That's the arc that started the franchise so they probably thought that it would also kick off GT in a big way.Kuririn Fan wrote: Why Toei thought that making Goku kid again and be a bad copy of the least popular arc is a good idea is beyond me.
The difference is, the 1st DB arc was funny, interesting and the characters were likable which is the exact opposite of GT's 1st arc.
Another thing is, DB's 1st arc was the introduction to the franchise so it made sense for Toriyama to start small and build his way up but GT was coming off of 7 huge battle arcs (22nd Tenkaichi, King Piccolo, 23rd Tenkaichi, Saiyan, Namek, Android & Buu arcs) and that's not counting the action packed movies so for them to go all the way back and make a bad arc on top of that...I don't think there's a word that can describe what a bad idea that was.
That would be like Hollywood deciding to make black and white movies again.
This would be a better split, 27-7-17.Kuririn Fan wrote:I'll go with 40-7-17, it just feels that there are 3 arcs with beginnings, middles and endings.
I know the Black star arc is a part of GT but does anyone want to watch that again ? it's so much easier to start with Baby cause it feels more natural after seeing Buu or which ever arc in Super. plus it's a decent arc unlike the black star arc which is the worst thing the franchise has produced.



