Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
Freeza Heika
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 957
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:03 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by Freeza Heika » Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:05 pm

caejones wrote:
Great Saiyaman I wrote:I kinda just think of GT like another series of Dragonball. While the manga was all one series, GT is like a new series, like a new Power Rangers or the newer Yugioh series. It's not part of the DB manga, but the manga is part of GT. Does anyone get what I'm saying?
I like the comparison to Power Rangers.
I think various PR series work better without trying to fit in the universe of the first six seasons.
Though I often think of Turbo as the PR equivalent of GT... except... less easily ignored. ^^
Lost Galaxy has always been my GT. They tried to squeeze it into the canon of the first six seasons, but it was just... lame.

Oh, right! I should say something topical. Uh...um...Gt... is... good. That's all I got. Sorry. i just really wanted to insult Lost Galaxy. :mrgreen:

-Клああту барадああ にиктω
Last edited by Freeza Heika on Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
My Super Awesome GT Origins Idea
"さあ、お前の罪を数えろ!"
"SuperSaiyan3Goku, give me all your breasts."

User avatar
Bussani
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8041
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:35 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by Bussani » Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:18 pm

NeoKING wrote:Just figured that AT's side-story comment would TECHNICALLY make it canon. That would be an interesting bit of trivia.
That depends on how you define "side-story". To be honest, I can't see how something that continues and serves as an ending for the whole Dragon Ball story can be a side-story in the way you're taking it. When I saw Toriyama's comment, I actually took it completely the opposite way--that GT wasn't canon, but was a side-thing that could still be enjoyed.

Why are Toriyama's comments always so vague and interpretable?
If TPP passes in your country it will be illegal for you to watch an imported DVD. Click here to learn more!

NeoKING
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:55 pm

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by NeoKING » Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:55 pm

Bussani wrote:
NeoKING wrote:Just figured that AT's side-story comment would TECHNICALLY make it canon. That would be an interesting bit of trivia.
That depends on how you define "side-story". To be honest, I can't see how something that continues and serves as an ending for the whole Dragon Ball story can be a side-story in the way you're taking it. When I saw Toriyama's comment, I actually took it completely the opposite way--that GT wasn't canon, but was a side-thing that could still be enjoyed.

Why are Toriyama's comments always so vague and interpretable?
Because as much as we all love him - and we ALL love him - Akira Toriyama really is just a brilliant-but-lazy manga-ka who kinda happened to get lucky, so he doesn't really care about the effect his vague comments has on his fans.

.... I think.

User avatar
SSJ4_Zankuto
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 378
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:43 pm
Location: South Wales
Contact:

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by SSJ4_Zankuto » Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:23 pm

Dragonball GT is non-canon in my books because the "black star dragonballs" have no connection to Dragonball anime/manga, even if emporer pilaf says "these balls where create when kami and piccolo were still one" and kami only created set of dragonballs once. This is why I consider Dragonball GT non-canon and also side story to dragonball anime/manga.

User avatar
Gaffer Tape
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6133
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by Gaffer Tape » Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:01 pm

Well, while I agree that GT isn't canon (simply because it's not part of the manga), it's impossible to deny that Dragon Ball pulled stuff out of its ass all the time: Goku's and Piccolo's alien origins, random limitations being put on the dragonballs, Dr. Gero being a part of the Red Ribbon Army, Freeza suddenly having a father as part of his empire, Tao Pai Pai apparently surviving his fight with Goku but nobody noticing, Vegeta working for an alien overlord, different levels of never-before-mentioned Kaio appearing out of nowhere, the Room of Spirit and Time, Chichi becoming impregnated before the Cell Games... honestly, there being another, earlier set of dragonballs doesn't really seem like that much of a stretch.
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:

MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 4/13/26!)
Current Episode: Low-Detail Freeza Can't Hurt You - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 3

MystikjMv
Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:15 am

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by MystikjMv » Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:06 pm

Canon or no-canon, if the series could be looked at as fan fiction in anime forum, I'd see the show being enjoyed more by the DB fan. I, for one, enjoyed it because I saw my favorite series being continued after the actual manga had finished. Some aspects of GT, although far fetched could actually be part of the original story, some sagas actually made sense, yet were so poorly scripted. The Dragonballs turning against Goku & the others should have been more thought provoking, more thought out then it was, however what done is done, and whats done cannot be undone. GT was good for what it was trying to accomplish. It's a small little dent in the DBZ ULTIMATE FAN world, but is it really that bad? It gave us 64 episodes extension of a show we love, loved and have forever loved. Although not the greatest, it wasn't the worst either.


Look at it like this folks, it could've been a lot worse. :wink:
Last edited by MystikjMv on Fri Nov 05, 2010 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Puto
I Live Here
Posts: 2668
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:40 am
Location: Portugal, Oeiras

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by Puto » Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:50 pm

Why are you pou posting in green?
Blue wrote:I love how Season 2 is so off color even the box managed to be so.

MystikjMv
Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:15 am

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by MystikjMv » Fri Nov 05, 2010 10:10 pm

Puto wrote:Why are you pou posting in green?
.....I have no idea? Fixed.

