The "smaller than flea" argument.
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 3:02 pm
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
It is only an excuse, goku flat out stated that the reason they couldn't beat super buu was because they were weak
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
We got another CODE PINK.
I still don't understand the flea argument. It seems like a desperate one. There have been better one's then that.
I still don't understand the flea argument. It seems like a desperate one. There have been better one's then that.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
Chapter: 508 (DBZ 314), P4.2-7
Kaioshin: “In m…my era there were five Kaioshins…until they were defeated by the Majin Boo that the wizard Babidi created…I was the youngest and most powerless one, but I somehow survived, with only heavy injuries…But the other four fell to Boo…First, two were killed…the North Kaioshin and the West Kaioshin….And then the South Kaioshin, the burliest and strongest one, was…somehow absorbed by Boo….. “
Elder Kaioshin: …And he became that huge Boo from before? “
Kaioshin: “…Yes…Next to be absorbed was the fat but kind and gentle Dai-Kaioshin….The Majin Boo that Bibidi created was evil itself, a failed creation that even Bibidi himself couldn’t handle, but by absorbing the Dai-Kaioshin, he somehow become controllable…. “
Elder Kaioshin: “…So he was finally completed…Which is to say…that this current…small Majin Boo…is the initial…mo…most troublesome one…”
Kaioshin: “….Yes…the heart which he gained by going so far as to lower his power through absorption…has returned once again to the way it was…he has no self-control whatsoever…he has become evil itself…”
He specifically says that Dai Kaioshin made him controllable. Nothing is ever said about South Kaioshin making him weaker.[/quote]
No. It specifically says Dai Kaioshin made him more controllable, but it said the absorption(s) made him weaker. Actually, reading back through it, it HEAVILY implies that LOSING Kais is actually raising his power. So the first Kai calmed and weakended him and the next one compounded more so over that - which explains why Buu POWERS UP when the Kais are being removed from him body. Nothing is EVER stated about a Kai or Kai energy being compatible with Buu, or that he gained power with any absorbtion of them. It makes sense in my book.
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
You know, this would be a good reason why Vegito defuses inside Buu. It's not some random reason, it's because Buu is completely incompatible with the Kai's.
[i]"I have yet to show you, young warrior, what I'm truly capable of."[/i] - Cell
- TheGmGoken
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 10592
- Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
- Location: Capsule Corps
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
I can see this turning into a Code Pink.
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
Do I want to know.
[i]"I have yet to show you, young warrior, what I'm truly capable of."[/i] - Cell
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
XD Dude, you have No clue what you are talking about.RandomGuy96 wrote:'Buff Buu' specifically said to be Pure Buu with the South Kaioshin absorbed. The manga makes it very, very clear that they're different since... well, Kibitoshin says that Pure Buu with the South Kaioshin absorbed is Buff Buu. Extremely simple. As if that's not enough, Vegeta specifies that Super Buu did two transformations, one to Buff and then to Pure, the video games differentiate them, and Old Kai differentiates them by calling one "that huge Boo from before" and the other "the initial, most troublesome Boo".
It is never stated Pure Buu is stronger. Only Buff. It is, however, indirectly stated he's weaker like half a dozen times. Goku even compares them fighting Super Buu to Vegetto fighting Pure Buu. That's how different they are.
Kibitoshin says that the Dai Kaioshin weakened him. He says nothing about Southy doing the same. In addition, the Daizenshuu also says that only Dai weakened him, without mentioning South.
So let's clarify:
-Pure Buu is never stated to be stronger
-Buff Buu is stated to be different than Pure Buu. They even outline exactly what makes him different.
-South Kaioshin is never said to weaken Pure Buu, so saying "the transformations made him weaker" is a lie.
So stop making things up.
Nothing, and I mean nothing you stated is in the manga - you just spout off at the hip as usual without knowing what the hell your talking about.
So here you go
Where did Vegeta mention 2 transformations? All we see is Buu swell up and turn into Kidbuu, the Kai comments about the buff size AFTER the transformation and Vegeta never mentions it. Furthermore, when Vegeta's confidence in fighting Buu is based on his size (which it can't be Ki, or he would have already known), as later he's surprised at how powerful this Buu is (which we are warned about a few panels later by Kibito)
- TheGmGoken
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 10592
- Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
- Location: Capsule Corps
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
Confused. What does this have to do with being smaller than a flee?
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
Everything.TheGmGoken wrote:Confused. What does this have to do with being smaller than a flee?
