Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
Psajdak
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 496
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:37 am

Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by Psajdak » Sat Aug 22, 2020 6:00 pm

Image

I honestly don't want to bash Vegeta, he is together with Gohan probably the best developed character in the entire franchise.

But the thing about him is that as much as he is for years hyped as character as central as Goku (nowadays), in the end end he just ends up being a dissapointment.

Already in Moro arc, where it seemed that this will FINALLY be his arc, he is now irrelevant, maybe he will get some cheap shot, but that's about it.

Just watching him is suffering.

...

Which brings me to the main thing - as I continue seeing Vegeta being garbage over and over (except when it comes to fusing with Goku), I find myself appreciating Raditz more and more - true, by current standards he is weak, but when he was alive, he was tough, dangerous, it took two strongest Earth fighters to kill him, and Goku actually had to die for that to happen, and that was the end of it.

I feel like Kuririn killing Vegeta, or Freeza on Namek, hell, he didn't even had to die, the end of Cell saga, when Vegeta says that he will never fight again after all the loses and failures would have been logical closure to his arc, and if one needs to go even further, him dying agains Majin Buu, but to be honest, as much as that part is so iconic, it still felt out of character, IMO.

I have no idea why authors even bother having him around Goku nowadays...

User avatar
Peach
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 882
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 8:57 am

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by Peach » Sat Aug 22, 2020 11:15 pm

From a story perspective, I think Vegeta and Goku taking the back seat and Gohan getting serious about training would have been the best move.

With the Cell saga, Goku handed the keys to the car over to Gohan. Then before Goku visited, they got pretty serious about the world building for Gohan, Videl, Goten, and Trunks. I think they could have continued that. Possibly with Uub and Pan.

FishermanJohnWest
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2020 4:33 am

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by FishermanJohnWest » Sat Aug 22, 2020 11:56 pm

Honestly, have him kill himself and take Moro with him, and keep him dead.

This is a Goku show, and he clearly ain't no rival to Goku

User avatar
Lionel
I Live Here
Posts: 2393
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2015 2:54 am

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by Lionel » Sun Aug 23, 2020 2:50 pm

Vegeta does represent paradigm of how even members of a ruthless and blood thirsty species such as the Saiyans are capable of redemption; of embracing some measure of humanity and becoming something more than just a fiend. Piccolo definitely represents a similar ideal though the background of his corruption was rooted in the corruption of mankind tainting the original Child of Katas. Vegeta's brutality was rooted in familial cultivation and instinct. I think those conditions serve as crucial differences between the Saiyan Prince and Piccolo.

After having said that, I do feel like Vegeta's own progression has been left wanting. Toriyama's last two original arcs compelled Vegeta to evaluate the darkness in his heart and come to the realisation of who he is and what ultimately matters most in his life. Toyotaro has flitted about with untapped plot concepts such as Vegeta's relationship with civilisational Saiyans in Cabba as well as the aftermath of one of the atrocities he perpetrated when he encounters the Namekians after so many years and having parted ways on, at best, tense and awkward terms.

Toyotaro has made some inroads in offering well meaning sub-plot of Vegeta's own, I have to grant him that. Still, this duopolistic relationship he's had with Goku has been continuously dragged on since the end of the Buu arc with little seeming to upset it. Many of us wish that the old dynamics of the ensemble couldn't be incorporated into the modern series. A one foot in/one foot out model that arcs suc has Moro have used does not really hold up to the old standard when others were engaged in the narrational and adventurous aspects -- not just serving as the front line barricade to the minions of the main antagonist.

I will agree with Peach. My thoughts are that Toriyama should have persisted in his original motive of having Gohan take the reigns while developing the "new generation". In spite of the new elements introduced, current Dragon Ball still holds a blandish resemblance to the old "Goku pushing for #1" model that's been in existence since the earliest arcs. Is that bad thing? Not necessarily as surpassing his limits and challenging new and stronger opponents is what defines Goku's characterisation. I personally feel that something different could have been explored with a protagonist as different in attitude as Gohan.

