Goku as the Main Character
Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20362
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Skippack, PA
- Contact:
Goku as the Main Character
I'm terrible with thread titles, so if someone can think of something better, feel free to suggest something.
The idea of this thread is to discuss what seems to be a common opinion on this forum, Goku should've ceded his spot as the protagonist of the story to someone else like Gohan or even Uub. One commenter even claimed a big reason they didn't like GT was because he felt like the end of Z lead him to believe Uub should've been the main hero. What are your thoughts on the subject?
Mine are simple, I like Goku as the main hero throughout the entirety of the shows, and have no interest in someone taking over the role. For one, we've been with him from the beginning, so I don't have an interest in someone taking over as the main character after nearly 400 episodes, much less nearly 500. I am all for other characters having more to do as it makes for a good series to have an ensemble and give other characters than just the lead important things to do, however, the lead is should remain the focus unless you're making an ensemble show, which DB has never been.
The idea of this thread is to discuss what seems to be a common opinion on this forum, Goku should've ceded his spot as the protagonist of the story to someone else like Gohan or even Uub. One commenter even claimed a big reason they didn't like GT was because he felt like the end of Z lead him to believe Uub should've been the main hero. What are your thoughts on the subject?
Mine are simple, I like Goku as the main hero throughout the entirety of the shows, and have no interest in someone taking over the role. For one, we've been with him from the beginning, so I don't have an interest in someone taking over as the main character after nearly 400 episodes, much less nearly 500. I am all for other characters having more to do as it makes for a good series to have an ensemble and give other characters than just the lead important things to do, however, the lead is should remain the focus unless you're making an ensemble show, which DB has never been.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
- Eire
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:58 pm
- Location: The Promised Land
- Contact:
Re: Goku as the Main Character
I used to feel bad about Goku being the main character. But after last re-watching I feel that I like him with all his flaws and I'm happy that he was present in whole series.
So the thing I wanted to wasn't getting rid of Goku. I just longed for ensemble cast. I wanted anyone else to do anything significant, I wanted any power-up given to someone else to be significant to the plot. Wanting anyone else to have a final say would be probably too much, but why not moving Goku to mentor/trainer type? Why not showing that maybe Uub and Pan have a raw power but can't rival his expirience in combat? To give Vegeta a significant part in victory? To make Goku step aside for a moment, remove him form spotlight (IMHO movie 8 could be so much better if the whole drama had been based solely on Paraga's revange against Vegeta Royal Family)? The show as long, there were so many possibilities, but everything was boiled down to format where all other characters served as ornaments.
So the thing I wanted to wasn't getting rid of Goku. I just longed for ensemble cast. I wanted anyone else to do anything significant, I wanted any power-up given to someone else to be significant to the plot. Wanting anyone else to have a final say would be probably too much, but why not moving Goku to mentor/trainer type? Why not showing that maybe Uub and Pan have a raw power but can't rival his expirience in combat? To give Vegeta a significant part in victory? To make Goku step aside for a moment, remove him form spotlight (IMHO movie 8 could be so much better if the whole drama had been based solely on Paraga's revange against Vegeta Royal Family)? The show as long, there were so many possibilities, but everything was boiled down to format where all other characters served as ornaments.
Per aspera ad astra, man!
Women belong in the kitchen.
Men belong in the kitchen.
Everyone belongs in the kitchen, the kitchen has food
Women belong in the kitchen.
Men belong in the kitchen.
Everyone belongs in the kitchen, the kitchen has food
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5167
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Goku as the Main Character
But here's the thing, Goku was not even the main focus in most of Z. In the Saiyan saga, he was dead. In the Namek saga, he was in space training. In the Android/Cell saga, he had a heart virus. And in the Buu saga, he was dead again. When he DID show up to fight, that's when things got exciting, but the stories weren't focused on him as this "main lead". It's just he always ended up beating the opponent. People just get angry that he didn't "pass the torch" to Gohan after the Cell saga. That's the only instance Goku shouldn't have been the one to defeat a villain.
