Can someone explain why the Yamamoto thing was a big deal?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
Cold Skin
I Live Here
Posts: 2730
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: France

Re: Can someone explain to me why the Yamamoto was a big dea

Post by Cold Skin » Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:20 pm

Well, I think he didn't plagiarize as much as people are led to believe, given that there are many examples of comparisons where it's just vaguely similar or just a small part of the song that somehow mirrors an existing song.
With the number of songs currently existing in music history, I'm pretty sure any soundtracks or songs does end up sounding similar to other soundtracks or songs whether it was the original intent or not.
Inspiration has to come from somewhere, and I'm sure 50% of a composer's creations are more or less a mimic of something he heard before in his life or even something they never even knew about, even if they will never be aware of that themselves.

However, as others said, there is a point in music where you can definately tell that this is so much a copy from the original that it can't be unintentionnal inspiration.
I never found most of Yamamoto's tracks to be a copies of anything, even the "Star Wars march" case was nowhere close enough to be deemed stolen at all... BUT there is at least one track that makes it clear he took it directly, and that's the one from Avatar (which I never saw but I did hear the original track from it)!
This can't be simply hommage or inspiration, the thing has the exact same rhythm, the exact same notes, with the same kind of instruments at the same moment, for a long length... Put simply, If you paste one track over the other, that's like a perfect match! If you had slipped Avatar's track instead of the Yamamoto one on the DB OST, all those watching the episodes and not knowing about Avatar would have believed it was the very track from the anime without even thinking twice.
In such a case, yes, the track was stolen, and the problem is not so much about using a track meant for another work, but crediting yourself as the composer and the one who deserves praise if the track is a success.

Now, I do agree that taking out the whole score was somewhat an extreme way to solve things, and a waste of excellent tracks! But given Kei's revelations, it seems they were simply overwhelmed: they first tried to take out only the problematic ones - just like I would have liked myself -, but ultimately, it became impossible to say "this track is not plagiarized, that's for sure!", and they couldn't afford to take risk if suddenly they were sued by ten different owners for ten different plagiarized tracks. The amount of money at risk would have had the potential to put the whole company in danger. They had no choice, surely they are the first ones who wanted to avoid having to spend extra time on Kai replacing every single track on every single episode released, but they had their back against the wall.

I understand how they were scared and acting accordingly, the first thing I don't agree with is the fact that they replaced the score when there were only two episodes left.
After 95 episodes of suspicions without anything happening, the situation was not much that much of an emergency to not be able to wait for two more weeks.
Secondly, I understand how they didn't want to spend more money on a finished product they were happy to get rid off, but using the old Kikuchi's score was a terrible choice: part of the concept of Kai is "with some whole new music!!!", and you don't take something away from the concept itself. They should have used a score that was not the one from the original Dragon Ball Z, even if it meant paying another composer AGAIN for it. But money issues come first, so we can't blame them for how the system works.

kei17
I Live Here
Posts: 4142
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:23 am

Re: Can someone explain to me why the Yamamoto was a big dea

Post by kei17 » Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:39 pm

TheRed259 wrote:@ kei17 I guess that's the reason why DragonBall Z Kai Episode 95 ( Yamamoto ) had two musicless scenes ? :think:
( Cell returns , Vegeta avenges Trunks )
Maybe so. Actually, soon after Toei acknowledged the plagiarism, they sent FUNi an alternate version of the BGM track which lacks the two specific pieces: The Ebb And The Flow and A New Foe Rears His Head. Some scenes had these pieces replaced with other "safe" ones, and the others were left silent. FUNimation first produced the early Android arc episodes with the original BGM track and Nicktoons streamed them on their official website, but some of them got replaced with the alternate version when they were broadcast on TV.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUfSUsb9wds

User avatar
dbboxkaifan
Banned
Posts: 8906
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:32 pm

Re: Can someone explain to me why the Yamamoto was a big dea

Post by dbboxkaifan » Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:41 pm

Because of the removal of Yamamoto's music it ruined the experience for me:

1) DB Kai Parts 5-8 didn't feature Yamamoto's soundtrack and the replacement score was unbearable, but since I bought I forced myself to watch it anyway. At least for the last two Kai episodes the Kikuchi placements were actually pretty good, thank god.

2) DB Raging Blast 2 had BT2's music as replacement for the newer copies which made it hard to find with the authentic score, but I finally have a copy of it (well, two of them).

