Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
- Demon of Light
- Not-So-Newbie
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:45 pm
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
Between General Blue and Otokosuki (his name literally means "loves men" oh my god), I don't think having more explicitly LGBTQ characters in Dragon Ball media is even advisable. Dragon Ball isn't exactly known for nuanced characterization or romance, and treating sexual and gender identity as a gag just isn't a thing you can do anymore.
- Basaku
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1937
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:00 pm
- Location: Planet of the Apes
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
Half is more than none. Simple.clutchins wrote: No I didn't forget that I like women as well, but that shouldn't matter. What do you mean by "half?" My entire sexuality is not represented in the show. When did one of those characters ever hit on another character of the same sex?
At what point did people start demanding sprawling romance arcs for new gay characters? What part of "like Gohan/Videl or Bulma/Vegeta" is hard to understand? Yes, even off-screen Bulma/Vegeta romance has its point and adds to this martial arts shonen show and Vegeta's character in particular. Characters have arcs, motivations, things/people/ideas they fight for. The plot has progression, build-ups, stakes and goals that don't exist in vacuum. If you only want to watch martial arts you can simply YouTube some training videos. Dragon Ball is a graphic novel/animation with martial arts.clutchins wrote:And to repeat my final point, it's a martial arts shonen show. This isn't some slice of life rom-com with a high school setting (Saiyaman notwithstanding). I don't expect there to be any depth in romance among any two characters, let alone any gay or lesbian or bisexual characters.
Dragon Ball Super will be a product of the 2010s so it's a moot point what was going on 30 years ago. Hit me up on PM if you wanna discuss more off-top broader aspects of thatclutchins wrote:Also keep in mind that Dragon Ball is the product of a different time when this conversation was not even being had. Even 20 and 30 years ago gays and lesbians were not part of the cultural zeitgeist as they are today (and certainly not bisexuals!)
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
Sorry, I wasn't clear. With those lines I was referring specifically to transgenderism, which can't be shown, only told.Basaku wrote:About as blatant as Gohan and Videl holding hands or Chi-Chi kissing Goku. We could of course also go into Kamesennin's "zone" and it would be perfectly appropirate for a Dragon Ball show.
Or you treat it like it's a no big deal and the same message gets sent.
Otokosuki is pretty offensive. Blue in the manga is generally ok, but then in the anime and various supplemental things....eccch.MarCas92 wrote:Do you find them offensive or just badly written? Otokosuki I get since he's just one big stereotype and isn't interesting. But Blue? I personally find him one of the funnest characters in Dragon Ball. If it wasn't for Tao Pai Pai, he'd be my favorite villain in that show. I think his homosexuality adds to his character, in a way being a parody of stereotypical German Nazis (blonde hair/blue eyes/clean and tidy/psychic powers).
And there were openly gay Nazis, so Blue isn't as much of a parody as you'd think.
- Basaku
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1937
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:00 pm
- Location: Planet of the Apes
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
Yep that's something that (especially in drawn form) would have to be spelled out, oviously not an issue for a show like DB where private parts being discussed is totally standard. The latter part still stands, there's no need for spelling out acceptance messages if the characters on screen simply treat it as no big deal.Rocketman wrote:Sorry, I wasn't clear. With those lines I was referring specifically to transgenderism, which can't be shown, only told.
Which is why gay Nazi stereotype was being popularized by Allies countries. Obviously not in a good way, we're talking WWII eraRocketman wrote: And there were openly gay Nazis, so Blue isn't as much of a parody as you'd think.
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
There's nothing at all bigoted about my statement. Do you think someone is bigoted just because they don't agree with you?VegettoEX wrote: There is no discussion to be had on this matter: bigoted assholery is not accepted here, so take your bigoted assholery elsewhere.
If I had said "unfortunately" instead of "thankfully", would you have still called me out for it? If not, then that's a huge double standard on your part.
Now, back on topic: no, I don't think there should be gay/bi/trans characters in order to appear "politically correct" or meet some sort of quota. I doubt that anyone has ever thought "Man, DBZ is really good, but it can never reach true greatness due to there not being enough homosexuals. It was so close to greatness, but also so far away."
I'm also tired of the homosexual agenda being thrown into everything. And I'm tired of being labelled as a bigot if I don't support the homosexual lifestyle.