Also, in all of the Z arcs, other characters got multiples chances to shine. Gohan, Krillin, and Vegeta had a ball in the Namek arc, as well as Piccolo when he fused with Nail. Vegeta, Trunks, Piccolo, and even Tien had great moments in the Android arc. The Buu arc put the focus on shitty characters, imo, but it wasn't just Goku all day by a long shot.
GT, on the other hand, is a Goku fest. Every character feels so incredibly irrelevant because Goku is always around. And to make it worse, it's Kid Goku. In Dragon Ball, Goku may have been the main focus, but he didn't have the power to blow up planets by farting on them. It's just bad. I guess when people claim they wish someone else would take Goku's role, it's another way of saying they want a fresh start, where other characters can also drive the story and not just get their asses beat until Goku arrives.
Also, in all of the Z arcs, other characters got multiples chances to shine. Gohan, Krillin, and Vegeta had a ball in the Namek arc, as well as Piccolo when he fused with Nail. Vegeta, Trunks, Piccolo, and even Tien had great moments in the Android arc. The Buu arc put the focus on shitty characters, imo, but it wasn't just Goku all day by a long shot.
GT, on the other hand, is a Goku fest. Every character feels so incredibly irrelevant because Goku is always around. And to make it worse, it's Kid Goku. In Dragon Ball, Goku may have been the main focus, but he didn't have the power to blow up planets by farting on them. It's just bad. I guess when people claim they wish someone else would take Goku's role, it's another way of saying they want a fresh start, where other characters can also drive the story and not just get their asses beat until Goku arrives.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
- TheUltimateVegito
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1002
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:37 am
- Location: Buu's Nightmares
Re: Goku as the Main Character
Couldn't have said it better myself.fadeddreams5 wrote:But here's the thing, Goku was not even the main focus in most of Z. In the Saiyan saga, he was dead. In the Namek saga, he was in space training. In the Android/Cell saga, he had a heart virus. And in the Buu saga, he was dead again. When he DID show up to fight, that's when things got exciting, but the stories weren't focused on him as this "main lead". It's just he always ended up beating the opponent. People just get angry that he didn't "pass the torch" to Gohan after the Cell saga. That's the only instance Goku shouldn't have been the one to defeat a villain.
Also, in all of the Z arcs, other characters got multiples chances to shine. Gohan, Krillin, and Vegeta had a ball in the Namek arc, as well as Piccolo when he fused with Nail. Vegeta, Trunks, Piccolo, and even Tenshinhan had great moments in the Android arc. The Buu arc put the focus on shitty characters, imo, but it wasn't just Goku all day by a long shot.
GT, on the other hand, is a Goku fest. Every character feels so incredibly irrelevant because Goku is always around. And to make it worse, it's Kid Goku. In Dragon Ball, Goku may have been the main focus, but he didn't have the power to blow up planets by farting on them. It's just bad. I guess when people claim they wish someone else would take Goku's role, it's another way of saying they want a fresh start, where other characters can also drive the story and not just get their asses beat until Goku arrives.
Gohan was the only character that would've been truly fit to take the lead. But even then it's debatable whether or not him taking the lead after the Cell Games would've been the best thing to do. Uub would've been suitable too, just not as much.
YouTube account:
https://www.youtube.com/user/SuperVegitoSSJ2
PSN: Songojames
My Reddit account is also Songojames
https://www.youtube.com/user/SuperVegitoSSJ2
PSN: Songojames
My Reddit account is also Songojames
- Marco Polo
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2967
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:44 pm
Re: Goku as the Main Character
GT should have started with Goku Jr., with Goku as this strange ghost-like entity from the past.
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20362
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Skippack, PA
- Contact:
Re: Goku as the Main Character
Goku was dead, but he wasn't off screen. The story followed his exploits in the afterlife.
Why is that necessarily a bad thing? He's once again the main character and DB also focused on Goku, which was arguably the best series of the three. It's not even kid Goku, it's him in his young body. And why is that even a bad thing? Kid Goku was great.GT, on the other hand, is a Goku fest.