3) I just prefer the original music over replacements.
FUNimation 2015 Releases I want:
- Kai 2.0 on Blu-ray

User avatar
FindKenshi
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Can someone explain to me why the Yamamoto was a big dea

Post by FindKenshi » Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:46 pm

kei17 wrote:
FindKenshi wrote:
kei17 wrote:How do you feel if Dragon Ball were found to be horribly unoriginal that it's rather a patchwork of things from other series and artists? I'm sure I'd stop being a fan. And it is why I'm no longer a Jojo fan.
It already is.. the story started as a retelling of Journey to the west..
Very famous classical writings like Journey to the west don't count.
Very famous classical music pieces don't count.

See what I did there!?
"Allow me to show you... my further evolution!" -Evil Lord Freeza
The best and most powerful villain in Dragon Ball

NeoKING
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:55 pm

Re: Can someone explain to me why the Yamamoto was a big dea

Post by NeoKING » Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:53 pm

kei17 wrote:How do you feel if Dragon Ball were found to be horribly unoriginal that it's rather a patchwork of things from other series and artists? I'm sure I'd stop being a fan. And it is why I'm no longer a Jojo fan.
Whoa, maybe wanna PM me about the JoJo deal, there. Sounds interesting.

kei17
I Live Here
Posts: 4142
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:23 am

Re: Can someone explain to me why the Yamamoto was a big dea

Post by kei17 » Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:59 pm

FindKenshi wrote:
kei17 wrote:Very famous classical writings like Journey to the west don't count.
Very famous classical music pieces don't count.
See what I did there!?
I said Journey to the west didn't count because it's in the public domain and every, I say every Japanese knows it. It's like Beethoven's Symphony No. 5. But what Yamamoto stole was not classic music in the public domain.

User avatar
Black_Liger
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1333
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:26 am

Re: Can someone explain to me why the Yamamoto was a big dea

Post by Black_Liger » Sun Mar 24, 2013 3:38 pm

kei17 wrote:
FindKenshi wrote:
kei17 wrote:Very famous classical writings like Journey to the west don't count.
Very famous classical music pieces don't count.
See what I did there!?
I said Journey to the west didn't count because it's in the public domain and every, I say every Japanese knows it. It's like Beethoven's Symphony No. 5. But what Yamamoto stole was not classic music in the public domain.

Makes sense actually, it would suck if toriyama got sued for using Journey to the west as basis for dragon ball lol!

I'm a yamamoto fan myself, but I guess there was nothing to be done. I would atleast hope for them to get more of the kikuchi music... I mean playing cell's theme for a saibaman?? Buu saga music in saiyan saga?!? :S
There's room for only one snake, and one big boss.

User avatar
MCDaveG
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5778
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: Prague, Czechia
Contact:

Re: Can someone explain to me why the Yamamoto was a big dea

Post by MCDaveG » Sun Mar 24, 2013 4:04 pm

FindKenshi wrote:Isn't it perfectly normal for musical artists to borrow basic themes from music that they like greatly? That's more of a homage than anything... this is called a "sample" and uncredited samples seem to be a norm in Japan. Just look at the Mother series (Earthbound in America.) In Mother 2 alone, there's several pieces of music "copying" (paying homage) to rock icons and the like.. as detailed at Starmen.net. http://earthboundcentral.com/2013/01/ea ... mple-hunt/

Looks like tons of uncredited copyright musical tunes and such in that game, yet the game came out in America just fine and no lawsuits ever happened. Was this all making a big deal out of nothing?
I'm musician here.... OK, I'll get the melodies from Avatar bgm score track, play them and little spice them to sound little different. Then, I'll release it for money..........
I can guarantee that sooner or later, I'm in a big s**t in suspicion of plagiarism and going to be sued, ending to pay a big amount of money.....
I heavily sampled score from Danny Elfman's Alice, making a Breaks remix, so Elfman was clearly credited, it wasn't for money then, but for friends on soundcloud to listen.
It was taken down in few seconds after upload with suspicion of copyright infrigment. So I uploaded it for friends on mediafire. Down after 20 minutes, with links on itunes to buy the original......
The same Elfman did the score for Terminator Salvation, which Yamamoto ripped off. And Yamamoto wasn't making remixes, but stating it's his own work. Really unbelieavable.....
FindKenshi wrote:this is called a "sample" and uncredited samples seem to be a norm in Japan.
What is norm in Japan, isn't norm worldwide. To sample anything, you have to get permission from the artist who made the original track.... He will then simply gave you permission and you will pay him royalties from your record with that sample, if you are not his close friend.....
Or your sample must have criteria of being not more than 2 seconds long and barely recognizable. Which is called microsampling. Justice does this a lot and I do this as well. I sample sounds of drums for example :)
Don't know, why everyone thinks that everything, that you can't touch upon with bare hands, is free nowadays.

