Should non canon characters become canon?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
SupremeKai25
I Live Here
Posts: 4047
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by SupremeKai25 » Fri Nov 19, 2021 7:58 pm

Old Broly was popular only because of his big power level and the fact that he was presented as the strongest Saiyan ever. There is absolutely nothing else to his character aside from this, he was all style and no substance.

If he wasn't introduced as an unstoppable machine that stomped everyone, pretty much no one would care about him. Since there was nothing else going on for him.

It's hilarious that his female counterpart Kale turns into a hulking brute who screams Son Goku non-stop, it pretty much sums up who Old Broly is :lol:

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20276
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by ABED » Fri Nov 19, 2021 8:13 pm

It wasn't just his battle power. Creating a character with a high power level is easy. He left and impression because he has a great memorable design. Just about every movie villain is an unstoppable killing machine until the last few minutes.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

WittyUsername
I Live Here
Posts: 4170
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:09 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by WittyUsername » Fri Nov 19, 2021 9:55 pm

I think the fact that the old Broly is an evil Super Saiyan with a fairly fleshed out backstory (for a DBZ movie) was a contributing factor to his popularity, although his status as a super strong guy with big muscles probably didn’t hurt.

MyVisionity
Banned
Posts: 1834
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:51 pm
Location: US

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by MyVisionity » Fri Nov 19, 2021 10:57 pm

ABED wrote: Fri Nov 19, 2021 8:13 pm Just about every movie villain is an unstoppable killing machine until the last few minutes.
Brolli is the only one who was truly an unstoppable killing machine. The characters had never been overpowered or pushed to the limits the way they were with Brolli. It's his insane battle power, combined with him being an evil Legendary Super Saiyan that ensured his popularity. His design is merely a reflection of those things.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20276
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by ABED » Fri Nov 19, 2021 11:01 pm

MyVisionity wrote: Fri Nov 19, 2021 10:57 pm
ABED wrote: Fri Nov 19, 2021 8:13 pm Just about every movie villain is an unstoppable killing machine until the last few minutes.
Brolli is the only one who was truly an unstoppable killing machine. The characters had never been overpowered or pushed to the limits the way they were with Brolli. It's his insane battle power, combined with him being an evil Legendary Super Saiyan that ensured his popularity. His design is merely a reflection of those things.
Except when they stop him. They're pretty much always overpowered
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
SupremeKai25
I Live Here
Posts: 4047
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by SupremeKai25 » Sat Nov 20, 2021 6:06 am

ABED wrote: Fri Nov 19, 2021 8:13 pm It wasn't just his battle power. Creating a character with a high power level is easy. He left and impression because he has a great memorable design. Just about every movie villain is an unstoppable killing machine until the last few minutes.
I mean, I was about to say that, and this doesn't help your point at all. Pretty much every movie villain who became popular did so only thanks to the design and battle power (=impression, if Broly didn't have a huge battle power that allowed him to stomp everyone, he wouldn't have made such a big impression), so Old Broly is unique or special because...?

Whereas the villains made by Toriyama always have something more going for them, whether it be personality, backstory, or motivations, that truly makes them unique and stand out.

"Design" and "Huge power level/Impression" don't make Broly unique because Janemba and Cooler also have these traits. Janemba literally doesn't have a personality, he's popular only because he looks cool and forced the Saiyans to fuse.
WittyUsername wrote: Fri Nov 19, 2021 9:55 pm I think the fact that the old Broly is an evil Super Saiyan with a fairly fleshed out backstory (for a DBZ movie) was a contributing factor to his popularity, although his status as a super strong guy with big muscles probably didn’t hurt.
Lol at Broly's backstory being fleshed-out, imagine having PTSD about Goku just because he was crying a lot. As a baby. Toei should have just left that shitty part out, it would have saved Broly some dignity :lol:

DBZA nailed it on how Broly, at his core, despite all his power level and "omg Legendary Super Saiyan!!!" presence, is a literal manchild.

User avatar
Magnificent Ponta
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2020 2:25 pm
Location: Not on Tumblr, I guess

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by Magnificent Ponta » Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:44 am

I always thought a slightly tweaked Hearts could be pretty neat.

