Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by precita » Sun Oct 25, 2015 6:38 pm

As we know, Super Saiyan 3 just never quite felt right. It didn't seem like a natural extension of the Super Saiyan line and Goku using it always drained his power too quickly. Whereas SSJ2 was just a stronger version of Super Saiyan that wasn't even named when it debuted in the Cell saga (and only teen Gohan looks different, everyone else looks the same), SSJ3 came out of nowhere.

Also unlike the original Super Saiyan and Super Saiyan God, there's no "legend" of a Super Saiyan 3 at all, meaning Goku is probably the very first one to have created it. It felt like Goku created this new transformation out of his training, although it doesn't make sense why Gotenks was able to become one true.

Also we have Vegeta skipping SSJ3 in Super just like in GT. Vegeta goes to Super Saiyan God in Super, and in GT he skipped SSJ3 and went straight to Super Saiyan 4.

So is Super Saiyan 3 just a botched transformation?

User avatar
Xeztin
I Live Here
Posts: 2242
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 7:15 pm
Location: Toyotarō's Place

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by Xeztin » Sun Oct 25, 2015 6:54 pm

There are only really two Super Saiyan lines, (3 if you count GT) those being Super Saiyan, and Super Saiyan God. As we know, 2 and 3 are just Variants or levels of the normal SSJ form itself, rather than being completely different transformations like Freizas. To be fair there was not a legend of SSJ 2 either, but as you said you don't think 3 fits the normal SSJ line, so that would be pointless to you. In my opinion SSJ 3 was, in a way a failed transformation as it has terrible side effects on the body. Goku only pulls out SSJ 3 when he knows he has no other choice, Gotenk's just does it for the heck of it I think. I was always baffled as to why SSJ 3's hair went so long, I figured it would have been somewhere around SSJ4's length. I am pretty certain though that in Toriyama's mindset, this transformation was the end all be all, probably meaning he had no plans to ever come back at the time, which he didn't for a good 18 years, so he went all out and created what he thought was the most "epic" of them all. If you look at it from a different perspective then In a way it isn't a failed transformation, just that they couldn't really master it like they did the two previous. I think Vegeta want's to go SSJ 3, but if he can go SSG what's the point? As for GT there are more plot-holes than one can probably wrap his head around, but he didn't turn SSJ4 naturally either. I don't even think he had a tail? I think Gohan's SSJ2 was at first supposed to be exclusive to him, because of his hidden potential mixed with Super Saiyan, and it wasn't really called SSJ2 at the time because of that. After it continued on to the Buu Arc, and Goku and Vegeta got the form, they found out it wasn't exclusive to Gohan, so they had to give it a name. Boom! SSJ2 was born, this is what I've convinced myself of being true. :)

User avatar
B
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5561
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:15 am
Contact:

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by B » Sun Oct 25, 2015 7:06 pm

It was always my interpretation that 2 and 3 were "fabrications" that the users invented themselves through training. I wouldn't call 3 "failed" so much as "flawed." Obviously from an out-of-universe perspective, 3 is designed to simultaneously be ridiculous and still establish that the user is stronger, so if you want to try to go into Goku's mindset and decipher why it looks like that or what function does longer hair serve... That is, if he even had any control on how it looked to begin with. I figured Gotenks was able to replicate it because A) gag manga, B) he had the strength/capabilities to assess how Goku did it. Kind of like how the characters can see instantaneous movements that look like blurs to normal people. Or, y'know, how everyone and their mama picked up on the Kamehameha based solely on the visuals of it; like that but at a more advanced level because it's Gotenks.

So, 3 isn't foolproof, much like the Kaiou-ken wasn't foolproof. They're at least better than the Grade transformations.
Keen Observation of Dragon Ball Z Movie 4's Climax wrote:Slug shits to see the genki

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5156
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by fadeddreams5 » Sun Oct 25, 2015 7:57 pm

SSJ3 isn't a failed transformation. It's a forced one, sort of like USSJ, only it manages to increase both speed and power. It always came off as a "last resort" sort of thing, which is what made it great, unlike SSJ4 and SSJB, which seem perfect.

If we go by the anime, Gotenks learned it by watching Goku transform into it. Being a fusion of two SSJ prodigies, you can imagine it wasn't too difficult.

Also, I hate that SSJ2 even became a thing, but it should have completely replaced SSJ, imo. I hate that Goku tends to fight as a SSJ at all after revealing this form.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by precita » Sun Oct 25, 2015 8:38 pm

The weird thing is, isn't Super Saiyan 2 only mentioned once in-show when Goku is powering up to SSJ3 for Fat Majin Buu?

They never mention when Vegeta goes SSJ2 either. Its just expected when he's fighting Goku as Majin Vegeta. And for Gohan its not brought up. Its almost like something that was just added in there to sell toys or videogame variants.

User avatar
Avenged
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1023
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by Avenged » Sun Oct 25, 2015 8:44 pm

Thought it was established ssj3 could only be achieved in an unearthly manner as Goku was dead and first achieved it in the afterlife and Gotenks was able to due to fusion. The transformation itself also hinted at it being the ultimate Saiyan form with the scenes as Goku turning into Great Ape form.
Dragon Blog Z - A Dragon Ball Z Community

User avatar
Scarlet Spider
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 10:07 am

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by Scarlet Spider » Sun Oct 25, 2015 8:45 pm

I feel like SSJ2 is far better than SSJ3. There's a great boost in speed and power. The only drawback I could remember was slight increased aggression. (Gohan, Goku, Vegeta; mainly Gohan) Gohan instantly became arrogant and sadistic in his fight against Cell. When demonstrating the form at Kibito he was suddenly eager to fight after hesitating. It doesn't take as much ki as SSJ3 yet outclasses regular SSJ. The strain of SSJ3 is so much. But we'll never see them again. Unless SSJB2 happens.

