"Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
- mute_proxy
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:09 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
The flames in the aura were just design adjustments to differentiate between forms more easily and mastered SSB is without the aura
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
That left hand though good lordIM21 wrote:Toyo's Bardock doesn't look that bad.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I totally agree. It isn't really even a retcon, we just got a better explanation, and it makes sense In-Universe because conventionally only Kaioshin use them so Elder Kaioshin not knowing about that restriction makes sense. Gowasu hasn't been sealed up in a sword forever so he's more in the loop as far as things work, and "our" Shin is just a moron that doesn't know anything.shadowfox87 wrote:The potara for me wasn't a retcon. It was never explained why Vegito defused inside Buu's stomach. The previous explanation was because of the "air" in Buu's stomach. Now we have a better one. Elder Kaioshin just didn't know what he was talking about because normally, non-kaioshin don't use the potara.
Spoiler:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I'm just sitting here wondering why people are calling them "flames" when they're clearly globules.mute_proxy wrote:The flames in the aura were just design adjustments to differentiate between forms more easily and mastered SSB is without the aura
-
- Regular
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:40 pm
- supersaiyanZero
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:10 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I don't think they mean a literal demon, like Akuma for instance. In that context Demon/monster usually just means a power so big it seems otherworldly.RecolorSaiyan wrote:https://twitter.com/Cipher_db/status/10 ... 4257744901
Broly is a "demon Saiyan"
-
- Regular
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:40 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Oh I know. I'm just pointing it out cause thats exactly what kale was described as in the mangasupersaiyanZero wrote:I don't think they mean a literal demon, like Akuma for instance. In that context Demon/monster usually just means a power so big it seems otherworldly.RecolorSaiyan wrote:https://twitter.com/Cipher_db/status/10 ... 4257744901
Broly is a "demon Saiyan"
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
You cannot be serious, I don't think there will be a Broly arc, at most Toyotaro will do a few few promotional chapters like he did back in Ressurection of F' movie.1345521 wrote:It's going to be a bit hard to say, but I think Toyotaro is going to make a really good Broly arc. To me, Toyotaro really dropped the ball in the ToP arc (I think large part due to having to rush it to get to the Broly stuff), but I think he can rebound this Broly arc, and he's really going to expand what the movie did. How long do you have Toyotaro's Broly arc being? 12 chapters? 16 chapters?IM21 wrote:Toyo's Bardock doesn't look that bad:Spoiler:
-
- Regular
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:40 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Noah wrote:You cannot be serious, I don't think there will be a Broly arc, at most Toyotaro will do a few few promotional chapters like he did back in Ressurection of F' movie.1345521 wrote:It's going to be a bit hard to say, but I think Toyotaro is going to make a really good Broly arc. To me, Toyotaro really dropped the ball in the ToP arc (I think large part due to having to rush it to get to the Broly stuff), but I think he can rebound this Broly arc, and he's really going to expand what the movie did. How long do you have Toyotaro's Broly arc being? 12 chapters? 16 chapters?IM21 wrote:Toyo's Bardock doesn't look that bad:Spoiler:
Toriyama basically said that Toyotaro will adapt the movie into an arc, also we know that he wrote a script that would go 180 minutes which was cut to 100 minutes for the film meaning there's possibly a lot of lore stuff that the manga and anime will delve into later
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Except Vegito wasn't really original meant to return and the retcon was for Merged Zamasu.reecehoward wrote: Well, the reason the potara one was particularly stupid is because both versions(manga and anime) have the plot point of Kibitokai using the dragonballs to defuse. Everyone in their right mind assumed that this was setting up for Vegito's return, which would make a lot of sense in order for Vegito to not be a permanent thing. There was no need for this retcon other than to add a sense of tension for a Vegito fight, which doesn't work for my sensibilities personally. Once you introduce obvious weaknesses such as time limits and stamina drains, the fights become hella predictable to me.
RecolorSaiyan wrote:Oh I know. I'm just pointing it out cause thats exactly what kale was described as in the mangasupersaiyanZero wrote:I don't think they mean a literal demon, like Akuma for instance. In that context Demon/monster usually just means a power so big it seems otherworldly.RecolorSaiyan wrote:https://twitter.com/Cipher_db/status/10 ... 4257744901
Broly is a "demon Saiyan"
Not really the same. Cabba called Kale a 'Demon Saiyan', while the card seems to used demon as a general term, not a title.
