This is something I've seen in a few other places and I just don't understand it. Why do you want them to retell the movie when they did such an atrocious job of it with Battle of Gods and Resurrection F? The only thing "retelling" means in this context is "Padding, filler, and worse animation". I'm genuinely curious why anyone would want this.JulieYBM wrote:I hope this means the Broli arc will be recreated in the next series.
"Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
The Creatives who inspire me: Akira Toriyama, George Lucas, Chris Nolan, J. R. R. Tolkien and Zack Snyder
http://i.imgur.com/XAnj7Yi.jpg
You saw Batman v Superman? Is it the Ultimate Edition? No? Then you haven't seen Batman v Superman. Also, the Snyder Cut is the greatest, non-deconstructionist ensemble comic book film ever made.
- Son-Kakaroto
- Temporarily Banned
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:01 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Why would toei care if toyo is ahead or not? it'll just make it easier for them to make actual good episodes.PFM18 wrote:This could mean that the manga would be WAY ahead of the anime if they do a retelling, and I don't know if that is something that Toei wants.JulieYBM wrote:Dang, so it does take place after the Broli arc. At the very least, I hope this means the Broli arc will be recreated in the next series. I'm also hoping looking forward to seeing how this arc pans out since it'll come out before any animated adaption.
I wouldn't get your hopes up. I'm going to keep my expectations extremely low for anything that Toyotaro puts together whether it be assisted by Toriyama or otherwise.Draconic wrote: If it's Toyotaro's own little thing I might check out the manga again, just to give him one more chance and see if with some more freedom he can finally put out something worthwhile.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Pls let there be a Xeno Time Patrol crossover, cameo, or reference. Even in passing.
One thing I'm extremely glad about. It seems Goku is keeping his kanji-less gi, which I much rather prefer. It's also in the spirit of transitioning towards his EoZ gi with no undershirt.
One thing I'm extremely glad about. It seems Goku is keeping his kanji-less gi, which I much rather prefer. It's also in the spirit of transitioning towards his EoZ gi with no undershirt.
Super Dragon Ball Heroes Universe Mission translation compilation here. All translations are done and owned by me.
SDBH 9th anniversary the secret development interview here. Learn how original SDBH characters such as SS3 Raditz, SS4 Bardock, Robel, & more were conceived!
SDBH 9th anniversary the secret development interview here. Learn how original SDBH characters such as SS3 Raditz, SS4 Bardock, Robel, & more were conceived!
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I doubt he changed his mind since Vegeta talked about going to Sadala in the TOP in both the anime and manga.RecolorSaiyan wrote:I'm just glad its not a Sadala arc. I really hope that arc is something Toriyama changed his mind on from back in 2016.
Kanassa wrote:Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I mean, yeah it would.Doctor. wrote:It wouldn't be the first time.PFM18 wrote:This could mean that the manga would be WAY ahead of the anime if they do a retelling, and I don't know if that is something that Toei wants.
Before, the manga skipped the RoF arc as they were going at the same time. In this case, the anime coming back hasn't even been announced yet and Toyotaro is already getting started on Post-Broly stuff, so in terms of the Anime's progression compared to the manga if they are doing a retelling, the absolute best they could do would be getting started on the Broly arc when Toyotaro is already well into the next arc following it.
Spoiler:
-
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:05 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Because if they want to continue Super from where we left they should at least give a reason as to why SSBKK and SSBE aren't being used if Broly is at least as strong as JirenTKA wrote:This is something I've seen in a few other places and I just don't understand it. Why do you want them to retell the movie when they did such an atrocious job of it with Battle of Gods and Resurrection F? The only thing "retelling" means in this context is "Padding, filler, and worse animation". I'm genuinely curious why anyone would want this.JulieYBM wrote:I hope this means the Broli arc will be recreated in the next series.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
The manga was ahead of the anime when Super started and it caught up in a few months. So I don't think the anime staff cares.PFM18 wrote:This could mean that the manga would be WAY ahead of the anime if they do a retelling, and I don't know if that is something that Toei wants.JulieYBM wrote:Dang, so it does take place after the Broli arc. At the very least, I hope this means the Broli arc will be recreated in the next series. I'm also hoping looking forward to seeing how this arc pans out since it'll come out before any animated adaption.
I wouldn't get your hopes up. I'm going to keep my expectations extremely low for anything that Toyotaro puts together whether it be assisted by Toriyama or otherwise.Draconic wrote: If it's Toyotaro's own little thing I might check out the manga again, just to give him one more chance and see if with some more freedom he can finally put out something worthwhile.
