Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
Piccolo_Daima
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 7:42 pm

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by Piccolo_Daima » Thu Jun 06, 2019 2:44 pm

Grimlock wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 2:10 am No, actual reincarnation is the Buu/Uub case. Buu died, Enma-Daio did his trick, then there is Uub.

Piccolo Daimaoh spit an egg, from the egg came another being (or are Drum and others also Piccolo Daimaoh's reincarnation too?). That's simply called "asexual reproduction", no intervention from someone else is played here.
If Piccolo jr and Daimao weren't the same person, then Kami would have died when Goku killed Daimao

User avatar
KillerCory
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 237
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:50 pm
Location: North Carolina, USA

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by KillerCory » Thu Jun 06, 2019 3:52 pm

In my opinion I think it is both. He is both the father and the son. This is why he shares a connection with Kami.

Remember... Piccolo Daimao is the pure evil split from the original Namek that forgot his name. When Daimao gave birth to his son he may have made him in his image (a clone if you will) but it would be impossible for him to transfer his entire being into him because he (Daimao) continued to exist (very briefly) after this. Some part of him was left behind and died (in an explosive fashion :clap: ). As for Daimao's soul; I would like to think it went to limbo and stayed there forever.

So Piccolo Jr is not an exact copy and also grows up in a different world than his "father" did. His "father" was born within the original Namek after seeing much war and chaos. Piccolo Jr didn't see such horrors as the world at this time is mostly unified. Jr just grew up with a mission to kill Goku. Jr may even fully believe that he is Daimao but it doesn't mean he is. While he is still evil he is not PURE evil like Daimao and this allows him to eventually change for the better.
Goku: "Look Vegeta! People popcorn!"
Vegeta: "What is he on?"

MyVisionity
Banned
Posts: 1834
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:51 pm
Location: US

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by MyVisionity » Thu Jun 06, 2019 5:41 pm

Michsi wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 8:19 am
MyVisionity wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:03 am Yes, but it's still the character's full name as presented by the author. When the characters refer to simply "Daimao", we know who they mean. It's both a title and a name. Just like with all of the similarly named characters in the series, and fiction in general.
It's not a name then , it's no different than Vegeta's title of "Saiyan prince" people know him for. That Piccolo Jr. calls himself the Demon King (very sparingly, by the way) isn't evidence of him being the same person as his father as it's just a title. As his son he is entitled to adopt that title.
Except no one calls Vegeta "Prince Vegeta", because it's not the character's name. In his case, you are correct that it's only a title. Daimao on the other hand is both a title and the character's name. Just like with Gyuu-mao, Kame-sennin/Roshi, Uranai Baba, Kaio, etc.

It's true that Ma Junior calling himself Daimao isn't necessarily proof of him being the same person, however it's unmistakable that he and the other characters refer to him as "Piccolo Daimao" from the 23rd Budoukai into the Z-era. Even if it gradually lessens over time.

User avatar
Grimlock
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8253
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:11 pm
Location: Cybertron.

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by Grimlock » Thu Jun 06, 2019 7:07 pm

Piccolo_Daima wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 10:16 amIf Piccolo Jr and Daimao aren't the same being, then Kami would have died when Daimao was killed by Goku.
Piccolo_Daima wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 2:44 pmIf Piccolo jr and Daimao weren't the same person, then Kami would have died when Goku killed Daimao
I mean, you can keep using the same arguments over and over. We're still not getting anywhere because there are evidences for both sides. You're willingly refusing to acknowledge Piccolo's referring him as "father" and Kami correcting himself by distinguishing Piccolo Daimaoh and Piccolo.

Like I said, the connection between Kami and Piccolo Daimaoh may have been transferred to Piccolo once the former died, which would explain why Kami was still alive. When Piccolo died in Saiyan saga, it was shown Kami dying too, proving that the connection was "inherited"/passed onto Piccolo.
Last edited by Grimlock on Thu Jun 06, 2019 7:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
We help! ... Hmm. Always get Autobots out of messes they get into.

