Canonical or not?

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
Horgus
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:06 am

Canonical or not?

Post by Horgus » Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:15 am


User avatar
The Tori-bot
I Live Here
Posts: 3217
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Penguin Village
Contact:

Post by The Tori-bot » Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:08 am

It's filler.

Great animation, though. :)

(And surprisingly brutal :shock:)
Last edited by The Tori-bot on Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
New to the forum? Just want to know when you'll hit your next posting rank? Ever wondered why some users have special titles, and what they mean? The answers to all these questions and more are waiting for you in the Kanzenshuu Member Hierarchy Guide!!
"Of all the things to worry about... the Wookiee has no pants." -- Mark Hamill
Herms wrote:Really, you could translate either title either way and nobody would care. But God would know.

User avatar
Conan the SSJ
I Live Here
Posts: 2812
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:40 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Canonical or not?

Post by Conan the SSJ » Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:09 am

If you're asking if we should consider this short scuffle "canon", well obviously we can and (IMO) should with the anime. When it comes to the manga, if it wasn't implemented by Toriyama, then it never happened in that realm. When is everyone gonna get this, the manga and anime, while similar to a fantastic degree, are two separate universes/canon/continuities. I could give at least a half a dozen reasons right off the top of my head, but I'd like to think you all got this by now. Anything filler in the anime isn't "non-canon" because the anime doesn't share the same world with the manga, understand that, please.
14 years later

User avatar
MisterFlashdude
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 779
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 3:21 pm

Re: Canonical or not?

Post by MisterFlashdude » Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:37 am

Conan the SSJ wrote:
If you're asking if we should consider this short scuffle "canon", well obviously we can and (IMO) should with the anime. When it comes to the manga, if it wasn't implemented by Toriyama, then it never happened in that realm. When is everyone gonna get this, the manga and anime, while similar to a fantastic degree, are two separate universes/canon/continuities. I could give at least a half a dozen reasons right off the top of my head, but I'd like to think you all got this by now. Anything filler in the anime isn't "non-canon" because the anime doesn't share the same world with the manga, understand that, please.
I wouldn't agree with you in this case... The anime is an adaption of the manga that follows the same continuity, which occasionally has random crap thrown in for various reasons and may not sync up because of it. Realizing the distinction between canon and filler is important because it may save you a lot of time wondering why something happened later on.
I can appreciate your attempt to rationalize the frustration of filler... and in some series I would agree with you (I.E. Fullmetal Alchemist, Trigun) but I wouldn't apply that reasoning to Dragonball...

As for that scene... it is, indeed, filler. The worst that comes about in the manga is after everyone gets bummed out, Vegeta suggests something that no one considered and Gohan attempts to thank him with a hand shake and he smacks his hand away.

MajinVejitaXV
Slut of the Daizenshuu EX Family
Posts: 3149
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:39 am

Re: Canonical or not?

Post by MajinVejitaXV » Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:45 am

Conan the SSJ wrote:If you're asking if we should consider this short scuffle "canon", well obviously we can and (IMO) should with the anime. When it comes to the manga, if it wasn't implemented by Toriyama, then it never happened in that realm. When is everyone gonna get this, the manga and anime, while similar to a fantastic degree, are two separate universes/canon/continuities. I could give at least a half a dozen reasons right off the top of my head, but I'd like to think you all got this by now. Anything filler in the anime isn't "non-canon" because the anime doesn't share the same world with the manga, understand that, please.
I disagree. The continuity errors produced by some filler (Piccolo destroying Goku's spacepod utterly, and Goku making note of it being intact many episodes later for example) make it impossible for them to fit *any* canon.

IMHO, it's goofy to try and make different canons. I actually know a guy who plays a video game series (Phantasy Star) wherein one character who is recurring through the series was renamed in the first title but had his original name restored in the other games. The guy refuses to believe the two are the same person in the English version, but acknowledges they are in the Japanese. His explanation? Different continuities/canon. Despite one of the translators giving an interview years later stating that the name change was a flub.