You brought up how Z let other characters shine, but it's the one where the above formula happens the most.it's another way of saying they want a fresh start, where other characters can also drive the story and not just get their asses beat until Goku arrives.
Pretty much the same here, though I still want Goku as the main character. A good example would be to let other characters take on each of the different evil dragons.I just longed for ensemble cast.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
- Eire
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:58 pm
- Location: The Promised Land
- Contact:
Re: Goku as the Main Character
Kid Goku was great once. Namely in DB. In GT he was old cold dish.
Per aspera ad astra, man!
Women belong in the kitchen.
Men belong in the kitchen.
Everyone belongs in the kitchen, the kitchen has food
Women belong in the kitchen.
Men belong in the kitchen.
Everyone belongs in the kitchen, the kitchen has food
Re: Goku as the Main Character
Exactly what I think! Plus it feels like Gohan was actually intended to be the lead character after Cell but couldn't really take the role... He's way better as receiving power-ups like SSJ2 or Ultimate and then being part of a good fight than anything else...fadeddreams5 wrote:But here's the thing, Goku was not even the main focus in most of Z. In the Saiyan saga, he was dead. In the Namek saga, he was in space training. In the Android/Cell saga, he had a heart virus. And in the Buu saga, he was dead again. When he DID show up to fight, that's when things got exciting, but the stories weren't focused on him as this "main lead". It's just he always ended up beating the opponent. People just get angry that he didn't "pass the torch" to Gohan after the Cell saga. That's the only instance Goku shouldn't have been the one to defeat a villain.
Also, in all of the Z arcs, other characters got multiples chances to shine. Gohan, Krillin, and Vegeta had a ball in the Namek arc, as well as Piccolo when he fused with Nail. Vegeta, Trunks, Piccolo, and even Tenshinhan had great moments in the Android arc. The Buu arc put the focus on shitty characters, imo, but it wasn't just Goku all day by a long shot.
GT, on the other hand, is a Goku fest. Every character feels so incredibly irrelevant because Goku is always around. And to make it worse, it's Kid Goku. In Dragon Ball, Goku may have been the main focus, but he didn't have the power to blow up planets by farting on them. It's just bad. I guess when people claim they wish someone else would take Goku's role, it's another way of saying they want a fresh start, where other characters can also drive the story and not just get their asses beat until Goku arrives.
And I really like how other characters seem both being behind Gokū AND having some character development and interesting fights/moments.
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20362
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Skippack, PA
- Contact:
Re: Goku as the Main Character
Good thing then that he wasn't a kid, and I don't see how he was cold fish, he never fundamentally changed when he physically grew up.Eire wrote:Kid Goku was great once. Namely in DB. In GT he was old cold dish.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
- Chuquita
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 15155
- Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 2:16 am
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Re: Goku as the Main Character
I like Gokû as main character. He's fun, he's cute, and he's got some badass moments too.
I agree that Gokû really isn't the main in Z the way he is in DB. If anything, Kuririn, Gohan, and Vegeta (Team 3-Star! :3) are the main characters of Z. In Z, Gokû is constantly being taken out of the action, but when he does re-appear, I always enjoy it.
The way Toriyama draws him when he finally wakes up from his illness and is feeling all better is wonderful. :3
I especially loved how Gokû was written in BOG. That's part of why I'm so looking forward to him in「F」.
He's my favorite Dragon Ball character (Vegeta is a close second.), it wouldn't be Dragon Ball without him for me.
GT was executed so poorly, I can't really count it, imo. I was sad they turned him into a kid and never turned him back, but I did like that he recovered his tail.
I agree that Gokû really isn't the main in Z the way he is in DB. If anything, Kuririn, Gohan, and Vegeta (Team 3-Star! :3) are the main characters of Z. In Z, Gokû is constantly being taken out of the action, but when he does re-appear, I always enjoy it.
