SpiritBombTriumphant wrote:So I've been thinking. Toei is notoriously cheap. Does anyone think that, to save money, Toei might just commission a new score for Kai 1.0 from Sumitomo rather than pay to have all of Z remastered? And if they don't, but do what we think they'll do and remaster Z, would they do what they did for Kai 1.0 and trace some of the damaged frames rather than repair them? It seems to me like they initially did that because it was cheaper and they are damaged. It wasn't to make some things look prettier or anything, but more of a necessity.
What do you all think?
... No.
Kai's score is already in place and done. Kai is already in 1080p HD anyway, so it doesn't need any remastering.
Z's score is also already in place and done. Any audio work on DB, Z, and GT will be on restoring the audio tracks, whether they be mono or stereo(DB, Z, and the first 4 episodes of GT were all mono. GT 5+ were originally stereo, but if Toei continue to ignore their still-existant stereo master tracks of GT, then it'll be all mono).
As for the redraws, that wasn't about damaged frames. If it was, there's far easier and cheaper ways of fixing such things. If redrawing was necessary for "Damaged frames", they'd also have to redraw any frames with tape/glue marks, scratches, dirt, etc. on them... Which would mean they'd have to redraw literally every shot, as even those without any scratches, dirt, etc. on them have tape/glue marks due to the fact the show was produced by animating each shot individually, then taping/gluing the film strip of each shot together in order, to assemble the film negatives of each episode.
Kai's redrawn frames were about reframing shots(Particularly for the widescreen master, which had several more redrawn shots than the 4:3 master), correcting errors in the original production(Vegeta and Nappa's incorrect colouring in their first appearance), or censorship(Painting out baby Goku's penis), as I understand it.
The point of Dragon Ball is to enjoy it. Never lose sight of that.