Remember how goku looked like a toddler when he was twelve. Sayains age much slower than humans so a 3 year old saiyan would look very similar to a baby human.ekrolo2 wrote:Roshi also says Grampa Gohan found a baby, not a toddler, an actual baby which a 3 year old who can walk and fight is not.Doctor. wrote:It's not the first time we see Goku as a baby regardless.PFM18 wrote:
That's just Raditz imagining him as a baby.....
Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie #1 Thread: "Broly"
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
- Kaiza_Toshiyuki
- Temporarily Banned
- Posts: 262
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2018 1:32 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Goku looks like he's 8-9 when he's a kid, definitely not like a 3-year-old. Roshi's Japanese dialogue also specifically calls him a baby (akanbou). This coupled with Vegeta and Raditz statements is clearly supposed to say: this guy was a baby when he got sent over here, not a 3-year old, not a toddler, a baby.Kaiza_Toshiyuki wrote:Remember how goku looked like a toddler when he was twelve. Sayains age much slower than humans so a 3 year old saiyan would look very similar to a baby human.ekrolo2 wrote:Roshi also says Grampa Gohan found a baby, not a toddler, an actual baby which a 3 year old who can walk and fight is not.Doctor. wrote: It's not the first time we see Goku as a baby regardless.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.
How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):
How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):
Spoiler:
- ShadowBardock89
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:40 pm
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
ekrolo2 wrote:Anyone know what the BR in Broly: BR stands for?
"Broken Restraint"? "Berserk"?
Anyways, I hope Nappa (who was strangely missing in DB: Minus) and Raditz make a cameo appearance with Vegeta.
Last edited by ShadowBardock89 on Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=40715&start=20#p1439892
http://dba.bn-ent.net/character/barduck.html
https://i.imgur.com/86hOk5i.gif
http://dba.bn-ent.net/character/barduck.html
https://i.imgur.com/86hOk5i.gif
- ZeroNeonix
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1400
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 3:35 pm
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Eh. Minus' version of things makes much more sense to me. Why would anyone send a baby to conquer a planet? A baby wouldn't even know what its goal was. It wouldn't know it was supposed to destroy all the local inhabitants. The baby, if it even survived, would likely grow up identifying with the locals rather than the Saiyans. Raditz's assumption that Goku bumped his head doesn't even make sense if Goku was a baby at the time. What difference does it make? What information did he have to forget from that bump on the head?ekrolo2 wrote:Roshi also says Grampa Gohan found a baby, not a toddler, an actual baby which a 3 year old who can walk and fight is not.
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Freeza's business model is idiotic regardless of what version you use, that's not really a defense or condemnation of either if you ask me.ZeroNeonix wrote:Eh. Minus' version of things makes much more sense to me. Why would anyone send a baby to conquer a planet? A baby wouldn't even know what its goal was. It wouldn't know it was supposed to destroy all the local inhabitants. The baby, if it even survived, would likely grow up identifying with the locals rather than the Saiyans. Raditz's assumption that Goku bumped his head doesn't even make sense if Goku was a baby at the time. What difference does it make? What information did he have to forget from that bump on the head?ekrolo2 wrote:Roshi also says Grampa Gohan found a baby, not a toddler, an actual baby which a 3 year old who can walk and fight is not.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.
How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):
How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):
Spoiler:
- BlueBasilisk
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3062
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:58 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Gine says he'd be an "infiltration baby" too, so there's that.ZeroNeonix wrote:Eh. Minus' version of things makes much more sense to me. Why would anyone send a baby to conquer a planet? A baby wouldn't even know what its goal was. It wouldn't know it was supposed to destroy all the local inhabitants. The baby, if it even survived, would likely grow up identifying with the locals rather than the Saiyans. Raditz's assumption that Goku bumped his head doesn't even make sense if Goku was a baby at the time. What difference does it make? What information did he have to forget from that bump on the head?
