Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Boo?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
Jackal puFF
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1684
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by Jackal puFF » Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:17 am

He should definitely be. He was the turning point in Dragonball! A lot of death came along with him.

User avatar
TheZFighter
Regular
Posts: 538
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 9:40 am

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by TheZFighter » Tue Jan 29, 2019 4:01 am

Of course he should. He absolutely should be considered among the main villains.

His story was/ still is one of my favourites, and he still lives on through Piccolo.

It was a great end to the original series and set us up perfectly for Z.
Z-Fighters fan.

Goku, Yamcha, Krillin, Tien, Chiaotzu, Yajirobe, Gohan, Piccolo, Vegeta, Future Trunks, Android 18, Goten, Trunks and Majin Buu.

BWri
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1712
Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by BWri » Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:15 am

Rebel_Yeh wrote:If we’re talking about the original Dragon Ball manga, then Freeza, Cell, and Majin Boo aren’t the only major villains. King Piccolo was one too (Vegeta fights on the heroic side for most of the series, so he’s not really counted here). But when most fans talk about classic Dragon Ball’s major villains, they only recognize three: Freeza, Cell, and Majin Boo. Do you think King Piccolo should also be recognized, thus making it four major villains in classic Dragon Ball?
Of course! I would even put him above the likes of Cell and Buu. While I like Cell and Buu (especially Cell) their success rate and impact on the story weren't anywhere near Piccolo's. King Piccolo is still affecting the story today thanks to his offspring Piccolo and he's the only villain cruel enough to kill Shenron. That's why in my Dragon Ball reboot fanfic he's going to serve as one of Frieza's top generals along with King Vegeta.
Big fan of the characters of Dragon Ball, all of them, especially formerly prominent sub-characters. -__-

Rebel_Yeh
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:49 am

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by Rebel_Yeh » Tue Jan 29, 2019 2:53 pm

Michsi wrote:Question for anyone that doesn't think Piccolo should be recognized as one of DB's classic villains, what could possibly stop you from doing so?

That’s what I’d like to know as well. It seems to me that the biggest reason is that some fans know DB primarily through the DBZ anime. However, it must be remembered that the founding work of the DB franchise is the original DB manga, which spans the time between when Goku meets Bulma for the first time and the time when Goku decides to train Uub. So I don’t see why King Piccolo shouldn’t be recognized as one of DB’s classic villains.

So if we use only the original DB manga as reference, we can determine who the classic villains as well as heroes are.

There are four villains. They are:

1. King Piccolo
2. Frieza
3. Cell
4. Majin Buu (bad)

There are seven heroes. You can call them “Z fighters” if you like. These seven are:

1. Goku
2. Piccolo
3. Krillin
4. Gohan
5. Vegeta
6. Majin Buu (good)
7. Mr. Satan

I would have loved to see King Piccolo and Cell in DBS, but at least Frieza and Majin Buu came back (well, part of him did).

User avatar
Robo4900
I Live Here
Posts: 4386
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:24 pm
Location: In another time and place...

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by Robo4900 » Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:44 am

Rebel_Yeh wrote:So if we use only the original DB manga as reference, we can determine who the classic villains as well as heroes are.

There are four villains. They are:

1. King Piccolo
2. Frieza
3. Cell
4. Majin Buu (bad)
What about Tao, Blue, and Tenshinhan?
The point of Dragon Ball is to enjoy it. Never lose sight of that.

jcogginsa
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1204
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:12 pm

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by jcogginsa » Wed Jan 30, 2019 1:53 pm

Robo4900 wrote:
Rebel_Yeh wrote:So if we use only the original DB manga as reference, we can determine who the classic villains as well as heroes are.

There are four villains. They are:

1. King Piccolo
2. Frieza
3. Cell
4. Majin Buu (bad)
What about Tao, Blue, and Tenshinhan?
Tao and Blue aren't main villains, they're like the Ginyu Force

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by ABED » Wed Jan 30, 2019 1:57 pm

Robo4900 wrote:
Rebel_Yeh wrote:So if we use only the original DB manga as reference, we can determine who the classic villains as well as heroes are.

There are four villains. They are:

1. King Piccolo
2. Frieza
3. Cell
4. Majin Buu (bad)
What about Tao, Blue, and Tenshinhan?
I think he's talking about Big Bads. Tao and Blue are intermediate villains, like Odd Job from Goldfinger. Tenshinhan isn't a villain as much as an antagonist. And Vegeta should be on the list. Vegeta changed after the Saiyan arc, but he's definitely one of DB's big bads.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Robo4900
I Live Here
Posts: 4386
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:24 pm
Location: In another time and place...

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by Robo4900 » Wed Jan 30, 2019 2:31 pm

ABED wrote:
Robo4900 wrote:
Rebel_Yeh wrote:So if we use only the original DB manga as reference, we can determine who the classic villains as well as heroes are.

