

Movie 13 hasn't been posted a lot. So here's two screenshots from it. I still think this movie is very well animated.


Tanooki Kuribo wrote:If Toriyama joined Kanzenshuu, he'd probably forget his login name and password.
Kamiccolo9 wrote:I mean, you're pretty open about looking at cartoon porn. Why would you do that? It's fiction. The proportions of these women are not possible to reach in reality.JacobYBM wrote:No, why would it? It's fiction. The strength of the characters is not possible to reach in reality.









For your information, it's Kazuya Hisada who drew that scene.LordCrumb wrote:Gohan turning SS2 at the World Tournament to me, is one of the most brilliantly animated scenes in DB history. Every shot is perfect. Even the shot of Yamu and Spopovich looking on.. such a basic animated move of Yamu moving forward, yet it's awesome...
Should have got a bloody Oscar for it.kei17 wrote:For your information, it's Kazuya Hisada who drew that scene.LordCrumb wrote:Gohan turning SS2 at the World Tournament to me, is one of the most brilliantly animated scenes in DB history. Every shot is perfect. Even the shot of Yamu and Spopovich looking on.. such a basic animated move of Yamu moving forward, yet it's awesome...




Kendamu wrote:This is an 80s/90s animated all-ages show that was popular amongst kids. It's not some potent super weapon that might fall into the wrong hands that we have to protect from evil.AjayLikesGaming wrote:If you put out untouched footage, someone like me is going to take it and turn it into a perfect release. Someone not like me is going to do the same and share it instead. You give pirates the opportunity to do better than companies and people will jump on that so fast.
Satou, not 'Saito'.DarkPrince_92 wrote:Awesome. That last shot is Yamamuro right? The rest are Masaki Saito's. I've been saying this for a while, Saito's work looks a lot better than Minoru Maeda's.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.
Thanks.JulieYBM wrote:Satou, not 'Saito'.DarkPrince_92 wrote:Awesome. That last shot is Yamamuro right? The rest are Masaki Saito's. I've been saying this for a while, Saito's work looks a lot better than Minoru Maeda's.
The only reason the movies weren't utterly ruined is because they're on 35mm film, which has more detail and higher quality. The actual restoration process is the same as the one used on the Orange Bricks.AjayLikesGaming wrote:You know, despite some of the clear issues with the remaster, I do like FUNi's Blu-ray sets for the movies. I can't understand why that type of restoration wasn't used for the new Season Sets. Surely this is just as 'bold and vibrant' as they want it to be without being truly destructive.
Blue wrote:I love how Season 2 is so off color even the box managed to be so.
Here's a comparison between the openings from Coolers revenge and the Season 2 Blu ray. Both openings were sourced from 35mm film but the Season blu rays clearly look much better and the two openings show the the remastering process used for the season blu rays is clearly superior. Puto was correct in saying that the only reason the movies look as good as they do is because of the high quality source material. The actual remastering proscess isn't anything special there are tons of instances of dirt, scratch, and burn marks left in.AjayLikesGaming wrote:I was aware they were 35mm but they don't strike me as having the same process as the as the Orange Bricks. There's still a thin layer of grain, colours aren't excessively saturated nor is the image destructively contrasted. Do you have a source on that?






Kendamu wrote:This is an 80s/90s animated all-ages show that was popular amongst kids. It's not some potent super weapon that might fall into the wrong hands that we have to protect from evil.AjayLikesGaming wrote:If you put out untouched footage, someone like me is going to take it and turn it into a perfect release. Someone not like me is going to do the same and share it instead. You give pirates the opportunity to do better than companies and people will jump on that so fast.


Exactly; they still have the exact same exaggerated color brightness/darkness and grain-scrubbing; the movies just have more detailed animation, a wider range of color, and greater inherent detail coming off 35mm. They had enough detail to effectively "take the hit" and still come out looking sharp and nice.qjz123 wrote:AjayLikesGaming wrote:Puto was correct in saying that the only reason the movies look as good as they do is because of the high quality source material. The actual remastering process isn't anything special there are tons of instances of dirt, scratch, and burn marks left in.





JulieYBM wrote:Just like Dragon Ball since Chapter #4.Pannaliciour wrote:Reading all the comments and interviews, my conclusion is: nobody knows what the hell is going on.
son veku wrote:CanadaMetalwario64 wrote:Where is that located?BlazingFiddlesticks wrote:Kingdom Piccolo
Haha! I was just watching that episode and was wanting to post that.
Then why does the 35mm opening used on each of the movies look way worse than the actual films themselves? And why do the colors look the same for the opening in each film, when the movies themselves clearly all have different "styles" of remastering, and very different colors?BlazingFiddlesticks wrote:Exactly; they still have the exact same exaggerated color brightness/darkness and grain-scrubbing; the movies just have more detailed animation, a wider range of color, and greater inherent detail coming off 35mm. They had enough detail to effectively "take the hit" and still come out looking sharp and nice.qjz123 wrote:AjayLikesGaming wrote:Puto was correct in saying that the only reason the movies look as good as they do is because of the high quality source material. The actual remastering process isn't anything special there are tons of instances of dirt, scratch, and burn marks left in.