Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:41 am

I agree that Raditz could have been 10 times better. It isn't bad by any circumstance.
Retired.

User avatar
Soppa Saia People
I Live Here
Posts: 3062
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 11:26 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Soppa Saia People » Tue Sep 06, 2016 3:03 am

Bansho64 wrote:
Doctor. wrote: Do you think the manga was too fast?
I know you weren't asking me but, yes, I do think it was a bit fast. I think MistareFusion (Gaffer Tape) said that in his Dragon Ball Dissection as well. We don't really see enough of Gohan's training or his development in the manga. It kinda leaves you wondering what happened. The anime filled in these blanks wonderfully in my opinion.
I think the Manga doesn't show enough, the pacing is fine. I agree with ABED that the Kai version is to fast.
I have borderline personality disorder, if my posts ever come off as aggressive or word vomit-y to you, please let me know.

🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸

User avatar
Baggie_Saiyan
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10283
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Location: Atlantis.

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Baggie_Saiyan » Tue Sep 06, 2016 5:55 am

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:I agree that Raditz could have been 10 times better. It isn't bad by any circumstance.
Raditz did his job though, a tease of what's come. I really wouldn't change anything about him or what happened.

User avatar
Friezacooler
Regular
Posts: 694
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 2:13 am

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Friezacooler » Tue Sep 06, 2016 7:18 am

People that hate the pacing of DBZ and near releastic consistency would proply praise super for it's tom and Jerry antics or illogical fangirl powerscaling.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Tue Sep 06, 2016 8:20 am

Baggie_Saiyan wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:I agree that Raditz could have been 10 times better. It isn't bad by any circumstance.
Raditz did his job though, a tease of what's come. I really wouldn't change anything about him or what happened.
He was Goku's brother. That may not be gold, but it's at least copper. Toriyama squandered some great potential here.
Retired.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20282
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by ABED » Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:17 am

Doctor. wrote:
ABED wrote:I don't think Kai fixed the pacing. It went in the opposite direction, it went too fast.
Do you think the manga was too fast?
In a number of places, yes. In the Saiyan arc, a lot is asked of the audience when Gohan is given so much focus. We're supposed to care, but without spending that much time with such a new character, it's not as compelling when anything good or bad happens to him.
He was Goku's brother. That may not be gold, but it's at least copper. Toriyama squandered some great potential here.
Yeah, they are related, but that's not by choice.
but instead totally obvious padding and a crutch to keep the overall story behind the manga by a certain margin (with the final Freeza battle's whole "Five Minutes" portion easily and without question being by far and away the single most over the top egregious, easy to point to, and just downright hateful in its awfulness, not to mention pointless, tiresomely repetitive shenanigans with Mr. Satan's entourage in the Cell Games).
The five minute issue doesn't bother me that much. I didn't literally want it to be over in five minutes. I would have prefered that Freeza be vague about how long the planet has left. And Mr. Satan, it did get repetitive, but a few of them were funny. The biggest problems I have aren't those things, but when they cut away from the action to have a character literally say what we just saw on screen. It's like commentary for the blind.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:42 am

ABED wrote:
Doctor. wrote:
ABED wrote:I don't think Kai fixed the pacing. It went in the opposite direction, it went too fast.
Do you think the manga was too fast?
In a number of places, yes. In the Saiyan arc, a lot is asked of the audience when Gohan is given so much focus. We're supposed to care, but without spending that much time with such a new character, it's not as compelling when anything good or bad happens to him.
He was Goku's brother. That may not be gold, but it's at least copper. Toriyama squandered some great potential here.
Yeah, they are related, but that's not by choice.
Umm... No? Toriyama definitely chose to make them brothers, he could've done more with them, your refutation is invalid
Retired.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20282
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by ABED » Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:59 am

No, I mean the characters didn't choose to be brothers. That fact isn't really all that big of a deal to Goku. I fail to see how there's so much potential there just because they happen to share genetic material.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Tue Sep 06, 2016 10:45 am

ABED wrote:No, I mean the characters didn't choose to be brothers. That fact isn't really all that big of a deal to Goku. I fail to see how there's so much potential there just because they happen to share genetic material.
It doesn't matter if they chose to be brothers, that's totally besides the point. Do you know how siblings work? I know it's not a big deal to Goku, it doesn't even need to be. That's like saying that Goku has to care that Black looks just like him, or the Black doesn't work as a character.