Please, don't be like him ;p

-Corey

User avatar
Pieter
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:37 pm
Location: Holland

Re: Canonical or not?

Post by Pieter » Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:59 am

MajinVejitaXV wrote:
Conan the SSJ wrote:If you're asking if we should consider this short scuffle "canon", well obviously we can and (IMO) should with the anime. When it comes to the manga, if it wasn't implemented by Toriyama, then it never happened in that realm. When is everyone gonna get this, the manga and anime, while similar to a fantastic degree, are two separate universes/canon/continuities. I could give at least a half a dozen reasons right off the top of my head, but I'd like to think you all got this by now. Anything filler in the anime isn't "non-canon" because the anime doesn't share the same world with the manga, understand that, please.
I disagree. The continuity errors produced by some filler (Piccolo destroying Goku's spacepod utterly, and Goku making note of it being intact many episodes later for example) make it impossible for them to fit *any* canon.

IMHO, it's goofy to try and make different canons. I actually know a guy who plays a video game series (Phantasy Star) wherein one character who is recurring through the series was renamed in the first title but had his original name restored in the other games. The guy refuses to believe the two are the same person in the English version, but acknowledges they are in the Japanese. His explanation? Different continuities/canon. Despite one of the translators giving an interview years later stating that the name change was a flub.

Please, don't be like him ;p

-Corey
There's a difference though. This does fit into a different cannon simply because it doesn't contradict anything in the manga. What happened on earth during the manga? This could have been what happened. Let's not forgot Toriyama had a lot of influince on some of the filler.

MajinVejitaXV
Slut of the Daizenshuu EX Family
Posts: 3149
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:39 am

Re: Canonical or not?

Post by MajinVejitaXV » Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:08 pm

Pieter wrote:There's a difference though. This does fit into a different cannon simply because it doesn't contradict anything in the manga. What happened on earth during the manga? This could have been what happened. Let's not forgot Toriyama had a lot of influince on some of the filler.
Oh, I wasn't arguing about this particular scene, just the concept of the "anime canon" vs. "manga canon." This scene doesn't conflict with anything, just like non-SSJ Vejito vs. Boo and numerous others, but I was just pointing out the more flawed filler scenes.

-Corey

User avatar
Conan the SSJ
I Live Here
Posts: 2812
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:40 am
Location: Ohio

Post by Conan the SSJ » Sat Feb 17, 2007 1:19 pm

I dunno, maybe it's plot elements like Namekians having a different number of fingers, certain deaths happening different than how the author implemented it (Kargo), major plot elements like how Trunks first went SSJ or the amount of help Gohan had defeating Cell, the specific traits of SSJ2, or even little things like where Vegeta took a nap before Porunga's first summoning. Really, it depends on our own points of view, and my point of view says they're two different canon/universes. That's just how I feel. :wink:
14 years later

lets go swimming
Newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:40 pm

Post by lets go swimming » Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:13 pm

The manga is canon, the anime is not

User avatar
Castor Troy
I Live Here
Posts: 2134
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:37 pm
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Contact:

Post by Castor Troy » Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:15 pm

I have to admit this is one of the dumber things TOEI put in the anime...

User avatar
tainted saiyan
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Vancouver
Contact:

Post by tainted saiyan » Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:31 pm

Still, You gotta love the look on Vegeta's face when Gohan lands that kick to the stomach. He's all "Oh no you didn't"! :lol:
Chivalry

User avatar
Rocketman
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10799
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:17 pm

Post by Rocketman » Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:58 pm

Conan the SSJ wrote:I dunno, maybe it's plot elements like Namekians having a different number of fingers, certain deaths happening different than how the author implemented it (Kargo), major plot elements like how Trunks first went SSJ or the amount of help Gohan had defeating Cell, the specific traits of SSJ2, or even little things like where Vegeta took a nap before Porunga's first summoning. Really, it depends on our own points of view, and my point of view says they're two different canon/universes. That's just how I feel. :wink:
The amazing ability of Goku's spacepod to be intact after getting blasted by Piccolo?

