Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
Kagari
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 929
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2015 2:11 pm
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Kagari » Fri Jul 10, 2020 3:34 pm

Lord Beerus wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 2:58 pm I've enjoyed his appearances for the most part and his dynamic with Goku in the Universal Survival arc was A+ material. But I can't help but feel in the grand scheme that Freeza's return(s) have been a major case of Toriyama in general having little to no faith in believing he can create a new and interesting antagonist without having to go down the old nostalgia well.

And it's such as shame because Beerus was such a wonderful change in pace when it came to antagonists in Battle Of God, and I wish he would have kept up that trend.

But if Resurrection F was an indication of anything, it's that Toriyama is just as guilty as Toei and Toyotaro when it comes to character favouritism, shameless pandering and just phoning it in.
That's exactly it. Freeza is a "safe" option in every sense of the word, and it's telling that he's either mentioned or part of every arc in Super except the Trunks arc (I think?). If BoG was a step forward, RoF began a massive step back.

Matches Malone
Banned
Posts: 3308
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:12 am

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Matches Malone » Fri Jul 10, 2020 3:45 pm

Kagari wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 3:34 pmIf BoG was a step forward, RoF began a massive step back.
I think what helped BOG was everyone involved not expecting it to result in anything major, they thought it was just going to be a one time project. Once they saw how much interest there was in the franchise, they started playing everything extremely safe, going as far as taking fan requests into consideration.

User avatar
LoganForkHands73
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1364
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:54 pm

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by LoganForkHands73 » Fri Jul 10, 2020 3:58 pm

I find it funny that Toriyama shamelessly called Resurrection F pure fanservice. It was always doomed to fail.

User avatar
Koitsukai
I Live Here
Posts: 4295
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 5:02 pm

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Koitsukai » Fri Jul 10, 2020 4:05 pm

Freeza's 4 month special to me was more for Toei than for us.
Toei spent a 2 decades in-universe making a laughing stock out of Freeza in ways that were described in this thread, and Toriyama just went oh had a good laugh?, well my guy training just for 4 months could outclass everything Toei, Koyama, etc could come up with for the past 20 years, even better he can outclass what I came up with for Goku and Vegeta just now.

It really is weird to have Freeza be the first enemy after BoG. The set-up promised much more, Beerus spoke in a way that it felt there were going to discover new worlds and powers. Nah, just bring Freeza, make him a challenge for current Goku somehow.

Matches Malone
Banned
Posts: 3308
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:12 am

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Matches Malone » Fri Jul 10, 2020 4:07 pm

LoganForkHands73 wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 3:58 pm I find it funny that Toriyama shamelessly called Resurrection F pure fanservice. It was always doomed to fail.
Toriyama and everyone involved have said more than once that their goal is to give fans what they want, going as far as saying one of the goals of the established dragon room is to figure out what fans worldwide expect from the franchise.
Koitsukai wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 4:05 pmIt really is weird to have Freeza be the first enemy after BoG. The set-up promised much more, Beerus spoke in a way that it felt there were going to discover new worlds and powers.
That's because the ending of BOG wasn't really a set up, but rather a message to the viewer that Goku's adventures would never end, similar to the message in his manga's ending. In an interview 6 months after BOG's release, Toriyama said he hadn't thought of anything regarding DB's future, as there were simply no plans for it to move ahead.

User avatar
Koitsukai
I Live Here
Posts: 4295
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 5:02 pm

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Koitsukai » Fri Jul 10, 2020 4:20 pm

Matches Malone wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 4:07 pm
LoganForkHands73 wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 3:58 pm I find it funny that Toriyama shamelessly called Resurrection F pure fanservice. It was always doomed to fail.
Toriyama and everyone involved have said more than once that their goal is to give fans what they want, going as far as saying one of the goals of the established dragon room is to figure out what fans worldwide expect from the franchise.
Koitsukai wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 4:05 pmIt really is weird to have Freeza be the first enemy after BoG. The set-up promised much more, Beerus spoke in a way that it felt there were going to discover new worlds and powers.
That's because the ending of BOG wasn't really a set up, but rather a message to the viewer that Goku's adventures would never end, similar to the message in his manga's ending. In an interview 6 months after BOG's release, Toriyama said he hadn't thought of anything regarding DB's future, as there were simply no plans for it to move ahead.
Even more so, it opened up a multiverse of possibilities, literally a multiverse... and then they called Freeza's agent.