BTW: I borrowed some mellody after all in this unreleased track! The hint is, that hardcore RPG gamers should recognize the melody there (not sampled, whole track is recorded from scratch).
http://soundcloud.com/dynamixxprince/hi ... ex-machina
FighterZ, Street Fighter 6, Mortal Kombat: Funky_Strudel
PS5: Dynamixx88
Trust me, I'm millenial and a designer.

User avatar
Duo
I Live Here
Posts: 3221
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Re: Can someone explain to me why the Yamamoto was a big dea

Post by Duo » Sun Mar 24, 2013 4:37 pm

It probably would have grown more and more problematic as it became more and more involved in the international market. The timing makes sense in that regard. All I ever heard compared was Battle Point Unlimited to its original source and I knew the argument was lost for whether or not he plagiarized. I also agree that it is too bad, simply because the replacement score was really poorly placed and didn't sample nearly enough material. The Yamamoto score had that problem too, but it was at least written with that context somewhat in mind. Kikuchi's work was mostly taken from actual film scores.

User avatar
penguintruth
Banned
Posts: 4861
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:49 pm

Re: Can someone explain to me why the Yamamoto was a big dea

Post by penguintruth » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:33 pm

Well, I did like Yamamoto's music, but I like Kikuchi's music better.

Yes, people will always say, "Well, the placement of Kikuchi's music in Kai is bad!" It isn't, really. A lot of the placement is quite good. Sometimes it's problematic. But I find a lot of it very enjoyable. The episode where Gohan defeats Cell, for instance, has some of the best placement in either Kai or original Z.

I'm just miffed I never got to get that Yamamoto piece for Gohan's SSJ2 transformation. It's no "Unmei no Hi", but it was pretty damn good.
Kentai wrote:Son Gokuu is a fascinating character anyway, because he is - at face value, anyway - an idiot savant. The victim of violent head trauma as an infant [...] he's a simple bumpkin with a fair share of brain damage who's natural talents to work out what's wrong compensate for his broad lack of common sense. But he's also a fighter, through and through [...] he fight until he has, in no uncertain terms, beaten his enemy on terms they can both acknowledge. He doesn't want to kill anyone, or even prove that he can win... he just wants to know he can. He's an ineffably charming bastard who's manly leanings were really incendental, and yes, the fact that he was voiced by a squeaky woman made the combination perhaps all the more charming.


Dragon Ball (Z) Kai Reviews!

Can I get a Schemen?

User avatar
Duo
I Live Here
Posts: 3221
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Re: Can someone explain to me why the Yamamoto was a big dea

Post by Duo » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:35 pm

penguintruth wrote:Well, I did like Yamamoto's music, but I like Kikuchi's music better.

Yes, people will always say, "Well, the placement of Kikuchi's music in Kai is bad!" It isn't, really. A lot of the placement is quite good. Sometimes it's problematic. But I find a lot of it very enjoyable. The episode where Gohan defeats Cell, for instance, has some of the best placement in either Kai or original Z.

I'm just miffed I never got to get that Yamamoto piece for Gohan's SSJ2 transformation. It's no "Unmei no Hi", but it was pretty damn good.
There were definitely some really well set and paced moments (look at the #17 v Piccolo episodes), but then you get the Kai replacement scene for Gohan turning Super Saiyan 2. Even if it's just a minute or so of footage, it just does not work at all. Should have at least shoved the Yamamoto piece in for that scene, I'd have liked to seen it that way too.

With both scores, it got to the point where I would starting singing the piece that would play as it started, just knowing what they were going to use based on the scene. Always the same for a hero charging in, or another piece for the villain winning in some way, or a piece for the villain showing that the attack didn't hurt him at all, or somebody getting hurt, or a big attack being unleashed. You could really get the point where you'd be able to call it pretty dependably.

User avatar
Black_Liger
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1333
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:26 am

Re: Can someone explain to me why the Yamamoto was a big dea

Post by Black_Liger » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:53 pm

penguintruth wrote:Well, I did like Yamamoto's music, but I like Kikuchi's music better.

Yes, people will always say, "Well, the placement of Kikuchi's music in Kai is bad!" It isn't, really. A lot of the placement is quite good. Sometimes it's problematic. But I find a lot of it very enjoyable. The episode where Gohan defeats Cell, for instance, has some of the best placement in either Kai or original Z.

I'm just miffed I never got to get that Yamamoto piece for Gohan's SSJ2 transformation. It's no "Unmei no Hi", but it was pretty damn good.
There were definitely good placements, but as far as I remember, there were a lot of different musical motifs for each saga in dbz, I recall that every saga got new music.

