According to the way Joon Park looks as Yamcha, he's probably around 110.omegacwa wrote:Fact, Asian men look like they are in there twenties until they are 85.
Seriously, though, Joon Park isn't 40. He's 35.
New Live-Action Dragon Ball Photo(s) Discussion
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
Born in 1972...he would be...36.Kendamu wrote:According to the way Joon Park looks as Yamcha, he's probably around 110.omegacwa wrote:Fact, Asian men look like they are in there twenties until they are 85.
Seriously, though, Joon Park isn't 40. He's 35.
She/Her
progesterone princess, estradiol empress
bisexual milf
progesterone princess, estradiol empress
bisexual milf
His age will forever be a mystery.JulieYBM wrote:Born in 1972...he would be...36.Kendamu wrote:According to the way Joon Park looks as Yamcha, he's probably around 110.omegacwa wrote:Fact, Asian men look like they are in there twenties until they are 85.
Seriously, though, Joon Park isn't 40. He's 35.
If challenge had a taste, you'd be quite delicious.
-
Kendamu
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:31 am
- Location: The Martial Arts World
- Contact:
I never was any good at math. One of my only classes before graduating that I still have to take (again!) is Algebra... so I can be an assistant English teacher in a Japanese classroom.JulieYBM wrote:Born in 1972...he would be...36.Kendamu wrote:According to the way Joon Park looks as Yamcha, he's probably around 110.omegacwa wrote:Fact, Asian men look like they are in there twenties until they are 85.
Seriously, though, Joon Park isn't 40. He's 35.
-
Sun_Wukong
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2052
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 3:57 pm
- Location: Ellicott City, MD
David Goyer is an awful screenwriter. I mean god he writes bad dialogue. I cant believe anyone expected the Invisible to be good.JAPPO wrote:You liked the invisible?Zuhalter2000 wrote:I liked Chatwin in the Invisible (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0435670/). Good movie, you all should see it.
On topic now, I'm not sure I really like that picture. I am a supporter of the movie and will be there at midnight... but... I don't know...
I find it interesting the person who directed that movie co-wrote 2 little movies called "Batman Begins" and "The Dark Knight."
Too bad The Invisible was... bad.
Korea Dragon Ball Poster
Release Date : March 14th 2009 in Korea
Last edited by DongHyun on Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Olivier Hague
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:09 pm
Re: Korea Dragon Ball Poster
'Would make a great ad for Veregen.DongHyun wrote:
These posters remind me of the posters for "WANTED". Speaking of which, that is a movie that deviated so much from it's original source material and yet still turned out pretty good. Seriously, You think Dragonball is "unrecognizable"?
EDIT: Also, David S. Goyer is a hit or Miss screenwriter. Half his stuff is Good, and half is bad. The invisible was Ok, It just felt, um, forced.
EDIT: Also, David S. Goyer is a hit or Miss screenwriter. Half his stuff is Good, and half is bad. The invisible was Ok, It just felt, um, forced.
-
Kendamu
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:31 am
- Location: The Martial Arts World
- Contact:
I see what you did there.omegacwa wrote:These posters remind me of the posters for "WANTED". Speaking of which, that is a movie that deviated so much from it's original source material and yet still turned out pretty good. Seriously, You think Dragonball is "unrecognizable"?
Most people didn't even know (and still don't know) that "Wanted" was a comic in the first place. So, there's nothing to compare it to because, to them, it's an original concept. I've seen this happen before. There's a guy I know who saw both the Super Mario Bros. movie and the Double Dragon movie without knowing a damn thing about either franchise and he thought both films were pretty decent.
I know Dragonball. I know what it was and I know what it is currently. Dragonball Evolution may not end up being a bad film for what it is. However, I have something to compare it to as a standard for what Dragonball is. This movie doesn't seem to compare to those standards for the most part. So, even if it does do well and it does turn out to be an entertaining movie in general, it still won't be what I'm looking for.
-
Kendamu
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:31 am
- Location: The Martial Arts World
- Contact:
He's more open to interpretation than most, then, when it comes to comics that have an established story and universe that it follows from beginning to end without semi-regular re-interpretations from the comic studios themselves (like Batman or the X-Men).omegacwa wrote:Well, I have a friend who is a big comic geek, and he loved the wanted comics, and really liked the movie, even though they are completely different.
Wanted isn't exactly well known. In fact, the comic was only a mini-series of six issues. Dragon Ball, however, is a comic and animated series known WORLD WIDE that's been published and aired for over a decade.omegacwa wrote:These posters remind me of the posters for "WANTED". Speaking of which, that is a movie that deviated so much from it's original source material and yet still turned out pretty good. Seriously, You think Dragonball is "unrecognizable"?
Dragon Ball is more widely known than Wanted is, so it's no surprise most people who see the movie (Wanted) wouldn't know that it's based off a comic book. Couple in the fact that the movie also has Angelina Jolie and Morgan Freeman and you have more reason for people to praise the movie. Especially with Angelina Jolie.
Dragon Ball is easily identifiable between fans and non-fans. This movie barely has any big name actors aside from Chow Yun-Fat with the movie crowd and James Marsters with the TV crowd. Doesn't help that the movie deviates heavily from the source material.
[url=http://www.youtube.com/user/TsukentoX]YouTube Profile[/url]
Are you saying one man's work deserves more respect than another simply because of the popularity of the source material, cause that's very biased and unfair.Tsukento wrote:Wanted isn't exactly well known. In fact, the comic was only a mini-series of six issues. Dragon Ball, however, is a comic and animated series known WORLD WIDE that's been published and aired for over a decade.omegacwa wrote:These posters remind me of the posters for "WANTED". Speaking of which, that is a movie that deviated so much from it's original source material and yet still turned out pretty good. Seriously, You think Dragonball is "unrecognizable"?
Dragon Ball is more widely known than Wanted is, so it's no surprise most people who see the movie (Wanted) wouldn't know that it's based off a comic book. Couple in the fact that the movie also has Angelina Jolie and Morgan Freeman and you have more reason for people to praise the movie. Especially with Angelina Jolie.
Also, I must bring up again that Hugh Jackman wasn't exactly well known before X-men.
Deserves it? No. My main point is that people tend to go nuts when they hear a big name actor is in a movie. Wanted got its praise from people who didn't know about the comic and people who wanted to see another Angelina Jolie flick (I personally don't see any appeal behind her, acting-wise or looks).omegacwa wrote:Are you saying one man's work deserves more respect than another simply because of the popularity of the source material, cause that's very biased and unfair.
Also, I must bring up again that Hugh Jackman wasn't exactly well known before X-men.
Hugh Jackman, while unknown prior to X-Men, still played an ACCURATE Wolverine. Yeah, he didn't have the stupid spandex, but he was still Wolverine in physical looks and character.
Whereas in Dragon Ball, no one resembles any of the actual characters in either looks or personality.
[url=http://www.youtube.com/user/TsukentoX]YouTube Profile[/url]
That is your opinion. I don't agree.Tsukento wrote: Whereas in Dragon Ball, no one resembles any of the actual characters in either looks or personality.
Second, Hugh Jackman doesn't really resemble the Wolverine I grew up with, he is way too tall, not nearly Muscular enough, not even close to being enough of a jerk. But you know what, he still did a good job with the movie reinterpretation.