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
How the hell did "Pure Boo Vs Evil Boo" get dragged into this topic?
deviantART
FanFic: DragonBall GT Revised [thread]
Powar Levuls: Main Series | Movies and Specials | GT
Nintendo/PSN/Steam: KaboomKrusader
ACNH Dream Address: DA-1637-4046-7415 ("SlamZone")
(Not) lost (enough) DB Super plots!
A handy video guide to Kanzenshuu-level grammar quality!
FanFic: DragonBall GT Revised [thread]
Powar Levuls: Main Series | Movies and Specials | GT
Nintendo/PSN/Steam: KaboomKrusader
ACNH Dream Address: DA-1637-4046-7415 ("SlamZone")
(Not) lost (enough) DB Super plots!
A handy video guide to Kanzenshuu-level grammar quality!
- Kamiccolo9
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 10353
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:32 pm
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
Kaboom wrote:How the hell did "Pure Boo Vs Evil Boo" get dragged into this topic?
This happened for some reason.Axiom wrote: It's the same thing - if Goku states definatively that he could beat fatbuu, it doesn't matter what "Rage Boost" buu is capable of, we are assuming that is already considered in his statement.
Honestly, things don't match up
SuperBuu is obviously stated to be stronger than Fatbuu. Nothing indicates that Fatbuu ever reaches his level of power.
KidBuu is obviously stronger than FatBuu as well, this is based on Vegeta and Goku's reaction
Goku doesn't think he can beat SuperBuu
Kidbuu (BuffBuu, which isn't mentioned in any media) is said to be stronger tha Superbuu
Goku assumes he can fight on KidBuu's level
Gohan is shown to be superior to Superbuu
Goku suggest both Gohan AND Gotenks are needed to fight Kidbuu
I just assume Goku > KidBuu > SuperBuu > FatBuu
Champion of the 1st Kanzenshuu Short Story Tenkaichi Budokai
Kamiccolo9's Kompendium of Short Stories
Kamiccolo9's Kompendium of Short Stories
Cipher wrote:If Vegeta does not kill Gohan, I will stop illegally streaming the series.
Malik_DBNA wrote:"Achievement Unlocked: Rule 34"Scarz wrote:Malik, stop. People are asking me for lewd art of possessed Bra (with Vegeta).
- RandomGuy96
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8862
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
- Location: San Diego, California, USA
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
I had a big response typed up for how wrong that is, buuuuuut it's apparent that it's not an appreciated conversation here. So see ya.
The Monkey King wrote:It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWokeRandomGuy96 wrote:He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
Can we still see it anyways? Better yet create a debunk thread.RandomGuy96 wrote:I had a big response typed up for how wrong that is, buuuuuut it's apparent that it's not an appreciated conversation here. So see ya.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:
- RandomGuy96
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8862
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
- Location: San Diego, California, USA
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
Nah. I'm tired of this conversation. You can go right ahead, though.dbzfan7 wrote:Can we still see it anyways? Better yet create a debunk thread.RandomGuy96 wrote:I had a big response typed up for how wrong that is, buuuuuut it's apparent that it's not an appreciated conversation here. So see ya.
The Monkey King wrote:It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWokeRandomGuy96 wrote:He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
Wouldn't matter what I or anyone says.RandomGuy96 wrote:Nah. I'm tired of this conversation. You can go right ahead, though.dbzfan7 wrote:Can we still see it anyways? Better yet create a debunk thread.RandomGuy96 wrote:I had a big response typed up for how wrong that is, buuuuuut it's apparent that it's not an appreciated conversation here. So see ya.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
You realise why there are brackets around the "s" after absorption, right? In the Japanese language it is hard to clarify whether the word is a plural or a noun. So what Dai Kaioshin may have said was "absorption", as in a single absorption. It makes more sense that it is a single absorption unless you think he is on about multiple. Seeing as you think that is the case then I guess Gotenks and Gohan made Boo weaker too and weaker means stronger in the story?Axiom wrote:No. It specifically says Dai Kaioshin made him more controllable, but it said the absorption(s) made him weaker. Actually, reading back through it, it HEAVILY implies that LOSING Kais is actually raising his power. So the first Kai calmed and weakended him and the next one compounded more so over that - which explains why Buu POWERS UP when the Kais are being removed from him body. Nothing is EVER stated about a Kai or Kai energy being compatible with Buu, or that he gained power with any absorbtion of them. It makes sense in my book.
