Search found 41 matches
- Tue Jan 28, 2020 11:11 pm
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 8502
- Views: 1284616
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
Adding Bardock and Goku Black was reasonable enough. Adding a black haired Goku, the most basic Goku, as paid for DLC was laughable. Not to mention adding GT baby Goku over practically any of the original characters in that show. They added Vegito, fair enough but then added Gogeta too. The same cha...
- Tue Jan 28, 2020 9:22 pm
- Forum: Dragon Ball Super
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 42696
- Views: 5673723
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I'm enjoying this for the most part. Doesn't feel like a continuation of canon, but more like an okay filler arc or movie. I think even that's being a bit kind. I've seen a lot of praise for this arc from fans and I have no idea what they're smoking. It's been terrible. There's next to no worthwhil...
- Tue Jan 28, 2020 8:57 pm
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 8502
- Views: 1284616
- Tue Jan 28, 2020 3:41 pm
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 8502
- Views: 1284616
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
It's still another Goku, the idea of reusing him is lazy. There's already black haired Goku, blonde hair Goku, blue haired Goku, pink haired Goku, daddy Goku, baby Goku, half Goku with a Gi, half Goku with a vest and now a silver haired Goku. It's ridiculous. Wheres Roshi or Dabura or Bojack or Topp...
- Tue Jan 28, 2020 4:40 am
- Forum: Dragon Ball Super
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 42696
- Views: 5673723
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
That's irrelevant to what I said but whatever. Stop harrassing me. Replying back and argueing is not the same as harrassing, pick a dictionary and read the meaning of the word. Nah he was badgering me in another thread over something the other day too. The word is also "arguing" not "...
- Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:09 pm
- Forum: Dragon Ball Super
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 42696
- Views: 5673723
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Uhm, the transformation numbers ended with the beginning of Super. We got SSJ God, instead of SSJ4. We got SSGSS (SSJ Blue), instead of SSJ5. We got SSJ Blue Evolution, instead of SSJ6, We got Ultra Instinct, instead of SSJ7. It's all the same thing. Super Saiyan God is just another Super Saiyan, S...
- Mon Jan 27, 2020 10:03 pm
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 8502
- Views: 1284616
Re: "Dragon Ball FighterZ" Official Discussion Thread
It's kinda repetitive that they keep adding more Gokus to the game instead of characters that aren't in at all. Lazy too.
- Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:55 pm
- Forum: Dragon Ball Super
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 42696
- Views: 5673723
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
That's simply not true. Yet it obviously is. He's a moderator, three of the five stickied threads were his own, none of the more relevant and active threads were stickied. He took advantage of his position to just sticky his own threads. Either that's exactly what happened or someone else happened ...
- Sun Jan 26, 2020 6:43 pm
- Forum: Dragon Ball Super
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 42696
- Views: 5673723
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
This is something I've been wondering myself. I'm really annoyed at having to scroll down to find the manga discussion thread which always seems to be competing w/ the Strength discussion thread for which is on top, when more obsolete threads like 'Super animation catalogue' or 'fact-checker' or he...
- Sat Jan 25, 2020 9:31 pm
- Forum: Dragon Ball Super
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 42696
- Views: 5673723
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Why isn't this thread stickied but then three threads by an Ajay are even though there's been no interest in them for many months?
- Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:21 pm
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 2336
- Views: 426544
Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
So how are Cyberconnect gonna make a sequel to this? Title : Dragonball Z : Adventures. Idea is instead of Sagas mini stories like Story 1 The Path to Power movie Story 2 bardock movie Story 3 future trunks movies Story 4 cooler Story 5 metal cooler Story 6 broly Story 7 broly 2nd movie Story 8 fus...
- Fri Jan 24, 2020 11:32 pm
- Forum: Dragon Ball Super
- Topic: Db manga adult Goku is very much different from super anime goku
- Replies: 56
- Views: 19232
Re: Db manga adult Goku is very much different from super anime goku
Toei have probably been influenced by that trash series One Piece and it's retarded characters.
- Thu Jan 23, 2020 7:43 pm
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 2336
- Views: 426544
Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
Sounds Dragon Ball Super. Why are you describing Dragon Ball Super? Dragon Ball Super was crap too. Really most of what comes out of this whole franchise isn't very good but it was on a whole other level from GT. The thing with Super is that at times it would be crap and then other times passable a...
- Thu Jan 23, 2020 7:38 pm
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 2336
- Views: 426544
Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
This isn’t the place for you to bitch about GT. Make the appropriate thread for that, not in the game section. But you bitched at my comment when it was only said in passing. "Widely" is a wide exeggaretion of yours. Reddits and Gamefaqs don't make even 10% of total DB fanbase. No, you're...
- Thu Jan 23, 2020 4:32 pm
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 2336
- Views: 426544
Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
Stop your hate boner. And no, it isn't "widely acknowledged", which is why games like Legends, Xenoverse, FighterZ continue with adding GT. The series has it's loyal fanbase and it's bigger than you would expect. I'm not sure if you're being influenced by being here on this Dragon Ball fa...
- Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:56 pm
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 2336
- Views: 426544
Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
...Dragon Ball, the BEGINNING OF THE STORY, is only something "hardcore fans" like??? Yes. Dragon Ball was never that popular in the west, it's popularity only ever came as an after effect of Z. Why are you surprised? Do they make OG Dragon Ball games? No. Why? Because nobody would buy th...
- Thu Jan 23, 2020 11:01 am
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 2336
- Views: 426544
Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
A DB game in this style would be amazing though. “Nobody cares”? Says who? Speak for yourself. Also GT isn’t trash. I’d love a GT game like this being able to free roam on different planets sounds fun as hell. People don't care about Dragon Ball for it sell. That's a series only hardcore fans enjoy...
- Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:05 am
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 2336
- Views: 426544
Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
So how are Cyberconnect gonna make a sequel to this? Nobody really cares about the original Dragon Ball for it to sell. Dragon Ball GT was trash so they wouldn't even bother with that. I suppose Dragon Ball Super is the only thing that could be done but a huge amount of that was just a Tournament wi...
- Wed Jan 22, 2020 8:40 pm
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 2336
- Views: 426544
Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
The game does look fun. The graphics look years out of date though, not sure what's going on there.
I'll have to get it one day.
I'll have to get it one day.
- Wed Jan 22, 2020 4:44 pm
- Forum: Video Games
- Topic: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
- Replies: 2336
- Views: 426544
Re: "Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot" Official Discussion Thread
Are they going to make DLC to cover the Z movies?