The way Toriyama draws him when he finally wakes up from his illness and is feeling all better is wonderful. :3
I especially loved how Gokû was written in BOG. That's part of why I'm so looking forward to him in「F」.
He's my favorite Dragon Ball character (Vegeta is a close second.), it wouldn't be Dragon Ball without him for me.
GT was executed so poorly, I can't really count it, imo. I was sad they turned him into a kid and never turned him back, but I did like that he recovered his tail.
- NitroEX
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:21 am
- Location: Not America
Re: Goku as the Main Character
I like Goku just as much as the next fan but I do believe there is evidence pointing toward Gohan being groomed for more than just a side character role but as we know, that never played out fully. I can only speculate what the reason for that was, maybe it was because Toriyama knew he had botched Gohan's character during the Buu arc or fans of the Manga weren't reacting as expected to Gohan, I don't know. One thing I do know is that Toriyama was influenced by people he knew during his creation of the Android arc and repeatedly changed and created new villains based on the opinions of others so I think it's plausible he changed his mind about Gohan or was persuaded otherwise to go with Goku for the series' end.
Admittedly it's a difficult theory to argue because Goku is quite clearly the main character of Dragonball, the various movies and GT. It's easy to see why people would assume Gohan was never intended for anything more than Goku's second fiddle based on what we got afterwards but you have to keep in mind that a lot of that stuff was a by-product of the Manga and they're just following in the direction Toriyama chose to go in.
let me sum this up by saying; A lot of Goku's appeal comes from beating obstacles and achieving goals throughout the story such as beating Piccolo and winning the 23rd(?) Tournament (goals that he'd previously struggled to achieve). From there we fast forward to him avenging the Saiyan race by humiliating Freeza, the tyrant of the universe, and becoming a SSJ. What else could they come up for him next that would top that? Other than fighting Gods... Not much.
Point is, after all that nothing he did would be as compelling as what he'd achieved previously so it was the perfect time for Goku to move aside and let Gohan take the reigns (which he did) by defeating Cell who was a culmination of all previous foes. Unfortunately all that potential was squandered during the Buu arc when Gohan fell from grace and Goku was reintroduced twice to try and pick up the pieces. While I can still enjoy how the story turned out I don't think this was the plan all along.
Admittedly it's a difficult theory to argue because Goku is quite clearly the main character of Dragonball, the various movies and GT. It's easy to see why people would assume Gohan was never intended for anything more than Goku's second fiddle based on what we got afterwards but you have to keep in mind that a lot of that stuff was a by-product of the Manga and they're just following in the direction Toriyama chose to go in.
True but you could argue that the more important (long term) story events were happening on Earth with Gohan bonding with Piccolo as well as the fight with the Saiyans. Not only does Gohan's character develop from a crybaby into somewhat of a warrior but he also changes Piccolo permanently into a good guy. During the fight Gohan is shown the consequences of his failure to act with his friends dying on the battlefield. This is all character building stuff that plays a part later in the story as opposed to Goku getting a superficial power up and returning to save the day. Even after the Goku Vegeta fight it's still Gohan who bounces the Spirit Bomb back to Vegeta and Gohan who crushes and inadvertently defeats Vegeta as a great ape, not Goku.ABED wrote:Goku was dead, but he wasn't off screen. The story followed his exploits in the afterlife.
Besides Buu and (arguably) Freeza Goku didn't defeat the major bad guys in the series. It's always others finishing them off.fadeddreams5 wrote: It's just he [Goku] always ended up beating the opponent.
let me sum this up by saying; A lot of Goku's appeal comes from beating obstacles and achieving goals throughout the story such as beating Piccolo and winning the 23rd(?) Tournament (goals that he'd previously struggled to achieve). From there we fast forward to him avenging the Saiyan race by humiliating Freeza, the tyrant of the universe, and becoming a SSJ. What else could they come up for him next that would top that? Other than fighting Gods... Not much.