~ Day of the Machines ~

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by ABED » Thu Jun 06, 2019 7:09 pm

Grimlock wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 7:07 pm
Piccolo_Daima wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 10:16 amIf Piccolo Jr and Daimao aren't the same being, then Kami would have died when Daimao was killed by Goku.
Piccolo_Daima wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 2:44 pmIf Piccolo jr and Daimao weren't the same person, then Kami would have died when Goku killed Daimao
I mean, you can keep using the same arguments over and over like a broken record. We're still not getting anywhere because there are evidences for both sides. You're willingly refusing to acknowledge Piccolo's referring him as "father" and Kami correcting himself by distinguishing Piccolo Daimaoh and Piccolo.

Like I said, the connection between Kami and Piccolo Daimaoh may have been transferred to Piccolo once the former died, which would explain why Kami was still alive. When Piccolo died in Saiyan saga, it was shown Kami dying too, proving that the connection was "inherited"/passed onto Piccolo.
We aren't saying they are either/or, we're saying he's BOTH.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

Michsi
I Live Here
Posts: 4557
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:10 pm

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by Michsi » Fri Jun 07, 2019 4:25 pm

MyVisionity wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 5:41 pm
Except no one calls Vegeta "Prince Vegeta", because it's not the character's name. In his case, you are correct that it's only a title. Daimao on the other hand is both a title and the character's name. Just like with Gyuu-mao, Kame-sennin/Roshi, Uranai Baba, Kaio, etc.

It's true that Ma Junior calling himself Daimao isn't necessarily proof of him being the same person, however it's unmistakable that he and the other characters refer to him as "Piccolo Daimao" from the 23rd Budoukai into the Z-era. Even if it gradually lessens over time.
Who calls calls Piccolo "Daimao"? And regardless of whether or not functions as a title or name, none of that proves that Piccolo Jr. is the same individual as his father, since names can be passed down too.

Again, the King Piccolo refers to him as "son" when addressing Piccolo Jr. before he dies and Piccolo Jr. in turn uses "father". This is the one and only time they refer to one another and those are the terms they use.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by ABED » Fri Jun 07, 2019 6:42 pm

Why not only call him son if he's not both? Why use the word reincarnation?
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

MyVisionity
Banned
Posts: 1834
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:51 pm
Location: US

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by MyVisionity » Fri Jun 07, 2019 7:00 pm

Michsi wrote: Fri Jun 07, 2019 4:25 pm Again, the King Piccolo refers to him as "son" when addressing Piccolo Jr. before he dies and Piccolo Jr. in turn uses "father". This is the one and only time they refer to one another and those are the terms they use.
I agree that they are father and son. However, in this case the son was made to be a near-copy of the father. Hence the "reincarnation" label. He may be a different person, but there is enough about him that mirrors his father to have that label.

User avatar
Piccolo_Daima
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 7:42 pm

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by Piccolo_Daima » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:18 pm

Michsi wrote: Fri Jun 07, 2019 4:25 pm
MyVisionity wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 5:41 pm
Except no one calls Vegeta "Prince Vegeta", because it's not the character's name. In his case, you are correct that it's only a title. Daimao on the other hand is both a title and the character's name. Just like with Gyuu-mao, Kame-sennin/Roshi, Uranai Baba, Kaio, etc.

It's true that Ma Junior calling himself Daimao isn't necessarily proof of him being the same person, however it's unmistakable that he and the other characters refer to him as "Piccolo Daimao" from the 23rd Budoukai into the Z-era. Even if it gradually lessens over time.
Who calls calls Piccolo "Daimao"? And regardless of whether or not functions as a title or name, none of that proves that Piccolo Jr. is the same individual as his father, since names can be passed down too.

Again, the King Piccolo refers to him as "son" when addressing Piccolo Jr. before he dies and Piccolo Jr. in turn uses "father". This is the one and only time they refer to one another and those are the terms they use.
Piccolo uses the term "reincarnation" most of the times he refers to Daimao.

User avatar
Piccolo_Daima
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 7:42 pm

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by Piccolo_Daima » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:18 pm

Michsi wrote: Fri Jun 07, 2019 4:25 pm
MyVisionity wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 5:41 pm
Except no one calls Vegeta "Prince Vegeta", because it's not the character's name. In his case, you are correct that it's only a title. Daimao on the other hand is both a title and the character's name. Just like with Gyuu-mao, Kame-sennin/Roshi, Uranai Baba, Kaio, etc.