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
Goku was bluffing. It's obvious by his expression after his blast failed to even dent Boo's insides that he didn't know his power had changed. The flea argument is desperation at its finest.
CatouttaHell wrote:I guess he's just impossibly powerful and he now gets thrills from letting things go as much to hell as possible before busting out his ultimate power and ending the villain or some shit.
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
Negative Captain - he is for sure talking about the Kai's that were originally absorbed, not anyone else. He also says in the viz translation "The souls he ate tamed him" Plural, and again, all while they are specifically talking about the Kais.Hitiro wrote:You realise why there are brackets around the "s" after absorption, right? In the Japanese language it is hard to clarify whether the word is a plural or a noun. So what Dai Kaioshin may have said was "absorption", as in a single absorption. It makes more sense that it is a single absorption unless you think he is on about multiple. Seeing as you think that is the case then I guess Gotenks and Gohan made Boo weaker too and weaker means stronger in the story?Axiom wrote:No. It specifically says Dai Kaioshin made him more controllable, but it said the absorption(s) made him weaker. Actually, reading back through it, it HEAVILY implies that LOSING Kais is actually raising his power. So the first Kai calmed and weakended him and the next one compounded more so over that - which explains why Buu POWERS UP when the Kais are being removed from him body. Nothing is EVER stated about a Kai or Kai energy being compatible with Buu, or that he gained power with any absorbtion of them. It makes sense in my book.
- PerfectFreeza
- Regular
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Europe
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
Daizenshuu 7 says only Dai Kaioshin weakened him.
Also:
Kaioshin: “…Yes…Next to be absorbed was the fat but kind and gentle Dai-Kaioshin….The Majin Boo that Bibidi created was evil itself, a failed creation that even Bibidi himself couldn’t handle, but by absorbing the Dai-Kaioshin, he somehow become controllable…. “
It's clear only Dai Kaioshin weakened him, but not South Kaioshin.
Also:
Kaioshin: “…Yes…Next to be absorbed was the fat but kind and gentle Dai-Kaioshin….The Majin Boo that Bibidi created was evil itself, a failed creation that even Bibidi himself couldn’t handle, but by absorbing the Dai-Kaioshin, he somehow become controllable…. “
It's clear only Dai Kaioshin weakened him, but not South Kaioshin.
Check out and join this awesome forum:
http://w11.zetaboards.com/DragonBallZone/index/
http://w11.zetaboards.com/DragonBallZone/index/
Re: The "smaller than flea" argument.
This is completely false, and most likely brought about by the anime, and Viz's translation doesn't help. In the original Japanese, after Kibitoshin explains Boo's past, Elder Kaioshin ascertains that the he was finally complete and that Pure Boo is the most troublesome one. Kibitoshin then says that the heart he gained by lowering his power through absorption has returned to the way it was. Daizenshuu #7 states that only Dai Kaioshin weakened Boo. Most Pure Boo supporters dismiss the daizenshuu entry as just "guidebook crap," and dismiss the original Japanese translation as just "another fan translation" and say that Viz is the only good translation because it's official. In the Viz translation, Elder Kaioshin states that the "souls [Boo] ate tamed him," which is easy for Pure Boo supporters to say proves that both the Kais weakened Boo. But this isn't so, because even if the Japanese translation is translated by a fan, it's a direct translation, and not an "adaptation" like the Viz translation, so it is more accurate, whether the Pure Boo supporters want to accept that or not.Axiom wrote:Negative Captain - he is for sure talking about the Kai's that were originally absorbed, not anyone else. He also says in the viz translation "The souls he ate tamed him" Plural, and again, all while they are specifically talking about the Kais.Hitiro wrote:You realise why there are brackets around the "s" after absorption, right? In the Japanese language it is hard to clarify whether the word is a plural or a noun. So what Dai Kaioshin may have said was "absorption", as in a single absorption. It makes more sense that it is a single absorption unless you think he is on about multiple. Seeing as you think that is the case then I guess Gotenks and Gohan made Boo weaker too and weaker means stronger in the story?Axiom wrote:No. It specifically says Dai Kaioshin made him more controllable, but it said the absorption(s) made him weaker. Actually, reading back through it, it HEAVILY implies that LOSING Kais is actually raising his power. So the first Kai calmed and weakended him and the next one compounded more so over that - which explains why Buu POWERS UP when the Kais are being removed from him body. Nothing is EVER stated about a Kai or Kai energy being compatible with Buu, or that he gained power with any absorbtion of them. It makes sense in my book.
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/forum/viewtop ... =8&t=23381