Take Bardock as an example. He has his own, unique personality and motivations. You feel sympathetic for him, even though he's really a piece of garbage. When he did meet his end, it was at the hands of the ultimate villain, and it set up Goku's battle with Freeza. A great character by Toei!

Raditz: Comes to Earth, kills a farmer, captures a 4 year old, dies. He was just a catalyst for 2 other random dudes to show up and become the villains. The worst part, he could have easily won if he hadn't been carrying the idiot ball for the entire fight. Bad character by Toriyama.

Raditz should have been more like Tullece; An interesting, competent villain with realistic* (for lack of a better term) goals. Another fantastic character by Toei!
Retired.

User avatar
Bansho64
I Live Here
Posts: 2036
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:59 am

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Bansho64 » Tue Sep 06, 2016 11:06 am

Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Raditz should have been more like Tullece; An interesting, competent villain with realistic* (for lack of a better term) goals. Another fantastic character by Toei!
But that's not who Raditz is. He's supposed to be incompetent. Yes, he made bad decisions. He was just a simple Saiyan following orders. Nothing else. All of his actions were consistent with his character and he did have realistic goals for a Saiyan. He wanted to bring back Goku to fight with him, Vegeta, and Nappa. So that he could grow stronger with more forces. How is that bad? He's the one person in Goku's family who doesn't have any complex motives because he's just an ordinary Saiyan. Nothing really major happened for him to change or even need to. I don't know how that makes him a bad character.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Tue Sep 06, 2016 11:21 am

Bansho64 wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Raditz should have been more like Tullece; An interesting, competent villain with realistic* (for lack of a better term) goals. Another fantastic character by Toei!
But that's not who Raditz is. He's supposed to be incompetent. Yes, he made bad decisions. He was just a simple Saiyan following orders. Nothing else. All of his actions were consistent with his character and he did have realistic goals for a Saiyan. He wanted to bring back Goku to fight with him, Vegeta, and Nappa. So that he could grow stronger with more forces. How is that bad? He's the one person in Goku's family who doesn't have any complex motives because he's just an ordinary Saiyan. Nothing really major happened for him to change or even need to. I don't know how that makes him a bad character.
He supposed to be? Was it some inherent force of nature? No, you've totally missed the point.

I recognize that that's how it was, I'm saying that it should have been different. You're just describing how it already is as a refutation.

I'm not saying it's bad, just that it was a missed opportunity. Even having Raditz and Nappa switch roles would be an improvement. As things stand, all 3 of these characters are just typical Saiyans.
Last edited by Jinzoningen MULE on Tue Sep 06, 2016 11:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Retired.

User avatar
Bansho64
I Live Here
Posts: 2036
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:59 am

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Bansho64 » Tue Sep 06, 2016 11:23 am

Jinzoningen MULE wrote: He supposed to be? Was it some inherent force of nature? No, you've totally missed the point.

I recognize that that's how it was, I'm saying that it should have been different. You're just describing how it already is as a refutation.
And why should it have been different? The character served his purpose and introduced two new villains. I'm still not getting what so wrong with Raditz :|

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Tue Sep 06, 2016 11:25 am

Bansho64 wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: He supposed to be? Was it some inherent force of nature? No, you've totally missed the point.

I recognize that that's how it was, I'm saying that it should have been different. You're just describing how it already is as a refutation.
And why should it have been different? The character served his purpose and introduced two new villains. I'm still not getting what so wrong with Raditz :|
Oh my lord... this is painful.

I never said that it "should be different". I said it would have been better.

Edit: Once again, I might add, totally missing the point.
Retired.

User avatar
Bansho64
I Live Here
Posts: 2036
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:59 am

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Bansho64 » Tue Sep 06, 2016 11:30 am

Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Oh my lord... this is painful.

I never said that it "should be different". I said it would have been better.

Edit: Once again, I might add, totally missing the point.
I apologize if I'm making this conversation so painful for you. I'm just trying to understand your viewpoint :(
Also, yes,
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: He supposed to be? Was it some inherent force of nature? No, you've totally missed the point.

