"Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:08 pm

kinisking wrote:I don't think kaioken is that inconsistent. It makes sense that a god's technique would work with a god transformation. Even then, it doesn't even work most of the time.
The problem with Kaio-ken is, SSB Goku was already a little stronger than Hit, and Hit could overpower Goku only with his Tokitobashi. Hit kept improving the Tokitobashi through their fight, while it was stated that his ki wasn't increasing. Then Goku uses Kaio-ken x10, and Hit takes a dozen of hits from Goku without exploding...
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
dbzfan7
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 13045
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by dbzfan7 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:15 pm

kinisking wrote:
dbzfan7 wrote:I don't think it should have. Hell it should have been THE form to keep, and not Blue. It makes it an utter waste of time and form that shouldn't have been made, if they barely have any mileage out of it.

Beyond the logic of Kaio-Ken being poor from past history, the bigger problem is it's constantly going to make everyone have it in mind all the time. So now if Goku doesn't use it at certain points, we're all going to say he didn't go all out or he didn't use the Kaio-Ken so it isn't that serious yet...etc. Not to mention it just leads to a ton more confusion in the hierarchy.
If that was the case, then it wouldn't be as bad. But I feel like ssb makes it seem so unnecessary. Not necessarily because of power, but because of the other reasons I said before. I always interpreted as ssb being the form where Goku finally made that ssg power his own and ssg ruins that.

Why is the logic poor? It's explained in the show. Super saiyan just wasn't compatible with it. Even ssb is barely compatible. Although your other point is really good imo. They should've just never used it again after King Kai tells him not to.

I consider SSJB combining SSJ and SSJ God. Hence what Goku was saying. That's how I interpreted it.

Because what they described was Super Saiyan. Super Saiyan was already deemed the pinnacle of no stress and perfect control. So much so you an sleep in it now. Then they made up some retcon bullshit that wasn't there, for a form that is more stressful than SSJ.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!

User avatar
ekrolo2
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7865
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:27 am
Location: Split, Croatia

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by ekrolo2 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:25 pm

Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
kinisking wrote:Let's say he didn't absorb it in the manga continuity...
No, no, I'm stopping you there. We're not "saying" anything, he did not absorb SSG in the manga, it's a fact.
Pretty much. Any talk of absorption definitely stops when the form that is meant to be absorbed is just another transformation Goku can turn on and off at will.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.

How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:08 pm

ekrolo2 wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote:
kinisking wrote:Let's say he didn't absorb it in the manga continuity...
No, no, I'm stopping you there. We're not "saying" anything, he did not absorb SSG in the manga, it's a fact.
Pretty much. Any talk of absorption definitely stops when the form that is meant to be absorbed is just another transformation Goku can turn on and off at will.
Except he absorbed it in the movie and then re-transformed Into it later on.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:09 pm

kinisking wrote:Except he absorbed it in the movie and then re-transformed Into it later on.
We aren't talking about the movies, we're talking about the manga. Entirely separate continuities.
Retired.

User avatar
ekrolo2
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7865
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:27 am
Location: Split, Croatia

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by ekrolo2 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:11 pm

kinisking wrote:Except he absorbed it in the movie and then re-transformed Into it later on.
The movie doesn't count for the manga, in the manga, Goku's fight with Beerus ends after he loses God and the fact he can flip it on and off as a separate form proves that there is no absoprtion in the manga continuity.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.

How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):

User avatar
MathSSJ
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by MathSSJ » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:12 pm

kinisking wrote:
ekrolo2 wrote:
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: No, no, I'm stopping you there. We're not "saying" anything, he did not absorb SSG in the manga, it's a fact.
Pretty much. Any talk of absorption definitely stops when the form that is meant to be absorbed is just another transformation Goku can turn on and off at will.
Except he absorbed it in the movie and then re-transformed Into it later on.
In an involuntary act. If it meant to be a form that he could pop again, why would Toriyama himself introduce SSGSS?

