Honestly Balish, I see no difference between your complaining and those that were getting "offended" over even the tame male-on-male artworks here. Why is it so hard for people to not get all up in arms just because something that's not to your taste exists, and suddenly act like their opinion should be the moral standard for everyone else? I can't proclaim to personally like everything that was posted in this thread. I'm not a fan of the BDSM-ey stuff myself, but I'm not about to scream from the rooftops that it has to be stopped.
And as far as this stuff appearing in the interesting or funny art thread goes, yes, perhaps some of it would do better here than it would there, such as that Chi Chi image that was censored...but the fact remains that it
was censored, doesn't portray anything particularly lewd once said censoring is done, and actually could almost fit in the series proper...so if someone is that easily offended by it, I'd say the problem lies more with them than the artist or the poster.
I also hope you realize you've made it far too easy to just discount you as a whiner whose moral compass, if they even have one, is so far askew that we shouldn't take any of your words very highly. I mean...
TheBalishChannel wrote:What I'm conveying here is not what I myself would consider a moral crusade. It's a well-known stereotype that generally it is the autistic, heavily-devoted internet fanbases that find this type of stuff appealing and I just wanted to make that clear. I myself am not a man of aspergers syndrome or it's various forms, so perhaps that's why it's difficult for me to understand what exactly you guys are getting out of this. Is it the fact that they're Dragon Ball characters? Does real porn starring real human-beings not quite do it for some of you people?
REALLY? You can spout
that and yet find sexy drawings offensive? Oy vey.
), that that predates the Renaissance.
