and turles is not that it has many interesting movements
I also do not see possible to cabba in addition it is very similar to vegeta in movements
janemba or Kefla and raditz or roshi
the worst case ... dodoria or android 13 ...
-
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:56 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
Bryesque wrote:Definitely on the same page! If they're able and willing to do alternate skins/models like Videl, there's no reason they couldn't make DBS Broly an alternate costume, and the same definitely goes for Vegetto/Gogeta. (I'm not super fond of the countless Goku and Vegeta variants either, but if they made alternate skins of some other SSJ forms, that would help justify it a bit...?)Nickolaidas wrote:Oh my God - this. This so much.Bryesque wrote:I wouldn't mind Raditz, but there are a bunch of other characters who deserve a slot before he does. Two Brolys already feels like kind of a waste of space here... I'd really prefer they use their remaining DLC on a wider representation of characters instead of even more Saiyans (especially since there multiple versions of the same Saiyan characters filling up the roster already).
Basically, Roshi or I riot.
Broly from the movie feels so, so, SO unnecessary. That's like having jumpsuit ToP 18 or jumpsuit RoF Gohan as 'new' characters. When we still don't have characters like Janemba, Roshi, Gero, Tao Pai Pai, Trio de Dangers, Ribrianne, Kefla, God Toppo, Dyspo, Zarbon, #19, Dabura, Slug, Bojack, Kid Goku, Piccolo Daimaoh, and a dozen others.
Yes, I get that they're trying to capitalize on the hype of the movie - but they knew a Broly movie was in the works as they made the game - they could've ditched DBZ Broly altogether and release him once as the very first DLC character of Season 2.
Heck, I find Gogeta unnecessary when Vegetto is already in the roster. Just make him an alternate costume for Chrisake - he's literally the same fusion with a different method.
It's such a great game and does such a nice job representing the look and feel of the series that I wish the roster was more "definitive" (for example, I'd rather have most of the characters you listed than, say, Cooler). This is the one game where I'd buy more season passes without complaining too much, though.
Woah woah WOAH there.
Cooler was the best addition to this game. No joke.
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
...okay, I've gotta admit I've barely played the character... guess I'll have to rectify that?Nickolaidas wrote:Woah woah WOAH there.Bryesque wrote:Definitely on the same page! If they're able and willing to do alternate skins/models like Videl, there's no reason they couldn't make DBS Broly an alternate costume, and the same definitely goes for Vegetto/Gogeta. (I'm not super fond of the countless Goku and Vegeta variants either, but if they made alternate skins of some other SSJ forms, that would help justify it a bit...?)Nickolaidas wrote:
Oh my God - this. This so much.
Broly from the movie feels so, so, SO unnecessary. That's like having jumpsuit ToP 18 or jumpsuit RoF Gohan as 'new' characters. When we still don't have characters like Janemba, Roshi, Gero, Tao Pai Pai, Trio de Dangers, Ribrianne, Kefla, God Toppo, Dyspo, Zarbon, #19, Dabura, Slug, Bojack, Kid Goku, Piccolo Daimaoh, and a dozen others.
Yes, I get that they're trying to capitalize on the hype of the movie - but they knew a Broly movie was in the works as they made the game - they could've ditched DBZ Broly altogether and release him once as the very first DLC character of Season 2.
Heck, I find Gogeta unnecessary when Vegetto is already in the roster. Just make him an alternate costume for Chrisake - he's literally the same fusion with a different method.
It's such a great game and does such a nice job representing the look and feel of the series that I wish the roster was more "definitive" (for example, I'd rather have most of the characters you listed than, say, Cooler). This is the one game where I'd buy more season passes without complaining too much, though.
Cooler was the best addition to this game. No joke.
I do see why they've made the choices they've made... Cooler and Broly are popular characters and they're always gonna be in high demand with a lot of fans. I just want them to balance that with the more "important" and/or "canon characters too. (Then again, I was shocked and pleased to see Videl included, so hopefully that's a positive sign?)
- excelhedge
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 2:35 am
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
All the Characters from that are in the story mode are from Super. It's fairly obvious from the story and from the fight introductions and outros.mute_proxy wrote:The Gohan we have is also from Z. All of his moves are from the Buu saga, he just happens to be wearing the same orange gi in the ToP againexcelhedge wrote:So we have
Gohan from Super and High School Videl from Z
If there are no quotes in the game making fun of this I swear.
