Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:06 pm

Cipher wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:At least Videl was already uninteresting. The only time she ever shined was in the Saiyaman and very early Boo Arcs.
So ... basically any time she's given something to do?
Exactly that.
Retired.

Israelite Wolfman
Banned
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:49 pm
Location: Jerusalem, Israel.
Contact:

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by Israelite Wolfman » Fri Feb 17, 2017 9:45 am

Gohan is the most ruined character for me in Super (not counting Goku's drop in IQ from the Buu Saga). In the End of Z it seemed like he at least maintained his Ultimate/Mystic powers 10 years after the Majin Buu conflict/crisis to a degree, now he's a character who loses his powers and will to fight in each saga despite promising to train to protect his family every time a conflict rises/ends (he did train before the U6 tournament after he realized he was to blame for Piccolo's death in the RoF arc, also when he heard of the Goku Black conflict in the last phase of the Future Trunks arc). It's like Toei do not know what to do with him at all or afraid he'll take Goku's place.

User avatar
TekTheNinja
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1647
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:36 pm

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by TekTheNinja » Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:45 am

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
GodVegetto91 wrote:Well i'll tell you who it ruined..

Vegetto!!!
By nerfing him? Cheat codes are a bad thing. The fact that they brought Vegetto down a few pegs wasn't a problem, the fact that they blatantly contradicted previous explanations was.

If anything, Vegetto is better now that they don't have the option of abusing him.
What? If anything now they have even more reason to overuse Vegito since it's not permanent anymore. This is honestly infuriating to me.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
Cipher wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:At least Videl was already uninteresting. The only time she ever shined was in the Saiyaman and very early Boo Arcs.
So ... basically any time she's given something to do?
Exactly that.
So you just disproved your own point. She was VERY interesting.

Lujin_16
Regular
Posts: 726
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:18 pm

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by Lujin_16 » Sat Feb 18, 2017 6:19 am

So change means ruined??? Gohan in Super is like the Gohan in the beginning of Z,Vegeta changed a little bit he cares more about family now and it's not
a bad thing,Gohan & Trunks are the same and the rest are the same as we know them...

User avatar
TekTheNinja
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1647
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:36 pm

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by TekTheNinja » Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:30 am

Lujin_16 wrote:So change means ruined??? Gohan in Super is like the Gohan in the beginning of Z,Vegeta changed a little bit he cares more about family now and it's not
a bad thing,Gohan & Trunks are the same and the rest are the same as we know them...
Completely having a character's personality entirely changed at the drop of a hat to something less favorable than before? Yes, that's ruining a character.

Gogetto
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:17 pm

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by Gogetto » Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:35 am

So, on my list of favorite characters:

* Vegeta: he would have been ruined if his personality completely changed. Vegeta is still kind of an arrogant, hot-blooded jerk, just not as much as before. Several moments in Super showcased his character development. If there is an interesting character here, it's him.

* Goku: for reasons already stated before, I believed he has been ruined.

* Gohan: some people tend to think that Gohan not being as badass as he was in Cell Games is ruining his character. Remember, the SSJ2 was a huge out-of-character moment for him. So, if you only like Gohan when he kicks ass...you're not really fan of his character. Up until Cell Games and Boo arc, Gohan was always fodder. So, Super has done nothing to ruin this character (yet).

* Piccolo: Fodder and comic relief since Boo arc. Super is not responsible, and they actually tried to make him useful twice (they failed, but points for trying). I like his scenes with Pan, though.

* Future Trunks: never felt like he was much different from his Androids arc self, but it's obvious that he suffered a lot of emotional damage, justifiably so. The arc he was in actually served to brutally ruin the happy emding that he worked so hard to earn. Damn you, Zamasu !

Well, 1/5, not bad, I guess.

Lujin_16
Regular
Posts: 726
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:18 pm

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by Lujin_16 » Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:47 am

TekTheNinja wrote:
Lujin_16 wrote:So change means ruined??? Gohan in Super is like the Gohan in the beginning of Z,Vegeta changed a little bit he cares more about family now and it's not
a bad thing,Gohan & Trunks are the same and the rest are the same as we know them...
Completely having a character's personality entirely changed at the drop of a hat to something less favorable than before? Yes, that's ruining a character.