Kanassa wrote:Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
For realsies? Then this means it will be a continuation of this manga or it will be do it separately?RecolorSaiyan wrote:Toriyama basically said that Toyotaro will adapt the movie into an arc, also we know that he wrote a script that would go 180 minutes which was cut to 100 minutes for the film meaning there's possibly a lot of lore stuff that the manga and anime will delve into later
-
- Regular
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:40 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Continuation, not sure why you think it would be cancelled. Despite the negative view that you tend to see amongst the "internet western fandom" towards it, it sells more than well enough to where there is no reason to cancel it plus shueisha and toriyama and people in japan seem to like toyotaro a lot more than the west.Noah wrote:For realsies? Then this means it will be a continuation of this manga or it will be do it separately?RecolorSaiyan wrote:Toriyama basically said that Toyotaro will adapt the movie into an arc, also we know that he wrote a script that would go 180 minutes which was cut to 100 minutes for the film meaning there's possibly a lot of lore stuff that the manga and anime will delve into later
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Cool chapter.
Mostly active on discord.
-
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 7:52 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I know. Still doesn't make the retcon sit any better with me. As a matter of fact, now that I think about it, i don't think that retcon was created for Zamasu as it never came up in the anime, which tells me that was something Toyotaro chose to do for Merged Zamasu...which amounted to nothing because Zamasu stayed fused and multiplied because reasons.lolHeroR wrote:Except Vegito wasn't really original meant to return and the retcon was for Merged Zamasu.reecehoward wrote: Well, the reason the potara one was particularly stupid is because both versions(manga and anime) have the plot point of Kibitokai using the dragonballs to defuse. Everyone in their right mind assumed that this was setting up for Vegito's return, which would make a lot of sense in order for Vegito to not be a permanent thing. There was no need for this retcon other than to add a sense of tension for a Vegito fight, which doesn't work for my sensibilities personally. Once you introduce obvious weaknesses such as time limits and stamina drains, the fights become hella predictable to me.
RecolorSaiyan wrote:Oh I know. I'm just pointing it out cause thats exactly what kale was described as in the mangasupersaiyanZero wrote:
I don't think they mean a literal demon, like Akuma for instance. In that context Demon/monster usually just means a power so big it seems otherworldly.
Not really the same. Cabba called Kale a 'Demon Saiyan', while the card seems to used demon as a general term, not a title.
Honestly, even if it wasn't a retcon doesn't mean I woupd have liked it. I don't like severe stamina issues and time limits at this stage in the game. With potara having that stipulation, it lost what really seperated it from metamoran fusion.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Toyo confirmed that the retcon was a thing before Vegito, who wasn't in the original manga. Vegito was literally fan service that was added in later.reecehoward wrote:
I know. Still doesn't make the retcon sit any better with me. As a matter of fact, now that I think about it, i don't think that retcon was created for Zamasu as it never came up in the anime, which tells me that was something Toyotaro chose to do for Merged Zamasu...which amounted to nothing because Zamasu stayed fused and multiplied because reasons.lol
Honestly, even if it wasn't a retcon doesn't mean I woupd have liked it. I don't like severe stamina issues and time limits at this stage in the game. With potara having that stipulation, it lost what really seperated it from metamoran fusion.
Potara is a god's fusion, so it make sense why it would greatly benefit gods and be gimped for mortals. That and the Potara fusion only existed because of Fusion Reborn and Toriyama didn't want to reused the Fusion Dance for Goku and Vegeta.
Kanassa wrote:Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
The usage is the same and it's too convenient to be called a coincidence. A Saiyan said to be called a demon, and a "demon" Saiyan. M8 Broly called himself a demon. They're demons in terms of power and personality.HeroR wrote:
Not really the same. Cabba called Kale a 'Demon Saiyan', while the card seems to used demon as a general term, not a title.
Super Dragon Ball Heroes Universe Mission translation compilation here. All translations are done and owned by me.
SDBH 9th anniversary the secret development interview here. Learn how original SDBH characters such as SS3 Raditz, SS4 Bardock, Robel, & more were conceived!
SDBH 9th anniversary the secret development interview here. Learn how original SDBH characters such as SS3 Raditz, SS4 Bardock, Robel, & more were conceived!
-
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 7:52 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I have to put it out there, but my issue is not whether it makes sense or not. My issue is that it bores me to sleep when i know the outcome of a fight because a weakness or drawback is established right before a fight or in it's beginning stages. It's not a matter of it making sense, more a matter of it just isn't interesting when it's overused, which has been the case since the Buu arc; with damn near every new concept having similar faults. That arc burned that method of tension out for me.HeroR wrote:Toyo confirmed that the retcon was a thing before Vegito, who wasn't in the original manga. Vegito was literally fan service that was added in later.reecehoward wrote:
I know. Still doesn't make the retcon sit any better with me. As a matter of fact, now that I think about it, i don't think that retcon was created for Zamasu as it never came up in the anime, which tells me that was something Toyotaro chose to do for Merged Zamasu...which amounted to nothing because Zamasu stayed fused and multiplied because reasons.lol
Honestly, even if it wasn't a retcon doesn't mean I woupd have liked it. I don't like severe stamina issues and time limits at this stage in the game. With potara having that stipulation, it lost what really seperated it from metamoran fusion.