There are four villains. They are:

1. King Piccolo
2. Frieza
3. Cell
4. Majin Buu (bad)
What about Tao, Blue, and Tenshinhan?
I think he's talking about Big Bads. Tao and Blue are intermediate villains, like Odd Job from Goldfinger. Tenshinhan isn't a villain as much as an antagonist. And Vegeta should be on the list. Vegeta changed after the Saiyan arc, but he's definitely one of DB's big bads.
I dunno... I 100% agree about putting Vegeta on there(And I would also argue that Piccolo should just be listed as "Piccolo", given the way his reincarnation went and how that rippled into the 23rd Tenkaichi), but the thing is, Blue and Tao were the primary antagonists of the piece of the franchise they were in. They, along with Tenshinhan, were the beginning of the villain-centric storylines Dragon Ball built itself around from that point on.

Thing is, Blue and Tao aren't like the Ginyus; they aren't underlings to a bigger, badder villain, Commander Red is pretty much a wimp. It'd be like if Freeza took over from the Ginyu Force after they were defeated, but he was just another mercenary/underling, and the Freeza Forces were actually commanded by Appule or Cui.

But y'know, okay, I'm willing to surrender that Blue and Tao are ultimately just two of a revolving roster of villains of the Red Ribbon arc(Lest we forget that for a time Silver, Murasaki, etc. were each the main villain, albeit much shorter-lived than Blue or Tao), much like the various underlings of Freeza's. But, under the same logic that Vegeta should be on the list, Tehnshinhan absolutely should be. Yes, he's more of an antagonist than a villain, so is Vegeta. Both started out seemingly as kind of evil dicks who were very clearly the main antagonists of their arcs, and for a time were most definitely Goku's rival, and both ultimately showed a better nature that allowed them to grow into being one of the goodguys, fighting alongside Goku, Kuririn, and the gang. Tenshinhan was basically the prototype for the archetype both Piccolo -- though moreso in his Jr. incarnation than Daimao -- and Vegeta would undertake later on, but told on a much shorter timescale.
The point of Dragon Ball is to enjoy it. Never lose sight of that.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by ABED » Wed Jan 30, 2019 2:38 pm

They aren't primary antagonists. They both took orders. Tao Pai Pai was a hitman hired to kill Goku, and Blue was not the leader of the organization.

Tenshinhan started out as a villain, but he doesn't qualify as a villain because he's not actually a bad guy. His change occurs in the very same arc, hence why he's an antagonist. Muten Roshi/Jackie Chun would be considered the main antagonist in the 21st Tenkaichi Budokai arc, but he's not a villain. Vegeta changes, but he doesn't change in the same arc. That's the difference.
Thing is, Blue and Tao aren't like the Ginyus; they aren't underlings to a bigger, badder villain, Commander Red is pretty much a wimp.
They are still underlings or contractors to one pulling the strings. Nothing about being the villain suggests they have to be physically strong.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

Rebel_Yeh
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:49 am

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by Rebel_Yeh » Wed Jan 30, 2019 3:30 pm

ABED wrote:
Robo4900 wrote:
Rebel_Yeh wrote:So if we use only the original DB manga as reference, we can determine who the classic villains as well as heroes are.

There are four villains. They are:

1. King Piccolo
2. Frieza
3. Cell
4. Majin Buu (bad)
What about Tao, Blue, and Tenshinhan?
I think he's talking about Big Bads. Tao and Blue are intermediate villains, like Odd Job from Goldfinger. Tenshinhan isn't a villain as much as an antagonist. And Vegeta should be on the list. Vegeta changed after the Saiyan arc, but he's definitely one of DB's big bads.
Vegeta would have been on the list if he was never good in the manga. The thing is that if they had to choose between listing him as a good guy or a bad guy, most fans of classic DB would list Vegeta as a good guy.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by ABED » Wed Jan 30, 2019 3:36 pm

Rebel_Yeh wrote:Vegeta would have been on the list if he was never good in the manga. The thing is that if they had to choose between listing him as a good guy or a bad guy, most fans would list Vegeta as a good guy.
Who said the characters couldn't be on both lists? Why do we have to choose? Was Vegeta not a big bad at one time?
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Robo4900
I Live Here
Posts: 4386
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:24 pm
Location: In another time and place...

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by Robo4900 » Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:55 am

ABED wrote:Tenshinhan started out as a villain, but he doesn't qualify as a villain because he's not actually a bad guy.
I'll grant you the rest, but I don't really get this logic; feels like a very arbitrary line.
The point of Dragon Ball is to enjoy it. Never lose sight of that.

