Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
Bussani
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8041
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:35 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by Bussani » Mon Dec 24, 2012 1:22 am

Wobbuffet wrote:So, should we make an topic about whether the tankobon or kanzenban are the true canon?
You mean a thread where people insist that their opinion is right and everyone else's is wrong?
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!

NeoKING
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:55 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by NeoKING » Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:01 am

Rocketman wrote:DBO is somehow even worse in all aspects than GT ever was.

So both can fuck off.
How can you judge an anime series and a video game on the same grounds? Does one have better graphics than the other? Maybe Dragon Ball GT's control scheme is better than DBO's :/.

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:16 am

What does the media a story is told through have to do with anything? In this day and age, we have big name franchises, like Transformers, that use transmedia storytelling (or multiplatform storytelling, whatever you want to call it).

Unlike any of the games before it, Dragon Ball Online is not a simple rehash, retelling, abridging, etc. The game was developed from the ground up as an actual continuation of the plot of the manga's plot, with heavy involvement from the original author. It means more to the franchise than any other game has.

How important is it, at least currently? I'll admit that's definitely debatable due to the limited release and fan exposure. Regardless though, it exists as an officially licensed Dragon Ball product that adds lore to the already existing content. So, in terms of narrative, it's just as important to the franchise as any thing else.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

NeoKING
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:55 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by NeoKING » Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:17 am

TheDevilsCorpse wrote: Unlike any of the games before it, Dragon Ball Online is not a simple rehash, retelling, abridging, etc. The game was developed from the ground up as an actual continuation of the plot of the manga's plot, with heavy involvement from the original author. It means more to the franchise than any other game has.
And, here's what I DON'T get. Am I the only one who realizes that in order to have created a Dragon Ball MMORPG, such things would have to be necessary?? It's a given that by the very nature of MMORPG games, for something like DB to become one it'd have to be a continuation of the original story. DB doesn't leave room for itself to become a MMORPG during the story, so obviously it'd have to be a "continuation" of some sort. Did you know that a Chinese Saint Seiya MMORPG is in development? And, like DBO, it also strongly adhere's to the manga's aesthetic. Maybe it's not to be a continuation, but just respect for the original work?

And, how heavy was this involvement? As heavy as Toriyama's involvement in Dragon Quest? As heavy as his involvement in GT or the movies? Or as heavy as his involvement in the filler episode of the Z anime where Yamcha plays baseball?

I admit, it's probably one of the most major games in the DB franchise, but even then, we don't ever see anything about it outside of Korea. Do we have a Dragon Ball Online manga? Is there even a Dragon Ball Online manhwa? Koreans love video game adaption comics as much as the Japanese do. Even MMORPG comics aren't out of the question - look at Ragnarok. Is it a matter of licensing? Doubt it, because video game manga adaptions, from what I've seen, don't have too much problems getting licensings for foreign adaptions, from what I've seen in the Street Fighter manhua that are exclusive to China and the U.S. Darkstalkers comics. Dragon Ball Heroes has a manga, though. A very promotional, hyper V-Jump-esque manga, but it has one. What other Dragon Ball video game has had it's own manga? Would you say that DBH also means more to the franchise than any other game has, and that it should be treated as some sort of continuation? Or no, because Toriyama wasn't involved in designing anything in DBH, thus his involvment was zero, double-thus the game has no impact on the franchise? But then, if you were to go by that logic, I would point out to GT, or anything that involved Toriyama drawing some characters.

But alas, Dragon Ball Online is ostensibly the sequel to Akira Toriyama's Dragon Ball manga, where millions of people and audiences around the world are able to join the story and the next 'chapter' depends on whether or not the people / audience in question can make it to that next save point or level up and beat characters like Cell-X. Oh, and your computer has to have a good amount of space before this sequel can exist before your very eyes.

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:27 am

NeoKING wrote:
Rocketman wrote:DBO is somehow even worse in all aspects than GT ever was.

