Editing of painfully-outdated LGBT+ content in future DB(Z) releases?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

Post Reply
Jord
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 8:13 am

Editing of painfully-outdated LGBT+ content in future DB(Z) releases?

Post by Jord » Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:48 pm

What was acceptable in the past isn't necessarily acceptable today. While Dragon Ball and Z are great series in itself with great animation and fights there are some nasty points sticking out. From pedohilic tendencies of Muten Roshi to worse cases like how LGBT characters like General Blue and Otokosuki (ugh) are handled. I was recently rewatching the series with my friends, some of them being part of the LGBT community and while we enjoyed the series, every time subject as those mentioned came up it became painful how outdated and awkward those segments are in 2019. As a society we've moved on from seeing LGBT+ people as 'funny' and 'strange' so the media should reflect that instead of reinforcing outdated thoughts and stereotypes.

User avatar
VegettoEX
Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
Posts: 17541
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by VegettoEX » Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:59 pm

They had an opportunity to do that: a "new" product called Dragon Ball Kai. (Granted, Kai never really hit the grossest of the content in question.)

They also had a chance to do that from scratch: a genuinely entirely new product called Dragon Ball Super.

One needs only take a cursory glance through Super episode 89 to see they don't care.

Kanzenshuu as an entity run by its administrative team absolutely 100% does not condone the removal or editing of content from existing products. Instead, we are all about context: explain what it is, why it was, who was involved, what's changed, and what a proper view on it through the lens of time could be knowing all that we know now.

It's not like you can ever get rid of the old content considering how many printings it's gotten across so many countries. Don't change the old stuff; explain it. Warner Bros. "... to do otherwise would be the same as claiming these prejudices never existed" bumper is more eloquent than it has any right to be.

Dragon Ball is old. It's going to take some explaining, and it's OK if not everyone sees it or enjoys it.

(And don't mistake any of that for excusing it. Dende knows we've taken this series to task for less.)
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::

User avatar
Gyt Kaliba
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8861
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:38 am
Location: Arkansas
Contact:

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by Gyt Kaliba » Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:00 pm

While I understand and don't begrudge you or your friends your views on it, censoring is never the right answer in regards to things like this. If nothing else though, they could perhaps go with a warning menu or the like on releases that feature those particular episodes. WB has the right idea with a message on a few collections of their older cartoons -

Image

- and I can never find a video link, but a collection of older Mickey Mouse shorts from Disney has a similar message in video form from a notable Hollywood historian.

Edit: Ninja-ed by Mike, wouldn't you know it. :lol: He puts it better than I did at any rate though.
AniManga Travelogue - Currently Reviewing: Dragon Ball (Z)
Twitter
Switch Friend Code: SW-0745-6427-7791 (let's play some Dragon Ball: The Breakers!)

User avatar
gokaiblue
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 400
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:40 am

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by gokaiblue » Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:22 pm

Like others had said, censoring past content because of modern sensibilities is not something that should be done. I'm of the mind that we should not judge the past through a modern lense. In many cases, we didn't even think like them.
Looking for these rare items/information:

Any information or recordings pertaining to Dragon Ball Z's syndicated run on WAWB
Any information regarding the stations that carried the origin Dragon Ball in the USA
Dragon Box (any deals would be nice)
Shonen Jumps with Dragon Ball in them

User avatar
jjgp1112
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 7478
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Crooklyn

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by jjgp1112 » Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:32 pm

The folly of censorship aside how would they go about this? Edit out General Blue entirely? Re-record lines? Do a Kai-style Frankenstein monster job with redrawn scenes? And while we're at it, edit Mr. Popo, Officer Black, and Killa's appearances too?

You see where I'm getting at.
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler

Mosaic
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 248
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 12:07 am
Location: NJ

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by Mosaic » Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:32 pm

Hey, gay man here.

I think moving forward, they should move away from it. I mean, it's not like the offensive LGBT jokes were a core of the series. However, the content from the previous series shouldn't be erased. If anything, *maybe* put a disclaimer up, but you have to view these as products of their time. While the General Blue stuff annoys me, I realize it was a different time and culture. If they put something like that in Super however... I'd be pissed.

