So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

Deathbringer
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 376
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 12:27 pm
Location: United Kingdom

So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by Deathbringer » Fri Mar 25, 2016 10:27 am

A 'midquel' is kind of like the missing link between a sequel and a prequel, where a sequel is a story that takes place after the ending of the story told before it and a prequel is a story that takes place before the beginning of the story told before it a midquel is a story that takes place before the ending of the story told before it, or rather "in the middle" (except for the fact that "before the ending" doesn't mean the exact middle).

I say this because I haven't really seen anyone call Dragon Ball Super a midquel but the thought occurred to me that it (and to a lesser extent, Battle of Gods and Resurrection F) might count as a midquel seeing as it takes place after the ending to the Majin Boo saga but BEFORE the actual proper ending to the manga. The only thing that makes me think it might not be a midquel is because there might be people who think of the final part of the story as being an epilogue with the ending being the ending to the Majin Boo saga, but the manga doesn't actually refer to that final chapter as an epilogue. I also don't know if something that takes place before an epilogue would still count as a midquel (it probably does but it would all come down to the difference between an ending and an epilogue) either way it feels wrong to call Super a sequel to Dragon Ball when it takes place before the ending, making it a midquel. In short: GT would count as a sequel to Dragon Ball but Super would count as a midquel.

Anyone have any thoughts on this?

Dragon Ball Ireland
I Live Here
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 9:09 am
Location: Sligo, Ireland

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by Dragon Ball Ireland » Fri Mar 25, 2016 10:42 am

I'm not sure if I would call Super a missing link, as of now it hasn't helped to explain anything in EOZ. You can watch the series from Pilaf to Buu and not miss anything relevant to the character arc of Goku. Super will simply be something extra.

That said, by yourdictionary's definition I would say yes, because it takes place within Z's timeframe, not before or after.

http://www.yourdictionary.com/midquel
A work that is set within the timeframe of a previous work, rather than before or after it.
Read more at http://www.yourdictionary.com/midquel#t ... TqOmRKu.99
I think the reason it's not really brought up much is because it's such an obscure term.
Do you have any info about international non-English broadcasts about the Dragon Ball anime or manga translations/editions? Please message me. Researching for a future book with Dragon Ball scholar Derek Padula :thumbup:

Check out my blogs https://dragonballireland.wordpress.com/ and https://dragonballinternational.wordpress.com/

User avatar
Pantalones
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1432
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:30 pm

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by Pantalones » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:21 pm

I suspect the main reason people refer to Super as a sequel to Dragonball/DBZ is because they aren't aware of the term "midquel"... and more importantly, because "midquel" sounds really, really stupid. >_<

But anyway, considering how little of DBZ actually takes place in the "ten years after Buu" ending bit, Super basically is a sequel. The very end of the manga/anime is really more of an epilogue than anything else, regardless of whether it's "officially" called that or not -- basically the whole point of it is to show all the characters again and how they've aged (or not) over 10 years, and show that yep, Goku's wish that Buu could be reincarnated as a good guy actually came true.

User avatar
Kamiccolo9
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10367
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:32 pm
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by Kamiccolo9 » Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:26 pm

By definition, a "Midquel" (and prequels as well) is just a subcategory of sequel, so referring to it as the latter is correct.
Champion of the 1st Kanzenshuu Short Story Tenkaichi Budokai
Kamiccolo9's Kompendium of Short Stories
Cipher wrote:If Vegeta does not kill Gohan, I will stop illegally streaming the series.
Malik_DBNA wrote:
Scarz wrote:Malik, stop. People are asking me for lewd art of possessed Bra (with Vegeta).
"Achievement Unlocked: Rule 34"

User avatar
Gaffer Tape
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6110
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by Gaffer Tape » Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:49 pm

Kamiccolo9 wrote:By definition, a "Midquel" (and prequels as well) is just a subcategory of sequel, so referring to it as the latter is correct.
Thank you for this. I can't tell you how much it annoys me when people get this wrong and, for example, think of a prequel as the opposite of a sequel. "Oh, a sequel comes after, so a prequel comes before. Therefore, Star Wars is a prequel to The Empire Strikes Back!" Nooooooo! In order for something to a prequel or a midquel or any other -quel, it has to be a sequel.
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:

MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 6/15/25!)
Current Episode: Magnificent Cringe - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Korean and Taiwanese Live-Action Movies

Danfun64
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2015 3:29 pm

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by Danfun64 » Fri Mar 25, 2016 4:38 pm

IMO, I personally think that BOG and Super retcon EOZ, because Oob being toe to toe with SSGSS Goku makes no sense.
Robo4900 wrote:Mouse is BRILLIANT SCIENTIST dumb.
CAT LOVES FOOD dumb.
Jack is just kinda dumb.