So you like to see the same shit again?? Vegeta's pride withhout learning something new??? Gohan was always like that not a fighter who loves fighting
If you like the character just only for fighting and nothings else that's your problem for me they ruined nothing

MrBlackFox
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 419
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 6:37 pm

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by MrBlackFox » Sat Feb 18, 2017 8:11 am

Goten / Kid Trunks, at least 'til their apparent return to arms in 77

Chi - Chi, annoying like a power pole extended right in the ass

Future Trunks, from brave, smart, bulky badass hero into e blue haired pussy who ends up as bigger loser in the series

Vegito, awesome design in blue, but I'll never love that retcon on fusion duration

Goku, a fuckin' retard, with no more traces of seriousness

Gohan so far, but it's coming back so i'm fine


The worst for me is FT, was my favourite character since I started loving DB, but now it's hard

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Sat Feb 18, 2017 11:59 am

TekTheNinja wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
GodVegetto91 wrote:Well i'll tell you who it ruined..

Vegetto!!!
By nerfing him? Cheat codes are a bad thing. The fact that they brought Vegetto down a few pegs wasn't a problem, the fact that they blatantly contradicted previous explanations was.

If anything, Vegetto is better now that they don't have the option of abusing him.
What? If anything now they have even more reason to overuse Vegito since it's not permanent anymore. This is honestly infuriating to me.
You're forgetting the fact that their time is cut down to jack shit if they use a significant amount of power. Vegetto is broken, he doesn't work with the time limit in place and that's a good thing.
TekTheNinja wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
Cipher wrote: So ... basically any time she's given something to do?
Exactly that.
So you just disproved your own point. She was VERY interesting.
No, she had the potential to be interesting, and when they capitalized on that it worked. They didn't capitalize on her enough to call it interesting, only potentially interesting.
Retired.

User avatar
TekTheNinja
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1647
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:36 pm

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by TekTheNinja » Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:30 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
TekTheNinja wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: By nerfing him? Cheat codes are a bad thing. The fact that they brought Vegetto down a few pegs wasn't a problem, the fact that they blatantly contradicted previous explanations was.

If anything, Vegetto is better now that they don't have the option of abusing him.
What? If anything now they have even more reason to overuse Vegito since it's not permanent anymore. This is honestly infuriating to me.
You're forgetting the fact that their time is cut down to jack shit if they use a significant amount of power. Vegetto is broken, he doesn't work with the time limit in place and that's a good thing.
TekTheNinja wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Exactly that.
So you just disproved your own point. She was VERY interesting.
No, she had the potential to be interesting, and when they capitalized on that it worked. They didn't capitalize on her enough to call it interesting, only potentially interesting.
That's not how it works. She was interesting when she was actually there before and you admitted it.

So you like to see the same shit again?? Vegeta's pride withhout learning something new??? Gohan was always like that not a fighter who loves fighting
If you like the character just only for fighting and nothings else that's your problem for me they ruined nothing
It's like you didn't listen to what I just said at all, dude.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:34 pm

You're the one who doesn't get how it works. I refuse to give credit to Toriyama and Toei for something that they could have done. Videl being relevant and interesting for less than 10 episodes (5 chapters?) total doesn't make her interesting.
Retired.

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6333
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by Cipher » Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:42 pm

I don't think it needs to be overintellectualized (it is a rare day you'll catch me saying that on this forum!).

Videl is a distinct, enjoyable character for the entirety of her presence in the Z/the manga (especially in Z, actually, with her expanded screentime). In Super, she's boring.

Of all character in Super, I think Videl has faired the worst. Checking in on her and Gohan, two well-intentioned ex-martial arts-superheroes living a domestic life, should be the best thing in the world. It never is.

User avatar
TekTheNinja
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1647
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:36 pm

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by TekTheNinja » Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:23 am

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:You're the one who doesn't get how it works. I refuse to give credit to Toriyama and Toei for something that they could have done. Videl being relevant and interesting for less than 10 episodes (5 chapters?) total doesn't make her interesting.
Dude, this is simple. In Z when she was there she was interesting. In Super, when she's here she's a boring housewife. How much she was used in Z is irrelevant.

User avatar
HybridSaiyan
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1113
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:18 pm
Location: UK

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by HybridSaiyan » Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:30 am

TekTheNinja wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:You're the one who doesn't get how it works. I refuse to give credit to Toriyama and Toei for something that they could have done. Videl being relevant and interesting for less than 10 episodes (5 chapters?) total doesn't make her interesting.
Dude, this is simple. In Z when she was there she was interesting. In Super, when she's here she's a boring housewife. How much she was used in Z is irrelevant.
Agreed. I always loved her tomboyish spark and her old design. She just seems completely different. If they were wanting a change, Toei / Toriyama could have just used her EOZ haircut. At least that still resembles Videl.

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21389
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by Lord Beerus » Sun Feb 19, 2017 1:38 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:You're the one who doesn't get how it works. I refuse to give credit to Toriyama and Toei for something that they could have done. Videl being relevant and interesting for less than 10 episodes (5 chapters?) total doesn't make her interesting.
Gotta side with Jinzoningen MULE on this one. Videl's character never really went through any significant character evolution in Z beyond her baseline generic tomboyish girl characterisation, which in itself, didn't last long. We see a brief glimpse of her in EOZ, but it's really nothing of importance to note.