Matches Malone
Banned
Posts: 3308
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:12 am

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Matches Malone » Fri Jul 10, 2020 4:27 pm

Koitsukai wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 4:20 pmEven more so, it opened up a multiverse of possibilities, literally a multiverse... and then they called Freeza's agent.
I'm sure Cell wishes he had such a good agent, as the poor guy can barely get a cameo now. :lol:

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21389
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Lord Beerus » Fri Jul 10, 2020 7:24 pm

Kagari wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 3:34 pm
Lord Beerus wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 2:58 pm I've enjoyed his appearances for the most part and his dynamic with Goku in the Universal Survival arc was A+ material. But I can't help but feel in the grand scheme that Freeza's return(s) have been a major case of Toriyama in general having little to no faith in believing he can create a new and interesting antagonist without having to go down the old nostalgia well.

And it's such as shame because Beerus was such a wonderful change in pace when it came to antagonists in Battle Of God, and I wish he would have kept up that trend.

But if Resurrection F was an indication of anything, it's that Toriyama is just as guilty as Toei and Toyotaro when it comes to character favouritism, shameless pandering and just phoning it in.
That's exactly it. Freeza is a "safe" option in every sense of the word, and it's telling that he's either mentioned or part of every arc in Super except the Trunks arc (I think?). If BoG was a step forward, RoF began a massive step back.
I really don't get Toriyama's new found fascination with Freeza. He had the perfect send-off for him in the manga, but nowadays, Freeza is bound to be brought up or have an active role in a storyline if Toriyama is the one writing it. The only storyline in modern Dragon Ball (everything from Battle Of Gods to now) that Freeza was M.I.A in was the Future Trunks arc.

User avatar
Super Murjin
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2016 5:42 pm

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Super Murjin » Fri Jul 10, 2020 9:41 pm

I'm glad Frieza came back, he's Dragon ball's Joker. I don't like how Super explained how he got more powerful. I think they should have made him train in the vacuum of space, maybe flying to planets with extreme high gravity and training there. Him training with Tagoma was goofy. Even though it was very vague i prefer what the Super manga and Resurrection F movie did.....keeping it a mystery is much better than the dumb Tagoma explanation. I was cool seeing Frieza team up with Goku and the rest of Universe 7 to fight in the TOP and then having him return yet again in the Broly film. I kinda hope we don't see Cell return, no need.

User avatar
The Undying
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 433
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 5:47 pm

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by The Undying » Fri Jul 10, 2020 11:11 pm

Super Murjin wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 9:41 pm I don't like how Super explained how he got more powerful.
To be frank, I don't really take issue with how the movie explained it. Freeza is a freak of nature who was pushing nine figures of power levels with just his natural untrained strength, so it makes sense he'd skyrocket to god tiers even with only a few months of real training. This is all in-character because he hates having to exert himself.

The film itself is fine. It's no Battle of Gods, but the tone, dialogue and character analysis is solid Toriyama. I'd watch it any day of the week over the 90's Z movies.
Formerly Marlowe89.

User avatar
Melee_Sovereign
Temporarily Banned
Posts: 598
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2017 12:43 am

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Melee_Sovereign » Fri Jul 10, 2020 11:24 pm

GodVegetto91 wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 12:05 am
a mortal with normal ki, was able to overpower, even a stronger version of Super Saiyan God, (SSGSS!)
To be fair, you can complain about the same thing with Hit, Toppo (well maybe not Toppo), Jiren, Broly, Moro etc...

The only way to avoid the problem you point out is to never make another mortal antagonist again.

Matches Malone
Banned
Posts: 3308
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:12 am

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Matches Malone » Sat Jul 11, 2020 1:51 am

Super Murjin wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 9:41 pmI'm glad Frieza came back, he's Dragon ball's Joker.
Dragon Ball was nothing like Batman to say Freeza was its Joker. Freeza wasn't the first or even 5th main villain Goku fought, and after he was dead, things just kept moving on as usual. Freeza was nothing special in the original manga, unlike Joker.

User avatar
Psajdak
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 496
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:37 am

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Psajdak » Sat Jul 11, 2020 10:38 am

I think people here underestimate how big of a thing is nostagia, and tradition in Japan...
Why do you think there are so many decades long franchises?

