Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Namek?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

Hero 004
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:42 am
Location: Texas

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by Hero 004 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:14 pm

I in-fact do think that the Dragon Ball Z manga and anime series get better after the character leave the planet Namek and return to Earth. The Trunks plot twist adds a lot to the mythology in my opinion. I enjoyed the transition from alien sci-fi to time travel and robot sci-fi.
"Sometimes life is too uncertain to have regrets"- Goku

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20282
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by ABED » Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:19 pm

Goku's battle power when he first arrives on Namek is around 180,000. Every source I've ever read says that.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4127
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by Kid Buu » Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:23 pm

ABED wrote:Goku's battle power when he first arrives on Namek is around 180,000. Every source I've ever read says that.
That's after the Kaioken
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20282
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by ABED » Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:29 pm

Kid Buu wrote:
ABED wrote:Goku's battle power when he first arrives on Namek is around 180,000. Every source I've ever read says that.
That's after the Kaioken
And... He wasn't using it as an attack, it was to boost his power quicker. Logically, it makes no sense that his base isn't 180k if Vegeta is so easily amazed by Goku's power yet he can take on Ginyu and Freeza.

And Kaio-ken and Kaio-ken x2 aren't the same thing.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4127
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by Kid Buu » Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:42 pm

ABED wrote: And Kaio-ken and Kaio-ken x2 aren't the same thing.
Huh?

Vegeta was also amazed by Goku's over 8000 power level in the Saiyan arc despite being more than twice that. Its more of being impressed how he managed to grow so much stronger over time then anything else.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20282
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by ABED » Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:51 pm

Kid Buu wrote:
ABED wrote: And Kaio-ken and Kaio-ken x2 aren't the same thing.
Huh?

Vegeta was also amazed by Goku's over 8000 power level in the Saiyan arc despite being more than twice that. Its more of being impressed how he managed to grow so much stronger over time then anything else.
Vegeta wasn't stronger than Goku, there's no way. There's nothing to support the claim that he was only 90k.

And Vegeta's reaction was different here. It wasn't shock that a low class fighter was stronger than he expected, it's that he was THE Super Saiyan, as in the one and only. Again, Kaio-ken and Kaio-ken x2 are two different attacks. I bring that up because you deduced the 90k (which doesn't make sense since the guides I've seen don't list the instantaneous boosts) because you assume the Kaio-ken doubled his power. However, Kaio-ken x2 and kaio-ken aren't the same. He wasn't using the double, so it's not 90k.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
penguintruth
Banned
Posts: 4861
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:49 pm

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by penguintruth » Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:54 pm

The Cell/Artificial Human arc has the best storytelling in the entire DB story. Increasingly complex (albeit at times a tad convoluted), some interesting new concepts, noteworthy twists, and some great combat. I like how Toriyama's time travel rules aren't the same as everyone else's, the concept of Cell, Piccolo's temporary return to prominence, the Room of Spirit and Time, and Gohan coming into his own. It's not exactly brilliant or groundbreaking, and it does continue most of the same trends that were used before, but it's easily some of the best material in the franchise.
Kentai wrote:Son Gokuu is a fascinating character anyway, because he is - at face value, anyway - an idiot savant. The victim of violent head trauma as an infant [...] he's a simple bumpkin with a fair share of brain damage who's natural talents to work out what's wrong compensate for his broad lack of common sense. But he's also a fighter, through and through [...] he fight until he has, in no uncertain terms, beaten his enemy on terms they can both acknowledge. He doesn't want to kill anyone, or even prove that he can win... he just wants to know he can. He's an ineffably charming bastard who's manly leanings were really incendental, and yes, the fact that he was voiced by a squeaky woman made the combination perhaps all the more charming.


Dragon Ball (Z) Kai Reviews!

Can I get a Schemen?

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by RandomGuy96 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:59 pm

ABED wrote:
Kid Buu wrote:
ABED wrote: And Kaio-ken and Kaio-ken x2 aren't the same thing.
Huh?

Vegeta was also amazed by Goku's over 8000 power level in the Saiyan arc despite being more than twice that. Its more of being impressed how he managed to grow so much stronger over time then anything else.
Vegeta wasn't stronger than Goku, there's no way. There's nothing to support the claim that he was only 90k.

