"Dragon Ball Super" Series Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
shadowmaria
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 754
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2015 5:35 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by shadowmaria » Mon Aug 29, 2016 4:30 am

Heroes introduced SSJ3 Trunks years and years ago. It is not something fan made since F aired

See the footage on YT and see for yourself

User avatar
Lionel
I Live Here
Posts: 2398
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2015 2:54 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Lionel » Mon Aug 29, 2016 4:37 am

Noah wrote:Okay, I can take Trunks being more stronger that he already is, but I can't take he being stronger than a SSJ3 as a SSJ2, why not give him the damn transformation?
Did anyone have any reservations concerning Future Gohan in Base being stronger than SSJ Trunks? Each character has their own respective potential and strengths. If you ask me, I have no issues with SSJ Gohan being above Cell after training with the Z-Sword.

User avatar
namekiansaiyan
I Live Here
Posts: 4358
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 9:39 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by namekiansaiyan » Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:13 am

Sodhi wrote:Here is the translation by Mr. Herms :)
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]
Trunks getting more powerful is just ridiculous as he has done no training.

Pannaliciour
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:04 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Pannaliciour » Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:52 am

Like it or not but introducing SsjB gogeta with KK times 10 and ssj3 Trunks , fans will go crazy (positive). Even if its not in line with dragon ball at all.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by sintzu » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:02 am

Pannaliciour wrote:Like it or not but introducing SsjB gogeta with KK times 10 and ssj3 Trunks , fans will go crazy (positive). Even if its not in line with dragon ball at all.
Goku and Vegeta's power is so high that they probably won't even need SsjB let alone that alongside Kaioken ×10.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:05 am

DBZGTKOSDH wrote:
Anime Kitten wrote:Okay. This is a stretch of a prediction, but I'm hoping this is what will happen.

Black will quite easily overpower Goku, forcing the latter to use Kaioken. He gains somewhat of an advantage, but Black quickly learns about this. Goku ups his KK to x10, finally overpowering Black. Now, I can't envision the ending just yet, but I'd love the Delayed Onset Ki Disorder to make a return and have permanent (or at least lasting) consequences.

What do you say?
Kaio-ken Super Saiyan Blue was filler, and the Delayed Onset Ki Disorder was another excuse for Goku to stop using Kaio-ken, along with how risky it is using it with a 1/10th chance working, and the heavy damage it causes to the body after using it. Toei introduced it for a one-time-only show, and then gave Goku multiple reasons to not use it again, which are meant to explain why we'll never see it again.
The Kaio-Ken/Super Saiyan God Super Saiyan combo is no more filler than the manga using Super Saiyan God twice. And the Kaio-Ken had multiple reasons not to go over a double in the original source. Not to mention, since Super isn't even yet, it's too soon to say it's was just an one-time used.

In either case, this is an incorrect used of the word filler. Filler is when something that has no overall bearing in the story. The Kaio-Ken/Super Saiyan God Super Saiyan combo was a big part of Goku's fight against Hit. So, even if it never reappeared again for the reasons you named, it wouldn't be called filler.
Last edited by HeroR on Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

vashter
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 489
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 5:23 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by vashter » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:12 am

Wait a min.... THERE going be a SSJ3 Trunks possibly?

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by TheMikado » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:16 am

Can't speak for anyone else, but for me personally, the source of the material is very important. If something doesn't come from Toriyama, I'm not particularly interested in it, and would tune out/drop the series, or if it is past material, would just forget about it (AT has built up his world, and I'm interested in seeing what his vision specifically is). Definitely wouldn't hold it against anybody, and those who enjoy expanded universe type material should have every right to do so.
You do realize the whole Gods of Destruction and Goku becoming a God thing wasn't from Toriyama right?? Toei literally pitched him a preconceived rough script with plot points, themes, character designs etc, fortunately he ended up rewriting most of it, but the core concepts of the new Dragonball series with Gods was a Toei invention, not a Toriyama one.
With what stance did you approach your work?
To be honest, I was busy as it was with just my own job1, so I didn’t intend to get involved with the animation. The rough script I read in order to check it over had an interesting-sounding theme of a God of Destruction, but the contents were a little dark, so while I was in the midst of giving advice on how to improve it, I got carried away and ended up writing almost everything. For the character designs, as well, I had an image of them to a certain extent while I was thinking up the contents [of the movie], so I decided that it would be faster to just draw them myself rather than asking for this or that.
About the movie-original characters

When you heard “God of Destruction”, what ideas did you suggest, Toriyama-sensei?
The God of Destruction I [initially] received was a malevolent, dark character. For a twisted guy like me, I took the stereotypical image you’d think of from the name “God of Destruction”, then went ahead and reversed everything, leaving only his fearsomeness. My style is to first tear down the image, then think up the contents. Also, there was a request to have the whole cast appear since it was the first animation in a while, so that’s how the contents came about.
Did you make any requests for the direction of Beerus’ battle?
I did generally write in a rough idea of their exchanges, but apart from that, I left the battle scenes up to the people on the anime staff. They’ve been doing Dragon Ball for a long time, and I believed that leaving the animation up to talented professionals would result in something much better than thinking it up for myself. And it was just the kind of quality I expected.
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/translations/ ... -toriyama/

User avatar
Baggie_Saiyan
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10315
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Location: Atlantis.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Baggie_Saiyan » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:28 am

This SS3 Trunks thing reminds me when people thought Vegeta was going get SS3 in the BoG arc. It's. Not. Going. To. Happen.