Point is, after all that nothing he did would be as compelling as what he'd achieved previously so it was the perfect time for Goku to move aside and let Gohan take the reigns (which he did) by defeating Cell who was a culmination of all previous foes. Unfortunately all that potential was squandered during the Buu arc when Gohan fell from grace and Goku was reintroduced twice to try and pick up the pieces. While I can still enjoy how the story turned out I don't think this was the plan all along.
- DBZGTKOSDH
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
- Location: Greece
Re: Goku as the Main Character
I don't know if you are referring to me (since we had a small debate about that), but I actually like GT. It's just that I would have liked to see more of Oob.ABED wrote:One commenter even claimed a big reason they didn't like GT was because he felt like the end of Z lead him to believe Uub should've been the main hero.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.
- TheLegend23
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 9:04 am
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Goku as the Main Character
Dragon ball was the story of Goku. Without him being the main character then you got yourself a spin-off. It has to be him.
Re: Goku as the Main Character
Gohan could have worked but the Cell arc botched it by shoehorning him in.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.
Re: Goku as the Main Character
I feel Goku is managed pretty well all in all by Toriyama as the main character. The first part of DB is undoubtedly Goku's story, both in terms of focus and actually doing most of the leg work to carry the plot along but by the time the Z-era arrived, Toriyama was pretty comfortable with having other characters carry the story forward, doing their fair share of the heavy lifting of the plot and it became more of an ensemble cast to me, even if Goku was still an unseen focus at times.
It's kind of like Pro Wrestling. Goku started as a main eventer, and while he never really truly dropped down to mid-card to let others shine exclusively as some may want, he had others such as Piccolo, Vegeta and Gohan who were eventually able to rise to main event status with him. Sure not all stayed there consistently, and some dropped back into the mid-card, but Goku was never really the sole main eventer like he was for the most part in pre-Z <and GT>.
And to take this further; Krillin is like that dependable upper mid-card act that can be pushed up the card into the main event scene to support the main event guys and he'll do his role well and won't let you down. And future Trunks is like a wrestler that had an amazing debut that suggest that he'll instantly be a main event guy but ultimately settles in the upper mid-card with a few shining moments but nothing that makes the same impact as their debut <i.e. Kane or Jerichio>. And Gohan is the guy who had a slow-burn push to the main event. He paid his dues in the mid-card/upper mid-card in the Saiyan and Namek arcs before getting his main event push in the Cell Games, where it appeared he was going to be THE guy to succeed Goku, but obviously that didn't quite work out in the long run.
Sorry if this makes no sense to those not overly familar with Pro Wrestling...I kinda got carried away there...
It's kind of like Pro Wrestling. Goku started as a main eventer, and while he never really truly dropped down to mid-card to let others shine exclusively as some may want, he had others such as Piccolo, Vegeta and Gohan who were eventually able to rise to main event status with him. Sure not all stayed there consistently, and some dropped back into the mid-card, but Goku was never really the sole main eventer like he was for the most part in pre-Z <and GT>.
And to take this further; Krillin is like that dependable upper mid-card act that can be pushed up the card into the main event scene to support the main event guys and he'll do his role well and won't let you down. And future Trunks is like a wrestler that had an amazing debut that suggest that he'll instantly be a main event guy but ultimately settles in the upper mid-card with a few shining moments but nothing that makes the same impact as their debut <i.e. Kane or Jerichio>. And Gohan is the guy who had a slow-burn push to the main event. He paid his dues in the mid-card/upper mid-card in the Saiyan and Namek arcs before getting his main event push in the Cell Games, where it appeared he was going to be THE guy to succeed Goku, but obviously that didn't quite work out in the long run.
Sorry if this makes no sense to those not overly familar with Pro Wrestling...I kinda got carried away there...
Last edited by Jodaku on Fri Dec 26, 2014 8:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- TheUltimateVegito
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1002
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:37 am
- Location: Buu's Nightmares
Re: Goku as the Main Character
They didn't shoehorn him in, really. He was pretty active throughout the arc but didn't have the opportunity to perform something major until to Cell Games, mainly because he was too weak before then. Heck, he even saved Piccolo similarly to how he saved Vegeta in the Namek arc.Kid Buu wrote:Gohan could have worked but the Cell arc botched it by shoehorning him in.
