Canonical or not?
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
- The Tori-bot
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3217
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 12:00 pm
- Location: Penguin Village
- Contact:
It's filler.
Great animation, though.
(And surprisingly brutal )
Great animation, though.
(And surprisingly brutal )
Last edited by The Tori-bot on Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
New to the forum? Just want to know when you'll hit your next posting rank? Ever wondered why some users have special titles, and what they mean? The answers to all these questions and more are waiting for you in the Kanzenshuu Member Hierarchy Guide!!
"Of all the things to worry about... the Wookiee has no pants." -- Mark Hamill
"Of all the things to worry about... the Wookiee has no pants." -- Mark Hamill
Herms wrote:Really, you could translate either title either way and nobody would care. But God would know.
- Conan the SSJ
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2812
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:40 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Canonical or not?
If you're asking if we should consider this short scuffle "canon", well obviously we can and (IMO) should with the anime. When it comes to the manga, if it wasn't implemented by Toriyama, then it never happened in that realm. When is everyone gonna get this, the manga and anime, while similar to a fantastic degree, are two separate universes/canon/continuities. I could give at least a half a dozen reasons right off the top of my head, but I'd like to think you all got this by now. Anything filler in the anime isn't "non-canon" because the anime doesn't share the same world with the manga, understand that, please.Horgus wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPuIKh2MQYo
14 years later
- MisterFlashdude
- OMG CRAZY REGEN
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 3:21 pm
Re: Canonical or not?
I wouldn't agree with you in this case... The anime is an adaption of the manga that follows the same continuity, which occasionally has random crap thrown in for various reasons and may not sync up because of it. Realizing the distinction between canon and filler is important because it may save you a lot of time wondering why something happened later on.Conan the SSJ wrote:If you're asking if we should consider this short scuffle "canon", well obviously we can and (IMO) should with the anime. When it comes to the manga, if it wasn't implemented by Toriyama, then it never happened in that realm. When is everyone gonna get this, the manga and anime, while similar to a fantastic degree, are two separate universes/canon/continuities. I could give at least a half a dozen reasons right off the top of my head, but I'd like to think you all got this by now. Anything filler in the anime isn't "non-canon" because the anime doesn't share the same world with the manga, understand that, please.Horgus wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPuIKh2MQYo
I can appreciate your attempt to rationalize the frustration of filler... and in some series I would agree with you (I.E. Fullmetal Alchemist, Trigun) but I wouldn't apply that reasoning to Dragonball...
As for that scene... it is, indeed, filler. The worst that comes about in the manga is after everyone gets bummed out, Vegeta suggests something that no one considered and Gohan attempts to thank him with a hand shake and he smacks his hand away.
-
- Slut of the Daizenshuu EX Family
- Posts: 3149
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:39 am
Re: Canonical or not?
I disagree. The continuity errors produced by some filler (Piccolo destroying Goku's spacepod utterly, and Goku making note of it being intact many episodes later for example) make it impossible for them to fit *any* canon.Conan the SSJ wrote:If you're asking if we should consider this short scuffle "canon", well obviously we can and (IMO) should with the anime. When it comes to the manga, if it wasn't implemented by Toriyama, then it never happened in that realm. When is everyone gonna get this, the manga and anime, while similar to a fantastic degree, are two separate universes/canon/continuities. I could give at least a half a dozen reasons right off the top of my head, but I'd like to think you all got this by now. Anything filler in the anime isn't "non-canon" because the anime doesn't share the same world with the manga, understand that, please.
IMHO, it's goofy to try and make different canons. I actually know a guy who plays a video game series (Phantasy Star) wherein one character who is recurring through the series was renamed in the first title but had his original name restored in the other games. The guy refuses to believe the two are the same person in the English version, but acknowledges they are in the Japanese. His explanation? Different continuities/canon. Despite one of the translators giving an interview years later stating that the name change was a flub.
Please, don't be like him ;p
-Corey
Re: Canonical or not?
There's a difference though. This does fit into a different cannon simply because it doesn't contradict anything in the manga. What happened on earth during the manga? This could have been what happened. Let's not forgot Toriyama had a lot of influince on some of the filler.MajinVejitaXV wrote:I disagree. The continuity errors produced by some filler (Piccolo destroying Goku's spacepod utterly, and Goku making note of it being intact many episodes later for example) make it impossible for them to fit *any* canon.Conan the SSJ wrote:If you're asking if we should consider this short scuffle "canon", well obviously we can and (IMO) should with the anime. When it comes to the manga, if it wasn't implemented by Toriyama, then it never happened in that realm. When is everyone gonna get this, the manga and anime, while similar to a fantastic degree, are two separate universes/canon/continuities. I could give at least a half a dozen reasons right off the top of my head, but I'd like to think you all got this by now. Anything filler in the anime isn't "non-canon" because the anime doesn't share the same world with the manga, understand that, please.
