Do we expect too much from Super?
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
People don't hate GT because it's not canon.
People hate GT because it's bad, contradicts the rules of the universe established earlier and has a lot of Toei patting themselves on the back with their forced attempts to reconcile their own original material with Toriyama's, often giving more spotlight to the former.
It being non-canon is not a reason to dislike GT, it's more of a justification for dismissing it. You tell yourself it's not canon, so you don't have to worry about it.
People hate GT because it's bad, contradicts the rules of the universe established earlier and has a lot of Toei patting themselves on the back with their forced attempts to reconcile their own original material with Toriyama's, often giving more spotlight to the former.
It being non-canon is not a reason to dislike GT, it's more of a justification for dismissing it. You tell yourself it's not canon, so you don't have to worry about it.
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
You mean like what Super is doing ?Saturnine wrote:GT contradicts the rules of the universe established earlier and has a lot of Toei patting themselves on the back with their forced attempts to reconcile their own original material with Toriyama's.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
I don't recall Super putting in Cooler or Janemba into the main timeline, like it was done in GT. GT makes it seem like the Cooler movie actually happened, while it isn't possible to make it fit into Z's timeline, not without lots of gymnastics at least.sintzu wrote:You mean like what Super is doing ?Saturnine wrote:GT contradicts the rules of the universe established earlier and has a lot of Toei patting themselves on the back with their forced attempts to reconcile their own original material with Toriyama's.
And what did Super do? Preserve Gregory or Satan's apprentices, harmless flavor characters? How can that be even compared to what was done in GT?
Not to mention that Super explicitly works on the assumption that filler didn't take place (Goku doesn't acknowledge the "Super-Kaioken" as something that ever took place), while GT embraces it instead - that's the difference right there.
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
Gt didn't have janempa nor super kaioken appear.Saturnine wrote:I don't recall Super putting in Cooler or Janemba into the main timeline, like it was done in GT. GT makes it seem like the Cooler movie actually happened, while it isn't possible to make it fit into Z's timeline, not without lots of gymnastics at least.sintzu wrote:You mean like what Super is doing ?Saturnine wrote:GT contradicts the rules of the universe established earlier and has a lot of Toei patting themselves on the back with their forced attempts to reconcile their own original material with Toriyama's.
And what did Super do? Preserve Gregory or Satan's apprentices, harmless flavor characters? How can that be even compared to what was done in GT?
Not to mention that Super explicitly works on the assumption that filler didn't take place (Goku doesn't acknowledge the "Super-Kaioken" as something that ever took place), while GT embraces it instead - that's the difference right there.
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
It just feels like super has the potential to keep the story going for YEARS but It's the way they execute the stories that throws me off. It almost feels half assed and rushed a lot of times which it probably is, but if that's the case then I wish toriyama would've taken his time with developing the story.
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5267
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
Just because Cooler and other movie villains had cameo appearances in the background doesn't mean the movies they appear in are canon within the series itself. They're just easter eggs.Saturnine wrote:I don't recall Super putting in Cooler or Janemba into the main timeline, like it was done in GT. GT makes it seem like the Cooler movie actually happened, while it isn't possible to make it fit into Z's timeline, not without lots of gymnastics at least.sintzu wrote:You mean like what Super is doing ?Saturnine wrote:GT contradicts the rules of the universe established earlier and has a lot of Toei patting themselves on the back with their forced attempts to reconcile their own original material with Toriyama's.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
Super had Beerus say he used 10% of his power to take down Ssj2 Vegeta then later say that he's still stronger than a 10× Kaioken SsjB Goku who trained with Whis for a year or a bit less and 3 years with Vegeta.Saturnine wrote:
And what did Super do?
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.
- Anime Kitten
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4275
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 3:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
God of Destruction Goku. I think he's selfish enough post-Battle of Gods (SSG power being not his own) to accept the offer.sintzu wrote:Super had Beerus say he used 10% of his power to take down Ssj2 Vegeta then later say that he's still stronger than a 10× Kaioken SsjB Goku who trained with Whis for a year or a bit less and 3 years with Vegeta.
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5267
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
To be fair, it's never outright stated outside of that one Toriyama interview. In the filler episode where Beerus is dressed as Monaka, Base Goku goes toe to toe with him, despite Beerus one-shotting SSJ3 Goku with minimal effort at the start of the series.sintzu wrote:Super had Beerus say he used 10% of his power to take down Ssj2 Vegeta then later say that he's still stronger than a 10× Kaioken SsjB Goku who trained with Whis for a year or a bit less and 3 years with Vegeta.Saturnine wrote:
And what did Super do?
