If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
some_weirdGuy
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 6:31 am

If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by some_weirdGuy » Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:18 am

... what would the divergence event(s) be?

For example it occurs to me that that the Cooler movie could well be a 'what if the spirit bomb really had worked on frieza'.
That then means no goku super saiyan, no goku out in space,no frieza surviving, and even potentially reason for goku to mistake cooler as frieza - explaining many of the 'plot holes' it had.

Another I've heard before is that super 13/broly possibly occurs if vegeta actually beat second form cell, explaining why goku and gohan aren't in their mastered ssj forms and why everyone seems to be relaxing.

So, if we pretend/assume this is indeed the case, and that all movies are the result of a divergence in the timeline, what are your theories on what these events/changes would be?
Like collab writing and enjoy the universe of Dragonball? Check out World of Dragonball: Souls

User avatar
Patrick
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:27 pm
Location: Canada

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Patrick » Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:36 am

I had a discussion about this with my friends awhile back for movies 2-4 (Worlds Strongest, Tree of Might and Lord Slug).

We (more or less) agreed they would have fit in a lot better IF Goku had gotten back to Earth from Snake Way on time to save his friends in the battle against Nappa and Vegeta, rather than be late like he originally was.

Incidentally, I think movie 9 fits well without any changes, but I'm not entirely sure if there was something I was missing about it.

EDIT: This image might help out.
Zephyr wrote:Toriyama's not breaking into everyone's homes and editing your copy of the manga with a pen to include Goku's mom and this "blasphemous" information about her.

RocktheDragon
Regular
Posts: 586
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 7:03 pm
Location: North Orange County, California
Contact:

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by RocktheDragon » Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:24 pm

Patrick wrote:I had a discussion about this with my friends awhile back for movies 2-4 (Worlds Strongest, Tree of Might and Lord Slug).

EDIT: This image might help out.
I really enjoyed looking through that infographic. It really makes me want to revisit the movies, something that I have not had the time to do in quite a while. For some reason the movies seem to take a backseat to the anime and manga for me. What's even stranger is that I think I enjoy the movies quite a lot more than the anime (at least the original series)!
Kyle Broflovski wrote:It's all real. Think about it. Haven't Luke Skywalker and Santa Claus affected your lives more than most real people in this room? I mean, whether Jesus is real or not, he - he's had a bigger impact on the world than any of us have. And the same can be said for Bugs Bunny and - and Superman and Harry Potter. They've changed my life - changed the way I act on the earth. Doesn't that make them kind of real? They might be imaginary but, but they're more important than most of us here. And they're all gonna be around here long after we're dead. So, in a way, those things are more realer than any of us.

User avatar
garnetjester
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:42 am
Location: Colombia

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by garnetjester » Sat Feb 22, 2014 1:20 pm

I like that timeline a lot! I couldn't hold my suspension of disbelief long enough to enjoy all of the movies because some of them made 0 sense to me, but with that graphic I might watch all of them again in a different light. Maybe not all of them in the same day though, because when I did that I became super bored with the "Goku is in trouble, Gohan decides to help and gets beaten in the process, Piccolo has to save him, Goku powers up and beats the main villain" running theme the first few of them have.

However, isn't Bojack unbound more related to the main timeline? If Vegeta beat semi-perfect cell, then Goku wouldn't have died and the movie has him dead and helping Gohan from the afterlife :think:
"Giving up is something we can do anytime, so let's head on, even if it's just a little bit!"

User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15722
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Hellspawn28 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 1:42 pm

The issue with Movie 8 taking place in a universe were Vegeta kills Cell is that Goku is seen dead in Movie 10 and 11 since those three movies take place in the same universe. My idea on what universe that the movies can take place in.

Movie 2 - Piccolo survive the blast from Nappa then Goku kills Vegeta with his Kamehameha. Chazou most likely stay dead and they used the Dragon Balls to wish back everyone.

Movie 3 - Goku arrive on time and no one was killed. Goku kills both Nappa and Vegeta.

