Doctor. wrote:JazzMazz wrote:King Vegeta never saw or particularly felt anything about what happened to Vegeta in pretty much every previous incarnation, so I have no idea where your getting this "as an extension of himself" idea from. Also, none of this contrast was bought to attention when comparing all three in the previous movies. King Vegeta appears once, and he doesn't do anything to constrast with Paragus as a father, same for Bardock.
That's false. Watch Dragon Ball Z #124; King Vegeta clearly wants Vegeta to succeed him and become the strongest he could possibly be. It's nothing too dissimilar from the King Vegeta here, but my problem is with Bardock, Broly and Paragus, not King Vegeta.
And I never said the contrast was brought to attention. I said that if they wanted to focus on the fathers of these three Saiyans, which this movie does, the potential dynamic offered by the original characterization of all these characters was far more interesting than what we have now.
JazzMazz wrote:Also, whose to say that Paragus is purely evil? Broly obviously cares about his father despite his fathers character flaws, to get immensely upset upon seeing him killed.
The fact that Broly is portrayed as a good boy who dindu nuffin and wouldn't hurt a housefly without the coercion of big, bad, meanie Paragus is enough to tell you that Broly only cares about his father because BROLY is that special and kind, not because Paragus has redeeming qualities. But again, I'll hold out for the movie on this point before saying it with conviction.
I mean, Paragus never really had that quality to begin with even in his original characterization, so I really don't see how Paragus is less loving now, especially since we haven't seen anything from him yet. Also, if Broly isn't a complete jackass, doesn't that also reflect on Paragus not being a complete monster himself as opposed to it being in spite of Paragus?
I don't particularly remember DBZ episode 124, but I do remember the flashback relating to his rebellion where he out right just states that he doesn't care if Vegeta lives or dies, he just cares about being in control.
ekrolo2 wrote:
JazzMazz wrote:Doesn't he beg not to kill him because he could be a valuable military recourse? Wasn't that his whole argument?
Also, his not particularly sympathetic, his revealed to be a complete evil moustache twirling villain by the end of the film, the main sympathies of the film are supposed to be the people that Paragus enslaved to set this whole thing up.
He uses that as an excuse to King Vegeta not to kill him, not THE reason why Paragus himself wants Broly to live. King Vegeta responds by sending the hitman to Broly anyway and leaving Paragus for dead. He loved his son, grew to realize he was a psychotic monster and whatever affection for him died away, leaving Paragus with nothing but revenge to keep him going. If you can't feel sympathy for a guy like that who got screwed over and twisted into a bastard on the level of King Vegeta, if not worse, than I really have nothing left to say.
That character is very ill formed and sudden in the prior Broly movies, not to mention, I think its going to be literally impossible to make Paragus more of an evil bastard than he was in movie 8, where he was literally a moustace twirling villain who enslaved an entire civilzation and killed people on a whim.
Yes, Paragus was wronged, but there was never any revealing qualities of him being inherently kind to Broly in the movie either, and his extremely villainous tendencies also make it hard for him to empathize with.