It's true that Ma Junior calling himself Daimao isn't necessarily proof of him being the same person, however it's unmistakable that he and the other characters refer to him as "Piccolo Daimao" from the 23rd Budoukai into the Z-era. Even if it gradually lessens over time.
Who calls calls Piccolo "Daimao"? And regardless of whether or not functions as a title or name, none of that proves that Piccolo Jr. is the same individual as his father, since names can be passed down too.

Again, the King Piccolo refers to him as "son" when addressing Piccolo Jr. before he dies and Piccolo Jr. in turn uses "father". This is the one and only time they refer to one another and those are the terms they use.
Piccolo uses the term "reincarnation" most of the times he refers to Daimao.

User avatar
Piccolo_Daima
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 7:42 pm

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by Piccolo_Daima » Mon Jun 10, 2019 1:43 pm

KBABZ wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2019 8:29 pm

You say it's poor excuses but I'm quoting evidence from other scenes in the story. As said numerous times in this thread, mainly by ABED, it's both. Jr. is both the father Daimao and his own individual, and there's a lot of evidence to support that idea because of the way both the manga and anime seem to flip-flop and transition on the subject. In my opinion, Jr. starts out as basically Daimao, but over time he grows into his own person who rejects the mission given by his predecessor. And for me the fact that Jr. even has a conscience and has such a unique bond with Gohan proves he's different because Daimao would never have been capable of that.

.
Come on man, If Daimao had spent 5 years readying himself to beat Goku, then got beat by him, then Goku spared him, and now he's just spent 5 years waiting around, and now he has to ally with Goku's son to stop a greater threat for basically an entire year... An 11-year span like that can change someone like that. In the 10 years leading up to Raditz's arrival, Piccolo had basically been alone to meditate on his ways, his failures, etc. Presumably, this along with his fairly isolated upbringing changed him quite a lot. And he was with Gohan for a year...

Also if then Daimao had fused with pure heart namekians like Nail and Kami, he would have become in a good namekian.

User avatar
KBABZ
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5180
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:38 pm
Location: The tallest tower in West City

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by KBABZ » Mon Jun 10, 2019 1:55 pm

Piccolo_Daima wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 1:43 pm Come on man, If Daimao had spent 5 years readying himself to beat Goku, then got beat by him, then Goku spared him, and now he's just spent 5 years waiting around, and now he has to ally with Goku's son to stop a greater threat for basically an entire year... An 11-year span like that can change someone like that. In the 10 years leading up to Raditz's arrival, Piccolo had basically been alone to meditate on his ways, his failures, etc. Presumably, this along with his fairly isolated upbringing changed him quite a lot. And he was with Gohan for a year...
You're talking about the guy who held a grudge against martial artists and rice cookers for hundreds of years.

Michsi
I Live Here
Posts: 4557
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:10 pm

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by Michsi » Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:48 am

KBABZ wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 1:55 pm
Piccolo_Daima wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2019 1:43 pm Come on man, If Daimao had spent 5 years readying himself to beat Goku, then got beat by him, then Goku spared him, and now he's just spent 5 years waiting around, and now he has to ally with Goku's son to stop a greater threat for basically an entire year... An 11-year span like that can change someone like that. In the 10 years leading up to Raditz's arrival, Piccolo had basically been alone to meditate on his ways, his failures, etc. Presumably, this along with his fairly isolated upbringing changed him quite a lot. And he was with Gohan for a year...
You're talking about the guy who held a grudge against martial artists and rice cookers for hundreds of years.

Not to mention that we find out through Gohan that Goku believed Piccolo Jr. was different from the old Demon King from the first time they met.

