I HOPE MY BODY'S READY.Zestanor wrote:I had a feeling GT was next. But you should call it the "GT Review of Mediocrity."
I did a very mediocre job on this logo.
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
I HOPE MY BODY'S READY.Zestanor wrote:I had a feeling GT was next. But you should call it the "GT Review of Mediocrity."
Jeff is really the only one who needs to give the show a fair chance. As long as Mike, Meri, and Julian have been with the fandom, it probably had its fair chance with them years ago. I can't blame them if they've made up their minds by now.Herms wrote:It will be a pretty boring review if they just go into it already having made up their minds that GT is mediocre.
To be fair, they did go into it having already made up their minds that the manga is awesome, so maybe just "GT Review of" would be a better title.Herms wrote:It will be a pretty boring review if they just go into it already having made up their minds that GT is mediocre.
Yup.Puto wrote:Mike stated on IRC a few days back that he never watched through the entirety of GT.
Doesn't it already mean that?Piccolo Daimao wrote:Why not call it "GT Review of Awesomeness"? The "awesomeness" could refer to the fact that they'll be doing an "awesome" review of GT, whether or not it's a mediocre series.
Some people are like that. I recall how this debate came up a while back on another forum, where I was arguing, what you are arguing and the opposition refused to accept the points I brought up and stuck with their "GT ruined Gogeta" approach.TheDevilsCorpse wrote:I always like to equate him to Gogeta, who people suggest demonstrates two totally different personalities with his appearances in Movie 12 and GT. While it is true, most people seem to assume the writers just don't know what they are doing and just changed his personality because they wanted to, but that doesn't really seem to be the case.
And you know you've been with it too long when you realize that child's a year and 4 months old and you could've sworn it was more like... 4 months...jda95 wrote:You know you've been away from DaizEX from too long when you find out that Julian's had a child..... A very belated congratulations from me.
Just noticed this post. While I appreciate the suggestion, I'd wager very few people will be following along with the R2s, so I'm not TOO concerned with that. Additionally, if I do just a random spot-check of episodes, the Super 17 arc takes place from episodes 41-47 (well, 42... but I'll figure out what to do with that great, one-off Tenkaichi Budokai episode later)... and then if you consult the R2s, that splits the arc between two discs. There's no reason NOT to contain the entire arc in one episode's review, so that alone breaks down the possibility of just following the R2s.johnboy1 wrote:I hope I'm not too late to suggest this, guys, but it might make more sense to do episodes 1-6 of GT for the first GTRoA. While the series doesn't have a well-known simple division like the 42 volumes of the manga, it does have a "volume system" in the form of the Japanese DBox singles. In those, it was split into eleven volumes, with the first nine being six episodes apiece and the last two being five apiece. In other words,
< snip >
Yeah, I meant to say that, but maybe it was a poor choice of words. I would assume it already means that, but people here are acting like it doesn't.dbgtFO wrote:Doesn't it already mean that?Piccolo Daimao wrote:Why not call it "GT Review of Awesomeness"? The "awesomeness" could refer to the fact that they'll be doing an "awesome" review of GT, whether or not it's a mediocre series.
What you wrote is pretty much how I see it. The only problem I have is Mr. Buu co existing with the original unaltered Buu.Cipher wrote:I'm surprised no one has commented on the Boo "logic" yet.