User avatar
Kunzait_83
I Live Here
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 5:19 pm

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by Kunzait_83 » Fri Mar 25, 2016 5:54 pm

In fairness, Super would be set after the vast, vast lion's share of Z is well and over with. All you're basically left with that Super is set prior to is what amounts to the briefest bit of an epilogue/coda tacked onto the very tail-most end (albeit a very, very important one thematically). This is also assuming you're not counting GT, because at this point I think its plenty fair to say that Super itself isn't counting GT either.
http://80s90sdragonballart.tumblr.com/

Kunzait's Wuxia Thread
Journey to the West, chapter 26 wrote:The strong man will meet someone stronger still:
Come to naught at last he surely will!
Zephyr wrote:And that's to say nothing of how pretty much impossible it is to capture what made the original run of the series so great. I'm in the generation of fans that started with Toonami, so I totally empathize with the feeling of having "missed the party", experiencing disappointment, and wanting to experience it myself. But I can't, that's how life is. Time is a bitch. The party is over. Kageyama, Kikuchi, and Maeda are off the sauce now; Yanami almost OD'd; Yamamoto got arrested; Toriyama's not going to light trash cans on fire and hang from the chandelier anymore. We can't get the band back together, and even if we could, everyone's either old, in poor health, or calmed way the fuck down. Best we're going to get, and are getting, is a party that's almost entirely devoid of the magic that made the original one so awesome that we even want more.
Kamiccolo9 wrote:It grinds my gears that people get "outraged" over any of this stuff. It's a fucking cartoon. If you are that determined to be angry about something, get off the internet and make a stand for something that actually matters.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

Danfun64
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2015 3:29 pm

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by Danfun64 » Fri Mar 25, 2016 5:56 pm

You're right. If EOZ has to go in order for Super to fit, so must GT. Then again, GT was never completely "canon".
Robo4900 wrote:Mouse is BRILLIANT SCIENTIST dumb.
CAT LOVES FOOD dumb.
Jack is just kinda dumb.

User avatar
TheGreatness25
I Live Here
Posts: 4981
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:36 am

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by TheGreatness25 » Fri Mar 25, 2016 6:36 pm

Danfun64 wrote:IMO, I personally think that BOG and Super retcon EOZ, because Oob being toe to toe with SSGSS Goku makes no sense.
But he's not going toe-to-toe with Super Saiyan God Super Saiyan Goku, he's going head-to-head with base Goku... and losing. Goku being excited at Oob's potential and what he could become if he were trained properly does not interfere with Dragon Ball Super. I would find that to be a pointless modification to the end of Z.

TheShadowEmperor8055
Regular
Posts: 717
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 3:36 pm

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by TheShadowEmperor8055 » Fri Mar 25, 2016 10:56 pm

I guess calling it a "midquel" is accurate.
Gaffer Tape wrote:
Kamiccolo9 wrote:By definition, a "Midquel" (and prequels as well) is just a subcategory of sequel, so referring to it as the latter is correct.
Thank you for this. I can't tell you how much it annoys me when people get this wrong and, for example, think of a prequel as the opposite of a sequel. "Oh, a sequel comes after, so a prequel comes before. Therefore, Star Wars is a prequel to The Empire Strikes Back!" Nooooooo! In order for something to a prequel or a midquel or any other -quel, it has to be a sequel.
This. And the Star Wars original trilogy is a great film series. But yeah, can't be a prequel or a midquel without some type of sequel.

buutenks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1888
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:42 am

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by buutenks » Sun Mar 27, 2016 4:28 pm

Well, so far super is taking in account of the eoz. Since goku stated that he asked for kid buu to be reincarnated.

Plus uub fighting base goku and giving him some 'trouble' doesnt really contradict super.

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6389
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by Cipher » Sun Mar 27, 2016 5:30 pm

Danfun64 wrote:You're right. If EOZ has to go in order for Super to fit, so must GT. Then again, GT was never completely "canon".
It actually still lines up with the end of the manga right now. GT, on the other hand, would take some massive changes to set up at this point, and I doubt Toriyama was thinking about it at all when writing this story. We can safely assume it and Super aren't compatible.

User avatar
djcoopdawg
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2015 12:13 pm
Contact:

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by djcoopdawg » Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:10 pm

Given what is happening right now, the future presence of Uub at the EOZ seems very unimportant now. It is still very plausible to fit in the timeline still. Uub has been mentioned in Super as well. However GT has very little credibility. The lack of god power and going back to super saiyan 3 make it more difficult to fit in GT. There could always be reasons to explain the absence of super saiyan God, but it definitely at this moment seems that GT is going to be completely ignored and "scrapped" from the timeline. The fact that it is referenced as an alternate universe/timeline in the video games gives a nice explanation for those that may be concerned or are looking for a reason.

EDIT: Also note that Kabito and Supreme Kai are unfused now.... unless they get fused again for GT lol
EDIT 2: Also Pilaf group are now kids... unless they wish for rapid old age for GT lol

User avatar
Saturnine
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1523
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:45 am

Re: So Dragon Ball Super is a midquel right?

Post by Saturnine » Mon Mar 28, 2016 1:16 pm

djcoopdawg wrote:Given what is happening right now, the future presence of Uub at the EOZ seems very unimportant now. It is still very plausible to fit in the timeline still. Uub has been mentioned in Super as well. However GT has very little credibility. The lack of god power and going back to super saiyan 3 make it more difficult to fit in GT. There could always be reasons to explain the absence of super saiyan God, but it definitely at this moment seems that GT is going to be completely ignored and "scrapped" from the timeline. The fact that it is referenced as an alternate universe/timeline in the video games gives a nice explanation for those that may be concerned or are looking for a reason.

EDIT: Also note that Kabito and Supreme Kai are unfused now.... unless they get fused again for GT lol
EDIT 2: Also Pilaf group are now kids... unless they wish for rapid old age for GT lol
Yeah, I think it's been made clear enough that no one even cares about reconciling things with GT as of right now. Except maybe some sad fan souls :lol:

Post Reply