And the moments where he actually did something were key moments of the arc, these moment set the stage perfectly for what should've been Gohan's time to take over for a number of reasons:
1. Goku training Gohan in the ROSAT - Not only did they train together, but Goku passed down the MSSJ form (which he invented) to him in a room that Goku himself couldn't handle as a child (Symbolism). Also, keep in mind that it was easier for Gohan to achieve the regular SSJ form since he was a hybrid.
2. The Cell Games - Let's see... Goku finally decides to give up in a recreation of the World Tournament, which was a big part of Goku's adventures, which represents Goku's rise to becoming the strongest on the planet, symbolizing the end of Goku... for Gohan. Gohan was then able to unleash his hidden power that was built up since he was debuted because of the MSSJ form, meaning that Goku passing down what he knows allowed Gohan to unleash his full potential and finally become the strongest being on the planet. (Symbolism)
3. SSJ2 Gohan - We learn more about Gohan as a character, about how he resents meaningless fighting in comparison to Goku. Also, it took 16's speech (Android 8 and Goku symbolism) to make Gohan go SSJ2 in arguably the greatest transformation scene in the entire series. And all the build up and wait for SSJ2 Gohan was worth it as we got a sadistic, merciless, badass warrior.
And that's without mentioning the Father-son-Kamehameha which was symbolism galore!
Just because Gohan took a break, doesn't mean he was shoehorned. It just allowed room for other characters to shine, while saving the best for last.
I mean, would you rather have them use Gohan similarly to how he was used in the Saiyan/Namek arcs? I wouldn't, since it would get redundant at that point. It's like saying we need another saga with Super Saiyan talk similar to the Namek saga. It would get repetitive.
The thing is, they managed to have Goku pass down the torch to Gohan while staying true to both their characters and the overall structure of the show. This deserves great praise as they're not your average costumed hero (well, at least Goku wasn't), making it a lot tougher to pull off.
YouTube account:
https://www.youtube.com/user/SuperVegitoSSJ2
PSN: Songojames
My Reddit account is also Songojames
https://www.youtube.com/user/SuperVegitoSSJ2
PSN: Songojames
My Reddit account is also Songojames
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20362
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Skippack, PA
- Contact:
Re: Goku as the Main Character
I don't think Gohan's story was more important to that arc. He took part of the spotlight naturally because he's a new character, but Goku had just learned of his true lineage, and the central conflict was between Goku and the members of his race. Goku's power up wasn't superficial. This incessant need of some to minimize Goku's contributions to the series is odd. Gohan would be dead if not for his father and there would be no Genkidama to bounce back had it not been for him. Let's not forget Kuririn's or Yajirobe's contributions. All of them were important, but Goku was still the central character to the story. It was all leading to his confrontation with Vegeta.True but you could argue that the more important (long term) story events were happening on Earth with Gohan bonding with Piccolo as well as the fight with the Saiyans. Not only does Gohan's character develop from a crybaby into somewhat of a warrior but he also changes Piccolo permanently into a good guy. During the fight Gohan is shown the consequences of his failure to act with his friends dying on the battlefield. This is all character building stuff that plays a part later in the story as opposed to Goku getting a superficial power up and returning to save the day. Even after the Goku Vegeta fight it's still Gohan who bounces the Spirit Bomb back to Vegeta and Gohan who crushes and inadvertently defeats Vegeta as a great ape, not Goku.
Not really. He carries Bulma and Yajirobe around, then trains with is father. My issue with Gohan as the hero is how he needs his hand held constantly, even until the end, which doesn't make for the most interesting hero.He was pretty active throughout the arc
All of this torch passing talk is nonsense. No one passed the torch to Goku. He took the torch, nothing was given to him, and being the Earth's hero wasn't a title that he was ever after. It just happened. Gohan's a good character but he's Robin or Nightwing. He can have interesting adventures in his own right, but I prefer Batman.
