That's different. When people talked about Broli in the context of Super, they meant the actual character, not someone inspired by him. There's no need to be obnoxious about canon debates but, in my opinion, it's pointless to speculate based on nothing. Toriyama writes the stories so he only considers what is in the manga and nothing more.Lord Frieza wrote:Your probably right...but he still has a point. Kale and her form still COME from Broly. A character who was not a part of the manga and not cannon my many people definition.
Also while I have said we have not reached the point yet, even by your scoring there is still a 1% chance that with a single sentence we can be dealing with a "Broly is Cannon" scenario.
If that even dose occur.......well just read Mikado's original post.
This said, we already know how far they'll willing to go and how they handle these things (Kale, Trunks, etc). We should adapt our opinion for the possibility of more "inspirations" from the franchise but they won't be 1:1. Those characters didn't fit in the story back then and still don't now.
He specified that the God of Destruction that couldn't beat the mortal was the one stronger than Beers.GodVegetto91 wrote:A question to anyone with great translation skills
Did Whis really say: "there is a universe where lives a mortal even A god of destruction can't defeat." ??
Or did he acthally say that IT'S (it's universes') god of destruction can't beat.
Because this would make all the difference. If he said there's a mortal A god of destruction can't beat then it would apply to ALL gods of destruction, rather than the one of the universe said mortal belongs to.