Like a lot of non-main continuity characters, he's fundamentally a bit grandiose compared with Toriyama-written characters, but if you strip out the Godslayer 'I want to destroy Zeno so Mortals can be free' element of him, you're left with someone who fundamentally believes that people should be free to do whatever they want (and therefore could extend that principle logically into 'when there's a clash between desires, people should naturally fight it out, and whoever wants it more will win out'), with a neat ability in 'reading people's hearts' so he knows what they want and what they intend to do (so, both in keeping with his beliefs and having an obvious application to combat), and a pretty unique visual style - I could see him being a nice combat foil for an Uub being trained in Ultra Instinct, in the event of a kind of 'Next Gen Dragon Ball' kind of story.

But therein lies the crux of the topic - I guess the real question that needs asking is, 'what sort of scenarios/stories should the main continuity want to include as good Dragon Ball stories, which a currently existing character (however reimagined) might serve well?' Even the above example is very abstract; unless there's a good story to tell where he'd be a neat addition, he may as well stay where he is. Of course a reimagined character could be neat, but coming at the question from a perspective of 'what kind of characters would be neat to have in the main continuity?' is kind of putting the cart before the horse.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20276
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by ABED » Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:47 am

Because he has a great design. Battle powers are easy. Just write that someone's strong. Designing a character that audiences take to and remember is the hard part. Broly doesn't have to have much going on. He's not being asked to carry more than a movie at a time.

Janemba is pretty bland and Coola is a mod of Freeza. Regardless if I agreed about Janemba and Coola, it's possible that, GASP, at least one other character has a unique design.

DBZA nailed it on how Broly, at his core, despite all his power level and "omg Legendary Super Saiyan!!!" presence, is a literal manchild.
There you go. That's different.
Last edited by ABED on Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:52 am, edited 2 times in total.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
SupremeKai25
I Live Here
Posts: 4047
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by SupremeKai25 » Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:49 am

Magnificent Ponta wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:44 am the Godslayer 'I want to destroy Zeno so Mortals can be free' element of him
That's the only thing about him that makes him a worthwhile addition to Canon.

If Toriyama doesn't want such a kind of villain he shouldn't introduce a being like Zeno who literally erase trillions if he's bored one day. It only makes sense that some mortals wouldn't take kindly to be ruled by such a Deity.

Having a villain like Hearts is just a natural consequence of introducing a God like Zeno.

User avatar
Magnificent Ponta
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2020 2:25 pm
Location: Not on Tumblr, I guess

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by Magnificent Ponta » Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:53 am

SupremeKai25 wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:49 am If Toriyama doesn't want such a kind of villain he shouldn't introduce a being like Zeno who literally erase trillions if he's bored one day. It only makes sense that some mortals wouldn't take kindly to be ruled by such a Deity.

Having a villain like Hearts is just a natural consequence of introducing a God like Zeno.
Sure it makes sense; I just find it to be the least interesting aspect of the character which, furthermore, would have the side-effect of predetermining the terms of whatever story he might be involved in if he were included.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20276
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by ABED » Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:57 am

Magnificent Ponta wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:53 am
SupremeKai25 wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:49 am If Toriyama doesn't want such a kind of villain he shouldn't introduce a being like Zeno who literally erase trillions if he's bored one day. It only makes sense that some mortals wouldn't take kindly to be ruled by such a Deity.

Having a villain like Hearts is just a natural consequence of introducing a God like Zeno.
Sure it makes sense; I just find it to be the least interesting aspect of the character which, furthermore, would have the side-effect of predetermining the terms of whatever story he might be involved in if he were included.
If I understand what you mean, I don't see how that's a negative. He has a definable character with a specific motivation.

At most, maybe they should use some non-canon character as inspiration, but not just flat out bring them into the story proper.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Magnificent Ponta
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2020 2:25 pm
Location: Not on Tumblr, I guess

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by Magnificent Ponta » Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:59 am

ABED wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:57 am
Magnificent Ponta wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:53 am
SupremeKai25 wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:49 am If Toriyama doesn't want such a kind of villain he shouldn't introduce a being like Zeno who literally erase trillions if he's bored one day. It only makes sense that some mortals wouldn't take kindly to be ruled by such a Deity.