Beerus probably lied to Vegeta, just like he lied when he told SSJG Goku he was fighting at 100%.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
- Lord Beerus
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 21430
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
- Location: A temple on a giant tree
- Contact:
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
That's the theory I always gone with. Not mention he also lied about Monaka to motivate Goku and Vegeta for the Universe 6/Universe 7 tournament. Beerus always seems to be full of porkies.fadeddreams5 wrote:To be fair, it's never outright stated outside of that one Toriyama interview. In the filler episode where Beerus is dressed as Monaka, Base Goku goes toe to toe with him, despite Beerus one-shotting SSJ3 Goku with minimal effort at the start of the series.sintzu wrote:Super had Beerus say he used 10% of his power to take down Ssj2 Vegeta then later say that he's still stronger than a 10× Kaioken SsjB Goku who trained with Whis for a year or a bit less and 3 years with Vegeta.Saturnine wrote:
And what did Super do?
Beerus probably lied to Vegeta, just like he lied when he told SSJG Goku he was fighting at 100%.
Spoiler:
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
Yeah, like the guys have said. Super does have contradictions within itself, sure, but it's as easy to reconcile them as to assume that Beerus was just lying.
In GT you can't reconcile some of that shit no matter how hard you tried. Like Kibito Kai using Instant Transmission rather than the Kaioshin Teleportation, which was stated in Z to be superior to the former.
I remember once adding this to Dragonball wikia's list of GT's inconsistencies. It got edited out by the biggest GT fanboy there (who happens to wield, or at least exercise a lot of power around that wikia) with a comment that "it shouldn't be hard for the ultimate god of the universe to learn an Android saga-level technique". The more times you read that comment the more wrong it feels.
Either that or you can just consider stuff like the appearance of Cooler an easter egg, which is fine and shit. But guess what, it's been established in canon material that the deceased don't keep their bodies, barring some special exceptions such as Goku, so that whole fucking segment shouldn't even be possible, and neither should that theatrical Z movie that did the same thing earlier (Fusion Reborn, was it?), because it CONTRADICTS THE VERY PRECEPTS OF THE WORLD LAID OUT BY THE CREATOR.
In GT you can't reconcile some of that shit no matter how hard you tried. Like Kibito Kai using Instant Transmission rather than the Kaioshin Teleportation, which was stated in Z to be superior to the former.
I remember once adding this to Dragonball wikia's list of GT's inconsistencies. It got edited out by the biggest GT fanboy there (who happens to wield, or at least exercise a lot of power around that wikia) with a comment that "it shouldn't be hard for the ultimate god of the universe to learn an Android saga-level technique". The more times you read that comment the more wrong it feels.
Either that or you can just consider stuff like the appearance of Cooler an easter egg, which is fine and shit. But guess what, it's been established in canon material that the deceased don't keep their bodies, barring some special exceptions such as Goku, so that whole fucking segment shouldn't even be possible, and neither should that theatrical Z movie that did the same thing earlier (Fusion Reborn, was it?), because it CONTRADICTS THE VERY PRECEPTS OF THE WORLD LAID OUT BY THE CREATOR.
- Lord Beerus
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 21430
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
- Location: A temple on a giant tree
- Contact:
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
Word of advice, never trust the Dragon Ball wiki. Under any circumstances. They mostly base their information on the Funimation dub.Saturnine wrote:Yeah, like the guys have said. Super does have contradictions within itself, sure, but it's as easy to reconcile them as to assume that Beerus was just lying.
In GT you can't reconcile some of that shit no matter how hard you tried. Like Kibito Kai using Instant Transmission rather than the Kaioshin Teleportation, which was stated in Z to be superior to the former.
I remember once adding this to Dragonball wikia's list of GT's inconsistencies. It got edited out by the biggest GT fanboy there (who happens to wield, or at least exercise a lot of power around that wikia) with a comment that "it shouldn't be hard for the ultimate god of the universe to learn an Android saga-level technique". The more times you read that comment the more wrong it feels.
Either that or you can just consider stuff like the appearance of Cooler an easter egg, which is fine and shit. But guess what, it's been established in canon material that the deceased don't keep their bodies, barring some special exceptions such as Goku, so that whole fucking segment shouldn't even be possible, and neither should that theatrical Z movie that did the same thing earlier (Fusion Reborn, was it?), because it CONTRADICTS THE VERY PRECEPTS OF THE WORLD LAID OUT BY THE CREATOR.
Spoiler:
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
Oh believe me, you don't need to tell meLord Beerus wrote: Word of advice, never trust the Dragon Ball wiki. Under any circumstances. They mostly base their information on the Funimation dub.
- Hellspawn28
- Patreon Supporter
- Posts: 15697
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
- Location: Maryland, USA
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
I think GT is not very like because it was a poor show. The show suffers from bad story telling and bad character development. Not to mention the fight scenes didn't live up to DBZ and people did felt like the 1st arc in GT felt like it was made for a younger audience in mind (Given how they made Goku a kid again and the Black Star Dragon Ball hunt was pretty tame and lighthearted. The Bebi saga was when they try to make it feel like DBZ again).Saturnine wrote:People don't hate GT because it's not canon.
People hate GT because it's bad, contradicts the rules of the universe established earlier and has a lot of Toei patting themselves on the back with their forced attempts to reconcile their own original material with Toriyama's, often giving more spotlight to the former.