Movie 4 - Goku kills Freeza with the Genki-Dama. Vegeta was most likely not wish back and the other Z fighters choose to stay on King Kai's Planet for a while to get stronger. King Kai makes a reference to Freeza, it's likely Goku and the others did fought Freeza in this AU.

The Coola Movies - Trunks most likely never went back in time which can explain why he was never seen or mention in both films. Kami sense a powerful energy in the city of Amenbo Island and so he fused with Piccolo. Piccolo kills #17, #18 and Cell then everyone goes to New Namek.

Movie 7 - Goku takes the heart medicine early then Goku and the others kill #16 - #18, and Cell.

The Broli Movies - The Cell games never happen and the Z fighters fight Cell after fighting Broli. Cell kills Goku and Gohan quickly kills Cell before he can blow up himself. Goku never returns back to the living world and Gohan & Goten both take care of Broli on their own. In Movie 11, Gohan, Vegeta, Piccolo and Kaioshin take care of Babidi and Dabra while Goten, Trunks, #18 and Kuririn fight Bio Broli. Piccolo fights Yakon and kills him while Gohan was able to defeat Dabra. So Majin Buu was never hatch out of his egg in this universe.

Movie 12 - Who the hell knows. The movie has other movie villains escaping out of Hell when those movies don't fit into the main timeline. This movie could take place in a special timeline where Movie 1 - 11 happen without causing major timeline issues.

Movie 9 and 13 fit pretty well. I do find it odd that Toei ignores those two films in DBZ since Tapion was never mention or seen again in DBZ or GT. Bojack and his gang are nowhere seen or mention as well.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

User avatar
Pantalones
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1432
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:30 pm

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Pantalones » Sat Feb 22, 2014 1:56 pm

Yeah, there's a few iffy bits in that timeline--as mentioned already, Goku is dead in the Bojack movie, so the Cell Games had to have played out the usual way before that happened. And I'm fairly sure I remember that Kaio or someone mentioned Slug being more powerful than Freeza in the Slug movie (which would be kind of silly if Goku hadn't fought or even heard of Freeza yet at the time.) They didn't mention which form of Freeza, of course, but consider that Goku's Super Saiyan form in that movie wasn't actually intended to be some sort of weaker "false Super Saiyan" when it was made (that idea didn't start going around until later on when the main series' version of Super Saiyan debuted and it turned out to look different), it was intended to be the real thing... so Slug survived being smacked around for a bit by a 50x (or at least 10x if you want to go by how strong Toriyama initially felt SSj should be, before it was established as 50x) stronger Goku. And then he later survives being run through by Goku powered by a transfusion of Piccolo's energy and Kaio-ken x100 (according to one of the guides, I think; the only indication that it's something other than a typical Kaio-ken in the movie itself is that huge flaring aura with Piccolo's image inside it when he first fires it up) and only finally dies from the combination of that wound and a Spirit Bomb that crashes him into his own machine and destroys it... Slug would have to at least be stronger than all of Freeza's suppressed forms for things to make any sense at all, assuming that Goku in this movie is around the same level he was during the Ginyu Force battles in the main series.

For the most part it seems to work okay, though. It's been a while since I've seen a lot of the movies, though, so I may be overlooking some detail that throws it off for one of them.

User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15722
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Hellspawn28 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 2:30 pm

Everyone likes still dies in the other universes that the movies take place in. Everyone gets killed by #17 and #18 in Movie 2-4 universes and Buu likely kills everyone in the Coola movies universe and Movie 7 universe. I would imagine Beerus destroys the Earth in the Broli movie universe or Bebi takes over the Earth.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

User avatar
KentalSSJ6
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6473
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:03 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois.

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by KentalSSJ6 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 2:44 pm

Hellspawn28 wrote:The issue with Movie 8 taking place in a universe were Vegeta kills Cell is that Goku is seen dead in Movie 10 and 11 since those three movies take place in the same universe. My idea on what universe that the movies can take place in.

Movie 2 - Piccolo survive the blast from Nappa then Goku kills Vegeta with his Kamehameha. Chazou most likely stay dead and they used the Dragon Balls to wish back everyone.

Movie 3 - Goku arrive on time and no one was killed. Goku kills both Nappa and Vegeta.

