Kanzenshuu

Like Gafonso6 shared in the other thread, the movie Super Hero is getting a sub and dub release on August 18: https://www.crunchyroll.com/pt-pt/anime ... e-portugal

I'm honestly surprised.

AFAIK, the name Bills changed to Beerus in the Spanish dub at some point of the Super series because an international requirement from Toei Animation existed. That is why I wanted to know if that happened in other languages too :think: In Portugal it never changed from Bills. Last weekend they aire...

In Broly's case, IIRC there is a scan that directly referenced the manga when introducing SSG Vegeta. As for Super Hero, there are some ideas very similar to what the manga has presented in the past. Adult Gohan wearing Piccolo's clothes, Piccolo's giant form returning, Dragon Balls being used as a...

kemuri07 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 05, 2022 11:06 amThere's an anime canon, there's a manga canon, and there are the movies that take things from both versions.

What exactly do the movies take exclusively from the Super manga?

You mean like in the anime... The 3rd canon or whatever Goku used it against Black first fight or in the ToP? I mean that that's the direction Toriyama chose going forward: "Super Saiyan 2 and 3 are nothing more than powered-up variations of Super Saiyan. After the fight with Beerus, Goku real...

Regardless, if we're indeed talking about visual buildup, then in those terms the appearance of all three is totally random and without explanation or buildup. Why is Super Saiyan gold, and not some other color? Why is God red, and not some other color? Why does a red haired form combined with a go...

But, the fact remains that there was a set up and a pay off. Okay, I don't really count that throw away line as a pay off but agree to disagree. If it's a pay off of something, it's of the untapped potential that Gohan always had that he never really fully discovered or put to use. But considering ...

Can't say I agree. In Episode 90 (I think?) of Super Gohan says this, which I had at the time written off as something which would never amount to anything: Except Gohan clearly didn't work (or wasn't working) for that goal. He had returned to his scholar life, something long established to be his ...

I wonder if this is how fandom today would have reacted to Super Saiyan 3's reveal. :lol: The thing about Super Saiyan 3 is that as ridiculous and over the top as it looks, it telegraphs to the reader/viewer rather easily what it is. This one is probably the first of Toriyama's new transformations ...

When the title was revealed, I also thought that the Great Saiyaman would be part of the plot with Gohan. Then again, I also thought this would be a Gohan movie.

thinking about the description of Gohan Beast... isn't it basically the same as Broly, bringing out the animal=oozaru power inside of him? No. In Broly, it was the power of the Oozaru. But in Gohan, it's something tied to the unlocks he got from the Great Elder on Namek and from the Elder Supreme K...

Dbzfan94 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 7:12 amAnd toriyama’s art of Gohan just makes it even more glaring how stupid it looks.

What art?

Which movies? Broly. Actually, I saw 3 designs/concept art for this movie coming from him with his signature on twitter. I meant to show them properly, isolated and with the commentary. Not in the middle of an ad with a watermark like this: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWXyCL9aUAMnD6N?format=jpg&...

I don't know why they refrain from showing Toriyama's original designs with his commentaries. They did the same thing with the last film. To this day we don't have any of Toriyama's designs for that movie.

You're all overthinking what was clearly a mistake/oversight from the colorist. Toriyama is not responsible for that.

Some one correct me if i'm wrong, but, wasn't Toriyama supposedly vocally unhappy with how the super anime turn out? Only the movie retelling episodes I think. And thinking about it, not sure if it was even real in the first place, it's rare for things like this to be publicised, when usually all w...

Shaolin monks.

Jord wrote: ↑Mon Jun 13, 2022 3:06 pmI think he's so enthousiastic is because he got an easy paycheck by recycling a few old concepts and squishing them together.

Oh, please. By that logic, how is this movie any different from the previous three?

I don't see in his comments a particular endorsement for the 3D to assume that, as far as he's concerned, future projects would take this route.

He definitely enjoyed the final product, that's pretty clear.

Xeogran wrote: ↑Sun Jun 12, 2022 7:36 amIt's his classic laziness, not making fun of his fanbase.

Simplicity is not laziness.