It being non-canon is not a reason to dislike GT, it's more of a justification for dismissing it. You tell yourself it's not canon, so you don't have to worry about it.
Super did give Vegeta a bigger role again compare to GT when he was mainly use for Bebi as a host and didn't have a major battle until he reach SSj4 much later on. We also had Goten and Trunks recently got to fight Gryll and his gang. The ROF saga still had Gohan, Piccolo, Krillin and the others fight before Goku and Vegeta show up.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
Super is marginally better than GT in this regard. Neither come even close to how Saiyan/Freeza/Android/Cell sagas featured and utilized the ensemble cast, regardless if Goku was the one with final battle or not. Without it, no new DB story content will ever match the original.Hellspawn28 wrote: Super did give Vegeta a bigger role again compare to GT when he was mainly use for Bebi as a host and didn't have a major battle until he reach SSj4 much later on. We also had Goten and Trunks recently got to fight Gryll and his gang. The ROF saga still had Gohan, Piccolo, Krillin and the others fight before Goku and Vegeta show up.
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
Why'd this thread become about GT? I'm confused on what this has to do with the topic at hand. This is about if we expect too much from Super, which I'd say no. If anything it's people being far too lenient, and a smaller few who are way too hard on it. Super is for me very hit and miss. Does some damn good stuff and a fuck load of bad stuff. It ain't no saviour of DB that redeems anything, and it ain't no spawn of Satan like DBE is. It exists. It's nice to have around. It will probably not be considered much by todays standard, and just be a nostalgia trip. A pass time, and definitely nothing groundbreaking or memorable as the series was back then.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
I would also add Garlic Jr. Saga, one of main reasons i really like this saga, is that it feature my favorite trio, and i just love Kuririn and Piccolo interactions.Basaku wrote:Super is marginally better than GT in this regard. Neither come even close to how Saiyan/Freeza/Android/Cell sagas featured and utilized the ensemble cast, regardless if Goku was the one with final battle or not. Without it, no new DB story content will ever match the original.Hellspawn28 wrote: Super did give Vegeta a bigger role again compare to GT when he was mainly use for Bebi as a host and didn't have a major battle until he reach SSj4 much later on. We also had Goten and Trunks recently got to fight Gryll and his gang. The ROF saga still had Gohan, Piccolo, Krillin and the others fight before Goku and Vegeta show up.
My Twitter: @kamil198811
Bulma fan
Thanks to Discotek:
Magic Knight Rayearth get DVD release in 2015 and Blu-Ray release on 2016
Saint Seiya: The Lost Canvas get DVD release in 2015
Bulma fan
Thanks to Discotek:
Magic Knight Rayearth get DVD release in 2015 and Blu-Ray release on 2016
Saint Seiya: The Lost Canvas get DVD release in 2015
- TekTheNinja
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1647
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:36 pm
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
Thing is, GT was up front about it's underutilazation of the cast. Super keeps teasing things and not following through.Basaku wrote:Super is marginally better than GT in this regard. Neither come even close to how Saiyan/Freeza/Android/Cell sagas featured and utilized the ensemble cast, regardless if Goku was the one with final battle or not. Without it, no new DB story content will ever match the original.Hellspawn28 wrote: Super did give Vegeta a bigger role again compare to GT when he was mainly use for Bebi as a host and didn't have a major battle until he reach SSj4 much later on. We also had Goten and Trunks recently got to fight Gryll and his gang. The ROF saga still had Gohan, Piccolo, Krillin and the others fight before Goku and Vegeta show up.
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
With the exception of Mr.Boo, Super has been pretty honest. The opening song with Goku and Vegeta ahead of everybody else couldn't be more direct. I don't know about GT but Super isn't lying to anyone or creating false expectations.TekTheNinja wrote:Thing is, GT was up front about it's underutilazation of the cast. Super keeps teasing things and not following through.
It's usually the people who set themselves up for disappointment. Piccolo fight in the tournament is the perfect example, we were promised a fight and we got it. They didn't say, Piccolo trained and is super strong or any other kind of hype.
Some people reactions post-episodes sourly and boringly repeating "tt's the Goku and Vegeta show", said a lot...
PS: You could say Gohan promised rehabilitation hasn't come through. I would give time for this to develop before taking any conclusion.
Re: Do we expect too much from Super?
It pretty much is the Goku & Vegeta show. However, is that really an insult though? That depends on perspective. To some that's an insult, while to others it's the natural progression of the series. On the one hand it's lame how lackluster most of the supporting cast is. On the other hand, it might be even worse to forcibly write for them, if there's no real interest in them. Forced material can be pretty bad. I wonder why some people who like the current direction of the show take that comment as an insult. Is it because some people would link that to people calling GT the Goku show? I don't think labeling something "The Goku & Vegeta Show" or "Goku Show" an insult. It's what's done with the focus and executions that counts I think.LightBing wrote:Some people reactions post-episodes sourly and boringly repeating "tt's the Goku and Vegeta show", said a lot...
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:





