ABED wrote:No one was passive aggressive.
Okay if you say so.
aWell it's kinda hard if he's still trying to continue the discussion, while simultaneously ignorantly sprouting incorrect information and making assumptions such as these "It's like you don't want to discuss further because you know this is an irrational issue to be so bugged about "all he just has to say alright I don't get what you're talking about let's agree to disagree."
Lastly, DB isn't sophisticated.
Ok, then why were you expecting such a sophisticated answer from me and constantly asking to explain myself. When I was basically tpying essays, was that not explaining myself? When I looked up the definition for explain a few pages back it was “make (an idea, situation, or problem) clear to someone by describing it in more detail or revealing relevant facts or ideas.
and account for (an action or event) by giving a reason as excuse or justification.
And it’s clearly still the same definition, while I understand you probably wanted a clearer picture to put it bluntly, if you didn’t get it, you just didn’t get it there was no need for this to have protected as long as it did. Non chantly disparaging me and my argument with comments such as silly and irrational is counterintuitive to what you’re trying to achieve.
It's not hard. You don't have to respond. You can choose to respond or not and hopefully you respond in an adult manner. Lastly, DB isn't sophisticated. I may not have seen Super, but it doesn't take that much effort to say, "In episode such and such, Goku was nearly crushed by a black hole attack, which is evidence of..." Instead your brushed me off completely and said I have no credibility as though we were discussing something important like macroeconomic theory and I spouted some ignorant like "why don't they just print more money?" Your response was not commensurate with the 'transgression'.
Well of course, if you’re going to make false accusations about me, as well as, unknowingly discredit me on stuff you know nothing about then by and large I’m going to defend myself. A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh answer stirs up anger, if you see me trying to agree to disagree on a heated debate and the next thing you do is compose a paragraph describing how silly or irrational opinion is, throwing false accusations, and then ignorantly discredit me on something you don’t even have the full context on. All things considered, of course I’m going to reply, so why you don’t take your own advice and do the same. While I will admit there was lot of stuff I could have done differently like explaining stuff and my conduct toward people, their were some things you could have done differently too.
Gaffer Tape wrote:
SaiyanGod117 wrote:Additionally, excuse me, if this comes off as rude, but I don't care if you don't agree with my opinion or your qualms. Just as you could care less for my opinion.
Yeah... see, this is the kind of thing I'm talking about. I don't know if this is one of those text-tone problems, or if you're just easily ruffled. But like ABED said, no one has been passive aggressive to you in this conversation. Not a single time. And as for what I said, that was me trying to assure you that your opinion is valid. That even if I don't agree with it, I defend your right to have it. And yet for some reason, you get huffy about even that. Out of everything I said in my post, that sentence was the most affirming to you and your case, and yet that's the one you seem to have taken the most issue with. So clearly there is some kind of disconnect at work here where people's neutral inquiries and statements are being interpreted by you as "passive aggressive" and insulting. You really shouldn't be so quick to assume everything is meant to put you on the defensive.
Ok, my bad read too fast.