And Vegeta's reaction was different here. It wasn't shock that a low class fighter was stronger than he expected, it's that he was THE Super Saiyan, as in the one and only. Again, Kaio-ken and Kaio-ken x2 are two different attacks. I bring that up because you deduced the 90k (which doesn't make sense since the guides I've seen don't list the instantaneous boosts) because you assume the Kaio-ken doubled his power. However, Kaio-ken x2 and kaio-ken aren't the same. He wasn't using the double, so it's not 90k.
Even if if he was 180,000, Vegeta would still be considerably stronger than him. So there'd be no difference. Daizenshuu has him at 90,000 and he had to use kaio-ken to get to 180,000. In the manga, whenever the move is just called "kaio-ken" (no multiplier), it doubles strength. Kaio-ken x2 and kaio-ken are the same thing.
And... He wasn't using it as an attack, it was to boost his power quicker
What does this even mean?
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4127
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by Kid Buu » Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:02 pm

See, I've never heard of anything saying KK and KKx2 are difference attacks.

As soon as Goku's starts to use the Kaioken, his power level starts at 90,000:

Chapter: 284 (DBZ 90), P14.6-7
Context: as Goku starts using the Kaio-Ken
Ginyu: "Ni... 90,000...?! 100,000... 110,000... I'm... impossible... it can't be... It's st... still rising...!"

Even prior, Vegeta thinks Goku and Ginyu are near power. 90k is certainly closer to 120k then 180k is.

Chapter: 284 (DBZ 90), P4.3
Vegeta: “Kukkukkuh, things are turning out well! Kakarot and Ginyu look to be about even in ability! If things go well they just might take each other out…!”
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20282
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by ABED » Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:18 pm

Kid Buu wrote:See, I've never heard of anything saying KK and KKx2 are difference attacks.

As soon as Goku's starts to use the Kaioken, his power level starts at 90,000:

Chapter: 284 (DBZ 90), P14.6-7
Context: as Goku starts using the Kaio-Ken
Ginyu: "Ni... 90,000...?! 100,000... 110,000... I'm... impossible... it can't be... It's st... still rising...!"

Even prior, Vegeta thinks Goku and Ginyu are near power. 90k is certainly closer to 120k then 180k is.

Chapter: 284 (DBZ 90), P4.3
Vegeta: “Kukkukkuh, things are turning out well! Kakarot and Ginyu look to be about even in ability! If things go well they just might take each other out…!”
Why would Goku use Kaio-ken and Kaio-ken x2 if they weren't two different attacks? It would be redundant. Your quote proves nothing because Goku's power and Ginyu's power were steadily rising throughout the battle. If Goku wasn't 180k base then his Kaio-ken power up wouldn't have meant much beyond showing off.

This is one of the first times I've ever seen someone say his power was around 90k. Every site and source I've read has Goku at 180k. I don't see why they would list his Kaio-ken unless they assume readers can't do the math.

And it makes no sense to have Vegeta be stronger than Goku at that point. Vegeta got his ass handed to him by Ginyu's subordinate and then he's stronger than Ginyu and Goku who spent several days under intense gravity training?

Forget it, this is what bothers me about power levels, it's the huge leaps in logic.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by RandomGuy96 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:22 pm

And it makes no sense to have Vegeta be stronger than Goku at that point. Vegeta got his ass handed to him by Ginyu's subordinate and then he's stronger than Ginyu and Goku who spent several days under intense gravity training?
Nowhere near as bullshit as Goku surpassing an even stronger Vegeta + Nailccolo by getting one near death boost which inexplicably made him a few dozen times stronger.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20282
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by ABED » Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:26 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:
And it makes no sense to have Vegeta be stronger than Goku at that point. Vegeta got his ass handed to him by Ginyu's subordinate and then he's stronger than Ginyu and Goku who spent several days under intense gravity training?
Nowhere near as bullshit as Goku surpassing an even stronger Vegeta + Nailccolo by getting one near death boost which inexplicably made him a few dozen times stronger.
Well, if Vegeta is capable of such huge illogical leaps, surely Goku is capable of the same. While we're at it, it never made that much sense to me that Piccolo would get such a huge jump in strength after merging with Kami considering how weak Kami was in comparison to Piccolo at the time of the Cell arc.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

rereboy
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10262
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:42 pm