Kanassa wrote:Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
So the premise of the new arc is a convict and Dai Kaioshin is making an appearance somehow and for some reason? I can't think of what significance the latter would have when he's supposed to have been deceased for millions of years. Any information they can obtain would be better off received from Zuno. Also, a convict? Unless this arc is aiming to have Jaco take a more integral role as a detective then I can't see why Goku and Vegeta would need to get involved. Is this criminal powerful? I guess the odds of this criminal shattering the impression of Freeza's old calibre being insurmountable for everyone except a select from Earth, and Broly, are quite odd.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
But not to the same extent. Not even close. And they saw first hand how much more hype/attention the anime got when it was the one that was ahead and giving new information.HeroR wrote:The manga was ahead of the anime when Super started and it caught up in a few months. So I don't think the anime staff cares.PFM18 wrote:This could mean that the manga would be WAY ahead of the anime if they do a retelling, and I don't know if that is something that Toei wants.JulieYBM wrote:Dang, so it does take place after the Broli arc. At the very least, I hope this means the Broli arc will be recreated in the next series. I'm also hoping looking forward to seeing how this arc pans out since it'll come out before any animated adaption.
I wouldn't get your hopes up. I'm going to keep my expectations extremely low for anything that Toyotaro puts together whether it be assisted by Toriyama or otherwise.Draconic wrote: If it's Toyotaro's own little thing I might check out the manga again, just to give him one more chance and see if with some more freedom he can finally put out something worthwhile.
Spoiler:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
My thoughts exactly. Who actually wants retellings?TKA wrote:This is something I've seen in a few other places and I just don't understand it. Why do you want them to retell the movie when they did such an atrocious job of it with Battle of Gods and Resurrection F? The only thing "retelling" means in this context is "Padding, filler, and worse animation". I'm genuinely curious why anyone would want this.JulieYBM wrote:I hope this means the Broli arc will be recreated in the next series.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Draconic wrote:Check the post above yours. The new Heroes game will introduce a new Galactic Patrol guy.Kinokima wrote:Where are people getting Dragon Ball Heroes from this? There is nothing about Dragon Ball Heroes mentioned.
The Galactic Patrol is the organization Jaco is part of and the prisoner can be anyone.
The real mystery is that is the Kai, Buu absorbed. I am intreresting to see how he is involved. Unless it is just a flashback explaining how he was involved with the so named prisoner.
In this case Heroes already takes things from the anime and uses it so this is nothing out of the ordinary.
I don’t think this is Heroes bleeding into the manga if that is what ppl think. Heroes already has its own manga.
- Bebi Hatchiyack
- OMG CRAZY REGEN
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2017 4:53 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Could be a good idea if we are in the same case scenerio as Boruto which the anime didn't catch up yet with the manga. Giving room for Toyotaro to advance the story leaving Toei the opportunity to release the retelling of the Broly movie which was supposed to be worked on a 3hours script.Dbzfan94 wrote:My thoughts exactly. Who actually wants retellings?TKA wrote:This is something I've seen in a few other places and I just don't understand it. Why do you want them to retell the movie when they did such an atrocious job of it with Battle of Gods and Resurrection F? The only thing "retelling" means in this context is "Padding, filler, and worse animation". I'm genuinely curious why anyone would want this.JulieYBM wrote:I hope this means the Broli arc will be recreated in the next series.
Saiya-jin me, watashi ha kisama wo koroshimasu
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
It was still well ahead for months, but the anime caught up because the manga is monthly. And 'hype' is mostly online fans. Japan really doesn't care about stuff like that.PFM18 wrote: But not to the same extent. Not even close. And they saw first hand how much more hype/attention the anime got when it was the one that was ahead and giving new information.
Kanassa wrote:Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:40 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
In the manga he only mentioned it during the u6 arc which came out in 2016. He didn’t mention it in the ToP version of manga so I’m hoping he’s changed his mindHeroR wrote:I doubt he changed his mind since Vegeta talked about going to Sadala in the TOP in both the anime and manga.RecolorSaiyan wrote:I'm just glad its not a Sadala arc. I really hope that arc is something Toriyama changed his mind on from back in 2016.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
If Toei starts their current arc after Toyotaro is well into the following arc, that'll be way further behind than it has ever been.HeroR wrote:It was still well ahead for months, but the anime caught up because the manga is monthly. And 'hype' is mostly online fans. Japan really doesn't care about stuff like that.PFM18 wrote: But not to the same extent. Not even close. And they saw first hand how much more hype/attention the anime got when it was the one that was ahead and giving new information.