And from a personal perspective, I also think that Piccolo Jr. acted very differently from his father when fighting Goku. I don't think King Piccolo would've played around like that for the sake of the tournament.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by ABED » Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:23 pm

No, but he did murder a city full of people without a second thought. He began changing, but he's still very much his father/his old self.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

Michsi
I Live Here
Posts: 4557
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:10 pm

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by Michsi » Wed Jun 12, 2019 12:50 am

ABED wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:23 pm No, but he did murder a city full of people without a second thought. He began changing, but he's still very much his father/his old self.
Actually he didn't. We find out through Chaozu that everyone evacuated. That is one of the things I was referring to as him being different. I think the old Demon King would've not let everyone escape the way Jr. did when they found out who he is. The old Demon King enjoyed gratuitous cruelty and would've attempted something.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by ABED » Wed Jun 12, 2019 7:40 am

Michsi wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 12:50 am
ABED wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:23 pm No, but he did murder a city full of people without a second thought. He began changing, but he's still very much his father/his old self.
Actually he didn't. We find out through Chaozu that everyone evacuated. That is one of the things I was referring to as him being different. I think the old Demon King would've not let everyone escape the way Jr. did when they found out who he is. The old Demon King enjoyed gratuitous cruelty and would've attempted something.
To that I call bullshit. Even if that was in the original, it's as stupid as everyone evacuating the city before Nappa's blast after they arrived on Earth. NO WAY IN HELL was everyone off the island. How did everyone leave the city within a few minutes? Even assuming it was true, Piccolo doesn't care nor does he know. How the hell did Chaozu know?
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
KBABZ
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5180
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:38 pm
Location: The tallest tower in West City

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by KBABZ » Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:02 am

ABED wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 7:40 am
Michsi wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 12:50 am
ABED wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:23 pm No, but he did murder a city full of people without a second thought. He began changing, but he's still very much his father/his old self.
Actually he didn't. We find out through Chaozu that everyone evacuated. That is one of the things I was referring to as him being different. I think the old Demon King would've not let everyone escape the way Jr. did when they found out who he is. The old Demon King enjoyed gratuitous cruelty and would've attempted something.
To that I call bullshit. Even if that was in the original, it's as stupid as everyone evacuating the city before Nappa's blast after they arrived on Earth. NO WAY IN HELL was everyone off the island. How did everyone leave the city within a few minutes? Even assuming it was true, Piccolo doesn't care nor does he know. How the hell did Chaozu know?
My personal thought behind that is, when Jr. made it known that he was Daimao's reincarnation and intended to take over the world, the word quickly spread and everyone on Papaya Island evacuated. THAT BEING SAID, Jr.'s intent was to wipe out Goku with no concern over collateral damage, and so by proxy was almost certainly expecting to kill everyone on the island in the process.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by ABED » Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:21 am

I get it, word spread quickly, but the time it takes to evacuate a city of that size even if everyone had access to either a boat or a plane, it would take entirely too long. I have no idea why Toriyama would try to claim everyone was off the island. He doesn't shy away from mass casualties. But as you said, it's clear that Piccolo didn't care. Why cause a blast that big if all he was after was Goku and maybe his friends. He doesn't know Goku can fly.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

Michsi
I Live Here
Posts: 4557
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:10 pm

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by Michsi » Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:36 am

ABED wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:21 am I get it, word spread quickly, but the time it takes to evacuate a city of that size even if everyone had access to either a boat or a plane, it would take entirely too long. I have no idea why Toriyama would try to claim everyone was off the island. He doesn't shy away from mass casualties. But as you said, it's clear that Piccolo didn't care. Why cause a blast that big if all he was after was Goku and maybe his friends. He doesn't know Goku can fly.
I'm not gonna get into technicalities (yes, in RL that would be impossible) but if iIrc Toriyama stated he decided Piccolo Jr. would stick around pretty much from the time he first designed so he was probably careful not to have him do stuff that would make him irredeemable.

There are a lot of weird stuff like this in DB- if we can accept Goku using a magic pole to put someone on the moon or blowing up the moon not having grave consequences to the Earth, I think we can easily accept this.

User avatar
MasenkoHA
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6256
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:38 pm

Re: Can we consider Piccolo Daimao and Piccolo Jr the same person?

Post by MasenkoHA » Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:45 am

Michsi wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:36 am There are a lot of weird stuff like this in DB- if we can accept Goku using a magic pole to put someone on the moon or blowing up the moon not having grave consequences to the Earth, I think we can easily accept this.
I don’t get this comparison at all.

There’s a world of difference between Goku has magic compliant staff that can extend at his command and Roshi has enough mastery over his chi to annihilate the moon and all these people survived a giant explosion in less than 3 minutes.


Fantastical elements is not a “Get out of insulting your audience intelligence” free card.

Post Reply