PFM18 wrote:You explain the creative process as if he had claimed anything about how the creative process is handled right now, when he was just saying what he would prefer.
Yes, I read what he said.
I then explained that what he prefers is exactly what we've been given.
What you don't seem to understand is he raised this as a counterargument to someone suggesting that we need more Toriyama given that he was the originator of this franchise.
Calm yourself.
When Dragonball doesn't have Toriyama, we get shitty ideas like:
1. What if 17 came back and fused with 17 and now he's super 17 and all the old villains are back!?
2. What if the dragonballs were bad?!?!?!?!?!
3. WHAT IF TUFFLES?!
Now let's look at why those suck.
1. Obviously because it's a retread. In addition, it thrusts into the lead villain role a character that didn't have much to him in his debut and didn't bother expanding upon what little there was. When 17 and Frieza were brought back with Toriyama's guidance in Super, they were given more to their characters and had downplayed roles.
2. The "shadow dragons" are bad because the idea of the dragonballs, the saviors of our heroes, turning out to be bad is... inherently awful. The dragonballs were always used in-series to solve problems that couldn't otherwise be fixed. There is no lesson to be learned from the dragonballs being evil because the heroes used them for good. This was conceptually flawed. There are several ways to "fix" this, but none I want to get into; I'm against that kind of thing.
3. The "tuffles" face the same problem 17 does, but to a worse degree. They had absolutely no importance placed upon them through the entirety of the original series. One could be forgiven for not even remembering who they were. It's essentially as superfluous as a Disney Star Wars movie (more specifically, Rogue One or Solo): a story made from an innocuous detail and doesn't need to be told.
So yes, more Toriyama is more better.