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by rereboy » Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:06 pm

ABED wrote:There's nothing to support the claim that he was only 90k.
What? Goku uses Kaioken agaisnt Ginyu and Ginyu's scouter registers his rising power in the manga. The first power that it registered, while Goku was activating Kaioken, was 90.000, then 100.000, then 110.000, then 120.000, then 130.000, 140.000, 160.000 and finally stopped at 180.000.

Kaioken gives the user more power than the user has at base. So, AT BEST, Goku's base power when he fights Ginyu is 90.000, but he can increase it multiples times with Kaioken.

Vegeta is amazed at Goku's power because he had just proved to be overwhelmingly superior to the guys that had completely humiliated him a few moments ago. Not to mention that Vegeta knows that Goku can use Kaioken to multiply his power and apparently he wasn't anything like that to beat those guys.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by RandomGuy96 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:14 pm

ABED wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
And it makes no sense to have Vegeta be stronger than Goku at that point. Vegeta got his ass handed to him by Ginyu's subordinate and then he's stronger than Ginyu and Goku who spent several days under intense gravity training?
Nowhere near as bullshit as Goku surpassing an even stronger Vegeta + Nailccolo by getting one near death boost which inexplicably made him a few dozen times stronger.
Well, if Vegeta is capable of such huge illogical leaps, surely Goku is capable of the same. While we're at it, it never made that much sense to me that Piccolo would get such a huge jump in strength after merging with Kami considering how weak Kami was in comparison to Piccolo at the time of the Cell arc.
Uh huh. You know, I'm getting this "everything is bullshit unless Goku does it, because Goku is perfect" vibe from you.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20282
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by ABED » Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:34 pm

I won't deny Goku is probably my favorite character but you inferred wrong. He's not perfect, but that's not what this is about. I'm saying that from a storytelling stand point, it doesn't make sense that Vegeta is stronger than Goku when he arrives on Namek. I have nothing against Vegeta being stronger than Goku at points but it lacks sense here. Goku goes through harsh heavy training for several days straight, but Vegeta is still stronger than him because he was beat up by a subordinate?
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sat Jan 11, 2014 3:32 am

ABED wrote:I won't deny Goku is probably my favorite character but you inferred wrong. He's not perfect, but that's not what this is about. I'm saying that from a storytelling stand point, it doesn't make sense that Vegeta is stronger than Goku when he arrives on Namek. I have nothing against Vegeta being stronger than Goku at points but it lacks sense here. Goku goes through harsh heavy training for several days straight, but Vegeta is still stronger than him because he was beat up by a subordinate?
Vegeta is not stronger than Goku when he arrives on Namek. He's only stronger after eating the senzu and becoming strong enough to take on first form Freeza (so 450,000-ish compared to Goku's 90,000). Goku being 90,000 or 180,000 wouldn't change that; he'd still end up massively below Vegeta even if he were actually 270,000. And besides, Goku would still be able to effortlessly crush Vegeta by using kaio-ken x10 anyway, so does it even matter?

Yes, Goku trained for a week and became over eleven times as powerful. Then after that he gets ONE near death healing boost and goes from weaker than Ginyu to stronger than all lower forms of Freeza, almost three dozen times his previous strength. That's so much better than Vegeta getting ~15 times stronger from getting a worse beat down, right?

Both of the power-ups were bullshit. Goku getting eleven times stronger in one week was bullshit. Vegeta getting even stronger than that with one beatdown was also bullshit. Goku getting much, much stronger than THAT, almost three dozen times stronger, is again bullshit. Goku just has a higher rate of bullshit power-ups on average.

Yet whenever Goku gets a bullshit power-up, you say he deserved it then criticize other characters for doing the same thing: "rage boosts", dormant power, and near-death healing boosts in particular. You also try to rewrite the story to make Goku look better (i.e. "Goku didn't actually do this thing, even though we clearly saw him do it on the page, because Toriyama hadn't thought one chapter ahead and therefore nothing Goku did counts").
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Daimo-Rukiri
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:44 am
Location: U..S..A..