Movie 4 - Goku kills Freeza with the Genki-Dama. Vegeta was most likely not wish back and the other Z fighters choose to stay on King Kai's Planet for a while to get stronger. King Kai makes a reference to Freeza, it's likely Goku and the others did fought Freeza in this AU.

The Coola Movies - Trunks most likely never went back in time which can explain why he was never seen or mention in both films. Kami sense a powerful energy in the city of Amenbo Island and so he fused with Piccolo. Piccolo kills #17, #18 and Cell then everyone goes to New Namek.

Movie 7 - Goku takes the heart medicine early then Goku and the others kill #16 - #18, and Cell.

The Broli Movies - The Cell games never happen and the Z fighters fight Cell after fighting Broli. Cell kills Goku and Gohan quickly kills Cell before he can blow up himself. Goku never returns back to the living world and Gohan & Goten both take care of Broli on their own. In Movie 11, Gohan, Vegeta, Piccolo and Kaioshin take care of Babidi and Dabra while Goten, Trunks, #18 and Kuririn fight Bio Broli. Piccolo fights Yakon and kills him while Gohan was able to defeat Dabra. So Majin Buu was never hatch out of his egg in this universe.

Movie 12 - Who the hell knows. The movie has other movie villains escaping out of Hell when those movies don't fit into the main timeline. This movie could take place in a special timeline where Movie 1 - 11 happen without causing major timeline issues.

Movie 9 and 13 fit pretty well. I do find it odd that Toei ignores those two films in DBZ since Tapion was never mention or seen again in DBZ or GT. Bojack and his gang are nowhere seen or mention as well.

Which is a shame because movie 9 and 13 are arguably the best. Bojack and his minions are arguably the best designed villains we got since BOG and Tapion's race and history had a fleshed out backstory. Really wished their races were expanded upon because there is a lot of materiel to work with them.
Deviantart (NSFW) - http://yamato012.deviantart.com/
DBSW Group Page - http://dbsw.deviantart.com/
Still the 1k Sniper - [spoiler]http://orig10.deviantart.net/6a02/f/201 ... 8npe7r.png[/spoiler]

User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15722
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Hellspawn28 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 3:57 pm

It would be cool if Bojack and his gang made a cameo in Hell during the Buu saga when they were watching Goku fighting Kid Buu. I think the kids who watch DBZ on TV at the time in Japan would know who Bojack is since they likely saw the movie.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 4:04 pm

Movie 9 has more continuity issues than Movie 5 (i.e. it has one). Movies 5 and 13 can be fit in the main timeline without any issues. 1 and 9 DO have issues, but for the most part they're small, and 1 is officially placed in the timeline anyway, at least the anime's. Soooooo... I'll just cover the other movies:

Movie 2- Goku arrives in time to save Piccolo from Nappa.

Movie 3- same 'verse as Movie 3; Goku, Piccolo, and Gohan have already resurrected everyone and they've all gone back to training.

Movie 4- Freeza actually gets killed by the Spirit Bomb on Namek.

Movie 6- Kamiccolo and the three Super Saiyans barley pull a victory against the two androids (no 16 in this timeline). Kamiccolo later kills Imperfect Cell.

Movie 7- Chronologically before 6. After Kamiccolo and the Super Saiyans defeat 17 and 18, Gero's computer builds new androids to fight them. This is actually the timeline where Cell comes from (or at least linked to it); after 13-15 are defeated, Trunks takes the remote to deactivate 17 and 18 and goes back to his own timeline and does so. Then Cell kills him, takes his time machine, and comes to our timeline.

Movie 8- Vegeta killed Semi-Perfect, Goku and Gohan left the ROSAT early.

Movie 10- AU of an AU. Broly is easily defeated by post-CG heroes in Movie 8. The events of the Buu arc happen, but Goku doesn't screw around here and immediately kills Fat Buu after Vegeta dies, without teaching Goten and Trunks fusion.

Movie 11- Same timeline as 10. Goten and Trunks deal with Bio-Broly while Gohan is... I don't know, screwing Videl or something. Goku and Vegeta are still dead, and SS2 Goku later takes care of a rampaging Broly in Hell.