- Polyphase Avatron
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 6643
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:48 am
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
What 'agenda' and 'lifestyle'? People who use those words that way just confuse me.
Cool stuff that I upload here because Youtube will copyright claim it: https://vimeo.com/user60967147
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5156
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
Not at all. Just open about his sexuality.Rocketman wrote:
Otokosuki is pretty offensive.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
Stop being a bigot and you won't be labelled as one.Zenkai wrote:And I'm tired of being labelled as a bigot if I don't support the homosexual lifestyle.
- Metalwario64
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 6175
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:02 am
- Location: Namek
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
First of all, you're a bigot because you support taking people's rights away because they're different than you. That's the definition of bigotry.Zenkai wrote:I'm tired of being labelled as a bigot if I don't support the homosexual lifestyle.
Second, it's not a "lifestyle". That's like claiming being asian is a "lifestyle" choice (and I wouldn't be surprised if some racists morons thought it was). Even if it was a lifestyle choice, why should you even care?
Your comments are absurd, and outright offensive. Shit like this is what would get this thread locked.
"Kenshi is sitting down right now drawing his mutated spaghetti monsters thinking he's the shit..."--Neptune Kai
"90% of you here don't even know what you're talking about (there are a few that do). But the things you say about these releases are nonsense and just plain dumb. Like you Metalwario64"--final_flash
"90% of you here don't even know what you're talking about (there are a few that do). But the things you say about these releases are nonsense and just plain dumb. Like you Metalwario64"--final_flash
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5156
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
Pretty much this.Metalwario64 wrote:First of all, you're a bigot because you support taking people's rights away because they're different than you. That's the definition of bigotry.Zenkai wrote:I'm tired of being labelled as a bigot if I don't support the homosexual lifestyle.
Second of all, it's not a "lifestyle". That's like claiming being asian is a "lifestyle" choice (and I wouldn't be surprised if some racists morons thought it was). Even if it was a lifestyle choice, why should you even care?
Your comments are absurd, and outright offensive. Shit like this is what would get this thread locked.
I can understand not supporting gay marriage, but to label homosexuality a "lifestyle" and being downright against it is pretty ridiculous in this day and age.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
I'm not supporting taking anyone's rights away. No one ever had the right to marry someone of the same sex in the first place. I believe that God created marriage and that He said it's between one man and one woman.Metalwario64 wrote: First of all, you're a bigot because you support taking people's rights away because they're different than you. That's the definition of bigotry.
I don't believe that people with same-sex attraction (SSA) choose to become attracted to the same sex. I surely didn't. Yes, I'm attracted to males as well as females.Second, it's not a "lifestyle". That's like claiming being asian is a "lifestyle" choice (and I wouldn't be surprised if some racists morons thought it was).
The attraction is not a sin. Rather, it's acting on the attraction (ie gay sex, etc.) that is sinful.
Your analogy here really doesn't make any sense.
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
I think we should all agree to disagree and end this before anything bad happens. As for the topic, I'm not sure. I don't know if it would add anything significant to the story. They would have to explore the character more for it to work and I don't really see any situation that would warrant that. If it happens then fine, I just hope Toriyama does it well.
Heroes come and go, but legends are forever.
60.
Rest in peace.
60.
Rest in peace.
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
From Wikipedia: "The term '''lifestyle''' can denote the interests, opinions, behaviors, and behavioral orientations of an individual, group, or culture."fadeddreams5 wrote:
I can understand not supporting gay marriage, but to label homosexuality a "lifestyle" and being downright against it is pretty ridiculous in this day and age.
- Basaku
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1937
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:00 pm
- Location: Planet of the Apes
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
Either you recognize logic that there is nothing wrong with homosexuality as it doesn't harm anyone and no reason to deny homosexual people right to marry or you blindly follow religious doctrine that says "it's wrong because it's wrong". And that is a choice, yours to make.Zenkai wrote:I'm not supporting taking anyone's rights away. No one ever had the right to marry someone of the same sex in the first place. I believe that God created marriage and that He said it's between one man and one woman.
I don't believe that people with same-sex attraction (SSA) choose to become attracted to the same sex. I surely didn't. Yes, I'm attracted to males as well as females.
The attraction is not a sin. Rather, it's acting on the attraction (ie gay sex, etc.) that is sinful.
