What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
pacz360
I Live Here
Posts: 2542
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:38 am

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by pacz360 » Thu Jun 02, 2016 9:29 pm

kei17 wrote:
sintzu wrote:
kei17 wrote:Pretty much everything what Toei have done since the late 2000s except for BoG. Crappy cheap-ass Kai with rip-off music, Resurrection F with an extremely amateurish direction, and the shitty sequel we have now. They all hurt the brand badly.
You don't think GT hurt it ? I'm not saying you're wrong for thinking that but I'd like to know why.
I'm just referring to Toei's recent creations as a whole. GT was a huge, probably the biggest disaster, but they had done nothing for a decade since then and the JSAT special wasn't half bad. It's a different story.
Just curious whats bad about super in your opinion?

kei17
I Live Here
Posts: 4142
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:23 am

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by kei17 » Thu Jun 02, 2016 9:46 pm

pacz360 wrote:
kei17 wrote:I'm just referring to Toei's recent creations as a whole. GT was a huge, probably the biggest disaster, but they had done nothing for a decade since then and the JSAT special wasn't half bad. It's a different story.
Just curious whats bad about super in your opinion?
  • Retelling the latest movies for some incomprehensible reason
  • Lame and cheesy stories
  • Crappy animation
  • No use of the iconic sound effects
  • The so-called "Toei Goku" that I hate
You know, even Toriyama is pissed off by Super. I can't even find anything good in it.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4148
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kid Buu » Thu Jun 02, 2016 9:50 pm

kei17 wrote: You know, even Toriyama is pissed off by Super
Really? I heard he wasn't a fan of the animation, but haven't heard anything along the lines of that.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
JulieYBM
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 17607
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: 🏳️‍⚧️🍉

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by JulieYBM » Thu Jun 02, 2016 9:55 pm

Kid Buu wrote:
kei17 wrote: You know, even Toriyama is pissed off by Super
Really? I heard he wasn't a fan of the animation, but haven't heard anything along the lines of that.
Toriyama has not described what he complained about with Super.
💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖 She/Her 💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖
💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖 Hiiiiiiiiiiii 💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖

kei17
I Live Here
Posts: 4142
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:23 am

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by kei17 » Thu Jun 02, 2016 10:07 pm

Kid Buu wrote:
kei17 wrote: You know, even Toriyama is pissed off by Super
Really? I heard he wasn't a fan of the animation, but haven't heard anything along the lines of that.
I can't tell you the source because it's insider information, but he surely got turned off and reluctant to keep being involved with Super, so they had to provide him with some basic ideas for the plot of the new Goku Black arc.

User avatar
pacz360
I Live Here
Posts: 2542
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:38 am

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by pacz360 » Thu Jun 02, 2016 10:18 pm

kei17 wrote:
pacz360 wrote:
kei17 wrote:I'm just referring to Toei's recent creations as a whole. GT was a huge, probably the biggest disaster, but they had done nothing for a decade since then and the JSAT special wasn't half bad. It's a different story.
Just curious whats bad about super in your opinion?
  • Retelling the latest movies for some incomprehensible reason
  • Lame and cheesy stories
  • Crappy animation
  • No use of the iconic sound effects
  • The so-called "Toei Goku" that I hate
You know, even Toriyama is pissed off by Super. I can't even find anything good in it.
While I agree with everything you said About toei goku what do you mean if anything super seem to make goku the same in the manga but much dumber really.

User avatar
Bansho64
I Live Here
Posts: 2036
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:59 am

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Bansho64 » Fri Jun 03, 2016 12:26 am

kei17 wrote: I can't tell you the source because it's insider information, but he surely got turned off and reluctant to keep being involved with Super, so they had to provide him with some basic ideas for the plot of the new Goku Black arc.
Dang really? That explains a LOT. I definitely understand why he wouldn't wanna associate himself with such a parody of a sequel. Toriyama shouldn't be ashamed. I wouldn't blame him if he threw some warranted shade at Toei.
Last edited by Bansho64 on Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

Saikyo no Senshi
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1205
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 9:08 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Saikyo no Senshi » Fri Jun 03, 2016 12:52 am

kei17 wrote: I can't tell you the source because it's insider information, but he surely got turned off and reluctant to keep being involved with Super, so they had to provide him with some basic ideas for the plot of the new Goku Black arc.
Wow i mean it would be better if Toriyama just left Super completely. If what you say is true it clearly means he isn't interested at all.

- Travis

User avatar
TekTheNinja
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1647
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:36 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by TekTheNinja » Fri Jun 03, 2016 12:55 am

kei17 wrote: I can't tell you the source because it's insider information
Then what reason do I have to believe this?

User avatar
JulieYBM
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 17607
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: 🏳️‍⚧️🍉

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by JulieYBM » Fri Jun 03, 2016 1:23 am

TekTheNinja wrote:
kei17 wrote: I can't tell you the source because it's insider information
Then what reason do I have to believe this?
Kei's been reliable in the past with having certain knowledge.
💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖 She/Her 💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖
💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖 Hiiiiiiiiiiii 💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖💙💜💖

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by sintzu » Fri Jun 03, 2016 4:32 am

JulieYBM wrote:
TekTheNinja wrote:
kei17 wrote: I can't tell you the source because it's insider information
Then what reason do I have to believe this?
Kei's been reliable in the past with having certain knowledge.
Rumor has it that's he's actually Toriyama himself.
kei17 wrote: I can't tell you the source because it's insider information, but he surely got turned off and reluctant to keep being involved with Super, so they had to provide him with some basic ideas for the plot of the new Goku Black arc.
If he threatens to pull his name off of it and go public with the reason than Toei will more than likely give it a huge budget and staff increase to prevent that.