Movie 12- either this is the same timeline, and Goku still somehow taught the kids fusion from the Afterlife (being concerned about Earth having a good defender), or it's ANOTHER AU where Goku/Gotenks killed Fat Buu after he took out Vegeta.

Movie 14- Mister Satan successfully reforms Fat Buu. Super Buu is never formed and the Fusion Saga never happens.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15722
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Hellspawn28 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 4:20 pm

I believe in Movie 11, Goku never went to Earth which can explain why he is in Other World. I think Gohan could have handle Dabra on his own or Vegeta takes him out. Piccolo would have no issues taking out Yakon since Yakon would likely kill him in one attack.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

User avatar
Patrick
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:27 pm
Location: Canada

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Patrick » Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:10 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:Movie 9 has more continuity issues than Movie 5 (i.e. it has one). Movies 5 and 13 can be fit in the main timeline without any issues. 1 and 9 DO have issues.
I don't think that Movie 5 is completely free of errors, the biggest one I can think of is that Gohan has a Saiyan tail and has the bowl haircut. He would have had a different hairstyle since he returned from Namek, and also wouldn't have his tail at all.

Can you please tell me some of the errors Movie 9 has? I can't really think of any off the top of my head, but it's been awhile since I watched Movie 9.
Zephyr wrote:Toriyama's not breaking into everyone's homes and editing your copy of the manga with a pen to include Goku's mom and this "blasphemous" information about her.

User avatar
garnetjester
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 10:42 am
Location: Colombia

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by garnetjester » Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:24 pm

In the Buu saga Gohan says he hasn't seen his father since the Cell Games, which excludes the movie, I think. But I don't know if this is the same error RandomGuy was talking about
"Giving up is something we can do anytime, so let's head on, even if it's just a little bit!"

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:39 pm

Patrick wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:Movie 9 has more continuity issues than Movie 5 (i.e. it has one). Movies 5 and 13 can be fit in the main timeline without any issues. 1 and 9 DO have issues.
I don't think that Movie 5 is completely free of errors, the biggest one I can think of is that Gohan has a Saiyan tail and has the bowl haircut. He would have had a different hairstyle since he returned from Namek, and also wouldn't have his tail at all.

Can you please tell me some of the errors Movie 9 has? I can't really think of any off the top of my head, but it's been awhile since I watched Movie 9.
Gohan could've regrown his tail and cut his hair. That's really simple and not exactly an error.
In the Buu saga Gohan says he hasn't seen his father since the Cell Games, which excludes the movie, I think. But I don't know if this is the same error RandomGuy was talking about
It is
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

andrewtuell1991
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 3:10 pm

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by andrewtuell1991 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:44 pm

Patrick wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:Movie 9 has more continuity issues than Movie 5 (i.e. it has one). Movies 5 and 13 can be fit in the main timeline without any issues. 1 and 9 DO have issues.
I don't think that Movie 5 is completely free of errors, the biggest one I can think of is that Gohan has a Saiyan tail and has the bowl haircut. He would have had a different hairstyle since he returned from Namek, and also wouldn't have his tail at all.

Can you please tell me some of the errors Movie 9 has? I can't really think of any off the top of my head, but it's been awhile since I watched Movie 9.
Another problem with Movie 5 fitting in the main timeline is why the hell are Goku are and co. camping when they're supposed to be training for the Androids? Seriously, I know Goku can be pretty lax at times, but come on!

As for the continuity problems Movie 9 poses, I can think of a few:

*Future Trunks coming back in time for a simple tournament and having his post-Rosat long hair instead of being short.

*Tenshinhan being there even though he said they probably wouldn't see each other again.

*Baby Goten not being present or Chichi even looking pregnant.

*Kaio and Goku still being in that place where Kaio attempted to build a new house in filler instead of being at some training ground.

*Gohan enjoying fighting in a tournament without being forced by someone.

*Goku being a decent parent.