User avatar
emperior
I Live Here
Posts: 4322
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:52 pm
Location: Dragon World
Contact:

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by emperior » Sun Feb 19, 2017 1:50 pm

For me, it ruined Videl, even though she has been mostly fine during her last appearances. I also don't like how Goten has been portrayed, while Kid Trunks has been fine, especially in Future Trunks arc.
悟 “Vincit qui se vincit”

What I consider canonical

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21389
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by Lord Beerus » Sun Feb 19, 2017 2:10 pm

emperior wrote:For me, it ruined Videl, even though she has been mostly fine during her last appearances. I also don't like how Goten has been portrayed, while Kid Trunks has been fine, especially in Future Trunks arc.
To play devil's advocate, did Goten even have that much of a character to even begin with?

User avatar
emperior
I Live Here
Posts: 4322
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:52 pm
Location: Dragon World
Contact:

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by emperior » Sun Feb 19, 2017 2:21 pm

Lord Beerus wrote:
emperior wrote:For me, it ruined Videl, even though she has been mostly fine during her last appearances. I also don't like how Goten has been portrayed, while Kid Trunks has been fine, especially in Future Trunks arc.
To play devil's advocate, did Goten even have that much of a character to even begin with?
He didn't, in fact the thing I dislike the most is the fact they refuse to give him character, even though he is supposed to be aging, at least mentally. But it seems like he is stuck in a 6 years old body and mind. I get that he's Goku's son and lives in the country, but Gohan was even more mature than Goten when he was 4 years old. Only very recently they are starting to show Goten somewhat getting more mature.
悟 “Vincit qui se vincit”

What I consider canonical

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21389
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by Lord Beerus » Sun Feb 19, 2017 2:30 pm

emperior wrote:
Lord Beerus wrote:
emperior wrote:For me, it ruined Videl, even though she has been mostly fine during her last appearances. I also don't like how Goten has been portrayed, while Kid Trunks has been fine, especially in Future Trunks arc.
To play devil's advocate, did Goten even have that much of a character to even begin with?
He didn't, in fact the thing I dislike the most is the fact they refuse to give him character, even though he is supposed to be aging, at least mentally. But it seems like he is stuck in a 6 years old body and mind. I get that he's Goku's son and lives in the country, but Gohan was even more mature than Goten when he was 4 years old. Only very recently they are starting to show Goten somewhat getting more mature.
To be fair the circumstances of Gohan's childhood and Goten's childhood were greatly different. Goten's upbringing was during an era of peace, whereas Gohan had to deal with the likes of of Piccolo, Raditz, Vegeta, Nappa, The Ginyu Force, Freeza and Cell before he even reached double digits of age. So naturally, Gohan would have no other choice but to mature at a much faster rate than children normally would have to so that he would be mentally and physically prepared for the immense dangers he would have to face and the great responsibilities on his shoulders.

User avatar
szopman
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 9:56 am
Location: Poland

Re: Did Super ruin some characters for you?

Post by szopman » Wed Feb 22, 2017 4:44 am

I think that the most wasted/ruined characters in DBS are:
Goku - for obvious reasons :)
Piccolo - he's now more like comic relief ;/
Krillin - why Toei makes him such a coward in DBS? First in RoF saga he was afraid of Frieza's soldiers which he normally would beat easily. And later in fillers he was again afraid of fighting. + He was hurt after being shot ;O WTF.
and Gohan. I don't mind his personality, cause I think that his personality is presented as it should be. He never was into fighting, always wanted to be a schoolar and he always cared for his family. So I think his personality was well developed. But ... his power level. 7 years after Cell Games, he was a little bit weaker but he still could transform easily into SSJ2. In BoG, which takes place 4,5 years after Buu Saga, he still uses his Mystic form. And ONE years later, in RoF, he can't even maintain his SSJ1 transformation for more than a moment. Again, WTF? That doesn't even make sense. How could he become so weak in just one year? From Mystic (wich is more or less equivalent to SSJ3) to SSJ1. While Goten or Trunks still can easily transform into SSJ1 without any problems. So technically, in RoF, the kids are stronger than Gohan. That's insane! Especially that he's the one with the biggest potential.
I hope he will become again Mystic Gohan in the new saga.

About F.Trunks - I don't think his character was wasted in the previous saga. I really liked how he was portrayed in the Black Saga. And it's nice that he became far stronger than he was in Cell Saga. I think this character deserved that :)

Post Reply