So both can fuck off.
How can you judge an anime series and a video game on the same grounds? Does one have better graphics than the other? Maybe Dragon Ball GT's control scheme is better than DBO's :/.
DBO has a story as well.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Wed Dec 26, 2012 8:14 am

NeoKING wrote:And, here's what I DON'T get. Am I the only one who realizes that in order to have created a Dragon Ball MMORPG, such things would have to be necessary?? It's a given that by the very nature of MMORPG games, for something like DB to become one it'd have to be a continuation of the original story. DB doesn't leave room for itself to become a MMORPG during the story, so obviously it'd have to be a "continuation" of some sort. Did you know that a Chinese Saint Seiya MMORPG is in development? And, like DBO, it also strongly adhere's to the manga's aesthetic. Maybe it's not to be a continuation, but just respect for the original work?

And, how heavy was this involvement? As heavy as Toriyama's involvement in Dragon Quest? As heavy as his involvement in GT or the movies? Or as heavy as his involvement in the filler episode of the Z anime where Yamcha plays baseball?

I admit, it's probably one of the most major games in the DB franchise, but even then, we don't ever see anything about it outside of Korea. Do we have a Dragon Ball Online manga? Is there even a Dragon Ball Online manhwa? Koreans love video game adaption comics as much as the Japanese do. Even MMORPG comics aren't out of the question - look at Ragnarok. Is it a matter of licensing? Doubt it, because video game manga adaptions, from what I've seen, don't have too much problems getting licensings for foreign adaptions, from what I've seen in the Street Fighter manhua that are exclusive to China and the U.S. Darkstalkers comics. Dragon Ball Heroes has a manga, though. A very promotional, hyper V-Jump-esque manga, but it has one. What other Dragon Ball video game has had it's own manga? Would you say that DBH also means more to the franchise than any other game has, and that it should be treated as some sort of continuation? Or no, because Toriyama wasn't involved in designing anything in DBH, thus his involvment was zero, double-thus the game has no impact on the franchise? But then, if you were to go by that logic, I would point out to GT, or anything that involved Toriyama drawing some characters.

But alas, Dragon Ball Online is ostensibly the sequel to Akira Toriyama's Dragon Ball manga, where millions of people and audiences around the world are able to join the story and the next 'chapter' depends on whether or not the people / audience in question can make it to that next save point or level up and beat characters like Cell-X. Oh, and your computer has to have a good amount of space before this sequel can exist before your very eyes.
No, I doubt you're the only one to notice, but I'd also argue that that isn't the only approach they could have taken. They could have simply given you a player to wander the map and encounter characters around the regular course of events, perhaps starting you in a dojo and having your quests force you to interact with Goku and the gang as they search for the Dragon Balls, Yamcha as he tails them, or Pilaf and his goons as they prepare to steal from them, etc. They could have simply filled in the gaps from the original work, but instead, they went out of their way to set the game in the future and even create a timeline of events that lead up to that new AGE.

We don't know the specifics. All that's been said is that, at the time of said interview, he'd been working on contributing designs for 5 years and that he also had to give his approval of every other aspect of the game's design (story, attacks, graphics, maps, designs he didn't do, etc.). What else did he personally contribute? Who knows. But nothing in the game was released without getting his okay first, which is more than the other materials outside the maga where he pretty much always said "the staff know what they're doing, so I let them handle it".

Other series may not have big licensing issues, but who knows what is going on with Shueisha. They permitted the development of the game years ago, but we have no idea what was in the contract, rules that need to be followed or anything. We know they can be a bit stubborn with things: the requirement of one console DBZ game a year, 4 years since the JSAT special was released and still no signs of dubbing agreements, etc. On the subject of Heroes though, that's a whole 'nother behemoth. The game is extremely popular in the franchise's homeland, it does mean more to the franchise than any other game, just in a different way; marketing over narrative. Toriyama's lack of involvement in Heroes means nothing. The game itself can't be accepted as any sort of continuation because it hasn't presented itself with any real story outside of promotional commercials that don't paint any sort of coherent, chronological timeline (yet, Ultimate Mission may change things), but the Victory Mission manga is definitely...something: a continuation set after the heroes have died and become immortalized as a card game? an alternate universe? Pick one until clarified. Anyway, do we really need any of that for DBO to have any impact and not be disregarded completely? I already admitted that it's not as important of an influence as it could be if it were released in at least Japanese and English, but the fact that it exists and is playable in a couple of languages (and slowly expanding) is enough to keep it from just being dismissed entirely IMO.

