What gets me confused is what they consider “new”. Gogeta technically isn’t a new character but then again he technically is. Its like how we know who Broly is but technically the Broly from this new movie could be considered a new character.Baggie_Saiyan wrote:Another Ichiban Kuji won't get released for the movie. So it would make sense to pair UI Goku up with Full Power Broly if UI Goku was in the film. Ichiban Kuji is the highest tier of Banpresto figures and so no way UI wouldn't be part of the set if it were in the movie.sintzu wrote:If they were hiding something Goku related they'd call it an untitled/secret Goku figure. Keep in mind they may not be releasing an UI Goku until after the movie comes out so he could still be in, just not in that particular set.AnimeNation101 wrote:How does this confirm no UI?
Anyway here's what the March IBK labelled UI Goku as:
New form Son Goku (provisional). If they wanted to hide UI for the movie they could have just labelled it as Son Goku figure (provisional). And the mystery characters specifically say "new (新) character"
Of course, it doesn't flat out confirm no UI Goku but right now looking increasingly unlikely.
Next week we get catalogues for December figures and the WCFs which haven't been revealed. Mid September we'll get January catalogues and labels as well as Feb solicits, and the the next prize fair will also take place in mid September. So we will definitely have our answer by then.
So, in your personal opinion, do you think that if Gogeta was one of the figures, it would have said “Gogeta figure (provisional)” or can the term “new character” apply to him?
What about Bardock? Are characters who have already been revealed counted as “new” anymore?
Edit: Lol, you basically answered all my questions in the other message