"Hype" as in how much attention the anime actually attracts. They sure as hell care about that. Not a clue how you could argue otherwise. It gets more attention if it is brand new material rather than something we already saw in another medium.
Spoiler:
- Mister_Popo
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:12 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Didn't Toriyama say there was going to be stuff in the manga that's different to the anime? He could have referred to the traditional differences between Super manga and anime, or may he referred to a piece of the story that's manga exclusive? If Super continues or there would be a new movie next year, the manga might cover exclusive stories in between to fill in the gaps.
Last edited by Mister_Popo on Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Not really because the anime is weekly and the manga is monthly. If the anime is announced at Jump Fest for the Spring or even Summer it would take no time at all for anime to catch up.PFM18 wrote:If Toei starts their current arc after Toyotaro is well into the following arc, that'll be way further behind than it has ever been.HeroR wrote:It was still well ahead for months, but the anime caught up because the manga is monthly. And 'hype' is mostly online fans. Japan really doesn't care about stuff like that.PFM18 wrote: But not to the same extent. Not even close. And they saw first hand how much more hype/attention the anime got when it was the one that was ahead and giving new information.
"Hype" as in how much attention the anime actually attracts. They sure as hell care about that. Not a clue how you could argue otherwise. It gets more attention if it is brand new material rather than something we already saw in another medium.
And having an original story is win win because now we have something new to look forward to instead of the same story told in a different way.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
It wouldn't. The Super anime was in the BoG arc when the manga started the Champa arc.PFM18 wrote:I mean, yeah it would.Doctor. wrote:It wouldn't be the first time.PFM18 wrote:This could mean that the manga would be WAY ahead of the anime if they do a retelling, and I don't know if that is something that Toei wants.
Before, the manga skipped the RoF arc as they were going at the same time. In this case, the anime coming back hasn't even been announced yet and Toyotaro is already getting started on Post-Broly stuff, so in terms of the Anime's progression compared to the manga if they are doing a retelling, the absolute best they could do would be getting started on the Broly arc when Toyotaro is already well into the next arc following it.
- Mister_Popo
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:12 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Kinokima wrote:Not really because the anime is weekly and the manga is monthly. If the anime is announced at Jump Fest for the Spring or even Summer it would take no time at all for anime to catch up.PFM18 wrote:If Toei starts their current arc after Toyotaro is well into the following arc, that'll be way further behind than it has ever been.HeroR wrote:
It was still well ahead for months, but the anime caught up because the manga is monthly. And 'hype' is mostly online fans. Japan really doesn't care about stuff like that.
"Hype" as in how much attention the anime actually attracts. They sure as hell care about that. Not a clue how you could argue otherwise. It gets more attention if it is brand new material rather than something we already saw in another medium.
And having an original story is win win because now we have something new to look forward to instead of the same story told in a different way.
Yes, but if the anime restarts only in October with a retelling of Broly or the first anime we get to see is a next movie in fall or winter, the manga could very well use some extra content to catch up.
The manga could get some extra attention with that as 'sideproduct'. As slowly things can go in the manga, and it's monthly, it may not be needed. It remains to be seen.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Mister_Popo wrote:Kinokima wrote:Not really because the anime is weekly and the manga is monthly. If the anime is announced at Jump Fest for the Spring or even Summer it would take no time at all for anime to catch up.PFM18 wrote:
If Toei starts their current arc after Toyotaro is well into the following arc, that'll be way further behind than it has ever been.
"Hype" as in how much attention the anime actually attracts. They sure as hell care about that. Not a clue how you could argue otherwise. It gets more attention if it is brand new material rather than something we already saw in another medium.
And having an original story is win win because now we have something new to look forward to instead of the same story told in a different way.
Yes, but if the anime restarts only in October with a retelling of Broly or the first anime we get to see is a next movie in fall or winter, the manga could very well use some extra content to catch up.
The manga could get some extra attention with that as 'sideproduct'. As slowly things can go in the manga, and it's monthly, it may not be needed. It remains to be seen.
Even if the anime restarts in October the anime will absolutely eventually overtake the manga. Is it really that big of a deal that the manga might be ahead at first? That is how it usually works with manga.
We don’t even know if the anime will even adapt this arc or do a Broly Retelling. Everything is an assumption right now.
I think it’s cool we are getting an actual new story instead of just something told in a different way.