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:13 pm

ekrolo2 wrote:
kinisking wrote:Except he absorbed it in the movie and then re-transformed Into it later on.
The movie doesn't count for the manga, in the manga, Goku's fight with Beerus ends after he loses God and the fact he can flip it on and off as a separate form proves that there is no absoprtion in the manga continuity.
That's my freaking point. In the movies he absorbed it and could turn it on and off again so the same thing could be happening in the manga. It doesn't prove anything.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
ekrolo2
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7865
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:27 am
Location: Split, Croatia

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by ekrolo2 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:15 pm

kinisking wrote:
ekrolo2 wrote:
kinisking wrote:Except he absorbed it in the movie and then re-transformed Into it later on.
The movie doesn't count for the manga, in the manga, Goku's fight with Beerus ends after he loses God and the fact he can flip it on and off as a separate form proves that there is no absoprtion in the manga continuity.
That's my freaking point. In the movies he absorbed it and could turn it on and off again so the same thing could be happening in the manga. It doesn't prove anything.
Except nothing in the movies or the anime even remotely implies he can, nothing at all. Hell, the Super anime is actually MORE consistent with SSGod being a temporary boost form by never having it appear again!
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.

How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:16 pm

kinisking wrote:That's my freaking point. In the movies he absorbed it and could turn it on and off again so the same thing could be happening in the manga. It doesn't prove anything.
ekrolo2 wrote:...he fact he can flip it on and off as a separate form proves that there is no absoprtion in the manga continuity.
It's not even that. Absorption of the form was never mentioned, never alluded to even once in the manga. That's literally all that matters in this discussion.

It wasn't portrayed to happen, it wasn't alluded to after the fact. Therefore, it didn't happen.
Retired.

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:21 pm

ekrolo2 wrote:
kinisking wrote:
ekrolo2 wrote: The movie doesn't count for the manga, in the manga, Goku's fight with Beerus ends after he loses God and the fact he can flip it on and off as a separate form proves that there is no absoprtion in the manga continuity.
That's my freaking point. In the movies he absorbed it and could turn it on and off again so the same thing could be happening in the manga. It doesn't prove anything.
Except nothing in the movies or the anime even remotely implies he can, nothing at all. Hell, the Super anime is actually MORE consistent with SSGod being a temporary boost form by never having it appear again!
The fact that he literally transforms into it again implied that he can.

The manga is a promotional item and back then it was extremely quick paced. Just because it didn't mention something that everyone knew from every other form of the media doesn't mean it isn't part of the mangas continuity. Either way, this devolved into an argument I didn't even want to be involved in. I already said that I didn't like SSG returning regardless of whether he absorbed it's power or not. That was my initial argument and somehow the most controversial part of it was the fact that I said he might have absorbed it rather than stating its a fact. I'm not even dismissing the possibility that they didn't absorb it, I'm just not ready to say it's and absolute fact.
Last edited by kinisking on Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
ekrolo2
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7865
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:27 am
Location: Split, Croatia

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by ekrolo2 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:23 pm

kinisking wrote:The fact that he literally transforms into it again implied that he can.
In the movies maybe but the manga of Super has its own version of Battle of Gods and there, we have nothing concerning SSGod being absorbed because Goku can flip it on and off. If you want to make a bridge between the Super manga and Toyotaro's earlier F release, you can say Goku can access 10% or something of SSGods power in Base but not all of it. But personally, I don't go that route since Piccolo is still apparently stronger than Base Goku & Vegeta at the U6 tournament in the manga.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.

How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:31 pm

ekrolo2 wrote:
kinisking wrote:The fact that he literally transforms into it again implied that he can.
In the movies maybe but the manga of Super has its own version of Battle of Gods and there, we have nothing concerning SSGod being absorbed because Goku can flip it on and off. If you want to make a bridge between the Super manga and Toyotaro's earlier F release, you can say Goku can access 10% or something of SSGods power in Base but not all of it. But personally, I don't go that route since Piccolo is still apparently stronger than Base Goku & Vegeta at the U6 tournament in the manga.
Make sure to read my edit to that comment BTW. Also I never said that him being able to flip it off and on again = the power is absorbed. I'm just saying that him being able to flip it off and on again doesn't mean that the power wasn't absorbed because we have a continuity where he does both. Does it say 10 percent in the ROF manga?