I have no problems with Freeza being brought back, and for the most part he was one of the most entertaining characters in this current DB era.

Wouldn't mind if Cell would also be brought back, since he was fine in FighterZ.

Matches Malone
Banned
Posts: 3308
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:12 am

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Matches Malone » Sat Jul 11, 2020 10:57 am

Psajdak wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2020 10:38 am I think people here underestimate how big of a thing is nostagia, and tradition in Japan...

For the most part he was one of the most entertaining characters in this current DB era.
I understand that when a franchise as big as DB is brought back after so long, nostalgia is going to play a role in it, but the problem here is that nostalgia has taken over the franchise. The issue isn't just the nostalgic elements, it's how bad they've been handled. If you're going to bring back classic elements, at least do it right, that way it covers up the fact that your franchise is creatively bankrupt.

Apart from the tournament, he's been written extremely bad, as both RF and Broly turned him into an incompetent joke.

User avatar
GodVegetto91
Banned
Posts: 2906
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 12:49 pm

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by GodVegetto91 » Sat Jul 11, 2020 1:27 pm

Melee_Sovereign wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 11:24 pm
GodVegetto91 wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 12:05 am
a mortal with normal ki, was able to overpower, even a stronger version of Super Saiyan God, (SSGSS!)
To be fair, you can complain about the same thing with Hit, Toppo (well maybe not Toppo), Jiren, Broly, Moro etc...

The only way to avoid the problem you point out is to never make another mortal antagonist again.
Uhm... These are exactly all the things I have been saying in my posts this week..

User avatar
FortuneSSJ
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5812
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:07 pm

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by FortuneSSJ » Sun Jul 12, 2020 5:42 am

Anime ToP made it worth it. Toei wrote his character better than Toriyama ever did and I couldn't get enough of him
A world without Dragon Ball is just meh.

Sadala Elite
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:27 pm

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Sadala Elite » Mon Jul 13, 2020 3:06 am

Matches Malone wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2020 1:51 am
Super Murjin wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 9:41 pmI'm glad Frieza came back, he's Dragon ball's Joker.
Dragon Ball was nothing like Batman to say Freeza was its Joker. Freeza wasn't the first or even 5th main villain Goku fought, and after he was dead, things just kept moving on as usual. Freeza was nothing special in the original manga, unlike Joker.
Freeza is Dragonball's greatest and most impactful villain in the entire franchise. Even before RoF, Freeza was generally viewed & treated in Japan and in the wider franchise in general as the "Joker" of Dragonball, the archnemesis that has/had a bigger impact on the hero and series than any other antagonist. He's basically (in-universe) the reason why the story of Dragonball even happened in the 1st place. No other villain has as much built-in narrative importance as Freeza and is a big part of why many view the Namek saga as the peak of franchise.

The idea of bringing Freeza (or any other major villain) back isn't inherently a problem as him being around and relevant again actually opens up a lot of great story opportunities for Super, but Revival of F sucked hard lmao. ToP Freeza was awesome though.

Sadala Elite
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:27 pm

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Sadala Elite » Mon Jul 13, 2020 3:09 am

FortuneSSJ wrote: Sun Jul 12, 2020 5:42 am Anime ToP made it worth it. Toei wrote his character better than Toriyama ever did and I couldn't get enough of him
This also applies to DBZ, as Freeza was better portrayed in the Z/Kai anime than he was in the OG manga (Ryusei Nakao helps a lot).

Matches Malone
Banned
Posts: 3308
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:12 am

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Matches Malone » Mon Jul 13, 2020 3:31 am

Sadala Elite wrote: Mon Jul 13, 2020 3:06 amFreeza is Dragonball's greatest and most impactful villain in the entire franchise.
I agree, but to say he's the franchise's joker is saying he was the central villain of the original story, which he wasn't. He showed up and died in the same arc. He was never seen before or after. DB doesn't have a "joker" type character.

Block88
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 186
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 3:28 pm

Re: Should Freeza have never been revived in Super?

Post by Block88 » Sat Jul 18, 2020 11:30 pm

Yes he shouldn’t been brought back in the first place
He served his purpose in z who cares about him being treated as a joke since then Dragon ball is practically The rules of nature on the next baddie.

Him coming back practically started the nostalgia pandering non sensical power ups that plagued the series and reduced GoD Ki to the joke that it is now

Post Reply