IMHO, it's goofy to try and make different canons. I actually know a guy who plays a video game series (Phantasy Star) wherein one character who is recurring through the series was renamed in the first title but had his original name restored in the other games. The guy refuses to believe the two are the same person in the English version, but acknowledges they are in the Japanese. His explanation? Different continuities/canon. Despite one of the translators giving an interview years later stating that the name change was a flub.
Please, don't be like him ;p
-Corey
-
- Slut of the Daizenshuu EX Family
- Posts: 3149
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:39 am
Re: Canonical or not?
Oh, I wasn't arguing about this particular scene, just the concept of the "anime canon" vs. "manga canon." This scene doesn't conflict with anything, just like non-SSJ Vejito vs. Boo and numerous others, but I was just pointing out the more flawed filler scenes.Pieter wrote:There's a difference though. This does fit into a different cannon simply because it doesn't contradict anything in the manga. What happened on earth during the manga? This could have been what happened. Let's not forgot Toriyama had a lot of influince on some of the filler.
-Corey
- Conan the SSJ
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2812
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:40 am
- Location: Ohio
I dunno, maybe it's plot elements like Namekians having a different number of fingers, certain deaths happening different than how the author implemented it (Kargo), major plot elements like how Trunks first went SSJ or the amount of help Gohan had defeating Cell, the specific traits of SSJ2, or even little things like where Vegeta took a nap before Porunga's first summoning. Really, it depends on our own points of view, and my point of view says they're two different canon/universes. That's just how I feel.
14 years later
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:40 pm
- Castor Troy
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:37 pm
- Location: Huntington Beach, CA
- Contact:
- tainted saiyan
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 2:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver
- Contact:
The amazing ability of Goku's spacepod to be intact after getting blasted by Piccolo?Conan the SSJ wrote:I dunno, maybe it's plot elements like Namekians having a different number of fingers, certain deaths happening different than how the author implemented it (Kargo), major plot elements like how Trunks first went SSJ or the amount of help Gohan had defeating Cell, the specific traits of SSJ2, or even little things like where Vegeta took a nap before Porunga's first summoning. Really, it depends on our own points of view, and my point of view says they're two different canon/universes. That's just how I feel.
-
- Slut of the Daizenshuu EX Family
- Posts: 3149
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:39 am
- tainted saiyan
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 2:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver
- Contact:
I have to give my compliments about the perfection of these series. Yes there are errors, but for a serie so big the makers seem like perfectionists.
Also I think people underestimate Akira Toriyama's influince on a lot of the filler. Here's a snippet from an interview:
There's a lot of filler sequences I really like by the way. In DragonBall I watched the Goku vs Darkness without realising it was filler and it was great.
Also I think people underestimate Akira Toriyama's influince on a lot of the filler. Here's a snippet from an interview:
I believe Lunch didn't even appear in the manga, so he's talking about a cannon that only exists in the anime.Q: I have a question about Lunch. I noticed she disappeared once the series reaches the Raddiz saga. What ever happened to her?
A: To tell you the truth I totally forgot about the character Lunch at one time. But when I remembered her again, I had to think of a reason why she disappeared. So I made it seem that she was chasing after Teinshinhan all the time she was gone.
There's a lot of filler sequences I really like by the way. In DragonBall I watched the Goku vs Darkness without realising it was filler and it was great.
- Slickmasterfunk
- Regular
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:48 pm
- Location: New York State
Actually, that explanation he's referencing is in the manga, even though Lunch isn't actually shown. In the manga, when Bulma shows up at the Kame House before Raditz' arrival, she asks where Lunch is, and Kuririn says she went chasing Tenshinhan.Pieter wrote:I have to give my compliments about the perfection of these series. Yes there are errors, but for a serie so big the makers seem like perfectionists.
Also I think people underestimate Akira Toriyama's influince on a lot of the filler. Here's a snippet from an interview:I believe Lunch didn't even appear in the manga, so he's talking about a cannon that only exists in the anime.Q: I have a question about Lunch. I noticed she disappeared once the series reaches the Raddiz saga. What ever happened to her?
A: To tell you the truth I totally forgot about the character Lunch at one time. But when I remembered her again, I had to think of a reason why she disappeared. So I made it seem that she was chasing after Teinshinhan all the time she was gone.
That's an interesting scene I don't remember seeing, though. I kind of like it, although I wish I could understand it so I knew what they were fighting about. =p
It seems a lot of people have their own differing definitions of canon, so that I won't go into that (although I personally wouldn't take it as canon any more than other filler segments), but I'm sure what the topic creator meant was "Is this in the manga or not?". And to answer that: no, it isn't. It's anime only.