Also, I'm kinda disappointed Videl doesn't have her Super design as the Alt. to match up with Gohan.
- mute_proxy
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:09 am
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
What matters is the moveset. Android 16 and Android 18 are also in the story mode, but both of their movesets are taken straight from Z. The same goes for Gohan, he's placed in the story mode because he looks the same, but considering his ingame (not story) character, he's not from Super. The introductions and outros are unrelated to the timeline, they vary according to the character relations, it means nothing, as how Videl has a personalized intro with teen Gohan.excelhedge wrote:All the Characters from that are in the story mode are from Super. It's fairly obvious from the story and from the fight introductions and outros.mute_proxy wrote:The Gohan we have is also from Z. All of his moves are from the Buu saga, he just happens to be wearing the same orange gi in the ToP againexcelhedge wrote:So we have
Gohan from Super and High School Videl from Z
If there are no quotes in the game making fun of this I swear.
Also, I'm kinda disappointed Videl doesn't have her Super design as the Alt. to match up with Gohan.
- excelhedge
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 2:35 am
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
Are you serious right now? The majority of the cast are from super, the story takes place during super. Saying they are from Z soley based on moveset when most of the cast have the exact same moves between Z and Super is to be frank, denial.mute_proxy wrote:What matters is the moveset. Android 16 and Android 18 are also in the story mode, but both of their movesets are taken straight from Z. The same goes for Gohan, he's placed in the story mode because he looks the same, but considering his ingame (not story) character, he's not from Super. The introductions and outros are unrelated to the timeline, they vary according to the character relations, it means nothing, as how Videl has a personalized intro with teen Gohan.excelhedge wrote:All the Characters from that are in the story mode are from Super. It's fairly obvious from the story and from the fight introductions and outros.mute_proxy wrote:
The Gohan we have is also from Z. All of his moves are from the Buu saga, he just happens to be wearing the same orange gi in the ToP again
- mute_proxy
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:09 am
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
The story mode is a non canon story made with the assets at hand, which in this case involves Z characters (adjusting the story to seem like they belong in Super). None of the cast I mentioned use the same moveset in Super. They were not designed based on the story mode's needs, it's a fighting game foremostly, not an rpg. Adding remarks like "are you serious?" and "in denial" won't make you sound more credible either.excelhedge wrote:Are you serious right now? The majority of the cast are from super, the story takes place during super. Saying they are from Z soley based on moveset when most of the cast have the exact same moves between Z and Super is to be frank, denial.mute_proxy wrote:What matters is the moveset. Android 16 and Android 18 are also in the story mode, but both of their movesets are taken straight from Z. The same goes for Gohan, he's placed in the story mode because he looks the same, but considering his ingame (not story) character, he's not from Super. The introductions and outros are unrelated to the timeline, they vary according to the character relations, it means nothing, as how Videl has a personalized intro with teen Gohan.excelhedge wrote:
All the Characters from that are in the story mode are from Super. It's fairly obvious from the story and from the fight introductions and outros.
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
To add to this, the overwhelming majority of characters that is featured in both series have their trademark 'Z' costumes (or in Ginyu's case, body)mute_proxy wrote:The story mode is a non canon story made with the assets at hand, which in this case involves Z characters (adjusting the story to seem like they belong in Super). None of the cast I mentioned use the same moveset in Super. They were not designed based on the story mode's needs, it's a fighting game foremostly, not an rpg. Adding remarks like "are you serious?" and "in denial" won't make you sound more credible either.excelhedge wrote:Are you serious right now? The majority of the cast are from super, the story takes place during super. Saying they are from Z soley based on moveset when most of the cast have the exact same moves between Z and Super is to be frank, denial.mute_proxy wrote:
What matters is the moveset. Android 16 and Android 18 are also in the story mode, but both of their movesets are taken straight from Z. The same goes for Gohan, he's placed in the story mode because he looks the same, but considering his ingame (not story) character, he's not from Super. The introductions and outros are unrelated to the timeline, they vary according to the character relations, it means nothing, as how Videl has a personalized intro with teen Gohan.
An easy decision since at least for now, the Z brand is much more recognized than Super's.