User avatar
SuperSaiyaManZ94
I Live Here
Posts: 2712
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:01 pm
Location: Alabama, USA

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by SuperSaiyaManZ94 » Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:51 pm

No they shouldn't, we're talking about series that are over to just over thirty years old now. They should remain as they are even if some things presented in them (General Blue.etc) don't necessarily align with modern views on the same topics because retroactively censoring them does nothing, and we've already had that happen in the case of old cartoons from the Golden era of animation like Tom & Jerry and some Looney Tunes shorts. True, there are no doubt things that are indeed objectionable at times in the original series/DBZ but taking the censorship axe to them is not the answer.
Last edited by SuperSaiyaManZ94 on Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:03 pm, edited 4 times in total.
DB collection related goals as of now:

1.) Find decent priced copy of Dragon Box Z Vol. 4 (Done)

2.) Collect rest of manga

3.) Get rest of Daizenshuu (2-7)

User avatar
Shaddy
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1612
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2015 7:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by Shaddy » Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:55 pm

We should focus on getting new DB content to be less horrible, not changing old stuff.

User avatar
coola
I Live Here
Posts: 3360
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:33 am
Location: Poland

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by coola » Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:01 pm

No, I'm against revisionism in any form, small note like with Looney Tunes DVD, sure..but no censorship.
My Twitter: @kamil198811
Bulma fan
Thanks to Discotek:
Magic Knight Rayearth get DVD release in 2015 and Blu-Ray release on 2016
Saint Seiya: The Lost Canvas get DVD release in 2015

User avatar
PhoenixEX
Regular
Posts: 524
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 10:02 am
Location: New York

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by PhoenixEX » Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:07 pm

The Warner Brothers route is the way to go. I don't think that outright censorship is something that should be considered.
One World. 🌐 🕊

User avatar
PremiumSalt
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 466
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:58 pm

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by PremiumSalt » Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:16 pm

I agree, the WB method is the best.

That said, if there is ever a Kai version of OG Dragon Ball, since it's a new product and the preservation arguement is moot, I'll be a little upset if they don't remove the scene of General Blue creeping on Obotchaman.
Dragon Ball Arc Rankings: 1. Piccolo Daimaō 2. Saiyan 3. 22nd Budōkai 4. 23rd Budōkai 5. Hunt For the Dragon Balls 6. Zamasu 7. Moro 8. Tournament of Power 9. 21st Budōkai 10. Broly 11. Battle of Gods 12. Boo 13. U6 Tournament 14. Freeza 15. Red Ribbon Army 16. Artificial Humans/Cell 17.Golden Freeza
Kunzait_83 wrote:No matter what twisted pretzel logic you contort yourself into to try and convince yourself otherwise, Raditz landing on Earth is the middle of the fucking story. Zero context, zero setup. Its in NO way meant to be seen as a "beginning point" for ANYTHING other than the next story arc. It flows precisely and fluidly from where things left off in the aftermath of the 23rd Budokai and mostly hits the ground running from there without really stopping to look back. You're plopping someone into the middle of a book starting at chapter 195 out of 519 for absolutely no good goddamn reason, with very minimal opportunity to look back at much needed context and character/story growth.

User avatar
Soppa Saia People
I Live Here
Posts: 3062
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 11:26 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by Soppa Saia People » Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:25 pm

i don't think that scene would be in a "manga edit" of the original dragon ball anyhow. yes the penguin village as a whole is really different in the anime compared to manga, but i imagine they would probably cut a lot of scenes and keep it as close as they can. definitely won't happen but yeah.
I have borderline personality disorder, if my posts ever come off as aggressive or word vomit-y to you, please let me know.

🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸

User avatar
PremiumSalt
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 466
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:58 pm

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by PremiumSalt » Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:36 pm

Soppa Saia People wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:25 pm i don't think that scene would be in a "manga edit" of the original dragon ball anyhow. yes the penguin village as a whole is really different in the anime compared to manga, but i imagine they would probably cut a lot of scenes and keep it as close as they can. definitely won't happen but yeah.
Well given how Kai TFC turned out I don't trust Toei's ability to cut filler anymore to be honest.
Dragon Ball Arc Rankings: 1. Piccolo Daimaō 2. Saiyan 3. 22nd Budōkai 4. 23rd Budōkai 5. Hunt For the Dragon Balls 6. Zamasu 7. Moro 8. Tournament of Power 9. 21st Budōkai 10. Broly 11. Battle of Gods 12. Boo 13. U6 Tournament 14. Freeza 15. Red Ribbon Army 16. Artificial Humans/Cell 17.Golden Freeza
Kunzait_83 wrote:No matter what twisted pretzel logic you contort yourself into to try and convince yourself otherwise, Raditz landing on Earth is the middle of the fucking story. Zero context, zero setup. Its in NO way meant to be seen as a "beginning point" for ANYTHING other than the next story arc. It flows precisely and fluidly from where things left off in the aftermath of the 23rd Budokai and mostly hits the ground running from there without really stopping to look back. You're plopping someone into the middle of a book starting at chapter 195 out of 519 for absolutely no good goddamn reason, with very minimal opportunity to look back at much needed context and character/story growth.

