It sort of is tragic. The heir to the throne loses his entire race to a monster he ends up serving for the majority of his life. Just because he doesn't show that he cares does not mean that he, in fact, does not. Otherwise, it wouldn't have been so important for him that Frieza dies at the hand of a saiyan. He didn't revive Raditz because Raditz was so weak, he lost to Earthlings. And he killed Nappa because he was useless in his crippled state. At that point in his life, Vegeta valued power above anything else; he clinged onto nothing and unattached himself from anything that got in his way. Ideas develop based on upbringing and life experiences, which includes the past. Vegeta's servitude lasted a huge bulk of his life, and I like the idea that his obsession stemmed from the legends he heard as a kid and his desire to overthrow Frieza, and later increased when he lost to a low class saiyan, despite his sense of entitlement, experience, and growth.ABED wrote: But it's not really all that tragic, Vegeta wasn't held hostage and he doesn't seem all that bummed that his race was destroyed until he's about to die. He does little to show that he cares, he lets Raditz stay dead and he kills Nappa when he deems him useless. Vegeta isn't turned into a killer, he is a killer by choice. Vegeta wouldn't have tried to get revenge if he could've, he was after power. People aren't driven by their past, they are driven by their ideas. Their ideas determine their actions. It's way more true to life that some people simply want power for its own sake, not because they have some tragedy in their past, that doesn't make them any less 3 Dimensional.
But I'm referring to the depiction of Goku NOT written by that one man. The Goku I'm talking about already exists!But he fights for personal reasons, not to be the savior of the world, and it's completely different from American comics that have infinite middles where the writing changes hands. There's one writer who wrote the entire story and has one characterization. I don't want Goku to be selfless (not the same thing as heroic), I want Goku to be a man who loves life, loves fighting, and will fight like hell to defend his values.
Goku isn't the guy looking to fight bad guys to defend others. If his goals happen to align with that, then yes, he's also willing to help out, but it's not what drives him. It's far more interesting and I think ultimately more heroic if Goku fights Tao Pai Pai because he's defending a new friend than if he heard about the situation on the radio or something and decided to do something about it.
First of all, that's not what I mean. I'm not saying he needs be a super hero like great saiyaman. Secondly, I'm not arguing what makes him better or not.I don't see how it makes him better if he's going out fighting for strangers instead of his family and friends.
In fact, the Upa thing is exactly what I mean. That boy was a stranger. Goku still helped him. Goku meets people, and he helps them if they need it. Goku helped that turtle, even when his only actual friend didn't want him to. Goku is a selfless person, and if he protects his planet in the name of the innocent people he does not know, along with his friends and family, it's because he's gotten to know enough of them in his adventures to develop a connection. Again, the Goku I'm referring to already exists. People just hate when he's made to give heroic speeches, or when he prioritizes protecting others over his battle obsession.