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Saw this conversation on another board yesterday. Apparently, Gine refers to him as a “child” in the Japanese Raws.BlueBasilisk wrote:Gine says he'd be an "infiltration baby" too, so there's that.ZeroNeonix wrote:Eh. Minus' version of things makes much more sense to me. Why would anyone send a baby to conquer a planet? A baby wouldn't even know what its goal was. It wouldn't know it was supposed to destroy all the local inhabitants. The baby, if it even survived, would likely grow up identifying with the locals rather than the Saiyans. Raditz's assumption that Goku bumped his head doesn't even make sense if Goku was a baby at the time. What difference does it make? What information did he have to forget from that bump on the head?
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Wasn't it not so much the information but goku's temperment that changed? You're lead to believe a Saiyan would grow up with evil intentions from birth as if they were born to conquer. Theres probably some sort of conditioning as well before they are sent off but that last bit has never been proven.ZeroNeonix wrote:Eh. Minus' version of things makes much more sense to me. Why would anyone send a baby to conquer a planet? A baby wouldn't even know what its goal was. It wouldn't know it was supposed to destroy all the local inhabitants. The baby, if it even survived, would likely grow up identifying with the locals rather than the Saiyans. Raditz's assumption that Goku bumped his head doesn't even make sense if Goku was a baby at the time. What difference does it make? What information did he have to forget from that bump on the head?ekrolo2 wrote:Roshi also says Grampa Gohan found a baby, not a toddler, an actual baby which a 3 year old who can walk and fight is not.
And they send babies so when they grow up they conquer. I might be wrong about this but I beliebe they send babies to weak planets that arent worth adults time. But with only 28 planets (I guess there might have been as much as 100 at the time... Thanks Supreme Kai) that practice does seem rather dumb.
- BlueBasilisk
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3062
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:58 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
https://www.facebook.com/DBSuperOfficia ... ?__tn__=-R the panel is going to be streamed here if anyone wants to watch
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
You can see it here too.
- BlueBasilisk
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3062
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:58 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Well, that was kind of a waste of time. No real new information except for the english dub trailer and the next stop on the tour.
-
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4181
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:09 am
- Location: Houston, Texas
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
The problem is that the original manga still implied that Saiyans sending off babies to conquer planets is apparently something that they do in fact do. I agree that the concept silly, but I don’t think that’s why Toriyama retconned Goku’s backstory.ZeroNeonix wrote:Eh. Minus' version of things makes much more sense to me. Why would anyone send a baby to conquer a planet? A baby wouldn't even know what its goal was. It wouldn't know it was supposed to destroy all the local inhabitants. The baby, if it even survived, would likely grow up identifying with the locals rather than the Saiyans. Raditz's assumption that Goku bumped his head doesn't even make sense if Goku was a baby at the time. What difference does it make? What information did he have to forget from that bump on the head?ekrolo2 wrote:Roshi also says Grampa Gohan found a baby, not a toddler, an actual baby which a 3 year old who can walk and fight is not.
- The Patrolman
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 5:46 pm
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Freeza: Hello Monkeys
Ok wow man.
Ok wow man.
The Last Jedi is a terrible movie
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
"Hello, monkeys."Oracle wrote:English dub.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynuFEc_Zg5I
What an... unnecessary change? Freeza's line was already condescending enough, you don't need to make it even more overt.
- sunsetshimmer
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2017 4:34 pm
- Location: Poland/Equestria
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
So...
...it turns out they are rebooting GT as well!
(sorry i just had to lol)
...it turns out they are rebooting GT as well!
(sorry i just had to lol)
"I will concede that your feelings are worthy of the mightiest of Saiyans. However, there is more to my power than just this. Before you die, I will show it to you. This is the difference in power, between the primitive Saiyans and the evolved Tsufruians." ~Baby Vegeta
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Baby Vegeta confirmed canon
- Baggie_Saiyan
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 10283
- Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
- Location: Atlantis.
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Deliver of that line was perfect!The Patrolman wrote:Freeza: Hello Monkeys
Ok wow man.
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
I'm sure it's been answered somewhere but I'll ask again.
Are they doing a retcon so that Goku and Vegeta are now the same age?
Are they doing a retcon so that Goku and Vegeta are now the same age?
- The Patrolman
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 5:46 pm
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Honestly, maybe, maybe not. For all we know the trailer could be misleading usBullza wrote:I'm sure it's been answered somewhere but I'll ask again.
Are they doing a retcon so that Goku and Vegeta are now the same age?
The Last Jedi is a terrible movie