Okay that last one's a joke, but I think you get the point. I really like that chart in your first post with a few exceptions. For Lord Slug, Goku would've needed to meet Freeza for Kaio's reference to him make sense. Bojack Unbound can only work if the Cell Game preceded it.

For Dead Zone, I have an interesting suggestion: Goku doesn't let go of Raditz's tail. That way, it would sense for Kuririn, Roshi, and Bulma to already know Gohan and Goku and the others would still be surprised by Gohan's power

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:51 pm

Another problem with Movie 5 fitting in the main timeline is why the hell are Goku are and co. camping when they're supposed to be training for the Androids? Seriously, I know Goku can be pretty lax at times, but come on!
Goku WAS training at the beginning of the movie, and Roshi confirms he's been doing so for some time, but everyone needs a break. It was 3 years.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
DBZAOTA482
Banned
Posts: 6995
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by DBZAOTA482 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:54 pm

andrewtuell1991 wrote:
Patrick wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:Movie 9 has more continuity issues than Movie 5 (i.e. it has one). Movies 5 and 13 can be fit in the main timeline without any issues. 1 and 9 DO have issues.
I don't think that Movie 5 is completely free of errors, the biggest one I can think of is that Gohan has a Saiyan tail and has the bowl haircut. He would have had a different hairstyle since he returned from Namek, and also wouldn't have his tail at all.

Can you please tell me some of the errors Movie 9 has? I can't really think of any off the top of my head, but it's been awhile since I watched Movie 9.
*Tenshinhan being there even though he said they probably wouldn't see each other again.

*Gohan enjoying fighting in a tournament without being forced by someone.
1. Probably.

2. Gohan doesn't have as much of an aversion to fighting as you think. He actually enjoys martial arts/sparring with his father and Piccolo, just doesn't like death fights.

I agree with everything else.
fadeddreams5 wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:... Haven't we already gotten these in GT? Goku dies, the DBs go away, and the Namekian DBs most likely won't be used again because of the Evil Dragons.
Goku didn't die in GT. The show sucked him off so much, it was impossible to keep him in the world of the living, so he ascended beyond mortality.
jjgp1112 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:31 am I'm just about done with the concept of reboots and making shows that were products of their time and impactful "new and sexy" and in line with modern tastes and sensibilities. Let stuff stay in their era and give today's kids their own shit to watch.

I always side eye the people who say "Now my kids/today's kids can experience what I did as a child!" Nigga, who gives a fuck about your childhood? You're an adult now and it was at least 15 years ago. Let the kids have their own experience instead of picking at a corpse.

User avatar
Kamiccolo9
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10371
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:32 pm
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Kamiccolo9 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 7:14 pm

I don't see how the "so-and-so wasn't mentioned in the movie, so it can't fit" logic works. I mean, most of the movies take place over a few hours. It's not like Goku and co. would have spent every waking second talking about the androids and Trunks during those three years. That would just be depressing.

Granted, there are plenty of other reasons that movies can't fit, but this one never really worked for me.
Champion of the 1st Kanzenshuu Short Story Tenkaichi Budokai
Kamiccolo9's Kompendium of Short Stories
Cipher wrote:If Vegeta does not kill Gohan, I will stop illegally streaming the series.
Malik_DBNA wrote:
Scarz wrote:Malik, stop. People are asking me for lewd art of possessed Bra (with Vegeta).
"Achievement Unlocked: Rule 34"

User avatar
Polyphase Avatron
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6643
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:48 am

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by Polyphase Avatron » Sat Feb 22, 2014 7:40 pm

Didn't Cooler say something about Freeza being defeated by Goku as a Super Saiyan in movie 5?
Cool stuff that I upload here because Youtube will copyright claim it: https://vimeo.com/user60967147

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: If we assume the movies are the result of a divergence

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sat Feb 22, 2014 7:41 pm

Polyphase Avatron wrote:Didn't Cooler say something about Freeza being defeated by Goku as a Super Saiyan in movie 5?
He doesn't have any way of knowing that. I don't even think he says Goku killed Freeza, just that he either defeated Freeza (which is is true) or that Freeza was killed by a Super Saiyan (which was also true).
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

Post Reply