Cetra wrote:Apparently you have never in your childhood made a snow angel while lying in the snow. Not every picture of an angel is looking like a human with wings.
Its great (of course not) that you ignore the entire logic behind it and still call it a bird but you still don't (apparently at least) understand what a) abstract means and b) the entire meaning behind the symbolism of something heavenly. Or should I start debating you now that this thing did scream in a way a bird does not, had some weird energetic colouring that looked mored like a deformed (here once again, abstract as it is just a mass of energy that is used for symbolism) face, has no peck, which a bird has (so your "it has no arms" is quite unnecessary for your "its not an angel" thing), there is no meaning behind it being a bird and pretty much everyone I have seen on the internet identifies it as some kind of energy angel. It makes no sense for Zamasu to have a halo to support his theme of heavenly, divine theme but then using an abstract bird instead of an abstract angel. Also you did not get the point of the narcissistic argument at all. I used it to explain to you the entirety of his representation as is superior, godly and above everyone standing entity -> the godliness. That's the one reason I mentioned it. So you would understand the theme of Zamasu instead of giving him an animal that has no meaning for him. Zamasu is the classic representation of what Japan uses for super narcissistic villains in godly positions. They so often get angel wings, halos, et cetera, like Sephiroth in FFVII, Kefka in FFVI, et cetera. A bird out of nowhere does not even fit. There is no point in it being one and you will not find a proper argument being a bird being more appopriate for this kind of symbolism because everything around Zamasu is supported way more by the abstract model of an angel. As a matter of fact the only thing "oh, well, it flies, other than ordinary people" you can use for a bird is already represented by the being of an angel itself and that is only one of the themes of an angel that enhances Zamasu's heavenly "I am the one who stands above you all, I am a deity, I am so much better than all of you, generic villain blabla" theme.
Ok so with your (not so) great attitude aside... Now, we dont get snow living on a beach, but we can make sand angels and those STILL dont look like this.
1. Zamasu claims to be a god, not an angel, so angel doesnt make sense. Yes he has a halo but so does jesus and other divine figures.
2. It more resembles a bird to me, like you said, it's abstract. I don't have to see it the way you do to have a view.
3. Arguing its an angel because Zamasu looks like an angel (when he isnt one), well explain how goku, a literal monkey man, has this animal aura, which is not a monkey man.
4. Goku pulling Dragons out when hes a saiyan means Zamasu having a bird isnt too out of the realm of possibility. It's just a construct he chose to make.
5. In all fairness, given it's bird appearance, it could also be a pheonix, given those a birds that live forever, much like Zamasu himself through his wish. They are also associated with cleansing and rebirth, like his Zero Mortals Plan.
Here's an idea for you though, not taking people disagreeing with you as a need to be obnoxious. Try it sometime? Perhaps your need to be ;the right view' isnt as important as you'd have us all think.
I see a bird, I call it a bird. I wouldnt call a truck a motorcycle when I see a truck.