I've personally never said DBO is THE absolute sequel to the manga. It is A continuation of the events from the manga and a valid possible timeline for the franchise. Every other point you're trying to make here is in fact pointless though. Is it a shame that the fans outside the territories the game has been released in have to jump through so many hoops to get the experience, and that even after said hoops you still have to toil through playing the game to get the story? Sure, but it's already been done and other franchises have done it too. The Transformers: War for Cybertron game is in the same continuity as the Transformers: Prime animated series and Transformers: Exodus novel. The game's events aren't magically disregarded because someone doesn't have a system to play it on, could never afford to buy it, or were unable to manage making it beyond the first level.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

User avatar
Ringworm128
Banned
Posts: 2976
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 3:27 am

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by Ringworm128 » Wed Dec 26, 2012 8:43 am

NeoKING wrote:You're not particularly good at the humor thing.
I disagree, I think he's actually pretty funny. And plus, at least he isn't doing his usual "death to the Funimation dub and anyone who likes it! All hail the original version!" Routine.

User avatar
Bussani
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8041
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:35 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by Bussani » Thu Dec 27, 2012 12:47 am

TheDevilsCorpse wrote:I've personally never said DBO is THE absolute sequel to the manga. It is A continuation of the events from the manga
Yeah...one can't really argue that it isn't a continuation. It uses the manga as a starting point and goes from there. I'd direct everyone to the various Tenchi Muyo! canons that all start from the same OVA and then go their separate ways, but I think I've overused that as an example at this point!

As for Toriyama's involvement, weren't we told that he had to sign off on basically every aspect of the game? Or something like that. Regardless, it's a continuation that's set after the story portrayed in the manga. Whether you consider it the "official" continuation or not is up to you. Personally, I couldn't care less what it is. I think it's neat, though.
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!

User avatar
Rocketman
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10799
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:17 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by Rocketman » Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:24 am

DBZGTKOSDH wrote:DBO has a story as well.
A stupid, shitty story.

User avatar
Titan
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:43 am

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by Titan » Thu Dec 27, 2012 12:31 pm

Rocketman wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:DBO has a story as well.
A stupid, shitty story.
Care to elaborate.

User avatar
Rocketman
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10799
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:17 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by Rocketman » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:23 pm

Titan wrote:Care to elaborate.
Buu sex, penis-head Nameks, constant revisitation of places and things from the series, "Time Patrol" Trunks despite that not being how time travel works in DB, Super Saiyan for everybody, etc, etc

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:47 pm

Rocketman wrote:Buu sex, penis-head Nameks, constant revisitation of places and things from the series, "Time Patrol" Trunks despite that not being how time travel works in DB, Super Saiyan for everybody, etc, etc
Not even close to sex, not all of them, as part of optional story quests, "Time Lord(s)" gave him a "Time Pass" so that he could prevent the timelines from splitting, only for the human players and they are supposed to represent a very small minority of the human population, etc, etc.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

User avatar
Ryuman
Regular
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:33 am
Location: Taunton, England

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by Ryuman » Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:57 pm

TheDevilsCorpse wrote:
Rocketman wrote:Super Saiyan for everybody
only for the human players and they are supposed to represent a very small minority of the human population, etc, etc.
Also, if I recall correctly, you have to wish for it with (A special set of?) Dragon Balls.

User avatar
hleV
Banned
Posts: 3325
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:15 pm
Location: Lithuania

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by hleV » Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:06 pm

Rocketman wrote:Super Saiyan for everybody
Everybody isn't going SSJ in DBO's story. That's just a gameplay element.

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Online Retconning GT's Existence

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:54 pm

Ryuman wrote:Also, if I recall correctly, you have to wish for it with (A special set of?) Dragon Balls.
Yeah, you have to wish for it from the normal DBs you find from searching the map and defeating enemies, but I'd argue that using them to unlock the form should be viewed purely as a gameplay mechanic. By AGE 1000, Dende created multiple sets of Dragon Balls in order for the warriors to fight over and hone their skills in preparation for all the new evil threats that are rising up. These sets of the orbs were made weaker than the originals from the manga portion of the timeline to prevent bad guys from misusing them, and even the original Shenlong's power couldn't be used to alter a person's body.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

Post Reply