Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
The fact that you would ask is a sign that you just can't see it.
The hero, the guy that everyone has fallen in love with, is told that his time on earth is now over for transgressions against an unknown law, and is spirited away by shenron.
Sad only barely touches that one. It's like the writer wanted to end ALL OF DRAGON BALL by waving a gigantic F*** YOU to all of it's fans.
It was rather touching actually, it was implied that he died and since he is a reason so many threats keep attacking earth, it's best that he leaves. It's a bit like when he died during the cell arc. I know everything is different to other people, but it seems like the general consensus is that while GT isn't held in high regard, the ending is.
I feel like people give the GT ending way too much credit. Yeah it's kind of sad but it's also lazy writing. They don't have to explain what's happening to Goku or come up with anything they can just say wellllll maybe he died or maybeeee he didn't! But really, that's too easy to write.
I kind of am annoyed by how rushed the ending is and how it doesn't make any sense. It just suddenly happens with no explanations given and that's NOT good writing!
I feel like people give the GT ending way too much credit. Yeah it's kind of sad but it's also lazy writing. They don't have to explain what's happening to Goku or come up with anything they can just say wellllll maybe he died or maybeeee he didn't! But really, that's too easy to write.
I kind of am annoyed by how rushed the ending is and how it doesn't make any sense. It just suddenly happens with no explanations given and that's NOT good writing!
It doesn't suddenly happen. And Goku is dead or might as well be. He didn't come back for 100 years and even then it was only temporary. He clearly made a deal with Shen Long and had to leave as a part of that deal. That's the part that matters. How is that easy to write? I think your (and other's) big beef is that you don't know where he went and consider that bad writing.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
I feel like people give the GT ending way too much credit. Yeah it's kind of sad but it's also lazy writing. They don't have to explain what's happening to Goku or come up with anything they can just say wellllll maybe he died or maybeeee he didn't! But really, that's too easy to write.
I kind of am annoyed by how rushed the ending is and how it doesn't make any sense. It just suddenly happens with no explanations given and that's NOT good writing!
It doesn't suddenly happen. And Goku is dead or might as well be. He didn't come back for 100 years and even then it was only temporary. He clearly made a deal with Shen Long and had to leave as a part of that deal. That's the part that matters. How is that easy to write? I think your (and other's) big beef is that you don't know where he went and consider that bad writing.
You keep saying he "made a deal with Shenlong". That's only conjecture, there's nothing in the ending that actually suggest a deal, just that Goku had to go with Shenlong for some unbeknownst reason. The way you're framing it isn't in line with how it's portrayed in the actual show. I wouldn't go so far as to call it lazy, I don't even think it's necessarily a horrible ending, it just isn't consistent with anything, the precedent is non-existent. Perhaps if they had given Shenlong agency beforehand, or given him more power or importance than he actually had, or perhaps if we'd gotten a Movie 10-esque visual of shenlong's eyes glowing before Goku comes back with his Genki Dama, it would be better. What would really have made it brilliant is if the Evil Dragons spoke with more of a clear sense of familiarity, or maybe even a friendly, but backhanded tone, leading up to some foreshadowing of Goku's death (or whatever happened) as they made their way to the greater dragons. As-is, it's just kinda there, barely even attached to the rest of the series.
It's the obvious inference. Why else would specifically have to leave? The way it's portrayed in the show is he has to go with Shen Long and Goku had already knowingly agreed to go and he does so without a fight. I agree that the consequences should've been less vague and probably been known since the beginning, but old Kaioshin said overusing the DB's is problematic.
The Evil Dragons do speak with a sense of familiarity if I recall. They know the wishes they were created from.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
ABED wrote:The Evil Dragons do speak with a sense of familiarity if I recall. They know the wishes they were created from.
When I say familiarity, I don't mean simply that they know who Goku is, or what wishes they come from. I meant in a more of a personable way. The Dragons actually knowing Goku would've made for such an interesting dynamic.
Yeah the only one who seems to have a personal connection is Nova, but that's just because the four star ball was Goku's personal treasure from his grandpa.