I recognize that that's how it was, I'm saying that it should have been different. You're just describing how it already is as a refutation.
You did say it should've been different.

User avatar
Anime Kitten
I Live Here
Posts: 4272
Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 3:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Anime Kitten » Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:24 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:Oh my lord... this is painful.
I never said that it "should be different". I said it would have been better.
Edit: Once again, I might add, totally missing the point.
You're not making any sense and your arguments are baseless. Could you explain what your point is in this discussion? Please and thank you.
MyAnimeList | AniList
Discord: suchmisfortune

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:50 pm

Anime Kitten wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:Oh my lord... this is painful.
I never said that it "should be different". I said it would have been better.
Edit: Once again, I might add, totally missing the point.
You're not making any sense and your arguments are baseless. Could you explain what your point is in this discussion? Please and thank you.
It makes sense if you try reading it. I'm not arguing what is or isn't, I'm saying that a storytelling device could have been used better.
Retired.

User avatar
Anime Kitten
I Live Here
Posts: 4272
Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 3:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Anime Kitten » Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:52 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:It makes sense if you try reading it. I'm not arguing what is or isn't, I'm saying that a storytelling device could have been used better.
I did read it, several times. I just wanted to know why this was becoming so "painful" to you.
MyAnimeList | AniList
Discord: suchmisfortune

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:55 pm

Bansho64 wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Oh my lord... this is painful.

I never said that it "should be different". I said it would have been better.

Edit: Once again, I might add, totally missing the point.
I apologize if I'm making this conversation so painful for you. I'm just trying to understand your viewpoint :(
Also, yes,
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: He supposed to be? Was it some inherent force of nature? No, you've totally missed the point.

I recognize that that's how it was, I'm saying that it should have been different. You're just describing how it already is as a refutation.
You did say it should've been different.
You're right, I retract that. Contextually, I meant that it could have been different.

The reason it's painful is because my point should be obvious to anyone familiar with any story. This is a simple mechanism that could have brought a whole new dynamic, but it was thrown away.
Retired.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20282
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Skippack, PA
Contact:

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by ABED » Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:48 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
ABED wrote:No, I mean the characters didn't choose to be brothers. That fact isn't really all that big of a deal to Goku. I fail to see how there's so much potential there just because they happen to share genetic material.
It doesn't matter if they chose to be brothers, that's totally besides the point. Do you know how siblings work? I know it's not a big deal to Goku, it doesn't even need to be. That's like saying that Goku has to care that Black looks just like him, or the Black doesn't work as a character.

Take Bardock as an example. He has his own, unique personality and motivations. You feel sympathetic for him, even though he's really a piece of garbage. When he did meet his end, it was at the hands of the ultimate villain, and it set up Goku's battle with Freeza. A great character by Toei!

Raditz: Comes to Earth, kills a farmer, captures a 4 year old, dies. He was just a catalyst for 2 other random dudes to show up and become the villains. The worst part, he could have easily won if he hadn't been carrying the idiot ball for the entire fight. Bad character by Toriyama.

Raditz should have been more like Tullece; An interesting, competent villain with realistic* (for lack of a better term) goals. Another fantastic character by Toei!
I do know how siblings work, I have an older brother, and I still fail to see your point. Raditz isn't inherently more interesting or has more potential just because he was an older brother.

People have to stop abusing the term "random". Vegeta and Nappa weren't random. Raditz was the inciting incident for the story. Villains are often undone by their own hubris. That's not idiocy. Tullece was also undone by his own hubris. Instead of finishing the job, he left Goku alone because he thought he won. Raditz' goals were unique and I don't see why they were more "realistic" than Tullece's.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
MajinMan
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1236
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:42 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Dragonball Z was not that good in the beginning..

Post by MajinMan » Tue Sep 06, 2016 4:46 pm

I honestly think that Raditz should not have been revealed as Goku's brother. It does not serve a purpose and adds no extra drama other than "Goku's brother is an evil alien bastard omg." The fact that we never see or hear from him ever again proves that he could have just been a random Saiyan that was sent to earth by Vegeta and Nappa to recruit Goku to their squad.
Heroes come and go, but legends are forever.

60.

Rest in peace.

Post Reply