MajinVejitaXV
Slut of the Daizenshuu EX Family
Posts: 3149
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:39 am

Post by MajinVejitaXV » Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:07 pm

Rocketman wrote:The amazing ability of Goku's spacepod to be intact after getting blasted by Piccolo?
I can see its parachute, it's okay ;p

-Corey

tarsonis
Regular
Posts: 515
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:34 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by tarsonis » Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:12 pm

There's no reason why this particular scene can't be considered canon. It doesn't contradict the manga.

User avatar
tainted saiyan
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Vancouver
Contact:

Post by tainted saiyan » Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:21 pm

And, it's probably the most entertaining filler made... *Thinks back to the garlic junior saga and vomits*.
Chivalry

User avatar
Pieter
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:37 pm
Location: Holland

Post by Pieter » Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:30 pm

I have to give my compliments about the perfection of these series. Yes there are errors, but for a serie so big the makers seem like perfectionists.
Also I think people underestimate Akira Toriyama's influince on a lot of the filler. Here's a snippet from an interview:
Q: I have a question about Lunch. I noticed she disappeared once the series reaches the Raddiz saga. What ever happened to her?

A: To tell you the truth I totally forgot about the character Lunch at one time. But when I remembered her again, I had to think of a reason why she disappeared. So I made it seem that she was chasing after Teinshinhan all the time she was gone.
I believe Lunch didn't even appear in the manga, so he's talking about a cannon that only exists in the anime.
There's a lot of filler sequences I really like by the way. In DragonBall I watched the Goku vs Darkness without realising it was filler and it was great.

User avatar
mAcChaos
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1869
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 2:33 pm
Contact:

Post by mAcChaos » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:06 pm

That was a good filler. I wish I could understand what they were saying though.
[i]"I have yet to show you, young warrior, what I'm truly capable of."[/i] - Cell

User avatar
Slickmasterfunk
Regular
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:48 pm
Location: New York State

Post by Slickmasterfunk » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:47 pm

tainted saiyan wrote:And, it's probably the most entertaining filler made... *Thinks back to the garlic junior saga and vomits*.
Yes, this is definitely a great example of good filler. Garlic Jr. saga? Great example of bad filler.

User avatar
Thanos6
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1353
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Deep 13
Contact:

Post by Thanos6 » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:10 pm

My favorite filler is Videl as Great Saiyawoman aka Great Saiyaman II.
Trunks & Goten forever

User avatar
Swift
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: California

Post by Swift » Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:13 pm

Pieter wrote:I have to give my compliments about the perfection of these series. Yes there are errors, but for a serie so big the makers seem like perfectionists.
Also I think people underestimate Akira Toriyama's influince on a lot of the filler. Here's a snippet from an interview:
Q: I have a question about Lunch. I noticed she disappeared once the series reaches the Raddiz saga. What ever happened to her?

A: To tell you the truth I totally forgot about the character Lunch at one time. But when I remembered her again, I had to think of a reason why she disappeared. So I made it seem that she was chasing after Teinshinhan all the time she was gone.
I believe Lunch didn't even appear in the manga, so he's talking about a cannon that only exists in the anime.
Actually, that explanation he's referencing is in the manga, even though Lunch isn't actually shown. In the manga, when Bulma shows up at the Kame House before Raditz' arrival, she asks where Lunch is, and Kuririn says she went chasing Tenshinhan.


That's an interesting scene I don't remember seeing, though. I kind of like it, although I wish I could understand it so I knew what they were fighting about. =p

It seems a lot of people have their own differing definitions of canon, so that I won't go into that (although I personally wouldn't take it as canon any more than other filler segments), but I'm sure what the topic creator meant was "Is this in the manga or not?". And to answer that: no, it isn't. It's anime only.

Post Reply