Potara is a god's fusion, so it make sense why it would greatly benefit gods and be gimped for mortals. That and the Potara fusion only existed because of Fusion Reborn and Toriyama didn't want to reused the Fusion Dance for Goku and Vegeta.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
They both could be nods to Broly’s line and not Toyo’s ‘Demon Saiyan’.Rakurai wrote:The usage is the same and it's too convenient to be called a coincidence. A Saiyan said to be called a demon, and a "demon" Saiyan. M8 Broly called himself a demon. They're demons in terms of power and personality.HeroR wrote:
Not really the same. Cabba called Kale a 'Demon Saiyan', while the card seems to used demon as a general term, not a title.
reecehoward wrote:I have to put it out there, but my issue is not whether it makes sense or not. My issue is that it bores me to sleep when i know the outcome of a fight because a weakness or drawback is established right before a fight or in it's beginning stages. It's not a matter of it making sense, more a matter of it just isn't interesting when it's overused, which has been the case since the Buu arc; with damn near every new concept having similar faults. That arc burned that method of tension out for me.HeroR wrote:Toyo confirmed that the retcon was a thing before Vegito, who wasn't in the original manga. Vegito was literally fan service that was added in later.reecehoward wrote:
I know. Still doesn't make the retcon sit any better with me. As a matter of fact, now that I think about it, i don't think that retcon was created for Zamasu as it never came up in the anime, which tells me that was something Toyotaro chose to do for Merged Zamasu...which amounted to nothing because Zamasu stayed fused and multiplied because reasons.lol
Honestly, even if it wasn't a retcon doesn't mean I woupd have liked it. I don't like severe stamina issues and time limits at this stage in the game. With potara having that stipulation, it lost what really seperated it from metamoran fusion.
Potara is a god's fusion, so it make sense why it would greatly benefit gods and be gimped for mortals. That and the Potara fusion only existed because of Fusion Reborn and Toriyama didn't want to reused the Fusion Dance for Goku and Vegeta.
Opposite for me since I didn’t see Trunks cutting Zamasu in half and never wanted Vegito anyway.
Kanassa wrote:Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I never thought of it any other way. OG Broly is the prototype for Kale and DBS Broly, of course they're going to use his popular perception as a clutch for characterization. They're both "demons" so to speak, the result is the same.HeroR wrote:They both could be nods to Broly’s line and not Toyo’s ‘Demon Saiyan’.Rakurai wrote:The usage is the same and it's too convenient to be called a coincidence. A Saiyan said to be called a demon, and a "demon" Saiyan. M8 Broly called himself a demon. They're demons in terms of power and personality.HeroR wrote:
Not really the same. Cabba called Kale a 'Demon Saiyan', while the card seems to used demon as a general term, not a title.
Super Dragon Ball Heroes Universe Mission translation compilation here. All translations are done and owned by me.
SDBH 9th anniversary the secret development interview here. Learn how original SDBH characters such as SS3 Raditz, SS4 Bardock, Robel, & more were conceived!
SDBH 9th anniversary the secret development interview here. Learn how original SDBH characters such as SS3 Raditz, SS4 Bardock, Robel, & more were conceived!
-
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 7:52 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I'm talking about the results of Vegito's fight in both versions. Once they revealed the weakness, it was already a forgone conclusion that he wasn't gonna get the job done. They could've just had it happen and then told us why.HeroR wrote:They both could be nods to Broly’s line and not Toyo’s ‘Demon Saiyan’.Rakurai wrote:The usage is the same and it's too convenient to be called a coincidence. A Saiyan said to be called a demon, and a "demon" Saiyan. M8 Broly called himself a demon. They're demons in terms of power and personality.HeroR wrote:
Not really the same. Cabba called Kale a 'Demon Saiyan', while the card seems to used demon as a general term, not a title.
reecehoward wrote:I have to put it out there, but my issue is not whether it makes sense or not. My issue is that it bores me to sleep when i know the outcome of a fight because a weakness or drawback is established right before a fight or in it's beginning stages. It's not a matter of it making sense, more a matter of it just isn't interesting when it's overused, which has been the case since the Buu arc; with damn near every new concept having similar faults. That arc burned that method of tension out for me.HeroR wrote:
Toyo confirmed that the retcon was a thing before Vegito, who wasn't in the original manga. Vegito was literally fan service that was added in later.
Potara is a god's fusion, so it make sense why it would greatly benefit gods and be gimped for mortals. That and the Potara fusion only existed because of Fusion Reborn and Toriyama didn't want to reused the Fusion Dance for Goku and Vegeta.
Opposite for me since I didn’t see Trunks cutting Zamasu in half and never wanted Vegito anyway.