Your analogy here really doesn't make any sense.
Last edited by Basaku on Mon May 25, 2015 10:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Gyt Kaliba
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8861
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:38 am
- Location: Arkansas
- Contact:
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
Whether you mean to be or not (and it's certainly sounding like you do mean to be) Zenkai, you are coming off like a bigot, and a big one at that. "Homosexual agenda"? Oh please. When you have been mistreated in life, actually mistreated, because you're straight or even just because someone thinks you're straight, as so many gay and otherwise people (and even some that were just taken for that, as I was at times in school) have been mistreated for their own sexuality, maybe then you can complain about an "agenda", cuz as things stand now, the only agenda is that of your own.
That's all I'm going to say on the subject though (presuming I can suppress myself), because I feel like this is a topic that's worth discussing and I'd hate to see it closed.
That's all I'm going to say on the subject though (presuming I can suppress myself), because I feel like this is a topic that's worth discussing and I'd hate to see it closed.
AniManga Travelogue - Currently Reviewing: Dragon Ball (Z)
Twitter
Switch Friend Code: SW-0745-6427-7791 (let's play some Dragon Ball: The Breakers!)
Switch Friend Code: SW-0745-6427-7791 (let's play some Dragon Ball: The Breakers!)
- Metalwario64
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 6175
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:02 am
- Location: Namek
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
I hate making posts like these so much, because I fell they bring to much attention to myself, but I feel exactly the same way. I feel the urge to retort, but I'm holding myself back because I don't want to step out of line and get banned from this forum, which I've spent infinitely more time on than any other I've joined.Gyt Kaliba wrote:That's all I'm going to say on the subject though (presuming I can suppress myself), because I feel like this is a topic that's worth discussing and I'd hate to see it closed.
"Kenshi is sitting down right now drawing his mutated spaghetti monsters thinking he's the shit..."--Neptune Kai
"90% of you here don't even know what you're talking about (there are a few that do). But the things you say about these releases are nonsense and just plain dumb. Like you Metalwario64"--final_flash
"90% of you here don't even know what you're talking about (there are a few that do). But the things you say about these releases are nonsense and just plain dumb. Like you Metalwario64"--final_flash
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
I believe God made sex to be both procreative and unitive. Gay sex is not procreative; it cannot lead to reproduction.Basaku wrote:
Either you recognize logic that there is nothing wrong with homosexuality as it doesn't harm anyone and no reason to deny homosexual people right to marry or you blindly follow religious doctrine that says "it's wrong because it's wrong". And that is a choice, yours to make.
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
I'd advise directing your hatred towards the contraceptive industry rather than gay people then. There's far more people using condoms than there are people having gay sex out there.Zenkai wrote: I believe God made sex to be both procreative and unitive. Gay sex is not procreative; it cannot lead to reproduction.
Satan wrote:Lortedrøm! Bøh slog min datter ihjel! Hvad bilder du dig ind, Bøh?! Nu kommer Super-Satan og rydder op!
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
I'm not trying to be mean. I'm trying to express my religious beliefs on this issue. Others have been stating their beliefs, so I joined in and expressed a belief that differs from many of the others in this thread. Then, I was subsequently labelled a bigot for sharing said belief.Gyt Kaliba wrote:Whether you mean to be or not (and it's certainly sounding like you do mean to be) Zenkai, you are coming off like a bigot, and a big one at that. "Homosexual agenda"? Oh please. When you have been mistreated in life, actually mistreated, because you're straight or even just because someone thinks you're straight, as so many gay and otherwise people (and even some that were just taken for that, as I was at times in school) have been mistreated for their own sexuality, maybe then you can complain about an "agenda", cuz as things stand now, the only agenda is that of your own.
That's all I'm going to say on the subject though (presuming I can suppress myself), because I feel like this is a topic that's worth discussing and I'd hate to see it closed.
And as for me being mistreated, how about my mistreatment in this very thread? Being labelled a bigot for having different beliefs screams 'mistreatment' to me.
- Basaku
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1937
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:00 pm
- Location: Planet of the Apes
Re: Trans/Gay/Bi-sexual villians
Neither can sex be procreative among straight infertile couples or straight eldery couples.Zenkai wrote:I believe God made sex to be both procreative and unitive. Gay sex is not procreative; it cannot lead to reproduction.