User avatar
LoganForkHands73
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1358
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:54 pm

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by LoganForkHands73 » Sun Aug 23, 2020 3:47 pm

Gohan pushing on to become the main protagonist would have been nice and all, but I think the Buu arc is fundamentally Vegeta's arc (and... well, Buu's :problem: ) and if Gohan had taken over, we would have probably never gotten Vegeta's brilliantly handled mid-life-crisis conflict (which was probably the most active role Vegeta had played in the plot since the early Android arc) with no Goku to drive said conflict. Goku's return ended up exemplifying why Gohan wasn't cut out for the role, because Goku is a far more active protagonist - some might say Toriyama chickened out of writing outside of his comfort zone, but I think it shows his great instincts and his knowledge of his own limits (ironically, considering the themes of Dragon Ball). If Toriyama pushed forward, he knew that he would have still been unhappy with the direction, and chances were that Goku and Vegeta were going to return to the spotlight no matter what, so it was a blessing in disguise to establish them as the main focal points early on.

After that? Maybe Vegeta could have started taking a backseat, but when you see Goku and Vegeta's dynamic as fighting partners towards the very end of the Buu arc, you can definitely see the early trappings of Super. Amazingly, we'd never really seen Goku and Vegeta properly team up in the manga prior to this, and Toriyama happened to strike gold which was ripe for more mining. Considering the ready success of Vegeta acting as a deuteragonist to Goku, it made sense for Super to focus on their relationship. It's become the default, to a point where I can agree it's not that new or exciting anymore and in desperate need of spicing up. However, even now, it's sometimes cool to think that a former villain of Vegeta's calibre is still fighting against bigger threats alongside Goku.

DevilKing99
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 6:05 am

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by DevilKing99 » Sun Aug 23, 2020 4:08 pm

LoganForkHands73 wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 3:47 pm Gohan pushing on to become the main protagonist would have been nice and all, but I think the Buu arc is fundamentally Vegeta's arc (and... well, Buu's :problem: ) and if Gohan had taken over, we would have probably never gotten Vegeta's brilliantly handled mid-life-crisis conflict (which was probably the most active role Vegeta had played in the plot since the early Android arc) with no Goku to drive said conflict. Goku's return ended up exemplifying why Gohan wasn't cut out for the role, because Goku is a far more active protagonist - some might say Toriyama chickened out of writing outside of his comfort zone, but I think it shows his great instincts and his knowledge of his own limits (ironically, considering the themes of Dragon Ball). If Toriyama pushed forward, he knew that he would have still been unhappy with the direction, and chances were that Goku and Vegeta were going to return to the spotlight no matter what, so it was a blessing in disguise to establish them as the main focal points early on.

After that? Maybe Vegeta could have started taking a backseat, but when you see Goku and Vegeta's dynamic as fighting partners towards the very end of the Buu arc, you can definitely see the early trappings of Super. Amazingly, we'd never really seen Goku and Vegeta properly team up in the manga prior to this, and Toriyama happened to strike gold which was ripe for more mining. Considering the ready success of Vegeta acting as a deuteragonist to Goku, it made sense for Super to focus on their relationship. It's become the default, to a point where I can agree it's not that new or exciting anymore and in desperate need of spicing up. However, even now, it's sometimes cool to think that a former villain of Vegeta's calibre is still fighting against bigger threats alongside Goku.
Yeah, the focus on Vegeta and Goku has gotten very boring to me.

I really think they should expand the world and get away from those two, in the end they would make money by doing that anyways.

UI Peter
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:19 pm

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by UI Peter » Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:54 am

This could easily be applied to literally every other reoccurring character except Goku. They all have a worse track record than Vegeta (even Gohan).

In fact, if you killed off for good all of the human fighters & even Piccolo at the end of the Saiyan arc, nothing major would change in the future of the series (which shows how irrelevant and pointless most of the DB cast really is when you think about it).