If they're going to be involved with the story than don't be surprised if they convince him to do a Broly arc.
Last edited by sintzu on Fri Jun 03, 2016 4:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

Kakacarrottop
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:34 pm
Location: Australia

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kakacarrottop » Fri Jun 03, 2016 4:49 am

The way FUNimation marketed and dubbed the show helped perpetuate this notion in English countries that Dragon Ball is some mindless action cartoon only for toddlers, in the same category as stuff like Power Rangers and other cheesy 90s kids shows.
"I will literally dress as Goku and walk around jumping up and down, pretending to fly, in public if this ever gets an official release"

- ShadowDude112 on Ocean's Kai dub

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kuririn Fan » Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:06 am

EVERYTHING after the manga ended, EXCEPT 2008 special and BoG. It would be perfect if it ended in January 1996, when Z 291 aired.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by sintzu » Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:12 am

Kuririn Fan wrote:EVERYTHING after the manga ended, EXCEPT 2008 special and BoG. It would be perfect if it ended in January 1996, when Z 291 aired.
I think Path to Power would've been a better place to end it at cause it was made to celebrate the anime's 10th anniversary and it went back to where it all started instead of being another Z movie with Broly.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kuririn Fan » Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:13 am

sintzu wrote:
Kuririn Fan wrote:EVERYTHING after the manga ended, EXCEPT 2008 special and BoG. It would be perfect if it ended in January 1996, when Z 291 aired.
I think Path to Power would've been a better place to end it at cause it was made to celebrate the anime's 10th anniversary and it went back to where it all started instead of being another Z movie with Broly.
I agree, ten years of manga, ten years of anime, 519 chapters, 444 episodes, 17 movies - THE END, that's it, no need for more Dragon Ball.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by sintzu » Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:24 am

Kuririn Fan wrote:I agree, ten years of manga, ten years of anime, 519 chapters, 444 episodes, 17 movies - THE END, that's it, no need for more Dragon Ball.
I'm not sure I'd go with no dragon ball ever again but I think they could've handled it a lot better than they did.

I think they should've waited 10-15 years before doing anything new and they should've had a plan with a beginning and an end instead of being reactionary and wanting to milk the franchise for toys and cards like they're doing now.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kuririn Fan » Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:35 am

sintzu wrote:
Kuririn Fan wrote:I agree, ten years of manga, ten years of anime, 519 chapters, 444 episodes, 17 movies - THE END, that's it, no need for more Dragon Ball.
I'm not sure I'd go with no dragon ball ever again but I think they could've handled it a lot better than they did.

I think they should've waited 10-15 years before doing anything new and they should've had a plan with a beginning and an end instead of being reactionary and wanting to milk the franchise for toys and cards like they're doing now.
What's wrong with ending it for good? Is Yu Yu Hakusho bad because of that? Are 519 chapters, 444 episodes and 17 movies & couple of specials not enough?

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by sintzu » Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:44 am

Kuririn Fan wrote:
What's wrong with ending it for good?

Is Yu Yu Hakusho bad because of that?

Are 520 chapters, 444 episodes and 17 movies & couple of specials not enough?
Of course not and artistically it would've been better for it to end for good.

No.

They are but as a huge fan of the characters and world it's hard not to want to see more even though more won't be as good as the original.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

Kuririn Fan
Banned Alternate Account
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Kuririn Fan » Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:48 am

I know, but there's no need for it, look what happened with GT and Super.
And there are 519 chapters, my dear admins, Trunks special chapter isn't numbered.
Last edited by Kuririn Fan on Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

Dragon Ball Ireland
I Live Here
Posts: 4505
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 9:09 am
Location: Sligo, Ireland

Re: What aspects do you think tarnished the Dragonball brand

Post by Dragon Ball Ireland » Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:48 am

sintzu wrote:
kei17 wrote: I can't tell you the source because it's insider information, but he surely got turned off and reluctant to keep being involved with Super, so they had to provide him with some basic ideas for the plot of the new Goku Black arc.
If he threatens to pull his name off of it and go public with the reason than Toei will more than likely give it a huge budget and staff increase to prevent that.

If they're going to be involved with the story than don't be surprised if they convince him to do a Broly arc.
I wouldn't be against this happening, it might be just what Super needs to at least not look worse than DB, Z and GT.

If a Broly arc happens I think we can say TOEI has officially become a fanfiction company :lol: .
Do you have any info about international non-English broadcasts about the Dragon Ball anime or manga translations/editions? Please message me. Researching for a future book with Dragon Ball scholar Derek Padula :thumbup:

Check out my blogs https://dragonballireland.wordpress.com/ and https://dragonballinternational.wordpress.com/

Post Reply