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21389
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by Lord Beerus » Sun Oct 25, 2015 9:21 pm

Yes. SSJ3 is a failed transformation because it has failed to defeat a single villain since its introduction.

User avatar
LuckyCat
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1217
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 6:28 pm
Location: The Sacred Land
Contact:

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by LuckyCat » Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:10 pm

I just think it's overstayed its welcome. SSJ3 brought all these ideas that bigger is better and GT went ahead reinforced that. Some fans took it a step further with SSJ5, and it was all rad back in the 90s.

Toriyama is at his best when writing strong characters that look deceptively weak.

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5156
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by fadeddreams5 » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:03 pm

Lord Beerus wrote:Yes. SSJ3 is a failed transformation because it has failed to defeat a single villain since its introduction.
Hirudegarn!
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

User avatar
Kingdom Heartless
I Live Here
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 12:21 am
Location: QLD, Australia
Contact:

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by Kingdom Heartless » Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:33 am

I see it as sort of a mutation achieved when they transform beyond Super Saiyan 2 under unnatural circumstances, such as being dead or the product of a fusion.

That's why I believe that Vegeta was able to surpass Goku briefly while fighting Beerus. He transformed beyond SSj2 in a more natural way. I feel that in a way, Vegeta has reached Super Saiyan 3, simply not the unnatural version we're used to. Just a personal canon.
Yo! Cal's the name. Nice to meet you!
Lover of all that is pure and fun in the worlds of Dragon Ball, Jim Henson and so forth!
3DS Friend Code 1418-7854-8786. I'm always playing Pokemon, so PM me yours for Friend Safari and battling! :D

Gmez9
Newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by Gmez9 » Mon Oct 26, 2015 2:49 am

Only in the hirudegarn movie 13 which doesn't count was ssj3 useful.

His fight with second form janemba wasn't bad until janemba split and then it was over. It was my favorite transformation back in the day.

In my opinion, ssj3 should have been the ultimate level. It seems as if the huge strain on the body would cause damage to the user overtime. With a saiyajin ability to heal, (not just from zenkai boosts), ssj3 should have just been making huge gains in power even though the user gets burned out fast.

Gotenks showed greater control until bog when goku got massacred by bills.

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21389
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by Lord Beerus » Mon Oct 26, 2015 10:37 am

fadeddreams5 wrote:
Lord Beerus wrote:Yes. SSJ3 is a failed transformation because it has failed to defeat a single villain since its introduction.
Hirudegarn!
I don't count movie villains. :wink:

User avatar
LuckyCat
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1217
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 6:28 pm
Location: The Sacred Land
Contact:

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by LuckyCat » Mon Oct 26, 2015 11:37 am

SSJG has also failed to defeat a villain. :D

User avatar
raulvalente
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 6:27 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by raulvalente » Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:20 pm

I hate its design, I remember that when Goku was powering up I was like OH SHIT, but when I saw the transformation itself I though "da fuck?"

And it is a failed transformation, it drains the power of the warrior too quickly.

User avatar
Xeztin
I Live Here
Posts: 2242
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 7:15 pm
Location: Toyotarō's Place

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by Xeztin » Mon Oct 26, 2015 4:31 pm

I honestly hoped we'd get a explanation of why SSJ looked so different, but I don't think we ever will get one now unless they're a SSJB2/3

User avatar
TheGreatness25
I Live Here
Posts: 4928
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:36 am

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by TheGreatness25 » Mon Oct 26, 2015 7:02 pm

They look different so you could tell them apart. I mean, my God, people already have difficulty with Vegeta and adult Gohan, relying only on the sparks and electricity. Oh, sure, there could be some in-universe explanation, but realistically, it was just to distinguish them. I'd love to see an explanation for why Super Saiyan 3 is missing eyebrows, though.

User avatar
IDreamtIWasABee
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:45 am

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by IDreamtIWasABee » Mon Oct 26, 2015 7:43 pm

Like Fusion, Mystic, and consistently compelling drama, SSJ3 was only a failure in the Boo saga, not other stuff. Goku used it to strangle Hirudegarn with the lazy ease of a python, and Janemba only overpowered the form with raw force (Goku was dead and in the afterlife, so he wasn't laboring under the transformation's drawbacks when he went down).

Anyway, it seems evolved for zenkais, and if Cell could start pulling those out of his ass, why not Goku? If it's "natural," then it seems like a "gateway" form to a "genuine" SSJ4.

On the other hand, it's the only one of the three genuine SSJ transformations that comes out of nowhere and has zero dramatic impact.

User avatar
Son Edo
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:35 am
Location: Australia

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by Son Edo » Tue Oct 27, 2015 2:25 am

If he mastered it, he could probably use it for extended periods of time. But in Boo saga, yeah, it's not really useful unless the user finishes off the opponent quickly.

User avatar
Scarlet Spider
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 10:07 am

Re: Is Super Saiyan 3 a failed transformation?

Post by Scarlet Spider » Tue Oct 27, 2015 2:41 am

TheGreatness25 wrote:I'd love to see an explanation for why Super Saiyan 3 is missing eyebrows, though.
It went to the Saiyan's scalp.

Post Reply