User avatar
Cure Dragon 255
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5102
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 5:23 pm

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by Cure Dragon 255 » Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:43 pm

Gay man here too. I dont want Dragon Ball to be censored. Unless its an edited airing meant for kids and not the DVD's.
Marz wrote: Wed Jul 21, 2021 11:27 pm "Well, the chapter was good, the story was good and so were the fights. But a new transformation, in Dragon Ball? And one that's ugly? This is where we draw the line!!! Jump the Shark moment!!"

This forum is so over-dramatic that it's not even funny.
90sDBZ wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2019 2:44 pm19 years ago I was rushing home from school to watch DBZ on Cartoon Network, and today I've rushed home from work to watch DBS on Pop. I guess it's true the more things change the more they stay the same. :lol:

User avatar
Gyt Kaliba
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8861
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:38 am
Location: Arkansas
Contact:

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by Gyt Kaliba » Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:52 pm

Speaking of the infamous General Blue scene, I'm curious - how would people feel if, in a potential Kai-ifying of the original DB (which isn't going to happen at this point really, but just for the point of argument here), they kept the scene but re-wrote the dialogue to the scene somehow or another? Think like how the dub, even in the uncut version, went with him thinking Obatchaman was his long lost brother. In the case of a "brand new" product like a DB Kai, would that be considered censorship really? Or would it be a new take entirely?
Cure Dragon 255 wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:43 pm Gay man here too. I dont want Dragon Ball to be censored. Unless its an edited airing meant for kids and not the DVD's.
Bolded/underlining mine for emphasis. That's something I hadn't really thought of either. I'm fine with editing/censoring things for airing on TV if it's on a kid's channel, or even a censored home release like the old VHS tapes of DB/Z/GT had, in-so-far as there's also an equally uncut version also released, even if it has to be sub-only. Edits to get more kids into anime are fine, just so long as the rest of us aren't left hanging with no uncut version.
AniManga Travelogue - Currently Reviewing: Dragon Ball (Z)
Twitter
Switch Friend Code: SW-0745-6427-7791 (let's play some Dragon Ball: The Breakers!)

User avatar
Soppa Saia People
I Live Here
Posts: 3062
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 11:26 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by Soppa Saia People » Wed Sep 04, 2019 5:11 pm

Gyt Kaliba wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:52 pm Bolded/underlining mine for emphasis. That's something I hadn't really thought of either. I'm fine with editing/censoring things for airing on TV if it's on a kid's channel, or even a censored home release like the old VHS tapes of DB/Z/GT had, in-so-far as there's also an equally uncut version also released, even if it has to be sub-only. Edits to get more kids into anime are fine, just so long as the rest of us aren't left hanging with no uncut version.
yeah, and really that's my whole view on censorship to media, and really just changes to media in general. if you wanna make a change to a scene or whatever to make it more accessible to a wider audience or to make it so it's consistent with the later material, sure go ahead, just as long the original version is still (widely) available in some way. it's when those changes become the only way to experience something and the original version is basically lost is when i think there's a issue.
I have borderline personality disorder, if my posts ever come off as aggressive or word vomit-y to you, please let me know.

🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸

User avatar
PremiumSalt
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 466
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:58 pm

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by PremiumSalt » Wed Sep 04, 2019 5:15 pm

Gyt Kaliba wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 4:52 pm Speaking of the infamous General Blue scene, I'm curious - how would people feel if, in a potential Kai-ifying of the original DB (which isn't going to happen at this point really, but just for the point of argument here), they kept the scene but re-wrote the dialogue to the scene somehow or another? Think like how the dub, even in the uncut version, went with him thinking Obatchaman was his long lost brother.
I've always felt that Funi's attempt to fix that scene made it worse, since the implication was still obvious because of the animation. So, nothing like that please.
Dragon Ball Arc Rankings: 1. Piccolo Daimaō 2. Saiyan 3. 22nd Budōkai 4. 23rd Budōkai 5. Hunt For the Dragon Balls 6. Zamasu 7. Moro 8. Tournament of Power 9. 21st Budōkai 10. Broly 11. Battle of Gods 12. Boo 13. U6 Tournament 14. Freeza 15. Red Ribbon Army 16. Artificial Humans/Cell 17.Golden Freeza
Kunzait_83 wrote:No matter what twisted pretzel logic you contort yourself into to try and convince yourself otherwise, Raditz landing on Earth is the middle of the fucking story. Zero context, zero setup. Its in NO way meant to be seen as a "beginning point" for ANYTHING other than the next story arc. It flows precisely and fluidly from where things left off in the aftermath of the 23rd Budokai and mostly hits the ground running from there without really stopping to look back. You're plopping someone into the middle of a book starting at chapter 195 out of 519 for absolutely no good goddamn reason, with very minimal opportunity to look back at much needed context and character/story growth.

