Isn't it Goku that says that though, and Bulma just confirms it? At least that's how I remember it from the manga, forgot if they changed that in the anime.pacz360 wrote:I thinks others mentioned bulma exaggerating the whole 5 Year thing like saying when u meet a family member and acting like its been decade's since you seen th even though it was less or somethingRanmaru Rei wrote:I believe, if DBS will long go after ToP, the next arcs won't be set on Earth till EoZ, because Bulma in EoZ said that she have not seen Goku for 5 years.
"Dragon Ball Super" Series Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
She's like the textbook definition of Jerkass Sue. She's what crazy Vegeta fans want Vegeta to be like. A spoiled, powerful brat who everyone wanks and can literally get a way with murder. I find Multiverse Vegetto bearable compared to her, even he's also a Sue.pacz360 wrote: Hate dbm bra huh? Can't Say I blame you though
The only character I want out of Multiverse is U16/U18 Gohan if given a choice.
Kanassa wrote:Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
- Ranmaru Rei
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:50 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
[spoiler][/spoiler]Michsi wrote:Isn't it Goku that says that though, and Bulma just confirms it? At least that's how I remember it from the manga, forgot if they changed that in the anime.
- Boo Machine
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 7:44 pm
- Location: On the Track to NoWhere
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I thought it was already agreed upon that the "Haven't seen you in 5 years" bit is just a throw away line that shouldn't be taken seriously when it comes to Super. (Or did I just have that meeting in my head?) They aren't going to write the entire series around this one thing Bulma said when Toriyama thought he was done with it.
I think we can just assume a "retcon".
I think we can just assume a "retcon".
Last edited by Boo Machine on Fri Aug 25, 2017 3:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SUBARASHII! - Goku Black
I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!
To Infinity, then stop!
Anime are Cartoons.
I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!
To Infinity, then stop!
Anime are Cartoons.
- ArchedThunder
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:03 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
For someone who didn't even like the idea of people speculating about the end of Super that's a weird assumption to make. It all comes down to character and writing, just because Goku isn't the main character doesn't mean it will be cliche shonen. Some of my favorite parts of DB are when Goku isn't there.Baggie_Saiyan wrote: I understand. A show without Goku isn't DB. A Next gen is just gonna be boring cliché shonen, Gohan wasn't MC cuz he was boring af, there is a reason why Toei still had Goku as MC in GT probably realised he is DB.
Besides, Goku doesn't have to be taken out of the picture to have a focus on the next generation.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Wouldn't be surprised if they recton the sceneRanmaru Rei wrote:[spoiler][/spoiler]Michsi wrote:Isn't it Goku that says that though, and Bulma just confirms it? At least that's how I remember it from the manga, forgot if they changed that in the anime.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
It would only work if it's like Duck Tales with Goku being like Scrooge, imo.ArchedThunder wrote:For someone who didn't even like the idea of people speculating about the end of Super that's a weird assumption to make. It all comes down to character and writing, just because Goku isn't the main character doesn't mean it will be cliche shonen. Some of my favorite parts of DB are when Goku isn't there.Baggie_Saiyan wrote: I understand. A show without Goku isn't DB. A Next gen is just gonna be boring cliché shonen, Gohan wasn't MC cuz he was boring af, there is a reason why Toei still had Goku as MC in GT probably realised he is DB.
Besides, Goku doesn't have to be taken out of the picture to have a focus on the next generation.
Kanassa wrote:Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Pretty much it was written when Toriyama was Done with dbBoo Machine wrote:I thought it was already agreed upon that the "Haven't seen you in 5 years" bit is just a throw away line that shouldn't be taken seriously when it comes to Super. (Or did I just have that meeting in my head?) They aren't going to write the entire series around this one thing Bulma said when Toriyama thought he was done with it.
I think we can just assume a "retcon".
- Ranmaru Rei
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:50 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
lol, new series will be about Goku and Vegeta Jrs. I'm joking.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Pretty much lol bra should be a mix of her mother and vegeta tbhHeroR wrote:She's like the textbook definition of Jerkass Sue. She's what crazy Vegeta fans want Vegeta to be like. A spoiled, powerful brat who everyone wanks and can literally get a way with murder. I find Multiverse Vegetto bearable compared to her, even he's also a Sue.pacz360 wrote: Hate dbm bra huh? Can't Say I blame you though
The only character I want out of Multiverse is U16/U18 Gohan if given a choice.
- Baggie_Saiyan
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 10283
- Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
- Location: Atlantis.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Errrr no, I didn't /don't like people speculating about the end of DBS because the BD Box has one freaking extra episode...ArchedThunder wrote:For someone who didn't even like the idea of people speculating about the end of Super that's a weird assumption to make. It all comes down to character and writing, just because Goku isn't the main character doesn't mean it will be cliche shonen. Some of my favorite parts of DB are when Goku isn't there.Baggie_Saiyan wrote: I understand. A show without Goku isn't DB. A Next gen is just gonna be boring cliché shonen, Gohan wasn't MC cuz he was boring af, there is a reason why Toei still had Goku as MC in GT probably realised he is DB.
