Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
Goku da Silva
Newbie
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2021 9:16 pm

Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by Goku da Silva » Sat Jul 10, 2021 9:50 pm

In a interview Toryiama discussed the moments when he considered ending it (the interview is here somewhere :shifty: ), among the examples he gave i agree with him at the moment when Goku defeats Freeza. To me that would be the defintive end, after all if you keep prolonging it will gradually loose quality and it's essense. I recomend you to look for this interview in the site and comment here.

User avatar
JulieYBM
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 16540
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:25 pm

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by JulieYBM » Sat Jul 10, 2021 9:56 pm

Should've been canceled after the third chapter. The writing really went to shit after Toriyama stopped planning ahead.
She/Her
progesterone princess, estradiol empress
bisexual milf

User avatar
Grimlock
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8253
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:11 pm
Location: Cybertron.

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by Grimlock » Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:11 pm

Strictly speaking in terms of narrative, Freeza saga. Going full circle with Goku's character, finishing it at Freeza saga (and expanding more on Goku's backstory) should be good.

Although, obviously, it's not like what comes after that wouldn't be welcome too. Cell saga, Majin Buu saga, a great portion of Dragon Ball GT and Dragon Ball Online are all acceptable continuation, for sure.
We help! ... Hmm. Always get Autobots out of messes they get into.

~ Day of the Machines ~

User avatar
MasenkoHA
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6264
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:38 pm

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by MasenkoHA » Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:33 pm

Freeza is only a good ending for the Saiyan and Namek portion of the story.


If we’re talking about endings before Boo that would hage been as good or better than really the 23rd Tenkaichi Tournament it’s a pretty natural conclusion and the open endings are justified (Piccolo is kept alive to keep Goku in top shape and to keep Kami alive)

WittyUsername
I Live Here
Posts: 4186
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:09 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by WittyUsername » Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:48 pm

Either the 23rd Budokai or the Cell Games would’ve worked as endings, but I don’t dislike the ending that we got for the manga. It grew on me over the years.

MyVisionity
Banned
Posts: 1834
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:51 pm
Location: US

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by MyVisionity » Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:50 pm

Goku da Silva wrote: Sat Jul 10, 2021 9:50 pm In a interview Toryiama discussed the moments when he considered ending it (the interview is here somewhere :shifty: ), among the examples he gave i agree with him at the moment when Goku defeats Freeza.

I don't recall that Toriyama has ever stated such a thing in any interview, and according to the Intended Endings Guide on the main website, those are only rumors.

User avatar
Yuji
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1121
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2020 6:20 pm

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by Yuji » Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:58 pm

The Pilaf arc, the 23rd TB, Namek and the Cell Games could all function organically as endings but I think the Boo arc is the strongest ending both in terms of the actual climax of the battle with Boo and the denouement following it.

User avatar
JulieYBM
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 16540
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:25 pm

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by JulieYBM » Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:11 am

MasenkoHA wrote: Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:33 pm Freeza is only a good ending for the Saiyan and Namek portion of the story.


If we’re talking about endings before Boo that would hage been as good or better than really the 23rd Tenkaichi Tournament it’s a pretty natural conclusion and the open endings are justified (Piccolo is kept alive to keep Goku in top shape and to keep Kami alive)
Agreed. It's basically the only semi-decent ending, although even then it's still flawed. As much as I love Toriyama's art Piccolo is still a sorely under developed antagonist and the goal seems far too linear.
She/Her
progesterone princess, estradiol empress
bisexual milf

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6333
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by Cipher » Sun Jul 11, 2021 1:05 am

Of all the potential end points in the original series, the Boo arc really was the best one. I think it turned out just fine.

For Super, the ToP really could have easily been positioned as a conclusive finale, but neither version really went for it (not even the anime, where it literally is the TV series finale), so we’ll see how they feels in retrospect once the whole thing is over.