User avatar
JulieYBM
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 16503
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:25 pm

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by JulieYBM » Wed Sep 04, 2019 5:24 pm

As a trans woman who is pansexual I don't want censoring of old works, that's tantamount to erasure. We need to keep these things to remind us of the horrible actions humanity has done so as not to repeat ourselves.
She/Her💕 💜 💙
progesterone princess, estradiol empress
Lucifer's bimbo daughter

User avatar
TheBlackPaladin
I Live Here
Posts: 3772
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:05 pm

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by TheBlackPaladin » Wed Sep 04, 2019 5:49 pm

I think it's important to remember, too, that Toei is a Japanese company. I'm not saying anti-LGBT content is right, but I am saying that, on a cultural level, what offends American audiences doesn't necessarily offend Japanese audiences, and vice versa. So I don't think Toei was actively trying to be offensive, they were just operating from a Japanese way of thinking because, well...that's their natural way of thinking, considering they are Japanese. So, I respectfully think that censorship and editing isn't the way to go.

It would also set a weird precedent going forward about what they would and wouldn't have to edit. I mean, in the Arabic dub of DBZ, all instances of saiyans turning into oozarus are censored because those in charge of the censoring decided that those scenes amounted to promoting Darwin's Theory of Evolution, which many in the Arabic world are opposed to on religious grounds. Instead, those scenes are edited (very poorly) to imply that, in the presence of a full moon, saiyans "summon" oozarus rather than transforming into them. So does Toei now have to edit out the transformation scenes themselves to avoid offending audiences in Arabic countries? What about France? Italy? Spain? Germany? Thailand? Canada? Brazil? Mexico? The U.S.?

....That'd just get messy and confusing, which is exactly censorship decisions with dubs are left up to dubbing companies on a case-by-case, country-by-country basis.
A "rather haggard" translation of a line from Future Gohan in DBZ, provided to FUNimation by Toei:
"To think of fighting that is this fun...so, it was pleasant fight, as many as, therefore is a feeling which is good the fight where."

User avatar
TheBlackPaladin
I Live Here
Posts: 3772
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:05 pm

Re: Future DB(Z) releases should be edited for it's painfully outdated LBTG+ content

Post by TheBlackPaladin » Wed Sep 04, 2019 5:50 pm

I think it's important to remember, too, that Toei is a Japanese company. I'm not saying anti-LGBT content is right, but I am saying that, on a cultural level, what offends American audiences doesn't necessarily offend Japanese audiences, and vice versa. Political correctness, for example, is generally not nearly as big a concern to them as it is to other countries. So I don't think Toei was actively trying to be offensive, they were just operating from a Japanese way of thinking because, well...that's their natural way of thinking, considering they are Japanese. So, I respectfully think that censorship and editing isn't the way to go.

It would also set a weird precedent going forward about what they would and wouldn't have to edit. I mean, in the Arabic dub of DBZ, all instances of saiyans turning into oozarus are censored because those in charge of the censoring decided that those scenes amounted to promoting Darwin's Theory of Evolution, which many in the Arabic world are opposed to on religious grounds. Instead, those scenes are edited (very poorly) to imply that, in the presence of a full moon, saiyans "summon" oozarus rather than transforming into them. So does Toei now have to edit out the transformation scenes themselves to avoid offending audiences in Arabic countries? What about France? Italy? Spain? Germany? Thailand? Canada? Brazil? Mexico? The U.S.?

....That'd just get messy and confusing, which is exactly why censorship decisions with dubs are left up to dubbing companies on a case-by-case, country-by-country basis.
A "rather haggard" translation of a line from Future Gohan in DBZ, provided to FUNimation by Toei:
"To think of fighting that is this fun...so, it was pleasant fight, as many as, therefore is a feeling which is good the fight where."

Post Reply