The main problem with Kai/Kikuchi is that it's a butchered version of the kikuchi score, it doesn't even respect the themes he composed using music from EVERY dbz saga in every arc of Kai, it felt just terrible listening to buu saga battle themes in the saiyan saga, more so with yamamoto atleast we got new music per arc, while with the kikuchi score they just throw in random pieces of the "Complete" Collection. Which I think it's not even half the music that yamamoto composed for the series.
There's room for only one snake, and one big boss.

User avatar
Gaffer Tape
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6132
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Can someone explain why the Yamamoto thing was a big dea

Post by Gaffer Tape » Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:25 pm

While that is true, that different parts of the series had different music, it's not quite as specific as you would think. The majority of the score was composed for the movies, and, as each movie came out, its score would trickle down into the TV series. Relatively little (especially in the Z era) was composed specifically for the series.
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:

MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 4/13/26!)
Current Episode: Low-Detail Freeza Can't Hurt You - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 3

User avatar
Duo
I Live Here
Posts: 3221
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Re: Can someone explain why the Yamamoto thing was a big dea

Post by Duo » Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:30 pm

Gaffer Tape wrote:While that is true, that different parts of the series had different music, it's not quite as specific as you would think. The majority of the score was composed for the movies, and, as each movie came out, its score would trickle down into the TV series. Relatively little (especially in the Z era) was composed specifically for the series.
Yeah, it's by that point that I don't mind if it's from the wrong time period if compared to Z - both just sound like they're borrowing from the movie scores to me. I still didn't like the placement in Kai, though. Too predictable.

User avatar
Gaffer Tape
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6132
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Can someone explain why the Yamamoto thing was a big dea

Post by Gaffer Tape » Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:58 pm

I was just clarifying. That doesn't mean I necessarily agree with haphazardly placing it. Because even through the technicalities of it, the reality is that each story arc did have its own sound for the most part.
Do you follow the most comprehensive and entertaining Dragon Ball analysis series on YouTube? If you do, you're smart and awesome and fairly attractive. If not, see what all the fuss is about without even having to leave Kanzenshuu:

MistareFusion's Dragon Ball Dissection Series Discussion Thread! (Updated 4/13/26!)
Current Episode: Low-Detail Freeza Can't Hurt You - Dragon Ball Dissection: The Resurrection 'F' Arc Part 3

User avatar
coola
I Live Here
Posts: 3503
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:33 am
Location: Poland

Re: Can someone explain why the Yamamoto thing was a big dea

Post by coola » Tue Mar 26, 2013 5:30 pm

Not that i defend plagiarism, but, to be honest, video games in early/late 80 also liked to "borrow" other works, yet no one complained.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thTUazbke7A 0:19
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpSgJvTGumY
My Twitter: @kamil198811
Bulma fan
Thanks to Discotek:
Magic Knight Rayearth get DVD release in 2015 and Blu-Ray release on 2016
Saint Seiya: The Lost Canvas get DVD release in 2015

User avatar
AgitoZ
Temporarily Banned
Posts: 1713
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:24 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Re: Can someone explain why the Yamamoto thing was a big dea

Post by AgitoZ » Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:27 pm

coola wrote:Not that i defend plagiarism, but, to be honest, video games in early/late 80 also liked to "borrow" other works, yet no one complained.
Well, video games weren't exactly "mainstream" at that point. I don't think no one complained, I just think anyone with any stake in the matter just didn't know. If something like, I don't know, Call of Duty stole some music I think people would complain.

Also, I'm not sure about the 2nd example, but the first video you posted just kinda sounds like Moonlight Sonata. And I'm pretty sure classical music is fair game for everybody.
If you're not here soon... GET ON!

User avatar
Kroni_Hunter
Regular
Posts: 631
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:27 pm
Location: Clovis, California

Re: Can someone explain why the Yamamoto thing was a big dea

Post by Kroni_Hunter » Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:01 pm

Personally I'm not convinced that these similarities were intentional, I didn't even hear the similarities before a side by side comparison and to be fair there were plenty of differences in each one. They say that everything has been done before, and every new song is just a new personalization of something that came before. I write music, and some of it is undoubtedly influenced by the style and tone of other music that I enjoy.

A clip from Vsauce comes to mind, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAcjV60RnRw
It's a very interesting video, and towards the end of it he discusses this very idea.

"Even though mathematically speaking, there are so many possible unique melodies that we can safely say "there will always be room for new music" we don't seem to be wired to care. We enjoy certain patterns and melodies, and calculating how many there could be is a lot less interesting then how connected and similar all the ones we enjoy are."
"An optimist thinks that this is the best possible world; a pessimest fears that this is true."

User avatar
Pikachuuu
Newbie
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:23 am

Re: Can someone explain why the Yamamoto thing was a big dea

Post by Pikachuuu » Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:49 pm

Because he didn't "borrow" it, he stole it.

Post Reply