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by Zephyr » Sun Jul 11, 2021 11:05 am

Yeah, it seems the main thrust of the story he wanted to tell was mostly complete with the Freeza arc, and it took most of the Cell arc for him to realize that, I think. Had he realized that sooner, we might have gotten something more akin to the Boo arc just after Freeza, rather than the "can this just keep going?" experiment that the Cell arc effectively acted as. He wrote Boo with it being the final arc in mind. Granted, he also wasn't under Kondo anymore. Maybe a timeline where he made a Boo-like arc & finale after Freeza would require Kondo's departure after Freeza, as well. Either way, I think something like the Boo arc was always the only way something like Dragon Ball could properly end: doubling back on itself into comedy, and I don't think Toriyama would have written Boo the way he did if he didn't also believe that to some extent.

Under a certain light, one might say that Freeza is the climax, Cell is filler, and Boo is the epilogue.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by ABED » Sun Jul 11, 2021 11:39 am

JulieYBM wrote: Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:11 am
MasenkoHA wrote: Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:33 pm Freeza is only a good ending for the Saiyan and Namek portion of the story.


If we’re talking about endings before Boo that would hage been as good or better than really the 23rd Tenkaichi Tournament it’s a pretty natural conclusion and the open endings are justified (Piccolo is kept alive to keep Goku in top shape and to keep Kami alive)
Agreed. It's basically the only semi-decent ending, although even then it's still flawed. As much as I love Toriyama's art Piccolo is still a sorely under developed antagonist and the goal seems far too linear.
He's not underdeveloped. He has a personality and a presense. Given he starts off as pure evil, the desire to kill people and strike terror in them makes a lot of sense. His reincarnation wants revenge. It's simple and understandable which tends to be better than complicating matters by trying to "develop" them, which often ends up as a villain with cliched motivations

With a few minor tweeks, the Freeza arc works the best.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

kemuri07
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1012
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 3:09 am

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by kemuri07 » Sun Jul 11, 2021 11:45 am

ABED wrote: Sun Jul 11, 2021 11:39 am
JulieYBM wrote: Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:11 am
MasenkoHA wrote: Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:33 pm Freeza is only a good ending for the Saiyan and Namek portion of the story.


If we’re talking about endings before Boo that would hage been as good or better than really the 23rd Tenkaichi Tournament it’s a pretty natural conclusion and the open endings are justified (Piccolo is kept alive to keep Goku in top shape and to keep Kami alive)
Agreed. It's basically the only semi-decent ending, although even then it's still flawed. As much as I love Toriyama's art Piccolo is still a sorely under developed antagonist and the goal seems far too linear.
He's not underdeveloped. He has a personality and a presense. Given he starts off as pure evil, the desire to kill people and strike terror in them makes a lot of sense. His reincarnation wants revenge. It's simple and understandable which tends to be better than complicating matters by trying to "develop" them, which often ends up as a villain with cliched motivations

With a few minor tweeks, the Freeza arc works the best.
Piccolo's arc comes to an end when he sacrifices his life to save Gohan's. I know I know, some people angry at the mere suggestion that the Freeza arc was meant to be an ending point for this series, but I think it works perfectly. Goku finally takes the mantle as the strongest in the world, Gohan is handed the baton, and you literally could have ended the series while being ambiguous whether Goku actually survived the blast or not.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by ABED » Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:40 pm

Okay, but the arc doesn't become an arc until the Saiyan arc. As he is at the end of the 23rd TB works fine. Piccolo's character arc is only obvious in retrospect
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

kemuri07
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1012
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 3:09 am

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by kemuri07 » Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:55 pm

ABED wrote: Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:40 pm Okay, but the arc doesn't become an arc until the Saiyan arc. As he is at the end of the 23rd TB works fine. Piccolo's character arc is only obvious in retrospect
Right. You could end it there with Piccolo being the "Vegeta" and becoming Goku's rival. Dragonball has a perfect ending via the "and then the hero went off to find new adventures" route.

But then came Z and, as they say, the rest is history.

User avatar
MasenkoHA
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6264
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:38 pm

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by MasenkoHA » Sun Jul 11, 2021 1:01 pm

kemuri07 wrote: Sun Jul 11, 2021 11:45 am
Piccolo's arc comes to an end when he sacrifices his life to save Gohan's.
Piccolo’s arc also only starts at the Saiyan arc. In the 23rd Tenkaichi Tournament he’s just the villain.
I know I know, some people angry at the mere suggestion that the Freeza arc was meant to be an ending point for this series
It’s factually wrong to say it was meant to be an ending point

https://www.kanzenshuu.com/intended-end/freeza/




. Goku finally takes the mantle as the strongest in the world,
Preeeeetty sure he officially took the mantle when he won the Strongest Under The Heavens Tournament two arcs prior.

