
Now its difficult to see Turles as a separate character. I never liked this movie much anyway as its one of the weaker movies, but now Turtles feels even more out of place than he did already.


Alright, that makes sense (I've never watched movie 3)Kakacarrottop wrote:I've always just approached him as being another Saiyan bad guy, perhaps in the same bloodline as Bardock. It's very plausible since there is not a single mention of his similarities to Goku in the movie, aside from the brief exchange with Gohan. If he was truly meant to be Evil Goku like Goku Black is now, then the writers would have made that the main plot point of the film, as opposed to some giant evil Tree. That whole "Turles is Goku if he hadn't hit his head" thing is just a fan theory that isn't official in anyway.
I disagree. The writers don't hit you over the head with Turles being Evil Goku because they aren't treating the viewer like an idiot, the subtext of the film is clearly dealing with that premise though. The main plot of doesn't need to focus on the parallels between the two characters because frankly, that would be very boring and wouldn't fit the sci-fi space warrior direction the franchise was headed in by that point. Now that the series is dealing with God's and mystical elements again they're kind of free to explore it from that direction but back then the most popular thing was Saiyans and external threats coming from space.Kakacarrottop wrote:If he was truly meant to be Evil Goku like Goku Black is now, then the writers would have made that the main plot point of the film, as opposed to some giant evil Tree. That whole "Turles is Goku if he hadn't hit his head" thing is just a fan theory that isn't official in anyway.
We still don't know what exactly Black is. Saying that there is zero reason for Black to look like Goku is false. There could be something coming up soon explaining why he looks the way he does or what he actually is.TheGreatness25 wrote:The writers were lazy with Tullece and are now lazy with Black's design. Was there any point at all of making Black look like Goku? Is this actually discussed beyond a B.S. mention here and there? Are the characters tripped out seeing Black looking like Goku? If the answer is "no" to any of those questions, then there was zero reason to have Black look like Goku.
Oddly enough that was going to happen in my fanfic before I gave up on it.FoolsGil wrote:Well you know what else, the Fruit of Might is supposed to be eaten by the Gods. Now what God do we know loves eating as much as he loves destroying planets, and could reasonably cut out the middle man and do both at the same time?
So now I can't watch Movie 3 without thinking Turles took Beers' seeds.
Genuine question, what the hell has Black done besides kill Mai (?) ? The guys seems like a blank slate. Granted Tullece sucked, but still.Hellspawn28 wrote:Goku Black is a better written villain. Tullece to me is just another typical bad guy of the week for me. He is just Radditz in Goku's body.
People say it like it's that's much of a milestone in Dragonball...Hellspawn28 wrote:Goku Black is pretty well like at the moment and people even call him the deepest villain in the series.
Kanassa wrote:- FoolsGil, Out of Context, 2017FoolsGil wrote:I hope Mark is dead. But chances are the dragonballs will bring his stupid ass back.
Yes. I see Tullece like that as well. Seemingly a mix of Raditz and Vegeta (more so closer to Raditz) and it doesn't really inherently mean that Goku would have become exactly like that in character, as Goku isn't really an arrogant person but more of an ignorant and self-centered one. That pride he would have would fit more in lines of being more like Bardock as I see it, where Bardock doesn't necessarily care about anything moral or self-imposing, but just wants to fight and doesn't care who or why. Though given Goku's natural instincts he had as a baby of being very rowdy and impulsive (according to Grandpa Gohan) he'd probably become more like Nappa, rather than Tullece.Nejishiki wrote:I don't see it and I never agreed with the movie implying Goku could have developed into Tullece. He's more in line as a mixture of Raditz and Vegeta in character traits. Kakarotto, to me, would be the ideal Saiyan, obsessed with fighting and becoming stronger with zero regard for others, embracing of his pride and rage. His genius would only make him all the more dreadful compared to a typical Saiyan. It's a thin line of wild that separates the Son from the savage, because they're really not too far off from being the same. Tullece, on the other hand, was more a pirate seeking to conquer through any means possible.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.