Piccolo Daimaoh
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5407
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by Piccolo Daimaoh » Fri Nov 05, 2010 10:19 pm

Puto wrote:Why are you pou posting in green?
Because bolding/italicizing/changing the colour of random words in a sentence is fun! :P

MystikjMv
Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:15 am

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by MystikjMv » Fri Nov 05, 2010 10:21 pm

Piccolo Daimaoh wrote:
Puto wrote:Why are you pou posting in green?
Because bolding/italicizing/changing the colour of random words in a sentence is fun! :P

It does have it's moments, doesn't it? :lol:

Codarik
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1030
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:20 am
Location: Snake Way

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by Codarik » Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:23 pm

I like to think GT is canon to the series, even though I'm not a big fan of it. I just find it too depressing, and the only things I really like from it is the series ending (with all the flashbacks and stuff) and the 4th ending.

User avatar
Bardo117
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 977
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 7:03 pm

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by Bardo117 » Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:45 pm

GT has the best story.
El Conejo Malo

User avatar
Great Saiyaman I
Regular
Posts: 726
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:34 pm

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by Great Saiyaman I » Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:08 am

Gaffer Tape wrote:Well, while I agree that GT isn't canon (simply because it's not part of the manga), it's impossible to deny that Dragon Ball pulled stuff out of its ass all the time: Goku's and Piccolo's alien origins, random limitations being put on the dragonballs, Dr. Gero being a part of the Red Ribbon Army, Freeza suddenly having a father as part of his empire, Tao Pai Pai apparently surviving his fight with Goku but nobody noticing, Vegeta working for an alien overlord, different levels of never-before-mentioned Kaio appearing out of nowhere, the Room of Spirit and Time, Chichi becoming impregnated before the Cell Games... honestly, there being another, earlier set of dragonballs doesn't really seem like that much of a stretch.
King Cold wasn't a plot twist. Silly Gaffer, everyone has a daddy. :P

(except Piccolo, who's parent was asexual. That kid was messed up.
-The Great Saiyaman
Herms wrote:
Nex Carnifex wrote:Herms can you translate the whole thing
No.

User avatar
VegettoEX
Kanzenshuu Co-Owner & Administrator
Posts: 17815
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by VegettoEX » Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:20 am

Folks, please cut out the nonsense posts. If you do not have something to bring to the table, you do not have anything worth posting in the first place. There is so much to be discussed in the original topic idea and off-shoots from that... I simply can't comprehend how you can go off-course so badly and have nothing to say.
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: April 2026 |] ::

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4423
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by Zephyr » Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:46 am

While I wouldn't mind seeing some of the things GT brings to the table added to the manga canon (Super Dragonballs, Tuffles, "SSJ4", Evil Dragons), I don't like a lot of the other things that it did (Kid Goku, horrible use of the available cast of characters, the fact that it builds off of contradictory filler), and think that it was executed poorly. So personally, I don't regard it as canon.

In fact, I've recently warmed up to Tanooki Kuribo's idea that GT was all just a bad dream. Makes sense to me, as it certainly provides a logical explanation for the Super 17 saga.

User avatar
caejones
I Live Here
Posts: 3125
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:37 am
Contact:

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by caejones » Sat Nov 06, 2010 8:50 am

Freeza Heika wrote:
caejones wrote:
Great Saiyaman I wrote:I kinda just think of GT like another series of Dragonball. While the manga was all one series, GT is like a new series, like a new Power Rangers or the newer Yugioh series. It's not part of the DB manga, but the manga is part of GT. Does anyone get what I'm saying?
I like the comparison to Power Rangers.
I think various PR series work better without trying to fit in the universe of the first six seasons.
Though I often think of Turbo as the PR equivalent of GT... except... less easily ignored. ^^
Lost Galaxy has always been my GT. They tried to squeeze it into the canon of the first six seasons, but it was just... lame.

Oh, right! I should say something topical. Uh...um...Gt... is... good. That's all I got. Sorry. i just really wanted to insult Lost Galaxy. :mrgreen:

-Клああту барадああ にиктω
Actually, my post initially started with me talking about Lost Galaxy, but then I decided to change it to be more general. :D
Dr Gero, in Budokai 2 wrote:Go, my Saiba Rangers!
Akira Toriyama, in Son Goku Densetsu wrote:You really can’t go by rumors (laughs).

User avatar
Great Saiyaman I
Regular
Posts: 726
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:34 pm

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by Great Saiyaman I » Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:02 am

Zephyr wrote:While I wouldn't mind seeing some of the things GT brings to the table added to the manga canon (Super Dragonballs, Tuffles, "SSJ4", Evil Dragons), I don't like a lot of the other things that it did (Kid Goku, horrible use of the available cast of characters, the fact that it builds off of contradictory filler), and think that it was executed poorly. So personally, I don't regard it as canon.