Gohan is handed the baton, and you literally could have ended the series while being ambiguous whether Goku actually survived the blast or not.
Gohan was handed nothing. He goes back to being a normal little boy (albeit an absurdly strong one) which is fine Gohan didn’t want to be a fighter. He only went to Namek out of respect for Piccolo.

And you can’t keep Goku’s survival ambiguous. The Dragon Team asked Porunga to revive him. They were going to get confirmation one way or the other.

kemuri07
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1012
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 3:09 am

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by kemuri07 » Sun Jul 11, 2021 2:34 pm

I was talking more about Z. And sure we know he survived, but the series absolutely can end with us never knowing exactly what happened to Goku: He's the legendary Super Saiyan, and whether or not he comes back is ambiguous.

While I wasn't necessarily saying that Toriyama intended for the series to end, that link that posted doesn't exactly disprove that idea either. More than likely we'll never know the real answer, but I think the structure of the Freeza Saga suggests that, at the very least, was intended to be one, long stand-alone story as opposed to how he went about the story in the original DB, and what he'd do post-Freeza.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20280
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by ABED » Sun Jul 11, 2021 4:30 pm

kemuri07 wrote: Sun Jul 11, 2021 2:34 pm I was talking more about Z. And sure we know he survived, but the series absolutely can end with us never knowing exactly what happened to Goku: He's the legendary Super Saiyan, and whether or not he comes back is ambiguous.

While I wasn't necessarily saying that Toriyama intended for the series to end, that link that posted doesn't exactly disprove that idea either. More than likely we'll never know the real answer, but I think the structure of the Freeza Saga suggests that, at the very least, was intended to be one, long stand-alone story as opposed to how he went about the story in the original DB, and what he'd do post-Freeza.
But the series wasn't building towards him being the legendary Super Saiyan. We didn't even know that was a thing. If a series finale sums things up, how does that sum up the journey we had been on to that point?
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

pepd
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:52 pm

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by pepd » Sun Jul 11, 2021 6:12 pm

Pilaf, 23 Tenkaichi Budokai or Namek could work as finals with minor modifications, but I feel it would be a real loss to not have the Buu arc, where the essence of DB is freed stronger than ever, and its final.

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by precita » Sun Jul 11, 2021 9:02 pm

The original end of DBZ with the end of the Boo arc was the perfect time. GT had some good concepts that were executed poorly, and while I like most of Super, it did feel like Dragon Ball was done with Boo.

Toriyama originally ended it at the right time.

User avatar
MasenkoHA
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6264
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:38 pm

Re: Where Dragon Ball should have ended?

Post by MasenkoHA » Sun Jul 11, 2021 10:08 pm

kemuri07 wrote: Sun Jul 11, 2021 2:34 pm I was talking more about Z. And sure we know he survived, but the series absolutely can end with us never knowing exactly what happened to Goku: He's the legendary Super Saiyan, and whether or not he comes back is ambiguous.

While I wasn't necessarily saying that Toriyama intended for the series to end, that link that posted doesn't exactly disprove that idea either. More than likely we'll never know the real answer, but I think the structure of the Freeza Saga suggests that, at the very least, was intended to be one, long stand-alone story as opposed to how he went about the story in the original DB, and what he'd do post-Freeza.

But you do understand everything from Bulma and Goku meeting to Goku leaving with Oob is all Dragon Ball right? There is no distinction between the original Dragon Ball and “Z” when it comes to the manga.


And in the link there is a source where Toriyama said he wasn’t ready for Dragon Ball to end…in a magazine published while the Freeza arc was wrapping up. So yes it does disprove the idea that Toriyama intended for the story to end at Freeza.

There is nothing about the way the Freeza saga is structured that suggest it was meant to be the end. It only feels like a series finale if you skip 194 chapters of the manga.


Hell, it’s only the end of the Son Goku arc and 23rd Tenkaichi Budokai arc where Toriyama needs to assure the reader the story isn’t over “just yet” not because he intended to end there but because they actually feel like proper endings. The Namek arc does not.

Post Reply