Pannaliciour
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:04 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Pannaliciour » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:30 am

TheMikado wrote:
Can't speak for anyone else, but for me personally, the source of the material is very important. If something doesn't come from Toriyama, I'm not particularly interested in it, and would tune out/drop the series, or if it is past material, would just forget about it (AT has built up his world, and I'm interested in seeing what his vision specifically is). Definitely wouldn't hold it against anybody, and those who enjoy expanded universe type material should have every right to do so.
You do realize the whole Gods of Destruction and Goku becoming a God thing wasn't from Toriyama right?? Toei literally pitched him a preconceived rough script with plot points, themes, character designs etc, fortunately he ended up rewriting most of it, but the core concepts of the new Dragonball series with Gods was a Toei invention, not a Toriyama one.
With what stance did you approach your work?
To be honest, I was busy as it was with just my own job1, so I didn’t intend to get involved with the animation. The rough script I read in order to check it over had an interesting-sounding theme of a God of Destruction, but the contents were a little dark, so while I was in the midst of giving advice on how to improve it, I got carried away and ended up writing almost everything. For the character designs, as well, I had an image of them to a certain extent while I was thinking up the contents [of the movie], so I decided that it would be faster to just draw them myself rather than asking for this or that.
About the movie-original characters

When you heard “God of Destruction”, what ideas did you suggest, Toriyama-sensei?
The God of Destruction I [initially] received was a malevolent, dark character. For a twisted guy like me, I took the stereotypical image you’d think of from the name “God of Destruction”, then went ahead and reversed everything, leaving only his fearsomeness. My style is to first tear down the image, then think up the contents. Also, there was a request to have the whole cast appear since it was the first animation in a while, so that’s how the contents came about.
Did you make any requests for the direction of Beerus’ battle?
I did generally write in a rough idea of their exchanges, but apart from that, I left the battle scenes up to the people on the anime staff. They’ve been doing Dragon Ball for a long time, and I believed that leaving the animation up to talented professionals would result in something much better than thinking it up for myself. And it was just the kind of quality I expected.
http://www.kanzenshuu.com/translations/ ... -toriyama/

Hmm reallly i thought Toriyama came up with Beerus because of his cat? Or was he talking about Beerus design?

vashter
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 489
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 5:23 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by vashter » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:39 am

Baggie_Saiyan wrote:This SS3 Trunks thing reminds me when people thought Vegeta was going get SS3 in the BoG arc. It's. Not. Going. To. Happen.

Yea, but someone said in the manga that trunks went ssj3 and hero also if I'm not mistaken?

vashter
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 489
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 5:23 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by vashter » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:43 am

Neon Z wrote:Trunks' great one day of training. I guess this might explain why the manga had him on Goku SSJ3+ level from the start.

really? can you show me manga? that like saying people thought vegeta going SSJ in middle of Ep 7 or 8? but no manga or in bog at all, but trunks get a ssj 3 already in manga? hmmm

User avatar
TheMikado
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by TheMikado » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:53 am

Hmm reallly i thought Toriyama came up with Beerus because of his cat? Or was he talking about Beerus design?
His design, the original Toei script called for him to be a lizard or something.

User avatar
Lord Frieza
I Live Here
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:36 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Lord Frieza » Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:23 am

They had an almost entirely different story for the original BoG movie. However Toriyama made a very large amount of changes to the story with the concept of Super Saiyan God and Beerus's name being the only things that remained.

From what I can tell the entire aspect and tone of the movie changed after he came on board.

User avatar
Lord Beerus
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 21430
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
Location: A temple on a giant tree
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Lord Beerus » Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:33 am

Sodhi wrote:Here is the translation by Mr. Herms :)
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]
Just give Future Trunks SSJ3 already. Thankfully, the anime hasn't gone down the bullshit route of SSJ2 Future Trunks being on par with with SSJ3 Goku like the manga did, so they have golden opportunity to pull the trigger for Future Trunks to have another new form, and sell a crap load of new merch.

User avatar
nite_jay
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 929
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:52 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by nite_jay » Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:38 am

So did Trunks pull a quick 12 hour RoSaT run while he was "sleeping"? I can't see where he could put any more time in to train.

User avatar
ailema88
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 12:53 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by ailema88 » Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:48 am

Baggie_Saiyan wrote:This SS3 Trunks thing reminds me when people thought Vegeta was going get SS3 in the BoG arc. It's. Not. Going. To. Happen.
Yeah, I don't think that happens too, and I think Zamasu is in a higher level and Trunks has no chance to win, also is too early in the arc to such a thing like that happens.

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Mon Aug 29, 2016 9:28 am

Three options for the trunks training.
1. He's been training more than we previously saw.
2. It's referencing the training he did before he came back.
3. It's complete bs and apparently he absorbs power like Black now.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
namekiansaiyan
I Live Here
Posts: 4358
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 9:39 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by namekiansaiyan » Mon Aug 29, 2016 9:32 am

kinisking wrote:Three options for the trunks training.
1. He's been training more than we previously saw.
2. It's referencing the training he did before he came back.
3. It's complete bs and apparently he absorbs power like Black now.
Number 3 as the other 2 make no sense, I just hope that the preview card is over exaggerating a bit.

User avatar
THEGOKU
Regular
Posts: 584
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:52 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by THEGOKU » Mon Aug 29, 2016 9:34 am

Well he must have been training more than what we saw because Bulma even said he needs to rest from all the training. Its like when they were in the time chamber just because we didn't see it doesn't mean it didn't happen. I am just happy to finally see someone other than Goku and Vegeta getting some spotlight in a fight and hopefully Trunks can win. I doubt the fight ends here though. Plus some kind of fusion or something has to be done with Vegeta the guy was stabbed I doubt he can take that pain for much longer.

Post Reply