Besides, Goku doesn't have to be taken out of the picture to have a focus on the next generation.
- Boo Machine
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 7:44 pm
- Location: On the Track to NoWhere
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I mean, I'm not AGAINST the idea of the next generation. But any interest I had in that went out the window the minute Goku came back from death. So while I'd give it a shot, I'd rather stick with Goku as the main man. Half the fun shit wouldn't happen if he wasn't around.
SUBARASHII! - Goku Black
I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!
To Infinity, then stop!
Anime are Cartoons.
I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!
To Infinity, then stop!
Anime are Cartoons.
- namekiansaiyan
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4358
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 9:39 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Toriyama is not going to let himself be restricted by one line he could easily change.Ranmaru Rei wrote:[spoiler][/spoiler]Michsi wrote:Isn't it Goku that says that though, and Bulma just confirms it? At least that's how I remember it from the manga, forgot if they changed that in the anime.
- Ranmaru Rei
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:50 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Yeah. Especially, he can forget, how he already did about Lauch.namekiansaiyan wrote:Toriyama is not going to let himself be restricted by one line he could easily change.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Well, yeah. It might be a throw away line. Then again, it might not be, if we think about that whole "making sure it fits with EOZ" idea they seem so keen on. I was pointing out that it wasn't Bulma exaggerating here. It seems to be that they legitimately didn't see each other for five years. This scene was probably to show once again how flighty Goku is where his relationship with his friends is concerned, but back then people also assumed that he had also not met with Vegeta for that long too (which was why he came along with Bulma). You can find a way to write around Bulma and Goku not seeing each other for five years, but that's not going to work the other fighting characters.
Not saying he would, or he should, only that he made sure to mention that EOZ is still gonna happen like it was depicted. Saw the quote from the interview not too long ago, that's why it got me thinking.Toriyama is not going to let himself be restricted by one line he could easily change.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Maybe they want to make a new Dragon Ball show that starts from when Goku leaves with Uub, and that's why they are ending Super at episode 133? But honestly I don't think that's the case, as it would be stupid to suddenly dump the Super brand unless Toriyama stops writing it.
Though if a new show really happens that would be their chance to actually make it look really good, so better designs, better shading, better colors and backgrounds like in the 2008 special.
Though if a new show really happens that would be their chance to actually make it look really good, so better designs, better shading, better colors and backgrounds like in the 2008 special.
悟 “Vincit qui se vincit”
What I consider canonical
What I consider canonical
Spoiler:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I've never seen that scene in the manga before(not allowed to post illegally hosted scans here, by the way). Is that translation accurate? Because it's actually saying it's been five years since Goku decided to visit them, not five years since he's seen them.
"We'd never see you if we didn't drop in on you."
"That's not true. I visited you five years ago."
"If we didn't drop in on you" actually implies they've seen him more recently than that.
"We'd never see you if we didn't drop in on you."
"That's not true. I visited you five years ago."
"If we didn't drop in on you" actually implies they've seen him more recently than that.
Last edited by Simere on Fri Aug 25, 2017 3:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Does anyone have the japanese romaji lyrics of the full version of limit break or will it take some time until someone makes one?
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Same here people need to chill out with that stuff especially with the whole supers ending crapBaggie_Saiyan wrote:Errrr no, I didn't /don't like people speculating about the end of DBS because the BD Box has one freaking extra episode...ArchedThunder wrote:For someone who didn't even like the idea of people speculating about the end of Super that's a weird assumption to make. It all comes down to character and writing, just because Goku isn't the main character doesn't mean it will be cliche shonen. Some of my favorite parts of DB are when Goku isn't there.Baggie_Saiyan wrote: I understand. A show without Goku isn't DB. A Next gen is just gonna be boring cliché shonen, Gohan wasn't MC cuz he was boring af, there is a reason why Toei still had Goku as MC in GT probably realised he is DB.
Besides, Goku doesn't have to be taken out of the picture to have a focus on the next generation.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
But they've already setup the scenario perfectly, They gave Future Trunks a crappy unsatisfying ending. It's the perfect opportunity to make a "time patrol" spin off. It's perfect because Trunks could travel to any point in time in any universe. It gives Future Trunks and Mai something to do other than exist and I doubt it's a coincidence they survived as a team.HeroR wrote:It would only work if it's like Duck Tales with Goku being like Scrooge, imo.ArchedThunder wrote:For someone who didn't even like the idea of people speculating about the end of Super that's a weird assumption to make. It all comes down to character and writing, just because Goku isn't the main character doesn't mean it will be cliche shonen. Some of my favorite parts of DB are when Goku isn't there.Baggie_Saiyan wrote: I understand. A show without Goku isn't DB. A Next gen is just gonna be boring cliché shonen, Gohan wasn't MC cuz he was boring af, there is a reason why Toei still had Goku as MC in GT probably realised he is DB.
Besides, Goku doesn't have to be taken out of the picture to have a focus on the next generation.