"I just realized something. Honestly... it kinda doesn't matter where I go... whether I'm alive or dead... I'm still pretty dandy." - Space Dandy
GreatSaiyaJeff wrote:Yeah the only one who seems to have a personal connection is Nova, but that's just because the four star ball was Goku's personal treasure from his grandpa.
Even with him, they failed to capitalize on it. Ugh... I really don't like being reminded how much I hate the second half of GT.
I thought Nova and Goku's relationship was fine, the only downside is that Nova's death felt anti climatic. Then again another thing that was wasted on GT.
"I just realized something. Honestly... it kinda doesn't matter where I go... whether I'm alive or dead... I'm still pretty dandy." - Space Dandy
Personal connections to the bad guys are often overrated.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
Super, hands down. Even if the first to arcs are lame recreations of movies, and the U6 arc is pointless... after that,it'shonestly entertaining at least. GT's only good part was the music and Baby imo. But yeah, GT has better music
My immortal Phoenix died of food poisoning
Missions complete:
All Of Kai
All DB on DVD Current Missions:
Dragon Boxes (Funi)
GT season 1
I think the correct question would be "which one is the "less" worst one" hahaha.
But GT is by far better than Super.
Super breaks all levels of fanfic series. GT has a really bad writing, but still has some good fights.
Dragon Ball Super is bad in every single topic: it's bad writing, all the characters were flanderized, the worst animation/direction I've ever seen, it's just..Awful...
Sorry for the bad English, it's not my native language ^^'
hectorgf wrote:
Dragon Ball Super is bad in every single topic: it's bad writing, all the characters were flanderized, the worst animation/direction I've ever seen, it's just..Awful...
I don't see how everyone is flanderized more now than in GT. The fact that they barely did anything with the original cast like Gohan, Piccolo, Buu, Goten, Yamcha/Tien were completely absent, and Vegeta did nothing for most of it, I'd say it handled the characters worse.
Also the animation of Super improved dramatically at the start of the Zamasu arc, and continued to get better from there.
Let's be fair, Super's direction from episode to episode is usually on-point. It's only when you zoom out and look at each arc that it seems to suffer. Also, while it's not consistently good, Super has provided some of thegreatestcutsthe showhas ever had.
hectorgf wrote:Dragon Ball Super is bad in every single topic: it's bad writing, all the characters were flanderized, the worst animation/direction I've ever seen, it's just..Awful...
If by this you meant how often characters in Super look like a parody of themselves in Z, then I wholeheartedly agree with you.
Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?
Spoiler:
Nickolaidas wrote: ↑Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:10 am
Guys, I'm going to be straight with you. If you feel the show has gotten 'silly' ... it hasn't. You're just 'too old for this shit'. Seriously, 95% of the people in those boards do not fit the target demographic of the show, so don't expect the show to be 'everything you hoped for'. I'm referring to the people here who expect Super to be rich with dark moments, serious storytelling, meaningful characters etc etc. It won't. It's a show for kids. A show for kids being kids. Everyone in those boards has a manchild in him/her, clamoring to get out, and that's fine. But having unrealistic expectations (such as believing the show grew up alongside you) is naïve at best. Honestly, do you take seriously a story where the supposed God of Destruction halts his urges to blow up stuff in order to eat ice cream sundae? That's the show's silliness at full force, take it for what it is. The show hasn't matured one bit, so don't expect it too. Again, I'm not saying that's a bad thing. I'm saying *that* is DB and always will be.
Let's be fair, Super's direction from episode to episode is usually on-point. It's only when you zoom out and look at each arc that it seems to suffer. Also, while it's not consistently good, Super has provided some of thegreatestcutsthe showhas ever had.
Akira Toriyama wrote:My policy is to try and forget things once they’re over. Since if I don’t discard the old and focus on what’s new, I’ll overload my brain capacity. I still haven’t lived down going, “Who the heck is Tao Pai-pai?” that one time I was talking with Ei’ichiro Oda-kun. But the fact that there are still people reading the series after all this time… All I can say is; “thank you.” Really, that’s all.
Akira Toriyama wrote:Drawing Dragon Ball again reminded me of two things--how much I love it, and how much I never want to do it again.
