Beerus is find. He's just not important at first. He developed later on.Zephyr wrote: ...
Not bound sure but don't get upset that people complain that the manga isn't doing as good of a job making an exciting story as the anime.
I think he always was. I mean fruit people before Goku never have any reason to take non fruit people as apprentice.
I remember that I already wrote down that Dende is a magic namekian or something like that. What I said there is just to clarify that I wouldn't care if Trunks got healing through being a Guardian as it's an open job.
I don't really understand you. Excitement, sadness, anger, happiness all of those are important. You need that in your work for it to be remembered. You need it in your work for it to be good. If your work is sterile and lifeless, what's the use of creating that said work. Your work need to get the attention of your reader. You can make the most well written piece of instruction manual that have ever been written but without taking the attention of your reader, what's is even the use of even making your work? Not saying that Super anime is the most exciting thing that have ever been made but it's leagues better than the manga. If you say that rewatching the anime is going to be a slog, the manga would be even more so. Those few minute that you say I can read through the manga, I can do something else in those few minutes as how boring the manga is. It isn't gripping, it is nothing. Even the cliff hanger doesn't excite me. Do you read something you find boring? Will you read it like that? For the anime, there are episodes that you can skip but you don't like for people to do that? There are summaries for every episode. Well, what I'm saying here is that the manga for all intents and purposes is just sterile and boring. I mean I can't blame it as it does start out as a side thing for the anime. So, there's that.
The first part is you seem to complain about the production. Which is fair as it's not as good. But Super high are better than any of the Z high. Other than that, I can agree with all of the other part that you're saying besides the opening and the grain. First opening is still good and the film grain things feels more like a nitpick. Manga made by one person, still doesn't look like Toriyama but at least he tried right? With all the trac... I mean references, Toyotaro is doing a mighty good job. But I'm going to say this, I do prefer better production. I would like if they use the anime story instead of Toyotaro CRAZY new ideas for the manga and I want the anime to look better but I'll settle for what I get right now.
What's with all this short, short, short and short. If you wanted it short, well that's you. I don't care. The ending we know but we don't know what happens in between. They also have the option to not follow the current ending, that would be fine too. But if you say that making a story this big in that small time gap is bad, I have to disagree. They are doing a good job here. The characters still manage to change and develop even if they don't change too much. The stories are interesting. And the time gap of 10 years isn't too small actually. I mean how long did it take for the Saiyan arc to finish? The Cell arc? Buu arc? The retelling is done I think for the sake of the schedule. They instantly started production when they see that the movies was doing well. They need Toriyama to create new stories. They need for people who don't watch the movie not to be left out. And no, people need to know what happen before. Dragon Ball before sure have those chapters where you can jump in but there's also part that you need to read the chapters before for you to understand. Same as Z. You can't jump in the middle of the Cell arc and expect to understand what happen before. That's stupid. People can only start with Z because there's a timeskip that conveniently make it jump to a new arc.
Well the last part of your post is obvious. I agree Z is good. But saying Super is bad is just wrong. The manga may look good but it isn't interesting. Just feel I need to tell that again. But this is my last part. The story, characters and events that happen are not freaking nitpicks. If the characters are bad, the story aren't interesting then it isn't a nitpick. It's a legitimate complaint. STOP saying that taking apart the manga because of the characters and the flow of the story is nitpicking because it isn't. I don't care what you support, you don't have to tell me. Well, that's it. But your definition of nitpicking is really weird though.