In fact, I've recently warmed up to Tanooki Kuribo's idea that GT was all just a bad dream. Makes sense to me, as it certainly provides a logical explanation for the Super 17 saga.
The end, him leaving with Shenlong could be him waking up. I imagine the first thing he'd do is go to Vegeta and say, "Hey, I thought of this really cool thing to do with Super Saiyan and Ozaru..."
-The Great Saiyaman
Herms wrote:
Nex Carnifex wrote:Herms can you translate the whole thing
No.

rereboy
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10262
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:42 pm

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by rereboy » Sat Nov 06, 2010 10:29 am

Zephyr wrote:
In fact, I've recently warmed up to Tanooki Kuribo's idea that GT was all just a bad dream. Makes sense to me, as it certainly provides a logical explanation for the Super 17 saga.
And it would explain why Goku was the only one who got to do anything. It would be his dream after all. I like that idea very much.

User avatar
the_abberration
Regular
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Stuck On Earth

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by the_abberration » Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:39 pm

rereboy wrote:
Zephyr wrote:
In fact, I've recently warmed up to Tanooki Kuribo's idea that GT was all just a bad dream. Makes sense to me, as it certainly provides a logical explanation for the Super 17 saga.
And it would explain why Goku was the only one who got to do anything. It would be his dream after all. I like that idea very much.
Well...Pokemon did have that whole Ash was in a coma theory. So Goku could have dreamed GT.

Although Mr. Toriyama called it a side story, it's not the first time an anime has continued the story set in the manga (or vice versa with prequel manga to an anime series). I think that while officially authors, creators, etc. have say on what is and is not canon, the fandom has as much say if they want to accept something as canon. American fans tend to do this (i.e. Star Trek and Star Wars). Again, Gene Roddenberry officially went on the record to say Star Trek: TAS was not canon. But some elements that were introduced in that show were introduced to later works by the people involved outside of the creator. In addition, the fandom accepts certain aspects of the novels, animated series, or what have you as "canon", despite assertions to the contrary.

While canon may not be the appropriate term for DBGT in relation to the manga, one could look at it as a "second continuity" or "apocrypha", where the DBGT anime can be accepted as a continuation of the manga. Conflicting or contradicting plot points can then be disregarded to fit in with the original work. This way the fandom can also include the specials and movies as part of the manga canon. Although, since the anime in itself incorporates the manga as well as the addition of "filler", I (personally) think it is just easier to look at the anime as the manga adapted to another medium with the filler acting as part of the secondary continuity.

The fan can now incorporate what he/she considers canon into one medium, without having to read the entire DB manga series, then having to work the movies, specials, or DBGT around the manga itself. I think that is why many use the DBGT is anime canon instead of manga canon reasoning, when debating the issue. Although there may be some fans who do choose to do the latter (which I have no problem with). Since GT is only offered in anime form only, one may actually choose to read the manga prior to moving on to GT. While not the best example, I see it like a fan of the GTO anime who may not be big on manga, going back and reading the GTO: The Early Years manga since that is the only format available.

Another comparison (while again maybe not the best example), is Robotech. Robotech is acutally three separate shows in Japan. However, most American fans know it as one long running continuing anime series. Macross in reality can only have canon to Macross II, Plus, or what have you, since Macross, Southern Cross, and Mospeda are total unconnected works. But the general American audience (through people outside of the creator), see it as Macross, The Masters, and New Generation. Going one step further, even Robotech has issues with canon. As some of you may know, there were plans to continue the Macross arc with The Sentinels anime. But due to finacial reasons, only three episodes were made. Jack McKinney however made a series of novels based on the Sentinels story.

For a time the novels were accepted offically as canon, only later to be relegated to secondary continuity status. However, there are those in the fandom who still consider these novels as canon because they contniue the story set forth in the anime version. Also in order to understand some of the back story in the Shadow Chronicles Movie, it helps to be familair with the story in the novels. Now while there are official guidlines on what is canon, as a fan I still feel the whole experience can only be reached by accepting the novels along with the anime as canon.

Some fans can enjoy just the manga and disregard GT. There may be those who read the manga and follow it with GT. Others can enjoy the anime series as a whole (with or without GT) and never read the manga. Many drop in the specials and movies into the mix as needed when watching the series. Mr. Toriyama can enjoy DBGT as a side story. All in all as a fan, even though that is how he views it as a creator, doesn't dictate how I choose to enjoy or accept the material. To me, it would be the equivalent of disregarding the Watchmen movie because Alan Moore hated it. Sometimes the offical word can be overthrown in the mindset of the fan.
1 Corinthians 13: When I was a child, I spoke and thought and reasoned as a child. But when I grew up, I put away childish things. Except the anime. Never the anime.

"Look. I'm not allowed to hold you, but I'm sworn to protect you"-Sergeant Hatred

The Lineup: Danger Mouse

User avatar
Godo
I Live Here
Posts: 3367
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:25 am

Re: Is GT REALLY Non-Canon?

Post by Godo » Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:33 pm

rereboy wrote:
Zephyr wrote:
In fact, I've recently warmed up to Tanooki Kuribo's idea that GT was all just a bad dream. Makes sense to me, as it certainly provides a logical explanation for the Super 17 saga.
And it would explain why Goku was the only one who got to do anything. It would be his dream after all. I like that idea very much.
Me too. It would also make sense of "GT" (I know it's Grand Tour). The real definition would be "Grand Trance".

Post Reply