Having a villain like Hearts is just a natural consequence of introducing a God like Zeno.
Sure it makes sense; I just find it to be the least interesting aspect of the character which, furthermore, would have the side-effect of predetermining the terms of whatever story he might be involved in if he were included.
If I understand what you mean, I don't see how that's a negative. He has a definable character with a specific motivation.
The negative is simply in my opinion that the specific motivation in question isn't very interesting, and if it's retained then Hearts, despite having other attractive characteristics (and what in my opinion is a more interesting and usable basic motivation) that could be used in a different sort of scenario, actually couldn't really be in a story that's fundamentally about anything else. Nothing more than that, really.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20276
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by ABED » Sat Nov 20, 2021 10:41 am

Magnificent Ponta wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:59 am
ABED wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:57 am
Magnificent Ponta wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:53 am

Sure it makes sense; I just find it to be the least interesting aspect of the character which, furthermore, would have the side-effect of predetermining the terms of whatever story he might be involved in if he were included.
If I understand what you mean, I don't see how that's a negative. He has a definable character with a specific motivation.
The negative is simply in my opinion that the specific motivation in question isn't very interesting, and if it's retained then Hearts, despite having other attractive characteristics (and what in my opinion is a more interesting and usable basic motivation) that could be used in a different sort of scenario, actually couldn't really be in a story that's fundamentally about anything else. Nothing more than that, really.
You lost me. Who's Hearts? And you're speaking in such general terms, I have a hard time following.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Magnificent Ponta
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2020 2:25 pm
Location: Not on Tumblr, I guess

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by Magnificent Ponta » Sat Nov 20, 2021 10:47 am

ABED wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 10:41 amYou lost me. Who's Hearts? And you're speaking in such general terms, I have a hard time following.
Hearts is a villainous character from Super Dragon Ball Heroes (and therefore, by the terms of the OP, an example of a 'non-canon' character who could become 'canon'). He is also the only person I've been discussing, so far, in this topic, so I'm a little confused by your reply. Perhaps reviewing my original post on him might help you see what I'm getting at, here?:
Magnificent Ponta wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:44 am I always thought a slightly tweaked Hearts could be pretty neat.

Like a lot of non-main continuity characters, he's fundamentally a bit grandiose compared with Toriyama-written characters, but if you strip out the Godslayer 'I want to destroy Zeno so Mortals can be free' element of him, you're left with someone who fundamentally believes that people should be free to do whatever they want (and therefore could extend that principle logically into 'when there's a clash between desires, people should naturally fight it out, and whoever wants it more will win out'), with a neat ability in 'reading people's hearts' so he knows what they want and what they intend to do (so, both in keeping with his beliefs and having an obvious application to combat), and a pretty unique visual style - I could see him being a nice combat foil for an Uub being trained in Ultra Instinct, in the event of a kind of 'Next Gen Dragon Ball' kind of story.

But therein lies the crux of the topic - I guess the real question that needs asking is, 'what sort of scenarios/stories should the main continuity want to include as good Dragon Ball stories, which a currently existing character (however reimagined) might serve well?' Even the above example is very abstract; unless there's a good story to tell where he'd be a neat addition, he may as well stay where he is. Of course a reimagined character could be neat, but coming at the question from a perspective of 'what kind of characters would be neat to have in the main continuity?' is kind of putting the cart before the horse.
In brief, I'm saying that this character has a bunch of interesting aspects in terms of visual appeal, basic gimmick, and usability of the basic motivation that 'people should be free to do what they want' generally, all of which could be used quite profitably in the right story if he were to be written in to main continuity; however, the specific 'God-destroying = freedom' motivation he evinces in Super Dragon Ball Heroes really doesn't interest me at all, I don't think its grandiosity is very in keeping with the way Toriyama generally tends to treat characters (as he tends to write characters in a way that accentuates and sometimes lampoons their pettiness, which I find to be part of the charm of his writing and which Heart's basic motivation can still speak to pretty well, but his specific motivation cannot), and it would basically dictate the terms of a main-continuity story using this character, which I personally think would be a waste of potential. Hence, I think that it would be better to strip that aspect out (SupremeKai25's disagreement notwithstanding).

Does this make things a bit clearer?