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:32 pm

kinisking wrote:
ekrolo2 wrote:
kinisking wrote:Except he absorbed it in the movie and then re-transformed Into it later on.
The movie doesn't count for the manga, in the manga, Goku's fight with Beerus ends after he loses God and the fact he can flip it on and off as a separate form proves that there is no absoprtion in the manga continuity.
That's my freaking point. In the movies he absorbed it and could turn it on and off again so the same thing could be happening in the manga. It doesn't prove anything.
Super Saiyan & Super Saiyan God didn't give Goku a significant boost in power in the movies though.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
Noah
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8345
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:56 pm
Location: Virtual World

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Noah » Fri Jan 13, 2017 11:22 pm

DBZGTKOSDH wrote:The problem with Kaio-ken is, SSB Goku was already a little stronger than Hit, and Hit could overpower Goku only with his Tokitobashi. Hit kept improving the Tokitobashi through their fight, while it was stated that his ki wasn't increasing. Then Goku uses Kaio-ken x10, and Hit takes a dozen of hits from Goku without exploding...
That's the worst part, how could Hit be so durable? Kaioken was nice, but 2x was enough, 10x is clusterfuck.
乃亜

Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread

Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?

User avatar
Gog
I Live Here
Posts: 4099
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2016 7:33 am
Location: Dio's World.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Gog » Fri Jan 13, 2017 11:40 pm

Noah wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:The problem with Kaio-ken is, SSB Goku was already a little stronger than Hit, and Hit could overpower Goku only with his Tokitobashi. Hit kept improving the Tokitobashi through their fight, while it was stated that his ki wasn't increasing. Then Goku uses Kaio-ken x10, and Hit takes a dozen of hits from Goku without exploding...
That's the worst part, how could Hit be so durable? Kaioken was nice, but 2x was enough, 10x is clusterfuck.
Hit was harnessing not only the Cell, and Android saga, but he was also harnessing the plot, that is the only reason. Kind of surprised that he didn't transform into super Saiyan rage, if you ask me.

User avatar
emperior
I Live Here
Posts: 4347
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:52 pm
Location: Dragon World
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by emperior » Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:41 am

Gog wrote:
Noah wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:The problem with Kaio-ken is, SSB Goku was already a little stronger than Hit, and Hit could overpower Goku only with his Tokitobashi. Hit kept improving the Tokitobashi through their fight, while it was stated that his ki wasn't increasing. Then Goku uses Kaio-ken x10, and Hit takes a dozen of hits from Goku without exploding...
That's the worst part, how could Hit be so durable? Kaioken was nice, but 2x was enough, 10x is clusterfuck.
Hit was harnessing not only the Cell, and Android saga, but he was also harnessing the plot, that is the only reason. Kind of surprised that he didn't transform into super Saiyan rage, if you ask me.

The anime was bullshit in that situation. They should have stopped at Kaio-Ken x2 unless it was written by Toriyama that Goku was supposed to be 10x Vegeta.
悟 “Vincit qui se vincit”

What I consider canonical

User avatar
Gog
I Live Here
Posts: 4099
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2016 7:33 am
Location: Dio's World.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Gog » Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:45 am

emperior wrote:
Gog wrote:
Noah wrote:
That's the worst part, how could Hit be so durable? Kaioken was nice, but 2x was enough, 10x is clusterfuck.
Hit was harnessing not only the Cell, and Android saga, but he was also harnessing the plot, that is the only reason. Kind of surprised that he didn't transform into super Saiyan rage, if you ask me.

The anime was bullshit in that situation. They should have stopped at Kaio-Ken x2 unless it was written by Toriyama that Goku was supposed to be 10x Vegeta.
Manga was also bullshit with Super Saiyan God, being thrown back into the mix. Honestly should have been kaio ken times 1.5 in the manga. Honestly in the anime, I would imagine that Hit had some super special assassin technique, that meant any attack that's a one shot, is halved, or something. Or he's ten times as strong

User avatar
Ki Breaker
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6572
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:15 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Ki Breaker » Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:49 am

Noah wrote: That's the worst part, how could Hit be so durable? Kaioken was nice, but 2x was enough, 10x is clusterfuck.
That's the reason I still couldn't find any logic behind the 10x kaioken, what was the point of showing it as 10 times and not just one?
The Lord moves in mysterious ways but you don't have to. Please use your blinker

User avatar
OLKv3
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1822
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:39 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by OLKv3 » Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:06 am

MathSSJ wrote:
kinisking wrote:
ekrolo2 wrote: Pretty much. Any talk of absorption definitely stops when the form that is meant to be absorbed is just another transformation Goku can turn on and off at will.
Except he absorbed it in the movie and then re-transformed Into it later on.
In an involuntary act. If it meant to be a form that he could pop again, why would Toriyama himself introduce SSGSS?
SSGSS is separate either way though. It's when you turn into a SSJ while using God power. This implies in the movie, manga, and anime that God Ki can be turned on and off.

Post Reply