
The idea that she was his side chick and the fact that she got an additional voice credit on something he was working on really speaks for itself though
Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
Could it also be that they were never really thought that highly of, anyway? If I recall, there was this image about rock singers and other sorts of performers, like Elvis Presley, that their dancing was "immoral" or something... There was something that made them controversial from the get-go.Cursed Lemon wrote: Fri Jul 05, 2019 7:51 pm I guess the difference there is that, to my knowledge and correct me if I'm wrong, nobody has ever come out and accused Bowie or the Zeppelin guys of anything. It would've likely been the same with Michael Jackson had nobody spoken up; rumors would be just rumors.
Kataphrut wrote:It's a bit of a Boy Who Cried Wolf situation to me...Basically, the boy shouldn't have cried wolf when the wolves just wanted to Go See Yamcha. If not, they might have gotten some help when the wolves came back to Make the Donuts.
Chuquita wrote:I liken Gokû Black to "guy can't stand his job, so instead of quitting and finding a job he likes, he instead sets fire not only to his workplace so he doesn't have to work there, but tries setting fire to every store in the franchise of that company".
this really isn't true, lori mattix has talked about her "relationships" with page and bowie before and how they both had sex with her when she was like 13. i think the issue there is that a lot of people just don't know about it or try really hard too justify it ("oh it was rock in the 70s everyone was doing it"), as opposed to MJ where all that stuff was a national story and kinda lead too him becoming a huge punchline.Cursed Lemon wrote: Fri Jul 05, 2019 7:51 pm I guess the difference there is that, to my knowledge and correct me if I'm wrong, nobody has ever come out and accused Bowie or the Zeppelin guys of anything. It would've likely been the same with Michael Jackson had nobody spoken up; rumors would be just rumors.
Maybe, but if that were the case, you'd think that people would've been more than ready to nail them up against the wall.Fionordequester wrote: Fri Jul 05, 2019 7:58 pmCould it also be that they were never really thought that highly of, anyway? If I recall, there was this image about rock singers and other sorts of performers, like Elvis Presley, that their dancing was "immoral" or something... There was something that made them controversial from the get-go.
Maybe with them already having a bad reputation from those who didn't listen to their music, they were just... never held to any kind of standard. Like if you got mistreated, the social attitude would be "of course you were, what did you expect?".
Welp there it is, lolSoppa Saia People wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2019 3:28 amthis really isn't true, lori mattix has talked about her "relationships" with page and bowie before and how they both had sex with her when she was like 13.
I'm not sure if I buy this. If there was one person on this planet that people would've stood in front of a speeding semi truck for, it was Michael Jackson. I think possibly his extremely quirky nature as a person made him an easy target to build a media circus around.i think the issue there is that a lot of people just don't know about it or try really hard too justify it ("oh it was rock in the 70s everyone was doing it"), as opposed to MJ where all that stuff was a national story and kinda lead too him becoming a huge punchline.
yeah that's fair, the MJ stuff is a lot more complicated. there's certainly a lot of factors that lead too that kinda stuff, like his music decline, his vitiligo being viewed as skin bleaching, all his plastic surgeries, all that stuff. page and bowie were just high out of their minds, hell i think bowie's drugged out pro fascism period was around that time.Cursed Lemon wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2019 12:57 pm I'm not sure if I buy this. If there was one person on this planet that people would've stood in front of a speeding semi truck for, it was Michael Jackson. I think possibly his extremely quirky nature as a person made him an easy target to build a media circus around.
OFF-TOPIC:JulieYBM wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 11:39 pm In before Scott McNeil as the new dub Broli.
Anyway, the judge's reading of this case seems to be really fucking nonsensical. It's like he can't read between the lines? I don't even know.
As for Chuck Huber: he worked on Star Trek Continues with Vignogna so I'm not surprise that there's something seedy about him.
I'm also surprised this has reached over 200 pages.HakkaiBills93 wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2019 1:32 pm lol where is the time where interesting topics reach hundred post and this kind of speculations only few post.
It's something I started doing years ago to make my posts look a little better is all.Paulo Gabriel wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:01 amOFF-TOPIC:JulieYBM wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 11:39 pm In before Scott McNeil as the new dub Broli.
Anyway, the judge's reading of this case seems to be really fucking nonsensical. It's like he can't read between the lines? I don't even know.
As for Chuck Huber: he worked on Star Trek Continues with Vignogna so I'm not surprise that there's something seedy about him.
Not to sound like an asshole, but why put names of shows in italics? Doesn't that make the post much harder to write? Or is it just habit?
Force of habit. It's a minor formatting thing that helps make the titles of shows, movies, games and other media a bit clearer, particularly on TV Tropes and media sites like IGN.Paulo Gabriel wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:01 am OFF-TOPIC:
Not to sound like an asshole, but why put names of shows in italics? Doesn't that make the post much harder to write? Or is it just habit?
To follow up on the previous two responses, I have to say I feel it's not exactly getting the whole point across just to say it's an idiosyncratic personal preference or the unique style used on a couple of sites. Italicizing titles of works is considered proper formatting pretty much everywhere! Books, shows, movies are italicized. Chapters, episodes, etc. are put in quotations.Paulo Gabriel wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:01 am OFF-TOPIC:
Not to sound like an asshole, but why put names of shows in italics? Doesn't that make the post much harder to write? Or is it just habit?
I understand. And good explanations, KBABZ and Gaffer.JulieYBM wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:11 amIt's something I started doing years ago to make my posts look a little better is all.Paulo Gabriel wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:01 amOFF-TOPIC:JulieYBM wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 11:39 pm In before Scott McNeil as the new dub Broli.
Anyway, the judge's reading of this case seems to be really fucking nonsensical. It's like he can't read between the lines? I don't even know.
As for Chuck Huber: he worked on Star Trek Continues with Vignogna so I'm not surprise that there's something seedy about him.
Not to sound like an asshole, but why put names of shows in italics? Doesn't that make the post much harder to write? Or is it just habit?
I'm sure this is where I got it from. I used to be a writer for a news site so this probably just stuck.Gaffer Tape wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:58 amTo follow up on the previous two responses, I have to say I feel it's not exactly getting the whole point across just to say it's an idiosyncratic personal preference or the unique style used on a couple of sites. Italicizing titles of works is considered proper formatting pretty much everywhere! Books, shows, movies are italicized. Chapters, episodes, etc. are put in quotations.Paulo Gabriel wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:01 am OFF-TOPIC:
Not to sound like an asshole, but why put names of shows in italics? Doesn't that make the post much harder to write? Or is it just habit?