DragonBallFoodie
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1371
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 5:12 pm
Location: Zambia, Southern Africa

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by DragonBallFoodie » Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:39 am

But who could take his place as a rival to Goku to keep him fighting-ready?
"Don't take pleasure in destruction!" / "I will not let you destroy my world!"
A true hero goes beyond not the limits of power, but the limits that divide countries and people.

Matches Malone
Banned
Posts: 3308
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:12 am

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by Matches Malone » Mon Aug 24, 2020 5:20 am

Vegeta didn't fail against Moro, he managed to free the energy he stole and even bring back some of the Namakians he killed. Up to that point, Vegeta was also the only one who was able to match him in combat. Vegeta not getting the kill (as of now) shouldn't take anything away from what he's already accomplished.

DevilKing99
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 6:05 am

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by DevilKing99 » Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:29 am

UI Peter wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:54 am This could easily be applied to literally every other reoccurring character except Goku. They all have a worse track record than Vegeta (even Gohan).

In fact, if you killed off for good all of the human fighters & even Piccolo at the end of the Saiyan arc, nothing major would change in the future of the series (which shows how irrelevant and pointless most of the DB cast really is when you think about it).
I say this all of the time, even as a major fan of Tien, they might as well replace them with characters from the different universes.

Piccolo is like the only character from OG Dragon Ball that can even get a power up among them.

It's funny too how the androids are dramatically more important than they are, an Android just won the tournament, and Android 17 even showed up to fight in heroes before flipping Gohan did, A game about an Android came out 2 years ago.

UI Peter
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:19 pm

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by UI Peter » Tue Aug 25, 2020 12:15 am

Matches Malone wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 5:20 am Vegeta didn't fail against Moro, he managed to free the energy he stole and even bring back some of the Namakians he killed. Up to that point, Vegeta was also the only one who was able to match him in combat. Vegeta not getting the kill (as of now) shouldn't take anything away from what he's already accomplished.
Especially when you consider how he beat 14 people in the ToP anime (including a GoD) and Goku Black.

User avatar
Xeogran
I Live Here
Posts: 3056
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:04 am
Contact:

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by Xeogran » Tue Aug 25, 2020 6:09 am

Uhh Vegeta has a family now, so it's pretty much impossible to write him out unless you'd want to anger a huge chunk of your fanbase. He can be gone temporarily but die forever? That was only possible back in the Saiyan Saga days (until his popularity got Toriyama to keep him alive)

User avatar
Steven Bloodriver
I Live Here
Posts: 3477
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:06 pm

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by Steven Bloodriver » Tue Sep 01, 2020 7:34 pm

DragonBallFoodie wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:39 am But who could take his place as a rival to Goku to keep him fighting-ready?
Tien Shinhan or Piccolo.

UI Peter
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:19 pm

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by UI Peter » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:07 pm

Steven Bloodriver wrote: Tue Sep 01, 2020 7:34 pm
DragonBallFoodie wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:39 am But who could take his place as a rival to Goku to keep him fighting-ready?
Tien Shinhan or Piccolo.
That shipped had sunk a long time ago. The only other character that would work as Goku's main rival besides Vegeta is Freeza.

User avatar
PerhapsTheOtherOne
I Live Here
Posts: 2658
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 5:55 pm

Re: Would it have been better for Vegeta if he just, like, died forever...?

Post by PerhapsTheOtherOne » Thu Sep 03, 2020 11:59 am

Maybe a long time ago, but that ship has since set sail and is now too important to let die.

Vegeta is integral to the core of modern DB now. He's Goku's consistent rival and friend nowadays, now the second strongest of the characters from the original run. He provides a different but similar take to Goku, with his motivations for becoming stronger not exactly moving on from Goku as the main goal but not being centred around him in an unhealthy manner like in the Buu Arc.

He's the friendly but also not so friendly rival of Goku now.

Post Reply