Piccolo says that Goku "one-upped him this time." Goku then responds that he'll surpass him again. The comparison between their strength you're talking about isn't there. It is possible to interpret that conversation as them discussing Vegeta's ability to handle the situation better than Goku via technique rather than strength, and if you disagree with that notion, I implore you to pull up some new page where Goku says "Yeah Vegeta is stronger than me", or just agree to disagree on this one.Miracles wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2020 4:58 pm It can't be read that way at all. Goku made a blatant comparison to Vegeta. Not in the way; or how Vegeta dealt with Moro. You are trying to push a certain interpretation into the story that isn't there. Surpass means Vegeta in totality. Since Goku isn't going to go train afterwards and figure out a way how to deal with Moro better than Vegeta. The dialogue literally made no distinctions, that's not a feeling but a fact.
If it isn't up for debate then explain this thread of people debating it. To what extent do you define an attack "affecting" Moro anyhow? Goku made him struggle. Goku made him bleed. Goku made him use his full power in a fight and pull out at least one new technique he hadn't used before. That's about all as much you can get of attacks "affecting" Moro without Goku outright defeating him or crippling him for his next opponent. Vegeta's initial attack against Moro is specifically noted to be ineffective damage-wise (little do we know each hit was draining his energy) by Gohan and 18.
Look. It's ambiguous. It's interpretable as one likes at the moment due to the differences in both dialogue and feats when discussing Vegeta's strength. And while you can argue which side that ambiguity lies on, you can't argue the ambiguity itself. Even others in this thread who are on the side of "Vegeta is stronger" have agreed on that point given what I've pointed out.