Toriyama was pretty comfortable with having other characters carry the story forward, doing their fair share of the heavy lifting of the plot and it became more of an ensemble cast to me, even if Goku was still an unseen focus at times.
This I'm perfectly fine with. Yu Yu Hakusho did a great job of giving all of the main characters something to do even if Yusuke was ultimately the one to defeat the big bad.
I don't remember who wrote it, and I have no problem giving Uub something to do, but I don't want him as the main character. It's like when TV shows lose their main character but continue on, it's never as interesting.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:It's just that I would have liked to see more of Oob.
By the way I know I use Batman a lot as an example but I like the character a lot and he's well known so it works as a common frame of reference.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
Re: Goku as the Main Character
GT/bog Goku sucking the energy out of the others so he can keep being the center of attention is a pretty good metaphor for the whole thing.
"Trunks, Gotenks!"
"NO YOU MUST FEEED MEEEE *dr zoidberg eating noises*"
"Trunks, Gotenks!"
"NO YOU MUST FEEED MEEEE *dr zoidberg eating noises*"
- TheUltimateVegito
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1002
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:37 am
- Location: Buu's Nightmares
Re: Goku as the Main Character
By active I mean he was actually doing stuff, whether it be of significance or not. I mean, it's not like he disappeared completely until he trained with Goku. Also, the fact that he took a hiatus doesn't mean he's no longer interesting. He still had the build up from the previous sagas going for him. It's like saying Goku was no longer an interesting hero because he had a heart virus.ABED wrote: He was pretty active throughout the arc
Not really. He carries Bulma and Yajirobe around, then trains with is father. My issue with Gohan as the hero is how he needs his hand held constantly, even until the end, which doesn't make for the most interesting hero.
All of this torch passing talk is nonsense. No one passed the torch to Goku. He took the torch, nothing was given to him, and being the Earth's hero wasn't a title that he was ever after. It just happened. Gohan's a good character but he's Robin or Nightwing. He can have interesting adventures in his own right, but I prefer Batman.
By passing the torch, I mean passing the leading role/legacy to his son. Yes, Goku didn't technically have some blatant physical form of a torch to pass on (Although, he wouldn't have been as strong as he was if he wasn't for training with other masters) but that wasn't needed, with all the events that transpired during Goku and Gohan's part of the saga. Also, Goku always cared for protecting the earth, whether he be leading or not. Hell, one of the main reasons for him staying dead was because of Gohan's hidden power, which Goku helped unleash.
YouTube account:
https://www.youtube.com/user/SuperVegitoSSJ2
PSN: Songojames
My Reddit account is also Songojames
https://www.youtube.com/user/SuperVegitoSSJ2
PSN: Songojames
My Reddit account is also Songojames
- DBZAOTA482
- Banned
- Posts: 6995
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Goku as the Main Character
Throughout Dragon Ball to the Freeza Saga, I thought was perfect as the main character. Fairly dynamic (moreso in DB), had a great personality, and an overall good role-model. By the Cell Saga, Toriyama-sensei seem to have went every direction he could with his character and as a result, he was a bit bland as the main character but Toriyama-sensei seemed to have knew this and gave more focus to other characters instead. Also a lot of people may think of him as a bad father for his decision to rely on Gohan's hidden powers to beat Cell but for him to come in terms with his errors and actually be willing to toss aside his pride is not what I'd call a bad father. Also that sacrifice... the feels.
As for the Boo Saga.... a bit of a douche but he had his moments (more in the anime than manga) but as for GT, I thoroughly disliked him. Way too powerful, and too much emphasis on the manchild "dumbass" aspect of his character.
As for the Boo Saga.... a bit of a douche but he had his moments (more in the anime than manga) but as for GT, I thoroughly disliked him. Way too powerful, and too much emphasis on the manchild "dumbass" aspect of his character.
fadeddreams5 wrote:Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
jjgp1112 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.
I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.