WittyUsername
I Live Here
Posts: 4170
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:09 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by WittyUsername » Sat Nov 20, 2021 12:49 pm

SupremeKai25 wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 6:06 am Lol at Broly's backstory being fleshed-out, imagine having PTSD about Goku just because he was crying a lot. As a baby. Toei should have just left that shitty part out, it would have saved Broly some dignity :lol:

DBZA nailed it on how Broly, at his core, despite all his power level and "omg Legendary Super Saiyan!!!" presence, is a literal manchild.
DBZA is not the end all be all. Broly does have a fleshed out backstory compared to most of the other movie villains, and the film never claims that he hates Goku for crying a lot.

User avatar
SupremeKai25
I Live Here
Posts: 4047
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:40 am

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by SupremeKai25 » Sat Nov 20, 2021 12:56 pm

WittyUsername wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 12:49 pm
SupremeKai25 wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 6:06 am Lol at Broly's backstory being fleshed-out, imagine having PTSD about Goku just because he was crying a lot. As a baby. Toei should have just left that shitty part out, it would have saved Broly some dignity :lol:

DBZA nailed it on how Broly, at his core, despite all his power level and "omg Legendary Super Saiyan!!!" presence, is a literal manchild.
DBZA is not the end all be all. Broly does have a fleshed out backstory compared to most of the other movie villains, and the film never claims that he hates Goku for crying a lot.
Compared to the other movie villains, even Jiren has a fleshed-out backstory, it means nothing.

Tell me why Broly hates Goku then, I imagine you'll have much to tell me on the subject, since his backstory was fleshed-out.

User avatar
JulieYBM
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 16503
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:25 pm

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by JulieYBM » Sat Nov 20, 2021 12:58 pm

I mean...do we really need to harp on mental illness as if it's a joke? Can we not find some other avenue other than laughing at trauma?
She/Her💕 💜 💙
progesterone princess, estradiol empress
Lucifer's bimbo daughter

WittyUsername
I Live Here
Posts: 4170
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:09 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by WittyUsername » Sat Nov 20, 2021 1:08 pm

SupremeKai25 wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 12:56 pm
WittyUsername wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 12:49 pm
SupremeKai25 wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 6:06 am Lol at Broly's backstory being fleshed-out, imagine having PTSD about Goku just because he was crying a lot. As a baby. Toei should have just left that shitty part out, it would have saved Broly some dignity :lol:

DBZA nailed it on how Broly, at his core, despite all his power level and "omg Legendary Super Saiyan!!!" presence, is a literal manchild.
DBZA is not the end all be all. Broly does have a fleshed out backstory compared to most of the other movie villains, and the film never claims that he hates Goku for crying a lot.
Compared to the other movie villains, even Jiren has a fleshed-out backstory, it means nothing.

Tell me why Broly hates Goku then, I imagine you'll have much to tell me on the subject, since his backstory was fleshed-out.
The movie makes a point about how Goku and Broly’s fates are intertwined, due to them having been born on the same day. Paragus suggests that Broly’s hatred towards Goku is because Goku awakened his “fighting instincts” as a Saiyan. You can also make the potential argument that Broly associates Goku with his traumatic experience of having been stabbed and left for dead as an infant.

User avatar
ZeroIsOurHero
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2021 8:55 pm

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by ZeroIsOurHero » Sat Nov 20, 2021 1:14 pm

JulieYBM wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 12:58 pm I mean...do we really need to harp on mental illness as if it's a joke? Can we not find some other avenue other than laughing at trauma?
I mean, when that "mental illness" involves someone being turned into an unstoppable killing machine because a baby next to him cried a little too much when he was born, then it's actually pretty funny. We make fun of Broly's backstory because it's ridiculous and implausible, not because it involves "trauma."

User avatar
PurestEvil
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1948
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2020 2:34 pm
Location: Constantinopolee!

Re: Should non canon characters become canon?

Post by PurestEvil » Sat Nov 20, 2021 1:19 pm

WittyUsername wrote: Sat Nov 20, 2021 1:08 pm The movie makes a point about how Goku and Broly’s fates are intertwined, due to them having been born on the same day. Paragus suggests that Broly’s hatred towards Goku is because Goku awakened his “fighting instincts” as a Saiyan. You can also make the potential argument that Broly associates Goku with his traumatic experience of having been stabbed and left for dead as an infant.
Too bad the movie failed to convey that characterization effectively
This post was brought to you by 魔族

Rest in Peace, Toriyama-san

Post Reply