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by Daimo-Rukiri » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:07 am

The Namek-Freeza arc's are probably my favorite portion of the series, I just find that they're more exciting than later arcs mainly because the villains were a little bland in my opinion.
The Boo ark was alright but I found the cell portion pretty bland and tasteless.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20282
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by ABED » Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:40 am

RandomGuy96 wrote:
ABED wrote:I won't deny Goku is probably my favorite character but you inferred wrong. He's not perfect, but that's not what this is about. I'm saying that from a storytelling stand point, it doesn't make sense that Vegeta is stronger than Goku when he arrives on Namek. I have nothing against Vegeta being stronger than Goku at points but it lacks sense here. Goku goes through harsh heavy training for several days straight, but Vegeta is still stronger than him because he was beat up by a subordinate?
Vegeta is not stronger than Goku when he arrives on Namek. He's only stronger after eating the senzu and becoming strong enough to take on first form Freeza (so 450,000-ish compared to Goku's 90,000). Goku being 90,000 or 180,000 wouldn't change that; he'd still end up massively below Vegeta even if he were actually 270,000. And besides, Goku would still be able to effortlessly crush Vegeta by using kaio-ken x10 anyway, so does it even matter?

Yes, Goku trained for a week and became over eleven times as powerful. Then after that he gets ONE near death healing boost and goes from weaker than Ginyu to stronger than all lower forms of Freeza, almost three dozen times his previous strength. That's so much better than Vegeta getting ~15 times stronger from getting a worse beat down, right?

Both of the power-ups were bullshit. Goku getting eleven times stronger in one week was bullshit. Vegeta getting even stronger than that with one beatdown was also bullshit. Goku getting much, much stronger than THAT, almost three dozen times stronger, is again bullshit. Goku just has a higher rate of bullshit power-ups on average.

Yet whenever Goku gets a bullshit power-up, you say he deserved it then criticize other characters for doing the same thing: "rage boosts", dormant power, and near-death healing boosts in particular. You also try to rewrite the story to make Goku look better (i.e. "Goku didn't actually do this thing, even though we clearly saw him do it on the page, because Toriyama hadn't thought one chapter ahead and therefore nothing Goku did counts").
That's why power levels are so irritating, it leads to things like this. It makes no sense from a writing perspective to not have the hero of the story be stronger than Vegeta at that point, even before taking into account momentary power boosts like Kaio-ken. Forget about the math.

I get it, "shit" means you are REALLY irritated. It's a fantasy, so it makes sense to me and many others that Goku becomes insanely strong after heavy gravity training.

I've never rewritten the story.

Back to the actual thread topic, I don't think it got better. I enjoy the Cell arc but not the Buu arc, except for certain moments. The thing that bothers me about the Cell arc is that Freeza was so strong that he could destroy a planet without much effort, yet none of the fights going forward take that into account. It's hard for me to be impressed by Hell's Flash or the Big Bang Attack when Freeza could destroy a planet with his finger.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Duo
I Live Here
Posts: 3221
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by Duo » Sat Jan 11, 2014 2:56 pm

Abed, you're right insofar that the hero should not be suddenly outshined in this context of the series. Problem is, that just shows a weakness in the writing at that point (which I was trying to hit on a bit with my post last page). Nothing you say changes the fact multiple sources including the manga itself says Goku's base was 90,000 at that point.

I think his base was kept conservative at this point (kind of) because Toriyama was planning on him busting out Kaio-Ken x10 (Goku says he can probably do it before he lands on Namek), which would set him to nearly a million in power.

User avatar
Herms
Kanzenshuu Admin Emeritus
Posts: 10550
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Jupiter
Contact:

Re: Does anybody actually think that DBZ got better post-Nam

Post by Herms » Sat Jan 11, 2014 4:43 pm

At this point, how about just making a seperate thread for all this power level talk? It's off-topic and is overwhelming the original conversation.
Kanzenshuu: Is that place still around?
Sometimes, I tweet things
We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.

Post Reply