Kunzait_83 wrote:And if you're upset because all this new material completely invalidates the tabletop RPG rulebook-sized statistical system and flowchart for the characters' "canonical Power Levels" that you'd been working on painstakingly for the last bunch of years now... well I don't think there's a kind, non-blunt way of saying this, but that's 100% entirely your own misguided fault for buying so deeply into all this nonsensical garbage in the first place. And that you also have IMMENSELY skewed and comically backwards priorities in what you think is most important and needed to make a good Dragon Ball story.
Zephyr wrote:Goodness, they wrote idiotic drivel in a children's cartoon meant to advertise toys!? Again!? For the ninetieth episode in a row!? Somebody stop the presses! We have to voice our concern over these Super important issues!
Kamiccolo9 wrote:Fair enough, I concede. Sean Schemmel probably has some kind of hidden talent. Maybe he is an expert at Minesweeper. You're right; calling him "talentless" wasn't fair.
Michsi wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:29 amIn Super Piccolo got yelled off the stage by Vegeta in the U6 Tournament arc and lost to Jiminy Cricket in the ToP , he deserved 15 new transformations with his theme song played by Metallica in the background.
I'm unsure what exactly what you are trying to point out with those clips.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
ABED wrote:I'm unsure what exactly what you are trying to point out with those clips.
Basically good bits of animation from throughout Super's current run.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.
How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):
Spoiler:
Absolute Zamasu(my name for their fusion) wins. He fulfils his utopia and dwells in his loneliness(x amount of time for this to happen). He starts to doubt of his achievements, Goku's body influences him to seek out challenges but there's nothing. Perfection becomes a curse. Absolute Zamasu starts to dread his existence and presents himself to the Omni-King, detailing on his actions.
Using his powers the Omni-King restores everything to the moment before Goku and Vegeta perish, humanity's last barrier. Zamasu concedes. He ask for forgiveness(mainly to Goku, Gowasu and Trunks) and understands that his justice isn't justice at all. He asks for judgement and the Omni-King delivers.
Trunks is forced never to travel in time ever again, all the time-machines are destroyed.
ABED wrote:I'm unsure what exactly what you are trying to point out with those clips.
Basically good bits of animation from throughout Super's current run.
Yes. Those posts were made in relation to the comment made that Super has "the worst animation/direction I've ever seen".
Spoiler:
Akira Toriyama wrote:My policy is to try and forget things once they’re over. Since if I don’t discard the old and focus on what’s new, I’ll overload my brain capacity. I still haven’t lived down going, “Who the heck is Tao Pai-pai?” that one time I was talking with Ei’ichiro Oda-kun. But the fact that there are still people reading the series after all this time… All I can say is; “thank you.” Really, that’s all.
Akira Toriyama wrote:Drawing Dragon Ball again reminded me of two things--how much I love it, and how much I never want to do it again.
Kunzait_83 wrote:And if you're upset because all this new material completely invalidates the tabletop RPG rulebook-sized statistical system and flowchart for the characters' "canonical Power Levels" that you'd been working on painstakingly for the last bunch of years now... well I don't think there's a kind, non-blunt way of saying this, but that's 100% entirely your own misguided fault for buying so deeply into all this nonsensical garbage in the first place. And that you also have IMMENSELY skewed and comically backwards priorities in what you think is most important and needed to make a good Dragon Ball story.
Zephyr wrote:Goodness, they wrote idiotic drivel in a children's cartoon meant to advertise toys!? Again!? For the ninetieth episode in a row!? Somebody stop the presses! We have to voice our concern over these Super important issues!
Kamiccolo9 wrote:Fair enough, I concede. Sean Schemmel probably has some kind of hidden talent. Maybe he is an expert at Minesweeper. You're right; calling him "talentless" wasn't fair.
Michsi wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:29 amIn Super Piccolo got yelled off the stage by Vegeta in the U6 Tournament arc and lost to Jiminy Cricket in the ToP , he deserved 15 new transformations with his theme song played by Metallica in the background.
Let's be fair, Super's direction from episode to episode is usually on-point. It's only when you zoom out and look at each arc that it seems to suffer. Also, while it's not consistently good, Super has provided some of thegreatestcutsthe showhas ever had.
Those are fine, but I can think of older cuts that far surpass them. Still, DBS isn't an ugly series anymore. It's a complaint from the fairly distant past at this point.