The problem does not ariase at how "legitmate" those issues are (though if they are so big, why are you even a fan of the show in the first place? If you hate everything or most things about Z gt etc... then it shows you aren't a fan of those products),
So even ignoring the fact that you go on to describe exactly this
as being the problem, having criticism of something no matter how large doesn't have to mean you hate it, and again, you are not the authority on who qualifies as a fan of something. The only thing that actually makes someone a fan or not a fan of any Dragon Ball material whatsoever is whether they consider themselves one, bottom line.
1345521 wrote:it's about will you apply the issues of those series and product at the same harshness and fairness for the show whom you have been seen to oddly enough defend. Again, FAIR REPRESENATION. If you aren't being genuine in your critism and dare I say hypotcrical in your ctrism of the shows... then that shows a level of personal bias.
your only basis for fair "represenation" (please proofread your posts) is your own
opinions and biases. All criticism is biased, no opinion is objective.
1345521 wrote:If you have a ton of bias for one show insomuch that you'll excuse and/or undermine the objective problems it EQUALLY and worsly shares with the other shows you tend to be critcal of...
Ah, but here's where your problem starts. It's entirely your conjecture
as to whether a given piece of material "equally and worsly" has problems akin to another. He may not agree with that. And that's fine, because it's all subjective. Saying his opinion is worthless or that he's somehow no longer a fan of something because of it is a pretty shitty thing to do.
1345521 wrote:it gives evidence that you are more so just a personal supporter of an show then an objective person with an love of dragon ball who has no respect of properties and entertainment Which I highly suspect this PMF guy to have. If he just admits that hey:
"I like super but i'm not much of a fan for anything else in dragon ball" there, something akin to that would suffice.
Except there is no "objective person". Anyone's opinion is worth an equal amount. Nobody is more or less objective or biased, it's all
biased and all
subjective. You're trying to claim that he should say he likes or dislikes something despite it's quality, but you're trying to decide what that quality is for him,
which you have no jurisdiction over.