- excelhedge
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 2:35 am
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
Sure ingore the fact that the same "signature" costumes also appear in Super or that Super in suppossed to that place shortly after Z's Buu Saga. How about the humongous fact that Toei has pushing to marketing Super instead of Z to the point that you no longer see "Z" on any merchandise.Jord wrote:To add to this, the overwhelming majority of characters that is featured in both series have their trademark 'Z' costumes (or in Ginyu's case, body)mute_proxy wrote:The story mode is a non canon story made with the assets at hand, which in this case involves Z characters (adjusting the story to seem like they belong in Super). None of the cast I mentioned use the same moveset in Super. They were not designed based on the story mode's needs, it's a fighting game foremostly, not an rpg. Adding remarks like "are you serious?" and "in denial" won't make you sound more credible either.excelhedge wrote:
Are you serious right now? The majority of the cast are from super, the story takes place during super. Saying they are from Z soley based on moveset when most of the cast have the exact same moves between Z and Super is to be frank, denial.
An easy decision since at least for now, the Z brand is much more recognized than Super's.
Since your basing it soley on movesets tell me what moves are so exclusive to characters in Z that they can't do in Super?
Keep being in Denial. I'm done. Cuz I'm not gonna spam the thread with this argument.
- mute_proxy
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:09 am
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
"Same costume" isn't "same character". It's called FighterZ, not FighterSuper, and it's not developed by Toei. Toei is pushing Super merch in Japan, but overseas, the main label is still Z (outside of Japan they're even relabeling Super merch that shouldn't be labeled Super in the first place). Every move is exclusive to Z because they were never used in Super. It's not that they can't use those moves in Super, it's the fact that they didn't. Every single move is a reference to the Z portion of the manga and anime. Your arguments are extremely weak, and the smartass attitude isn't helping your point.excelhedge wrote:Sure ingore the fact that the same "signature" costumes also appear in Super or that Super in suppossed to that place shortly after Z's Buu Saga. How about the humongous fact that Toei has pushing to marketing Super instead of Z to the point that you no longer see "Z" on any merchandise.Jord wrote:To add to this, the overwhelming majority of characters that is featured in both series have their trademark 'Z' costumes (or in Ginyu's case, body)mute_proxy wrote:
The story mode is a non canon story made with the assets at hand, which in this case involves Z characters (adjusting the story to seem like they belong in Super). None of the cast I mentioned use the same moveset in Super. They were not designed based on the story mode's needs, it's a fighting game foremostly, not an rpg. Adding remarks like "are you serious?" and "in denial" won't make you sound more credible either.
An easy decision since at least for now, the Z brand is much more recognized than Super's.
Since your basing it soley on movesets tell me what moves are so exclusive to characters in Z that they can't do in Super?
Keep being in Denial. I'm done. Cuz I'm not gonna spam the thread with this argument.
- excelhedge
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 2:35 am
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
Says the guy resorting to insults...mute_proxy wrote:"Same costume" isn't "same character". It's called FighterZ, not FighterSuper, and it's not developed by Toei. Toei is pushing Super merch in Japan, but overseas, the main label is still Z (outside of Japan they're even relabeling Super merch that shouldn't be labeled Super in the first place). Every move is exclusive to Z because they were never used in Super. It's not that they can't use those moves in Super, it's the fact that they didn't. Every single move is a reference to the Z portion of the manga and anime. Your arguments are extremely weak, and the smartass attitude isn't helping your point.excelhedge wrote:Sure ingore the fact that the same "signature" costumes also appear in Super or that Super in suppossed to that place shortly after Z's Buu Saga. How about the humongous fact that Toei has pushing to marketing Super instead of Z to the point that you no longer see "Z" on any merchandise.Jord wrote:
To add to this, the overwhelming majority of characters that is featured in both series have their trademark 'Z' costumes (or in Ginyu's case, body)
An easy decision since at least for now, the Z brand is much more recognized than Super's.
Since your basing it soley on movesets tell me what moves are so exclusive to characters in Z that they can't do in Super?
Keep being in Denial. I'm done. Cuz I'm not gonna spam the thread with this argument.
Like I said I'm done. Have fun in your denial.
- mute_proxy
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:09 am
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
I did not insult nor did I intend to, stop making shit up. And you said you were done two times already, carry on pleaseexcelhedge wrote:
Says the guy resorting to insults...
Like I said I'm done. Have fun in your denial.
- excelhedge
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 2:35 am
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
Calling me a "smartass" not a insult? Yep. Totally not insulting.mute_proxy wrote:I did not insult nor did I intend to, stop making shit up. And you said you were done two times already, carry on pleaseexcelhedge wrote:
Says the guy resorting to insults...
Like I said I'm done. Have fun in your denial.