User avatar
KBABZ
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5180
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:38 pm
Location: The tallest tower in West City

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by KBABZ » Thu Jan 31, 2019 11:12 am

Robo4900 wrote:
ABED wrote:Tenshinhan started out as a villain, but he doesn't qualify as a villain because he's not actually a bad guy.
I'll grant you the rest, but I don't really get this logic; feels like a very arbitrary line.
I think what he's getting at is that Tien feels more like an antagonistic rival rather than a full-blown villain. IMO the real villain of that arc is Tsuru-sen'nin, and him being disposed of is due to Tenshinhan deciding to not be so antagonistic towards the Turtle School.

User avatar
Robo4900
I Live Here
Posts: 4386
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:24 pm
Location: In another time and place...

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by Robo4900 » Thu Jan 31, 2019 11:31 am

KBABZ wrote:
Robo4900 wrote:
ABED wrote:Tenshinhan started out as a villain, but he doesn't qualify as a villain because he's not actually a bad guy.
I'll grant you the rest, but I don't really get this logic; feels like a very arbitrary line.
I think what he's getting at is that Tien feels more like an antagonistic rival rather than a full-blown villain. IMO the real villain of that arc is Tsuru-sen'nin, and him being disposed of is due to Tenshinhan deciding to not be so antagonistic towards the Turtle School.
Yeah, but I would argue that makes him even better as a villain, and gives him even more of a right to be considered one of the classic villains alonside Piccolo, Vegeta, Freeza, Cell, and Boo.
The point of Dragon Ball is to enjoy it. Never lose sight of that.

User avatar
KBABZ
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5180
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:38 pm
Location: The tallest tower in West City

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by KBABZ » Thu Jan 31, 2019 11:37 am

Robo4900 wrote:
KBABZ wrote:
Robo4900 wrote: I'll grant you the rest, but I don't really get this logic; feels like a very arbitrary line.
I think what he's getting at is that Tien feels more like an antagonistic rival rather than a full-blown villain. IMO the real villain of that arc is Tsuru-sen'nin, and him being disposed of is due to Tenshinhan deciding to not be so antagonistic towards the Turtle School.
Yeah, but I would argue that makes him even better as a villain, and gives him even more of a right to be considered one of the classic villains alonside Piccolo, Vegeta, Freeza, Cell, and Boo.
I guess. He's definitely up there in Goku's line of rivals, which include Tenshinhan himself, Piccolo Jr. (I wouldn't call Daimao a rival, personally, not at that stage) and Vegeta. I guess I feel there's a line between a rival and a villain, and while Piccolo and Vegeta are villains-turned-rivals, I never saw Tenshinhan as a proper villain for that part of the story.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by ABED » Thu Jan 31, 2019 3:30 pm

By antagonist, I mean a character in opposition to the protagonist's goal(s). A villain is evil. Tenshinhan could've gone that way, but since he saw the light by the end of the arc, he's in the category of antagonist.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

jcogginsa
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1204
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:12 pm

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by jcogginsa » Thu Jan 31, 2019 4:29 pm

ABED wrote:By antagonist, I mean a character in opposition to the protagonist's goal(s). A villain is evil. Tenshinhan could've gone that way, but since he saw the light by the end of the arc, he's in the category of antagonist.
If we're talking about Antagonists, I'd say the major ones are

1. Jackie Chun
2. Commander Red
3. Tien
4. King Piccolo
5. Piccolo Jr.
6. Vegeta
7. Frieza
8. Cell
9. Majin Buu
10. Beerus
11. Hit
12. Zamasu
13. Jiren
14. Broly

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by ABED » Thu Jan 31, 2019 4:47 pm

You could arguably include Fortuneteller Baba in that list since her tournament was an obstacle in him collecting the Dragon Balls. And Pilaf should definitely be on the list of significant antagonists. He's a villain more in the comedic vein, but still a villain.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

jcogginsa
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1204
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:12 pm

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by jcogginsa » Thu Jan 31, 2019 4:49 pm

ABED wrote:You could arguably include Fortuneteller Baba in that list since her tournament was an obstacle in him collecting the Dragon Balls. And Pilaf should definitely be on the list of significant antagonists. He's a villain more in the comedic vein, but still a villain.
In the Manga version of the first arc, Pilaf isn't the central antagonist, he's just the last antagonist.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Should King Piccolo be recognized as one of classic Dragon Ball’s main villains alongside Freeza, Cell, and Majin Bo

Post by ABED » Thu Jan 31, 2019 4:53 pm

jcogginsa wrote:
ABED wrote:You could arguably include Fortuneteller Baba in that list since her tournament was an obstacle in him collecting the Dragon Balls. And Pilaf should definitely be on the list of significant antagonists. He's a villain more in the comedic vein, but still a villain.
In the Manga version of the first arc, Pilaf isn't the central antagonist, he's just the last antagonist.
He's not significant in terms of time, but he does very nearly succeed in killing the heroes and he came within a frog's hair of getting his wish granted, so I'd say he was a significant antagonist. Later on, he's the one that released Piccolo Daimao. I'd say he more than qualifies.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

Post Reply